Laparoscopy accounts for > 70% of general surgical cases. Given the increased use of laparoscopy in emergent colorectal disease, we hypothesized that there would be an increased use of laparoscopic colectomy (LC) in trauma patients. In addition, we hypothesized increased length of stay (LOS) and mortality in trauma patients undergoing open colectomy (OC) vs. LC. This was a retrospective analysis using the National Trauma Data Bank (2008–2015). We included adult patients undergoing LC or OC. A multivariable logistic regression model was used for determining risk of LOS and mortality. We identified 19,788 (96.8%) patients undergoing OC and 644 (3.2%) who underwent LC. There was a 21-fold increased number of patients that underwent LC over the study period (p < 0.05), with approximately 119 per 10,000 trauma patients undergoing LC. The most common operation was a laparoscopic right hemicolectomy (27.5%). LC patients had a lower median injury severity score (ISS) (16 vs. 17, p < 0.001). There was no difference in LOS (p = 0.14) or mortality (p = 0.44) between the two groups. This remained true in patients with isolated colorectal injury. The use of LC has increased 21-fold from 2008 to 2015, with laparoscopic right hemicolectomy being the most common procedure performed. There was no difference in LOS, in-hospital complications, or mortality between the two groups. We suggest that LC should be considered in stable adult trauma patients undergoing colectomy. However, future prospective research is needed to help determine which trauma patients may benefit from LC.
Trauma Colorectal Colon injury Laparoscopic colectomy Open colectomy
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
This research did not receive any specific Grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Research involving human participants and/or animals
This research involved humans. However, since this retrospective study was performed using a national database with deidentified patients, risk to participants is minimal.
There is no consent required.
Vecchio R, MacFayden BV, Palazzo F (2000) History of laparoscopic surgery. Panminerva Med 42(1):87–90Google Scholar
Walker Reynolds J (2001) The first laparoscopic cholecystectomy. JSLS 5(1):89Google Scholar
Polychronidis A, Laftsidis P, Bounovas A, Simopoulos C (2008) Twenty years of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Philippe Mouret—March 17, 1987. JSLS 12(1):109Google Scholar
Dua A, Aziz A, Desai SS, McMaster J, Kuy S (2014) National trends in the adoption of laparoscopic cholecystectomy over 7 years in the United States and impact of laparoscopic approaches stratified by age. Minim Invasive Surg 2014:635461. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/635461Google Scholar
Grace P, Quereshi A, Coleman J et al (1991) Reduced postoperative hospitalization after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 78(2):160–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lassen K, Soop M, Nygren J et al (2009) Consensus review of optimal perioperative care in colorectal surgery: enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Group recommendations. Arch Surg 144(10):961–969CrossRefGoogle Scholar