Australasian Plant Pathology

, Volume 48, Issue 1, pp 75–84 | Cite as

Evaluation of fungicide efficacy against Neofusicoccum species causing dieback disease of blueberries in New Zealand

  • K. M. S. Tennakoon
  • Hayley J. Ridgway
  • Marlene V. Jaspers
  • Geoff Langford
  • E. Eirian JonesEmail author
Original Paper


Several Botryosphaeriaceae species have been reported to cause stem canker, twig blight and dieback of blueberries, with different species being reported in different parts of the world. Pruning wounds are regarded as primary infection sites for these pathogens. This research evaluated in vitro and in vivo efficacy of fungicides against the main Neofusicoccum species associated with blueberry dieback in New Zealand. In vitro evaluation showed that four out of the nine fungicides tested were effective at reducing mycelial growth and/or conidial germination and germ tube growth of three pathogenic isolates each of N. australe, N. luteum, N. parvum and N. ribis. In vivo evaluation carried out with fungicides on wounded and non-wounded plant tissues on potted and field blueberry plants showed that carbendazim and tebuconazole were the most effective for protecting blueberry plants from infection by Neofusicoccum species. This research showed the importance of protecting both wounded and non-wounded tissues, with more than one application of fungicides likely to be required to provide effective control of the disease under natural inoculum levels.


Botryosphaeria Botryosphaeriales Natural infection levels Vaccinium ashei Rabbiteye 



The authors acknowledge Lincoln University and Blueberry growers for funding this project, and DuPont (New Zealand) Ltd, Etec Crop Solutions Ltd, Dow Agro Sciences NZ Ltd, BASF New Zealand Ltd and Nufarm Ltd for providing fungicides for the experiments. The authors also thank Brent Richards and Leona Meachen for maintaining the plants in the nursery at Lincoln University.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

None of the authors declare a conflict of interest.


  1. Alaniz S, Abad-Campos P, García-Jiménez J, Armengol J (2011) Evaluation of fungicides to control Cylindrocarpon liriodendri and Cylindrocarpon macrodidymum in vitro, and their effect during the rooting phase in the grapevine propagation process. Crop Prot 30(4):489–494Google Scholar
  2. Amponsah NT, Jones EE, Ridgway HJ, Jaspers MV (2012) Evaluation of fungicides for the management of Botryosphaeria dieback diseases of grapevines. Pest Manag Sci 68:676–683PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bester W, Crous PW, Fourie PH (2007) Evaluation of fungicides as potential grapevine pruning wound protectants against Botryosphaeria species. Australas Plant Pathol 36:73–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Billones-Baaijens RG, Ridgway HJ, Jones EE, Jaspers MV (2013) Prevalence and distribution of Botryosphaeriaceae species in New Zealand grapevine nurseries. Eur J Plant Pathol 135:176–185Google Scholar
  5. Bleach CM (2012) Management of Cylindrocarpon black foot disease in New Zealand nurseries and vineyards (PhD Thesis). Lincoln University, LincolnGoogle Scholar
  6. Espinoza JG, Braceno EX, Chavez ER, Urbez-Torres JR, Latorre BA (2009) Neofusicoccum species associated with stem canker and dieback of blueberry in Chile. Plant Dis 93(11):1187–1194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fan K, Wang J, Fu L, Li X, Zhang Y, Zhang X, Zhai H, Qu J (2016) Sensitivity of Botryosphaeria dothidea from apple to tebuconazole in China. Crop Prot 87:1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gramaje D, Úrbez-Torres JR, Sosnowski MR (2018) Managing grapevine trunk diseases with respect to etiology and epidemiology: current strategies and future prospects. Plant Dis 102:12–39PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Latorre BA, Torres R, Silva T, Elfar K (2013) Evaluation of the use of wound-protectant fungicides and biological control agents against stem canker (Neofusicoccum parvum) of blueberry. Cienc Investig Agrar 40(3):547–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Milholland RD (1995) Botryosphaeria stem blight. In: Caruso FL, Ramsdell DC (eds) Compendium of blueberry and cranberry diseases. American Phytopathological Society Press, St. Paul, pp 10–11Google Scholar
  11. Olmo D, Gramaje D, Armengol J (2017) Evaluation of fungicides to protect pruning wounds from Botryosphaeriaceae species infections on almond trees. Phytopathol Mediterr 56:77–86Google Scholar
  12. Polashock JJ, Kramer M (2006) Resistance of blueberry cultivars to Botryosphaeria stem blight and Phomopsis twig blight. Hortic Sci 41(6):1457–1461Google Scholar
  13. Rego C, Nascimento T, Cabral A, Silva MJ, Oliveira H (2009) Control of grapevine wood fungi in commercial nurseries. Phytopathol Mediterr 48:128–135Google Scholar
  14. Ridgway HJ, Amponsah NT, Brown DS, Baskarathevan J, Jones EE, Jaspers MV (2011) Detection of botryosphaeriaceous species in environmental samples using a multi-species primer pair. Plant Pathol 60:1118–1127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Tennakoon KMS, Ridgway HJ, Jaspers MV, Jones EE (2017) Production of Neofusicoccum species conidia and the pathogenicity of conidia on wounded and non-wounded attached blueberry shoots. NZ Plant Protect 70:209–214Google Scholar
  16. Tennakoon KMS, Ridgway HJ, Jaspers MV, Jones EE (2018a) Botryosphaeriaceae species associated with blueberry dieback and sources of primary inoculum in propagation nurseries in New Zealand. Eur J Plant Pathol 150:363–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Tennakoon KMS, Ridgway HJ, Jaspers MV, Jones EE (2018b) Factors affecting Neofuscicoccum ribis infection and disease progression in blueberry. Eur J Plant Pathol 151:87–99Google Scholar
  18. Torres C, Latorre BA, Undurraga P, Besoain X (2013) Evaluation of DMI fungicides against species of Diplodia and Neofusicoccum associated with Botryosphaeria canker of grapevine. Cienc Investig Agrar 40(1):131–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Australasian Plant Pathology Society Inc. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Pest-management and Conservation, Faculty of Agriculture and Life SciencesLincoln UniversityLincolnNew Zealand
  2. 2.The New Zealand Institute for Plant & Food Research LimitedChristchurchNew Zealand
  3. 3.Berryworld LtdChristchurchNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations