Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Laparoscopic splenectomy: a single center experience. Unusual cases and expanded inclusion criteria for laparoscopic approach

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Updates in Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) is nowadays considered as the gold standard for most hematological diseases where splenectomy is necessary, but many questions still remain. The aim of this study was to analyze our 5-years experiences consisting of 48 consecutive LS cases in order to assess the optimal approach and the feasibility of the procedure also in malignant diseases and unusual cases such as a primary spleen lymphoma, a big splenic artery aneurism, or a spleen infarct due to a huge pancreatic pseudo-cyst. Forty-eight consecutive patients underwent LS from January 2006 to January 2011 with at least 1-year follow-up. Clinical data and immediate outcome were retrospectively recorded; age, diagnosis, operation time, perioperative transfusion requirement, conversion rate, accessory incision, hospital stay, and complications were analyzed. We had 14 cases of malignant splenic disease, the most frequent malignant diagnosis was non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (12/14, 85.7 %). Splenomegaly (interpole diameter (ID) >20 cm) was observed in 12 cases (25 %) and massive splenomegaly (ID >25 cm) in 3 cases (6.25 %). Conversion to laparotomy occurred in two patients (4.16 %), both associated to uncontrollable bleeding in patients with splenomegaly. Mean operative time was 138 ± 22 min. Mean hospital stay was 4.5 days. Postoperative morbidity rate was 8.8 % for the benign group and 35.7 % in the malignant group. Mortality occurred in 1/48 patients (2.08 %), as a result of overwhelming post-splenectomy infection (OPSI). LS can be performed safely for malignant splenic disease and splenomegaly without any statistically significant increase of morbidity and mortality rate. Conversion rate is increased for massive splenomegaly. LS should be considered as the preferential approach even in patients with malignant disease, splenomegaly, or unusual cases. Massive splenomegaly should be considered as relative contraindication to LS even at experienced centers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gigot JF, Lengele B, Gianello P, Etienne J, Claeys N (1998) Present status of laparoscopic splenectomy for hematological diseases: certitudes and unresolved issues. Semin Laparosc Surg 5:147–167

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Delaitre B, Maignien B (1991) Splenectomy by the laparoscopic approach. Report of a case. Presse Med 20:2263

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cogliandolo A, Berland-Dai B, Pidoto RR (2001) Saint Marc O. Results of laparoscopic and open splenectomy for nontraumatic diseases. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 11:256–261

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Smith BM, Schropp KP, Lobe TE, Rogers DA, Presbury GJ, Wilimas JA, Wong WC (1994) Laparoscopic splenectomy in childhood. J Pediatr Surg 29:975–977

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Terrosu G, Baccarani U, Bresadola V, Sistu MA, Uzzau A, Bresadola F (2002) The impact of splenic weight on laparoscopic splenectomy for splenomegaly. Surg Endosc 16(1):103–107

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Silecchia G, Boru CE, Fantini A, Raparelli L, Greco F, Rizzello M, Pecchia A, Fabiano P, Basso N (2006) Laparoscopic splenectomy in the management of benign and malignant hematologic Diseases. JSLS 10:199–205

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Coignard-Biehler H, Lanternier F, Hot A, Salmon D, Berger A, de Montalebert M, Suarez F, Launay O, Lecuit M, Lortholary O (2011) Adherence to preventive measures after splenectomy in the hospital setting and in the Community. J Infect Public Health 4(4):187–194

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang H, Kopac D, Brisebois R, Sample C, Shapiro AM (2011) Randomized controlled trial to investigate the impact of anticoagulation on the incidence of splenic or portal vein thrombosis after laparoscopic splenectomy. Can J Surg 54(4):227–231

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Habermalz B, Sauerland S, Decker G, Delaitre B, Gigot JF, Leandros E, Lechner K, Rhodes M, Silecchia G, Szold A, Targarona E, Torelli P, Neugebauer E (2008) Laparoscopic splenectomy: the clinical practice guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES). Surg Endosc 22(4):821–848

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Carr SC, Mahvi BM, Hoch JR, Archer CW, Turnipseed WD (2001) Visceral artery aneurism rupture. J Vasc Surg 33:806–811

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Trastek VF, Pairolero PC, Joyce JW, Hollier LH, Bernatz PE (1982) Splenic artery aneurism. surgery 91:694–699

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Wu Z, Zhou J, Pankaj P, Peng B (2012) Comparative treatment and literature review for laparoscopic splenectomy alone versus preoperative splenic artery embolization splenectomy. Surg Endosc 26(10):2758–2766

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Neunert C, Lim W, Crowther M, Cohen A, Solberg L Jr, Crowther MA (2011) The American Society of Hematology 2011 evidence-based practice guideline for immune thrombocytopenia. Blood 117(16):4190–4207

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Corcione F, Pirozzi F, Aragiusto G, Galante F, Sciuto A (2012) Laparoscopic splenectomy: experience of a single center in a series of 300 cases. Surg Endosc 26(10):2870–2876

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bonnard A, Benkerrou M, Rorlich P, de Ribier A, Aigrain Y (2004) Pediatric laparoscopic splenectomy: benefits of the anterior approach. Surg Endosc 18:80–82

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Park A, Gagner M, Pomp A (1997) The lateral approach to laparoscopic splenectomy. Am J Surg 173:126–130

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Casaccia M, Torelli P, Squarcia S, Sormani MP, Savelli A, Troilo B, Santori G, Valente U (2006) Laparoscopic splenectomy for hematologic diseases: a preliminary analysis performed on the Italian Registry of Laparoscopic Surgery of the Spleen (IRLSS). Surg Endosc 20:1214–1220

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Stanek A, Stefaniak T, Makarewicz W, Kaska L, Podgorczyk H, Hellman A, Lachinski A (2005) Accessory spleens: preoperative diagnostics limitations and operational strategy in laparoscopic approach to splenectomy in idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura patients. Langenbecks Arch Surg 390:47–51

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Romano F, Gelmini R, Caprotti R, Andreotti A, Guaglio M, Franzoni C, Uggeri F, Saviano M (2007) Laparoscopic splenectomy: ligasure versus EndoGIA: a comparative study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 17(6):763–767

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Shabahang H, Maddah G, Tavassoli A (2012) Jangjoo, Alvandipour M, Abdollahi A, Noorshafiee S. Laparoscopic splenectomy: ligasure or clip ligation? Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 22(2):136–138

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Targarona EM, Cerdàn G, Gracia E, Rodriguez M, Trias M (2001) Results of laparoscopic splenectomy for treatment of malignant conditions. HPB (Oxford) 3(4):251–255

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Bai YN, Jiang H, Prasoon P (2012) A meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic splenectomy for hematological disorders. World J Surg 36(10):2349–2358

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Nursal TA, Ezer A, Belli S, Parlakgumus A, Caliskan K, Noyan T (2009) Reaching proficiency in laparoscopic splenectomy. World J Gastroenterol 15(32):4005–4008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplant Center, A. Cardarelli Hospital, Naples, Italy

    Gianpaolo Marte, Vincenzo Scuderi, Aldo Rocca, Giuseppe Surfaro, Carla Migliaccio & Antonio Ceriello

Authors
  1. Gianpaolo Marte
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Vincenzo Scuderi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Aldo Rocca
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Giuseppe Surfaro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Carla Migliaccio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Antonio Ceriello
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gianpaolo Marte.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marte, G., Scuderi, V., Rocca, A. et al. Laparoscopic splenectomy: a single center experience. Unusual cases and expanded inclusion criteria for laparoscopic approach. Updates Surg 65, 115–119 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-013-0197-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-013-0197-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation