Updates in Surgery

, Volume 71, Issue 1, pp 105–111 | Cite as

Use of laparoscopic colectomy increasing in trauma: comparison of laparoscopic vs. open colectomy

  • Areg GrigorianEmail author
  • Alessio Pigazzi
  • Ninh T. Nguyen
  • Sebastian D. Schubl
  • Victor Joe
  • Matthew Dolich
  • Michael Lekawa
  • Jeffry Nahmias
Original Article


Laparoscopy accounts for > 70% of general surgical cases. Given the increased use of laparoscopy in emergent colorectal disease, we hypothesized that there would be an increased use of laparoscopic colectomy (LC) in trauma patients. In addition, we hypothesized increased length of stay (LOS) and mortality in trauma patients undergoing open colectomy (OC) vs. LC. This was a retrospective analysis using the National Trauma Data Bank (2008–2015). We included adult patients undergoing LC or OC. A multivariable logistic regression model was used for determining risk of LOS and mortality. We identified 19,788 (96.8%) patients undergoing OC and 644 (3.2%) who underwent LC. There was a 21-fold increased number of patients that underwent LC over the study period (p < 0.05), with approximately 119 per 10,000 trauma patients undergoing LC. The most common operation was a laparoscopic right hemicolectomy (27.5%). LC patients had a lower median injury severity score (ISS) (16 vs. 17, p < 0.001). There was no difference in LOS (p = 0.14) or mortality (p = 0.44) between the two groups. This remained true in patients with isolated colorectal injury. The use of LC has increased 21-fold from 2008 to 2015, with laparoscopic right hemicolectomy being the most common procedure performed. There was no difference in LOS, in-hospital complications, or mortality between the two groups. We suggest that LC should be considered in stable adult trauma patients undergoing colectomy. However, future prospective research is needed to help determine which trauma patients may benefit from LC.


Trauma Colorectal Colon injury Laparoscopic colectomy Open colectomy 



This research did not receive any specific Grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Research involving human participants and/or animals

This research involved humans. However, since this retrospective study was performed using a national database with deidentified patients, risk to participants is minimal.

Informed consent

There is no consent required.


  1. 1.
    Vecchio R, MacFayden BV, Palazzo F (2000) History of laparoscopic surgery. Panminerva Med 42(1):87–90PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Walker Reynolds J (2001) The first laparoscopic cholecystectomy. JSLS 5(1):89Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Polychronidis A, Laftsidis P, Bounovas A, Simopoulos C (2008) Twenty years of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Philippe Mouret—March 17, 1987. JSLS 12(1):109PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dua A, Aziz A, Desai SS, McMaster J, Kuy S (2014) National trends in the adoption of laparoscopic cholecystectomy over 7 years in the United States and impact of laparoscopic approaches stratified by age. Minim Invasive Surg 2014:635461. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sakpal SV, Bindra SS, Chamberlain RS (2012) Laparoscopic appendectomy conversion rates two decades later: an analysis of surgeon and patient-specific factors resulting in open conversion. J Surg Res 176(1):42–49. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Group TCOoSTS (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350(20):2050–2059. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sroka G, Feldman LS, Vassiliou MC, Kaneva PA, Fayez R, Fried GM (2010) Fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery simulator training to proficiency improves laparoscopic performance in the operating room-a randomized controlled trial. Am J Surg 199(1):115–120. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Thornell A, Angenete E, Bisgaard T et al (2016) Laparoscopic lavage for perforated diverticulitis with purulent peritonitis: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 164(3):137–145. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kim IY, Kim BR, Kim YW (2015) Outcomes of laparoscopic and open surgery for colorectal cancer in the emergency setting. Vivo 29(2):295–300Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sujatha-Bhaskar S, Alizadeh RF, Koh C et al (2017) The growing utilization of laparoscopy in emergent colonic disease. Am Surg 83(10):1068–1073PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    O’Malley E, Boyle E, O’Callaghan A, Coffey JC, Walsh SR (2013) Role of laparoscopy in penetrating abdominal trauma: a systematic review. World J Surg 37(1):113–122. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kindel T, Latchana N, Swaroop M et al (2015) Laparoscopy in trauma: an overview of complications and related topics. Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci 5(3):196–205. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Leppaniemi AK, Elliott DC (1996) The role of laparoscopy in blunt abdominal trauma. Ann Med 28(6):483–489CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fabian TC, Croce MA, Stewart RM, Pritchard FE, Minard G, Kudsk KA (1993) A prospective analysis of diagnostic laparoscopy in trauma. Ann Surg 217(5):557CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Villavicencio RT, Aucar JA (1999) Analysis of laparoscopy in trauma. J Am Coll Surg 189(1):11–20CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Di Saverio S (2014) Emergency laparoscopy: a new emerging discipline for treating abdominal emergencies attempting to minimize costs and invasiveness and maximize outcomes and patients’ comfort. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 77(2):338–350. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Berg RJ, Karamanos E, Inaba K, Okoye O, Teixeira PG, Demetriades D (2014) The persistent diagnostic challenge of thoracoabdominal stab wounds. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 76(2):418–423. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mjoli M, Oosthuizen G, Clarke D, Madiba T (2015) Laparoscopy in the diagnosis and repair of diaphragmatic injuries in left-sided penetrating thoracoabdominal trauma: laparoscopy in trauma. Surg Endosc 29(3):747–752. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Surgeons ACo (2016) National Trauma Data Bank. American College of SurgeonsGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Niles SE, McLaughlin DF, Perkins JG et al (2008) Increased mortality associated with the early coagulopathy of trauma in combat casualties. J Trauma 64(6):1459–1463. discussion 1463–1455 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kuhne CA, Ruchholtz S, Kaiser GM, Nast-Kolb D (2005) Mortality in severely injured elderly trauma patients—when does age become a risk factor? World J Surg 29(11):1476–1482. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gaertner WB, Kwaan MR, Madoff RD et al (2013) The evolving role of laparoscopy in colonic diverticular disease: a systematic review. World J Surg 37(3):629–638. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Cothren CC, Moore EE, Hoyt DB (2008) The U.S. trauma surgeon’s current scope of practice: can we deliver acute care surgery? J Trauma 64(4):955–965. discussion 965–958 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Aquina CT, Probst CP, Hensley BJ et al (2016) Variation in use of a minimally invasive approach for colectomy: time to teach old dogs new tricks? J Am Coll Surg 223(4):S38–S39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Walker E, Poley S, Ricketts T (2010) The aging surgeon population: replacement rates vary. Bull Am Coll Surg 95(12):27–30PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Shanker BA, Soliman M, Williamson P, Ferrara A (2016) Laparoscopic colorectal training gap in colorectal and surgical residents. JSLS 20(3):e2016. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sharma KC, Brandstetter RD, Brensilver JM, Jung LD (1996) Cardiopulmonary physiology and pathophysiology as a consequence of laparoscopic surgery. Chest 110(3):810–815CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Chesney T, Acuna SA (2015) Do elderly patients have the most to gain from laparoscopic surgery? Ann Med Surg 4(3):321–323. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Fujii S, Tsukamoto M, Fukushima Y et al (2016) Systematic review of laparoscopic vs open surgery for colorectal cancer in elderly patients. World J Gastrointest Oncol 8(7):573CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Safran DB, Orlando R 3rd (1994) Physiologic effects of pneumoperitoneum. Am J Surg 167(2):281–286CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kim W, Song KY, Lee HJ, Han SU, Hyung WJ, Cho GS (2008) The impact of comorbidity on surgical outcomes in laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy: a retrospective analysis of multicenter results. Ann Surg 248(5):793–799. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Guller U, Hervey S, Purves H et al (2004) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: outcomes comparison based on a large administrative database. Ann Surg 239(1):43–52. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Grace P, Quereshi A, Coleman J et al (1991) Reduced postoperative hospitalization after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 78(2):160–162CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Lassen K, Soop M, Nygren J et al (2009) Consensus review of optimal perioperative care in colorectal surgery: enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Group recommendations. Arch Surg 144(10):961–969CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Miller TE, Thacker JK, White WD et al (2014) Reduced length of hospital stay in colorectal surgery after implementation of an enhanced recovery protocol. Anesth Analg 118(5):1052–1061. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Italian Society of Surgery (SIC) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Trauma, Burns and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Irvine Medical CenterUniversity of California, IrvineOrangeUSA

Personalised recommendations