Comparison between robotic and open liver resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of short-term outcomes
- 144 Downloads
Minimally invasive liver surgery has evolved significantly during the last 2 decades. A growing number of published studies report outcomes from robotic liver resections (RLR). The aim of our meta-analysis was to evaluate short-term outcomes after RLR vs. open liver resection (OLR). A systematic search of Medline, Scopus, Google Scholar, Cochrane CENTRAL Register of Controlled Trials and Clinicaltrials.gov databases for articles published from January 2000 until November 2018 was performed. Ten non-randomized retrospective clinical studies comprising a total of 1248 patients were included in our meta-analysis. Four hundred and fifty-eight patients underwent RLR and 790 underwent OLR. RLRs were associated with lower overall morbidity rates (p =0.006) and shorter hospital stay (p <0.00001), whereas OLRs were associated with shorter operative time (p =0.003). No differences were shown between the two groups with regard to blood loss, blood transfusion requirements, R0 resection and mortality rates. Cumulative conversion rate was 4.6% in the RLR group. Due to limited available data, further prospective randomized studies are needed to better determine the potential beneficial role of the robotic approach in the treatment of malignant and benign hepatic tumors.
KeywordsRobotic Open liver resection Hepatectomy Morbidity Length of stay
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors of this study declare no conflict of interest. The authors of this study declare no financial support.
The article is in accordance with ethical standards.
Research involving human participants and/or animals
This study does not contain any study with human participants performed by any of the authors.
- 3.Machairas N, Prodromidou A, Kostakis ID, Spartalis E, Sotiropoulos GC (2018) Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic liver resection for lesions located on posterosuperior segments: a meta-analysis of short-term outcomes. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 28(4):203–208. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0000000000000562 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Sotiropoulos GC, Machairas N, Stamopoulos P, Kostakis ID, Dimitroulis D, Mantas D et al (2016) Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: initial experience in Greece. Ann Gastroenterol 29(4):521–529. https://doi.org/10.20524/aog.2016.0067 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 5.Sotiropoulos GC, Prodromidou A, Machairas N (2017) Meta-analysis of laparoscopic vs open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: the European experience. J BUON 22(5):1160–1171Google Scholar
- 6.Machairas N, Papaconstantinou D, Stamopoulos P, Prodromidou A, Garoufalia Z, Spartalis E et al (2018) The emerging role of laparoscopic liver resection in the treatment of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review. Anticancer Res 38(5):3181–3186. https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.12582 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Daskalaki D, Gonzalez-Heredia R, Brown M, Bianco FM, Tzvetanov I, Davis M et al (2017) Financial impact of the robotic approach in liver surgery: a comparative study of clinical outcomes and costs between the robotic and open technique in a single institution. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech Part A 27(4):375–382. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2016.0576 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 40.Spampinato MG, Coratti A, Bianco L, Caniglia F, Laurenzi A, Puleo F et al (2014) Perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic and robot-assisted major hepatectomies: an Italian multi-institutional comparative study. Surg Endosc 28(10):2973–2979. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3560-4 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar