Carbon dioxide absorption during retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy: comparison between monolateral and synchronous bilateral approaches

  • Valter Perilli
  • Paola AcetoEmail author
  • Giovanni Punzo
  • Celestino Pio Lombardi
  • Rocco Bellantone
  • Liliana Sollazzi
Original Article


Synchronous posterior retroperitoneoscopic bilateral adrenalectomy (PR-BilA) is a novel technique proposed for the definitive cure of hypercortisolism when a surgical approach is indicated. The aim of the present prospective cohort study was to compare the carbon dioxide (CO2) absorption in patients undergoing PR-BilA with those undergoing single posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy (PRA). Twenty-nine patients undergoing PR-BilA or PRA were consecutively enrolled. Anaesthesia was standardised. In both groups, CO2 elimination (VCO2), CO2 dissolved in arterial blood (PaCO2), end-tidal CO2 (EtCO2), and volume per minute (VM) were measured at the following time points: after anaesthesia induction and before CO2 insufflation (T1), 5 min after CO2 insufflation (T2), at the time of maximum VCO2 (T3), and at desufflation (T4). VCO2 was continuously measured using a metabolic monitor. ANOVA for repeated measures was used for statistical analysis. With respect to VCO2, a significant group × time interaction was found (p = 0.03). Post hoc analysis revealed that VCO2 was significantly increased at T4 compared with T1 in both groups (p = 0.02 and p = 0.0001 in the PRA and PR-BilA groups, respectively). Regarding PaCO2, ANOVA analysis showed a significant group effect (p = 0.01), with higher values in the PR-BilA group. EtCO2 and VM did not differ between the two groups. We found that the CO2 absorption was increased in both groups at the end of surgery, in the presence of a higher trend in PaCO2 values during PR-BilA. Therefore, PR-BilA may be considered a safe surgical approach with respect to CO2 absorption, when a mild degree of hypercapnia may be accepted.


Carbon dioxide absorption Retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy Hypercapnia Monitoring Safety 


Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest. This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Research involving human participants and/or animals

The present manuscript is in compliant with ethical standard. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all the patients included in the study.


  1. 1.
    Walz MK, Alesina PF, Wenger FA et al (2006) Posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy: results of 560 procedures in 520 patients. Surgery 140:943–948. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wong A, Eloy JA, Jk Liu (2015) The role of bilateral adrenalectomy in the treatment of refractory Cushing’s disease. Neurosurg Focus 38:E9. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Maccora D, Walls GV, Sadler GP, Mihai R (2017) Bilateral adrenalectomy: a review of 10 years’ experience. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 99:119–122. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Raffaelli M, Brunaud L, De Crea C et al (2014) Synchronous bilateral adrenalectomy for Cushing’s syndrome: laparoscopic versus posterior retroperorg/itoneoscopic versus robotic approach. World J Surg 38:709–715. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Miccoli P, Materazzi G, Brauckhoff M, Ambrosini CE, Miccoli M, Dralle H (2011) No outcome differences between a laparoscopic and retroperitoneoscopic approach in synchronous bilateral adrenal surgery. Word J Surg 35:2698–2702. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lombardi CP, Raffaelli M, de Crea C, Bellantone R, Fusco A, Bianchi A, Pontecorvi A, de Marinis L (2011) ACTH-dependent Cushing syndrome: The potential benefits of simultaneous bilateral posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy. Surgery 149:299–300. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    De Crea C, Raffaelli M, D’Amato G, Princi P, Gallucci P, Bellantone R, Lombardi CP (2017) Retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy: tips and tricks. Updates Surg 69:267–270. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vestbo J, Hurd SS, Agusti AG et al (2013) Global strategy for the diagnosis, management and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, GOLD executive summary. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 187:347–365. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tissot S, Delafosse B, Bertrand O, Bouffard Y, Viale JP, Annat G (1995) Clinical validation of the Deltatrac monitoring system in mechanically ventilated patients. Intensive Care Med 21:149–153CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Streich B, Decilliot F, Perney C, Duvaldestin P (2003) Increased carbon dioxide absorption during retroperitoneal laparoscopy. Br J Anaesth 91:793–796CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mullet CE, Viale JP, Sagnard PE et al (1993) Pulmonary CO2 elimination during surgical procedures using intra- or extraperitoneal CO2 insufflation. Anesth Analg 76:622–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Siperstein AE, Berber E, Engle KL, Duh QY, Clark OH (2000) Laparoscopic posterior adrenalectomy: technical considerations. Arch Surg 135:967–971CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zhu YF, Meng FM (2015) Effect of retroperitoneal lavage with normal saline containing adrenaline on carbon dioxide absorption in patients undergoing retroperitoneal laparoscopic surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 25:903–907. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Italian Society of Surgery (SIC) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care MedicineFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCSRomeItaly
  2. 2.Università Cattolica del Sacro CuoreRomeItaly
  3. 3.Division of Endocrine and Metabolic Surgery, Department of SurgeryFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCSRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations