BE-SMART (Basal Early Strategies to Maximize HbA1c Reduction with Oral Therapy): Expert Opinion

  • Sarita Bajaj
  • A. K. Das
  • Sanjay KalraEmail author
  • Rakesh Sahay
  • Banshi Saboo
  • Sambit Das
  • M. Shunmugavelu
  • Jubbin Jacob
  • Gagan Priya
  • Deepak Khandelwal
  • Deep Dutta
  • Manoj Chawla
  • Vineet Surana
  • Mangesh Tiwaskar
  • Ameya Joshi
  • Pradip Krishna Shrestha
  • Jyoti Bhattarai
  • Bishwajit Bhowmik
  • Tint Swe Latt
  • Than Than Aye
  • G. Vijayakumar
  • Manash Baruah
  • Fatema Jawad
  • A. G. Unnikrishnan
  • Subhankar Chowdhury
  • Md. Faruqe Pathan
  • Noel Somasundaram
  • Manilka Sumanathilaka
  • Abbas Raza
  • Silver K. Bahendeka
  • Ankia Coetzee
  • Sundeep Ruder
  • Kaushik Ramaiya
  • Roberta Lamptey
  • Charlotte Bavuma
  • Khalid Shaikh
  • Andrew Uloko
  • Sandeep Chaudhary
  • Abdurezak Ahmed Abdela
  • Zhanay Akanov
  • Joel Rodrìguez-Saldaña
  • Raquel Faradji
  • Armindo Tiago
  • Ahmed Reja
  • Leszek Czupryniak
Open Access


The past three decades have seen a quadruple rise in the number of people affected by diabetes mellitus worldwide, with the disease being the ninth major cause of mortality. Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) often remains undiagnosed for several years due to its asymptomatic nature during the initial stages. In India, 70% of diagnosed diabetes cases remain uncontrolled. Current guidelines endorse the initiation of insulin early in the course of the disease, specifically in patients with HbA1c > 10%, as the use of oral agents alone is unlikely to achieve glycemic targets. Early insulin initiation and optimization of glycemic control using insulin titration algorithms and patient empowerment can facilitate the effective management of uncontrolled diabetes. Early glucose control has sustained benefits in people with diabetes. However, insulin initiation, dose adjustment, and the need to repeatedly assess blood glucose levels are often perplexing for both physicians and patients, and there are misconceptions and concerns regarding its use. Hence, an early transition to insulin and ideal intensification of treatment may aid in delaying the onset of diabetes complications. This opinion statement was formulated by an expert panel on the basis of existing guidelines, clinical experience, and economic and cultural contexts. The statement stresses the timely and appropriate use of basal insulin in T2DM. It focuses on the seven vital Ts—treatment initiation, timing of administration, transportation and storage, technique of administration, targets for titration, tablets, and tools for monitoring.

Funding: Sanofi.


Basal insulin Degludec Detemir Glargine Hypoglycemia Titration Type 2 diabetes mellitus 


In the past three decades, there has been a quadruple rise in the number of people affected by diabetes mellitus worldwide, such that the disease is now the ninth major cause of mortality [1]. In 1980, the estimated number of persons with diabetes was 108 million; by 2014, this figure had escalated to 422 million. The age-standardized global prevalence of diabetes has almost doubled, increasing from 4.7% to 8.5% in the adult population, reflecting a rise in associated risk factors such as obesity. In 2012, diabetes was the direct cause of 1.5 million deaths; additionally, by increasing the risks of cardiovascular and other diseases, higher-than-optimal blood glucose resulted in another 2.2 million deaths. Of these 3.7 million deaths linked to high glocuse levels, 43% occurred in people under 70 years of age [2].

The recent International Diabetes Federation (IDF) atlas predicted that the number of people with diabetes will rise to 693 million by 2045. In Africa, the number of people with diabetes is expected to rise by 162.5% by 2045. Southeast Asia is home to 19.3% (82 million adults) of the global diabetic population, and 84.5% of all undiagnosed cases of diabetes are in low- and middle-income countries. Nearly 45.8% of adults with diabetes in Southeast Asia are undiagnosed, while over two-thirds (69.2%) of adults with diabetes in the African region are undiagnosed [3].

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) often remains undiagnosed for many years, owing to its asymptomatic nature during the initial stages, during which the body is exposed to hyperglycemia, bringing about irreversible organ damage [4]. In India, 70% of diagnosed diabetes cases remain uncontrolled [5]. Once-daily dosing of basal insulin with continued use of one or more oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) has proven to be an effective and safe glucose-lowering treatment in most insulin-naive patients. It has various advantages—only one insulin injection may be required each day, with no need to mix different types of insulin, and titration can be accomplished in a slow and safe manner. Moreover, this combination therapy requires a lower total dose of insulin. This combination approach was popularized by the BIDS regimen, which combines a basal insulin (BI) with a sulfonylurea (DS) [6].

The ORIGIN trial showed that therapy with basal insulin glargine had a neutral effect on cardiovascular outcomes and cancers while permitting near-normal glycemic control and slowing the progression of dysglycemia [7]. However, early glucose control has shown sustained benefits in people with diabetes; it reduced the risks of macro- and microvascular complications [8] and even lowered the risk of cardiovascular complications in other trials such as the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) and the UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) [9, 10]. Studies such as GOAL assessed the clinical and nonclinical predictive factors for achieving the glycemic HbA1c goal as targeted by the treating physician in adults with type 2 diabetes requiring insulin initiation, titration, and/or intensification [11].

Current guidelines endorse the initiation of insulin early in the course of the disease, particularly in patients with HbA1c > 10%, as the use of oral agents alone is unlikely to achieve glycemic targets in patients with uncontrolled diabetes. Early insulin initiation and optimization of glycemic control using insulin titration algorithms and patient empowerment can help to effectively manage uncontrolled diabetes. Self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG), education about insulin, and the ability of those with diabetes to detect and manage hypoglycemia can significantly facilitate this process [12, 13].

Even though treatment with insulin is acknowledged to be the most effective treatment for T2DM, it is considered to be challenging and time-consuming for both the patient and the healthcare provider [14]. Insulin initiation, insulin dose adjustment, and the need for repeated assessment of blood glucose levels are often perplexing for physicians and patients owing to misconceptions and concerns regarding its use [15]. Clinical inertia or therapeutic inertia, defined as a recognition of the problem but a failure to act, plays a role in delayed insulin initiation and optimization and thus poor glycemic control. It can be present at the patient, physician, and system levels. This therapeutic inertia may be initiation inertia (delayed initiation of insulin), titration inertia (lack of dose adjustment), intensification inertia (delayed intensification), or all three together. Reasons for this inertia may include misconceptions surrounding insulin therapy, a lack of motivation, and poor communication between patients and healthcare providers (HCPs). Apart from these, a fear of weight gain, hypoglycemia, and increasingly complex treatment regimens may also contribute to therapeutic inertia, thereby leading to poor glycemic control. Early transition to insulin and ideal intensification of treatment might aid in delaying the onset of diabetes complications. Physicians managing diabetes must aim to increase acceptance, persistence, and adherence to insulin therapy by focusing on the safety, simplicity, and convenience of the therapy [14, 16, 17].

The members of the expert panel have formulated this opinion statement on the basis of current disease concepts among physicians, clinical experience, available research evidence, and economic and logistic constraints that are prevalent in India and other countries whose members were involved in this panel. This article is based on previously conducted studies and does not involve any new study on human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

BE-SMART Expert Opinion

This expert opinion is focused on the timely and appropriate use of basal insulin in T2DM treatment [early basal insulin initiation and optimization, with a focus on the role of basal insulin supported oral therapy (BOT)]. It focuses on the seven vital Ts—treatment initiation, timing of administration, transportation and storage, technique of administration, targets for titration, tablets, and tools for monitoring. The 7-T concept can be a useful reckoner to help physicians improve their understanding and optimize the use of basal insulin early in diabetes treatment along with oral antiglycemic agents, thereby improving outcomes.

Treatment Initiation

  • Timely insulin initiation leads to a long-term reduction in complications and improved outcomes. Clinical evidence from landmark trials such as the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Intervention and Complications Study (DCCT/EDIC) and the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) shows that early glucose control reduces the risk of both macro- and microvascular complications [8, 18]. Studies have shown that targeting postprandial glucose (PPG) can help minimize cardiovascular risk [19, 20].

  • “Metabolic karma” is a term that can effectively explain glycemic legacy in diabetes. It helps us to understand the advantages of achieving tight glycemic and metabolic control in persons with diabetes using appropriately individualized patient-centric therapy [21].

  • Early insulin initiation can help overcome the glucotoxic effects of hyperglycemia and hence facilitate “β-cell rest” to preserve β-cell mass and function, while also improving insulin sensitivity [22].

  • Basal insulin is a convenient and effective option for insulin initiation in the majority of patients if it does not impact post-meal hyperglycemia significantly. Basal insulin should be initiated in a timely manner, preferably within 3–6 months of inadequate control, with the optimal use of 1, 2, or 3 oral glucose-lowering agents (GLA) [12].

  • Basal insulin may be initiated at the diagnosis of diabetes if catabolic symptoms are present and/or glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) is > 10% [13].

  • The basal-only regime is the most convenient initial insulin regimen, beginning at 10 U/day or 0.1–0.2 U/kg/day, depending on the degree of hyperglycemia [12].

  • In diabetes management, it is crucial that patients are involved in their treatment process. There is a need for open doctor–patient communication to achieve good glycemic control, reduce complications, and improve quality of life. Training of healthcare professionals, persons living with diabetes, and other caregivers as well as teamwork among all stakeholders are crucial to achieving optimal basal insulin use [23, 24].

Timing of Administration

  • Basal insulin should be injected at the appropriate time (usually bedtime), in line with the prescribing information.

  • Basal insulin may, under some circumstances (e.g., administration by caregivers and nursing home residents), be administered in the morning or afternoon as well, preferably at the same time daily.

  • Basal insulin analogues provide the advantage of flexibility of timing, making it simple and less intrusive. They involve only one injection per day and do not require adherence to inflexible meal patterns, quantity, and composition [25].
    • Neutral Protamine Hagedorn (NPH) Insulin: With NPH insulin, the preferred injection time is bedtime [26].

    • First-Generation Basal Insulin Analogues (Gla-100 and Insulin Detemir): Both of the first-generation basal insulin analogues are also best administered at bedtime. Insulin glargine can be administered anytime each day, irrespective of fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels [25, 27, 28].

    • Second-Generation Basal Insulin Analogues (Insulin Degludec and Gla-300): These offer more flexibility in the timing of injection and can be administered at any time in the day, but they have to be administered at the same time each day [29].

  • Upon realizing that a dose of basal insulin has been missed, the situation can be redressed by immediately administering the dose while ensuring that there is a gap of at least an 8 h between injections. Once this dose has been taken, the patient can return to their regular dosing schedule.
    • In fasting and special populations, the schedule for basal insulin and GLA administration shown in Table 1 should be followed.
      Table 1

      Choice of basal insulin and GLAs in special populations


      Special concern

      Choice of BI


      Additional GLAs









      Early titration until target







      BI basal insulin, DPP4i dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, NPH neutral protamine Hagedorn, GLA oral glucose-lowering agents, TZD thiazolidinediones, SU sulfonylureas

In order to prevent episodes of hypoglycemia during fasts, such as during Ramadan, patients treated with insulin and insulin secretagogues should measure glucose before, during, and after fasting (2–4 times daily). A reduction in the dose of insulin secretagogues should be considered [30].

Transportation and Storage

Transport: The cold chain should be maintained during the transportation of the vials or cartridges of insulin [31].

Storage: Insulin vials, cartridges, or pens may be kept at room temperature, i.e., at 59–86 °F (15–30 °C), for 28 days or about 1 month. Insulin detemir can be stored at room temperature for up to 42 days. Insulin degludec may be kept at room temperature for 2 months. Exposure to extremes of temperature can lead to a loss of insulin effectiveness and a deterioration in glycemic control. In settings where the temperatures can be above 30 °C or below 2 °C, it is not advisable to leave the vials at room temperature, and appropriate steps for storing them at an optimum temperature must be taken [32].

Technique of Administration

Insulin Injection Technique: Basal insulin should be injected into the subcutaneous space. If injected into intramuscular space, it may inadvertently behave like rapid-acting insulin. Studies with insulin showed an increased rate of absorption with intramuscular injection, and this is thought to increase the risk and severity of hypoglycemia [33].

Injection Devices:
  • Syringes and vials: Disposable plastic insulin syringes are the most widely used devices for insulin injection. Insulin syringes are available with 0.3-, 0.5-, 1-, and 2-ml capacities. Needle length and thickness have been reduced to minimize the pain during the injection and to prevent inadvertent intramuscular administration of insulin.

Pinching may be necessary for some individuals with thin skin when using the 6-mm or larger needles. A 4-mm needle is currently available for pens and a 6-mm needle is available for syringes. This means that there are options suitable for everyone, without the need for pinching.
  • Pen needles: Pen needles are available in different lengths: 4, 5, 6, 8, and 12.7 mm. Shorter and thinner needles cause less pain; less penetration force can be applied with thinner needles.

Needle Reuse: Ideally, disposable syringes and pen needles should be used only once, as reuse compromises sterility. Hence, a new sterile syringe and needle for every injection is advised. However, despite reuse not being recommended, the practice is common. In such cases, reuse should be restricted to a maximum of 5 times, or fewer if the needle causes pain. Using short- and narrow-gauge (4–5 mm × 32G) insulin pen needles reduces pain [34].

Site of Injection: The injection site should be inspected by a physician, especially if lipohypertrophy is already present or suspected [26]. When shifting the injection site from the habitual lipohypertrophy site to normal subcutaneous tissue [35], insulin dosing may be reduced by 10–20%. The abdomen is the preferred site for soluble human insulin because absorption occurs the most rapidly there. In the case of NPH insulin, the thighs and buttocks are the preferred injection sites [26]. Differences in the rates of absorption at various body sites are negligible with the newer insulin analogues.

Injection-Site Rotation: In order to avoid bumps and scar tissue on the skin, the insulin injection site should be rotated. A systematic approach to injection-site rotation needs to be adopted [34].

The 2017 Indian recommendations for best practice in insulin injection are shown in Table 2 [35].
Table 2

Recommendations for insulin injection [35]


During injection


Convey the benefits of insulin in a positive manner

Do not inject on a tight, blanched, or painful skin fold or bruised or traumatic sites

Release skin fold, if raised, slowly after withdrawing the needle

Selection of appropriate insulin site, device, needle gauge, and length

Allow topical alcohol to evaporate

Follow correct site rotation policy

Use a new needle for each injection

Avoid injecting at hair roots


Use concentrated insulin if the dose requirement is high

Penetrate the skin quickly


Use neutral pH insulin if pain occurs with acidic pH insulin

Do not move the needle immediately after insertion


Insulin should preferably be at room temperature as injection of cold insulin is painful


It is important to appropriately match delivery device to insulin preparation (e.g., pen and cartridge as well as vial and syringe of correct strength). All stakeholders should be educated about different types of basal insulins, including biosimilar insulins, in order to avoid inappropriate use. As far as possible, prescription sanctity should be maintained [35].

Targets for Titration

  • Titration of the insulin dose is recommended using a treat-to-target approach, wherein the dose can be uptitrated to reach a predefined therapeutic goal in terms of FPG level and HbA1c [36].

  • The initial basal insulin dose may be started at 10 U/day or 0.1–0.2 U/kg/day, depending on the degree of hyperglycemia [12]. Starting with a higher dose may be required in persons with a high body mass index, high HbA1c, and longer duration of diabetes or signs of insulin resistance, such as acanthosis nigricans and/or a dorsocervical fat pad.

  • The recommended treat-to-target algorithm for the initiation and titration of basal insulin in basal insulin supported by oral GLA therapy is elaborated in Fig. 1.
    Fig. 1

    Recommended treat-to-target algorithm for the initiation and titration of basal insulin in basal insulin supported oral antidiabetic therapy (BOT). $Basal insulin analogues such as glargine and detemir are associated with a lower risk of hypoglycemia and are preferred. Where cost is a constraint, neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) can be used. In individuals at high risk of hypoglycemia, longer-acting insulin analogues such as degludec or Gla-300 should be considered. *While once-daily basal insulin is preferably administered at bedtime, it can be administered any time of the day depending on the sociocultural circumstances. NPH and detemir may have to be administered twice a day in some individuals

  • While glycemic targets should be individualized, a FPG level of 100–130 mg/dL (5.6–7.2 mmol/L) and HbA1c ≤ 7.0% are reasonable goals for most adults. Once fasting control has been achieved, oral medication or prandial insulin may be needed to achieve postprandial control. Dietary modification and portion size control is non-negotiable and must be emphasized at all stages of intensification of therapy. Titration, in dose steps of 2–4 units, should be initially performed once to twice a week until optimal control is achieved.

  • Titration may be performed in steeper steps if the daily requirement is > 30 U/day.

Physicians should refer to the prescribing information for the frequency of titration of a specific basal insulin.
  • The recommended dose adjustments for insulin dose based on the mean or lowest of the three most recent values of FPG are shown in Table 3 [37].
    Table 3

    Basal insulin dose adjustment [37]

    FPG (mg/dL) (mean of the three most recent values)

    Recommended dose adjustment (once or twice a week)

    < 80 mg/dL (< 4.4 mmol/L)

    Reduce dose by 2 units

    80–130 mg/dL (4.4–7.2 mmol/L)

    No dose modification

    131–160 mg/dL (7.27–8.9 mmol/L)

    Increase dose by 2 units

    161–180 mg/dL (8.94–10.0 mmol/L)

    Increase dose by 4 units

    > 180 mg/dL (> 10.0 mmol/L)

    Increase dose by 6 units

    FPG fasting plasma glucose

A simplified titration technique should be taught and demonstrated to the patient at the time of initiation of basal insulin. Patient-led titration regimens have been shown to be efficacious in achieving glycemic control.
  • For instance, in the INSIGHT study, patient-led titration using simple titration algorithms resulted in greater reductions in HbA1c than physician-led adjustment of oral antidiabetic drugs (control) (− 1.55% vs. − 1.25%, − 17 vs. − 14 mmol/mol, P = 0.005). The study also showed that compared to the control group, patients receiving Gla-100 were 1.68 times more likely to achieve two consecutive HbA1c levels ≤ 6.5%, had lower FPG (P = 0.0001), non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (P = 0.02) and triglycerides (P = 0.02), and greater increases in treatment satisfaction (P = 0.045) [38].

  • The AT.LANTUS trial compared an investigator-led insulin Gla-100 initiation and titration algorithm to that led by study subjects. It showed that there was a significant reduction in HbA1c (from 8.9 ± 1.3% to 7.8 ± 1.2%), with a greater decrease (P < 0.001) with the study subject-led algorithm (− 1.22%) than the investigator-led algorithm (− 1.08%) [39].

  • The Asian Treat to Target Lantus Study (ATLAS) showed that self-titration with Gla-100 was found to statistically significantly lower the mean HbA1c (by 1.40% for self-titration vs. 1.25% for physician-led titration) [40].

  • The TAKE CONTROL study evaluated the self-titration and physician-led titration of Gla-300 in people with T2DM. Self-titration was found to statistically significantly lower the mean HbA1c (by 0.97% for self-titration vs. 0.84% for physician-led titration) [40]. Hence, self-titration with both Gla-100 and Gla-300 resulted in significantly improved glycemic control (vs. physician-led titration), without increased hypoglycemia [40].

Titration of the basal insulin dose may be done by the physician, diabetes care nurse, patient, or caregiver.


Combination therapies (oral therapy combined with basal insulin or basal insulin combined with oral therapy) offer complementary mechanisms of action that can help maximize efficacy, reach target HbA1c goals, and minimize adverse events [41].
  • Among the various GLAs, metformin is the preferred initial therapy (with HbA1c ≥ 6.5% and FPG level ≥ 126 mg/dL). The advantages of including metformin are as follows [41, 42]:
    • It is associated with less weight gain (useful in treating obese patients)

    • Usage leads to decreased hepatic glucose production, blood pressure, and risk of atherothrombotic disease, thus reducing insulin requirements and blood levels of insulin

    • Inclusion of metformin leads to increased hepatic sensitivity to insulin, and it may also have a mild effect on muscular sensitivity to insulin

  • When adding sulfonylureas, start the therapy with low-dose sulfonylureas. The dosage can be increased at intervals of 2–4 weeks until the glycemic target is reached [43]. Modern sulfonylureas (glimepiride and gliclazide MR) confer a lower risk of hypoglycemia and are thus preferred over older sulfonylureas such as glibenclamide [44]. Clinical studies on the addition of sulfonylureas to basal insulin yielded the following results:
    • Basal insulin + glimepiride: In a 24-week prospective randomized comparative study, basal insulin in addition to glimepiride offered better efficacy, less hypoglycemia, and less weight gain, and significantly reduced the insulin dose required (by 4.01%) [45].

    • Basal insulin + metformin + glimepiride: In a 28-week clinical trial, metformin and glimepiride plus insulin glargine resulted in a significant improvement in overall glycemic control as compared to other combinations. The decrease in HbA1c was more pronounced with insulin glargine plus glimepiride plus metformin than with insulin glargine plus metformin (0.49% [CI, 0.16%–0.82%]; P  =  0.005) (5.10 mmol/mol [CI, 1.64–8.61]; P  =  0.005) and insulin glargine plus glimepiride (0.59% [CI, 0.13%–1.05%]; P  =  0.012) (5.87 mmol/mol [CI, 1.10–10.64]; P  =  0.012) (overall P  =  0.02) [46].

  • Regular monitoring is recommended, especially when combining with insulin secretagogues such as sulfonylureas.

  • Thiazolidinediones, when combined with insulin, may favor weight gain and fluid retention [47].

  • Pioglitazone or rosiglitazone helps reduce PPG levels [48].

  • Alpha-glucosidase inhibitors (AGIs) should be considered as the first-line treatment in patients with controlled basal glucose concentrations and marked postprandial hyperglycemia. Mean HbA1c at week 24 was significantly decreased (by 0.7% from baseline) in both acarbose and voglibose patient groups who were previously inadequately controlled with basal insulin [49, 50].

  • Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors may be considered as add-ons to metformin alongside other drugs such as sulfonylureas, dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, thiazolidinedione, and basal insulin. SGLT2 inhibitors are associated with weight loss and do not increase the risk of hypoglycemia. They have potential benefits in terms of weight loss, reduction of blood pressure, improvements in glycemic control without weight gain, and hypoglycemic risks associated with insulin therapy [51].

  • DPP-4 inhibitors are weight neutral and not associated with an increased risk of hypoglycemia. DPP-4 inhibitors lower PPG levels by decelerating gastric emptying. They best complement the action of basal insulin on fasting glucose control and help patients with T2DM achieve their target HbA1c [52].

  • In general, GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) should not be discontinued with the initiation of basal insulin. Basal insulin and GLP-1RAs address various defects seen in T2DM physiopathology. Basal insulin plus GLP-1 receptor agonists are associated with less hypoglycemia and with weight loss instead of weight gain. However, they may be less tolerable and come at a greater cost. That said, a fixed ratio combination of GLP-1RA and basal insulin is a potentially helpful tool for the treatment of patients with T2DM as a result of its favorable safety and efficacy profile, especially in obese patients who are uncontrolled on OADs or basal insulin [12, 53].

Tools for Monitoring and Troubleshooting

  • Second-generation basal insulin analogues (Gla-300 and degludec) are associated with the lowest risk of hypoglycemia, which can be further reduced by implementing timely therapy initiation, proper patient education, and SMBG. Hypoglycemia and need for monitoring is reduced with BOT as compared with basal bolus [24, 28].

  • Regular SMBG is recommended in patients with diabetes on multiple daily insulin injections, with a history of hypoglycemia, and with poor metabolic control with multiple GLAs and/or basal insulin.

  • SMBG should be performed at least as often as insulin is administered.
    • The ideal SMBG requirement is seven tests/day, i.e., three before and three after each meal and one test at 3 am. As a compromise, one fasting test and three each after breakfast, lunch, and dinner daily may be more feasible as well as acceptable. This can be further individualized to twice or thrice a week in pregnant patients as the pregnancy advances. Two-hour post-meal monitoring may be easier to remember, as this timing is routinely used [4].

    • For patients on intensive insulin regimens who are on multiple doses of insulin or on insulin pumps, testing should be carried out three or more times daily (all pre-meals, post-meals, at bedtime, and prior to exercise) [4].

    • Some patients may require testing 6–10 (or more) times daily [4].

    • Pregnant women with insulin-treated diabetes must be advised to perform SMBG on a daily basis. However, in case of any failure to do so, at least weekly monitoring should be encouraged [4].

    • Meal-based testing schemes such as 5- and 7-point regimens and the staggered-frequency regimen can help to show the effect of food consumed on the rise in blood glucose after specific mealtimes [54].

  • Monitoring hypoglycemia in patients: Severe hypoglycemia is a common acute complication in people with diabetes being treated with insulin, and its incidence increases with the duration of insulin therapy. A basal insulin switch from conventional to long-acting or to ultra-long-acting preparations may be indicated if a particular insulin cannot be uptitrated due to hypoglycemia or glycemic variability.

Physicians can refer to the hypoglycemia protocol illustrated in Fig. 2.
Fig. 2

Protocol for managing hypoglycemia. *Symptoms of hypoglycemia include excessive hunger, sweating, tremors, palpitations, irritability, blurring of vision, dizziness, difficulty concentrating, excessive tiredness, incoherent speech, and altered sensorium/seizures; symptoms of hypoglycemia are idiosyncratic. #15 g of glucose or sucrose or 150 mL of fruit juice or sweetened beverages such as cola (not diet cola) can be administered. $Complex carbohydrate snack can include 150 mL milk, 1 bread sandwich, 1 chapati, or 3 heaped tablespoons of cooked rice. When hypoglycemia occurs prior to a meal, the meal should be taken immediately

  • SMBG should be performed in a pragmatic manner. Once-daily FPG and structured 2-h PPG are acceptable SMBG strategies for BOT. Monitoring PPG levels will provide data on the adequacy of the BOT regimen [55].

  • Tools for patients: Basal insulin titration and target achievement can be facilitated by the use of modern technology, including ambulatory glucose profiling and online apps. The Hypoglycemia Awareness Questionnaire can be used by patients to monitor glucose level changes and consult with their healthcare providers [56]. Several online apps are available in India, such as mySugr, OnTrack Diabetes, and MyFitnessPal, which patients can conveniently use to manage diabetes [56, 57].

  • Risk factors for hypoglycemia can be reduced with the timely initiation of therapy using currently available insulin formulations and technologies (insulin pumps and monitoring) and proper patient education, which should empower physicians to overcome their inertia [24].

Summary of the 7-T concept of basal early strategies to maximize HbA1c reduction with oral therapy

Treatment initiation

Begin basal insulin at 10 U/day or 0.1–0.2 U/kg/day, depending on the degree of hyperglycemia


Basal insulin should be injected at the appropriate time (usually bedtime)

Under some circumstances, it may be administered at the same time daily, in the morning or afternoon

Transportation and storage

Insulin vials, cartridges, or pens may be kept at room temperature for 28 days to 1 month, depending on the type of insulin. However, in settings where the temperatures can be above 30 °C or below 2 °C, it is not advisable to leave the vials at room temperature

The cold chain should be maintained during the transportation of the vials or cartridges of insulin

Technique of administration

Basal insulin, if injected into intramuscular space, may act like rapid-acting insulin

The abdomen is the preferred site for soluble human insulin as it leads to the fastest absorption

Targets for titration

The initial basal insulin dose may be started at 10 U/day or 0.1–0.2 U/kg/day, depending on the degree of hyperglycemia

Titration, in steps of 2–4 units, should be initially performed once to twice a week until optimal control is achieved


In combination with basal insulin:

- Metformin: Preferred initial therapy (with HbA1c ≥ 6.5% and FPG level ≥ 126 mg/dL)

- Sulfonylureas: Preferred agents where cost is a limiting factor. Begin at a low dose, but dosage can be increased at intervals of 2–4 weeks until the glycemic target is reached. Pioglitazone or rosiglitazone help reduce PPG levels

- AGIs: Used as the first-line treatment in patients with controlled basal glucose concentrations and marked postprandial hyperglycemia

- DPP-4 inhibitors: Weight neutral, not associated with an increased risk of hypoglycemia, and lowers PPG levels by decelerating gastric emptying, thus helping patients with T2DM achieve their target HbA1c levels

- SGLT2 inhibitors: Possess potential benefits in terms of renoprotection, cardiovascular risk reduction, weight loss, blood pressure reduction, and improvements in glycemic control without the weight gain and hypoglycemic risks associated with insulin therapy

- GLP-1 receptor agonists: Basal insulin plus GLP-1 receptor agonists are associated with less hypoglycemia and with weight loss instead of weight gain, but they may be less tolerable and cost more

Tools for monitoring and troubleshooting

Once-daily FPG and strategic 2-h PPG are acceptable SMBG strategies for BOT

Hypoglycemia Awareness Questionnaire may be used by patients to monitor glucose level changes in consultation with their healthcare providers

Online apps, such as mySugr, OnTrack Diabetes, MyFitnessPal, and Diabeto, can be used by patients to manage diabetes and insulin dosing


The selection of an appropriate insulin regimen and initiation time as well as the optimization of insulin therapy are crucial to achieving optimal glycemic control. The strength of the current expert opinion statement is that it leverages clinical experience and regional expertise and practices to adapt existing recommendations on the basis of published evidence for local contexts.

We hope that these recommendations will prove useful to physicians as a reference. We envisage that these recommendations will highlight the need for the optimization and early intensification of basal insulin in the treatment of diabetes. The impact of these recommendations will be validated through observational studies in real-life diabetes outpatient practices.



We acknowledge the Sanofi India team—Dr. Shalini Menon, Dr. Senthilnathan Mohanasundaram, Dr. Romik Ghosh, and Dr. Amal Mathew—for their assistance, guidance, and expertise in convening the expert forum. The information contained herein solely represents the views and opinions of the authors. This expert opinion document does not seek to represent the opinions and policies of or the procedures used by Sanofi.


This expert opinion initiative was funded by Sanofi India. The article processing charges and the open access fee received by the journal for the publication of this article were sponsored by Sanofi India.

Medical Writing and/or Editorial Assistance

Editorial support was provided by Medulla Communications Private Limited, which was funded by Sanofi India.


All named authors meet the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) criteria for authorship for this manuscript, take responsibility for the integrity of the work, and gave final approval for the version to be published.


Jubbin Jacob received research funding for clinical trials from Novo Nordisk, Eli Lilly and Co., Sanofi Synthelabo Pvt. Ltd., and Biocon India Pvt. Ltd., and speaking assignments from Novo Nordisk India, Eli Lilly India Ltd., Sanofi Aventis India, Biocon, Lupin India, and AstraZeneca Pharma India Ltd. Deepak Khandelwal received a speaker honorarium from Sanofi. Manoj Chawla is on the advisory board for/has a speaker contract with/has a consultancy agreement with Sanofi India, Novo Nordisk India Pvt. Ltd., Eli Lilly India, Boehringer Ingelheim, MSD, AstraZeneca Pharma India Ltd., Novartis, Eris Lifesciences, and USV. Roberta Lamptey has served as consultant/speaker/advisory board member for Sanofi, Novo Nordisk, AstraZeneca and Novartis. Sarita Bajaj, AK Das, Rakesh Sahay, Banshi Saboo, Sambit Das, M. Shunmugavelu, Gagan Priya, Deep Dutta, Vineet Surana, Mangesh Tiwaskar, Ameya Joshi, Pradip Krishna Shrestha, Jyoti Bhattarai, Bishwajit Bhowmik, Tint Swe Latt, Than Than Aye, G. Vijayakumar, Manash Baruah, Fatema Jawad, A.G. Unnikrishnan, Subhankar Chowdhury, Md. Faruqe Pathan, Noel Somasundaram, Manilka Sumanathilaka, Abbas Raza, Silver K. Bahendeka, Ankia Coetzee, Sundeep Ruder, Kaushik Ramaiya, Charlotte Bavuma, Khalid Shaikh, Andrew Uloko, Sandeep Chaudhary, Abdurezak Ahmed Abdela, Zhanay Akanov, Joel Rodrìguez Saldaña, Raquel Faradji, Armindo Tiago, Ahmed Reja, and Leszek Czupryniak have nothing to declare. Sanjay Kalra is a member of the journal’s Editorial Board.

Compliance with Ethics Guidelines

This article is based on previously conducted studies and does not involve any new study on human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (, which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.


  1. 1.
    Zheng Y, Ley SH, Hu FB. Global aetiology and epidemiology of type 2 diabetes mellitus and its complications. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2018;14(2):88.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
  3. 3.
    International Diabetes Federation. IDF diabetes atlas. 8th ed. 2017. Accessed 15 Jan 2018.
  4. 4.
    Madhu SV, Saboo B, Makkar BM, et al. RSSDI clinical practice recommendations for management of type 2 diabetes mellitus, 2015. Int J Diabetes Dev Crit. 2015;35(1):1–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kanungo S, Mahapatra T, Bhowmik K, et al. Diabetes scenario in a backward rural district population of India and need for restructuring of health care delivery services. Epidemiol. 2016;6(2):1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ray S, Pramanik S, Ghosh S. Combination treatment of oral agents and insulin in type 2 diabetes: a narrative review. Int J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2016;1(1):1–7.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    ORIGIN Trial Investigators. Basal insulin and cardiovascular and other outcomes in dysglycemia. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(4):319–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    American Diabetes Association. Implications of the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study. Diabetes Care. 2002;25(Suppl 1):s28–32.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lovre D, Fonseca V. Benefits of timely basal insulin control in patients with type 2 diabetes. J Diabetes Complications. 2015;29(2):295–301.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mannucci E, Dicembrini I, Lauria A, Pozzilli P. Is glucose control important for prevention of cardiovascular disease in diabetes? Diabetes Care. 2013;36(Supplement 2):S259–63.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Al Mansari A, Obeid Y, Islam N, et al. GOAL study: clinical and non-clinical predictive factors for achieving glycemic control in people with type 2 diabetes in real clinical practice. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2018;6(1):e000519.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes—2018. Accessed 15 Jan 2018.
  13. 13.
    American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes—2019 (abridged for primary care providers). Clin Diabetes. 2019;37(1):11.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Moses CA, Seshiah V, Sahay BK, et al. Baseline results indicate poor glycemic control and delay in initiation and optimization of insulin therapy: results from the Improving Management Practices and Clinical Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes Study. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2012;16(Suppl 2):S432.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Khunti K, Davies MJ, Kalra S. Self-titration of insulin in the management of people with type 2 diabetes: a practical solution to improve management in primary care. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2013;15(8):690–700.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wangnoo SK, Maji D, Das AK, et al. Barriers and solutions to diabetes management: an Indian perspective. Indian J Endocrinol Metabol. 2013;17(4):594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Russell-Jones D, Pouwer F, Khunti K. Identification of barriers to insulin therapy and approaches to overcoming them. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018;20(3):488–96.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Unnikrishnan IR, Anjana RM, Mohan V. Importance of controlling diabetes early—the concept of metabolic memory, legacy effect and the case for early insulinisation. J Assoc Phys Indian. 2011;59(Suppl):8–12.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Avogaro A. Postprandial glucose: marker or risk factor? Diabetes Care. 2011;34:2333–5.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Peter R, Okoseime OE, Rees A, Owens DR. Postprandial glucose—a potential therapeutic target to reduce cardiovascular mortality. Curr Vasc Pharmacol. 2009;7(1):68–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kalra S, Ved J, Baruah MP. Diabetes destiny in our hands: achieving metabolic karma. Indian J Endocr Metab. 2017;21(3):482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Owens D. Clinical evidence for the earlier initiation of insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2013;15(9):776–85.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Shrivastava SR, Shrivastava PS, Ramasamy J. Role of self-care in management of diabetes mellitus. J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2013;12(1):14.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sorli C, Heile MK. Identifying and meeting the challenges of insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2014;7:267.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kalra S, Gupta Y, Unnikrishnan AG. Flexibility in insulin prescription. Indian J Endocr Metab. 2016;20(3):408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Frid AH, Kreugel G, Grassi G, et al. New insulin delivery recommendations. Mayo Clin Proc. 2016;91(9):1231–55.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Standl E, Maxeiner S, Raptis S, Karimi-Anderesi Z, Schweitzer MA. Good glycemic control with flexibility in timing of basal insulin supply: a 24-week comparison of insulin glargine given once daily in the morning or at bedtime in combination with morning glimepiride. Diabetes Care. 2005;28(2):419–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mauricio D, Hramiak I. Second-generation insulin analogues—a review of recent real-world data and forthcoming head-to-head comparisons. Eur Endocrinol. 2018;14(Suppl1):2.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Meneghini L, Atkin SL, Gough SC, et al. NN1250-3668 (BEGIN FLEX) Trial Investigators. The efficacy and safety of insulin degludec given in variable once-daily dosing intervals compared with insulin glargine and insulin degludec dosed at the same time daily: a 26-week, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, treat-to-target trial in individuals with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(4):858–64.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ibrahim M, Al Magd MA, Annabi FA, et al. Recommendations for management of diabetes during Ramadan: update 2015. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2015;3(1):e000108.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
  32. 32.
    Donner T. Insulin—pharmacology, therapeutic regimens and principles of intensive insulin therapy. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine; 2015.
  33. 33.
    ADEA. Clinical guiding principles for subcutaneous injection technique. 2015. Accessed 8 Feb 2018.
  34. 34.
    Bahendeka S, Kaushik R, Swai AB, et al. EADSG guidelines: insulin storage and optimisation of injection technique in diabetes management. Diabetes Ther. 2019:10(2):341–66.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Tandon N, Kalra S, Balhara YP, et al. Forum for injection technique and therapy expert recommendations, India: the Indian recommendations for best practice in insulin injection technique, 2017. Indian J Endocr Metab. 2017;21(4):600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Garber AJ. Treat-to-target trials: uses, interpretation and review of concepts. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2014;16(3):193–205.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Shah S, Sharma SK, Singh P, et al. Consensus evidence-based guidelines for insulin initiation, optimization and continuation in type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Assoc Physicians India. 2014;62(7 Suppl):49–54.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Gerstein HC, Yale JF, Harris SB, et al. A randomized trial of adding insulin glargine vs. avoidance of insulin in people with type 2 diabetes on either no oral glucose-lowering agents or submaximal doses of metformin and/or sulphonylureas. The Canadian INSIGHT (Implementing New Strategies with Insulin Glargine for Hyperglycaemia Treatment) Study. Diabet Med. 2006;23(7):736–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Davies M, Storms F, Shutler S, Bianchi-Biscay M, Gomis R. Improvement of glycemic control in subjects with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes: comparison of two treatment algorithms using insulin glargine. Diabetes Care. 2005;28(6):1282–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Davies MJ, Boelle-Le Corfec EM, Bonnemaire M, et al. Self-titration with insulin glargine 300 or 100 U/mL has improved efficacy vs. physician-led titration—comparison of the TAKE-CONTROL, AT. LANTUS, and ATLAS studies in people with type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Poster presented at ADA 2018. Diabetes. 2018;67(Suppl 1).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Kuritzky L. Addition of basal insulin to oral antidiabetic agents: a goal-directed approach to type 2 diabetes therapy. MedGenMed. 2006;8(4):34.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Wulffelé MG, Kooy A, Lehert P, et al. Combination of insulin and metformin in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2002;25(12):2133–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Sola D, Rossi L, Schianca GP, et al. Sulfonylureas and their use in clinical practice. Arch Med Sci. 2015;11(4):840.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Kalra S, Aamir AH, Raza A, et al. Place of sulfonylureas in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus in South Asia: a expert opinion. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2015;19(5):577–96.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Kelwade J, Sethi B. Efficacy of glimepiride as an add-on therapy to insulin in patients with high insulin requirement. Poster presented at IDF Congress 2017; 2017 Dec 4–8; Abu Dhabi, UAE.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Park CY, Kang JG, Chon S, et al. Comparison between the therapeutic effect of metformin, glimepiride and their combination as an add-on treatment to insulin glargine in uncontrolled patients with type 2 diabetes. PLoS One. 2014;9(3):e87799.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Charbonnel B, DeFronzo R, Davidson J, et al. Pioglitazone use in combination with insulin in the prospective pioglitazone clinical trial in macrovascular events study (PROactive19). J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95(5):2163–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Scheen AJ. Combined thiazolidinedione-insulin therapy. Drug Saf. 2004;27(12):841–56.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    van de Laar FA. Alpha-glucosidase inhibitors in the early treatment of type 2 diabetes. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2008;4(6):1189.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Lee MY, Choi DS, Lee MK, et al. Comparison of acarbose and voglibose in diabetes patients who are inadequately controlled with basal insulin treatment: randomized, parallel, open-label, active-controlled study. J Korean Med Sci. 2014;29(1):90–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    John M, Gopinath D, Jagesh R. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors with insulin in type 2 diabetes: clinical perspectives. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2016;20(1):22.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Chen C, Yu Q, Zhang S, et al. Assessing the efficacy and safety of combined DPP-4 inhibitor and insulin treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2015;8(11):14141.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Moreira RO, Cobas R, Coelho RC. Combination of basal insulin and GLP-1 receptor agonist: is this the end of basal insulin alone in the treatment of type 2 diabetes? Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2018;10(1):26.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Austin MM. The two skill sets of self-monitoring of blood glucose education: the operational and the interpretive. Diabetes Spectr. 2013;26(2):83–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Kalra S, Khandelwal D. The Hypoglycaemia Awareness Questionnaire (HAQ). J Pak Med Assoc. 2018;68(2):322–3.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Woodfield J. Diabetes PA and the 10 best diabetes apps available. Accessed 28 April 2018.
  57. 57.
    Doyle A. The Best diabetes apps of 2016. Accessed 28 April 2018.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sarita Bajaj
    • 1
  • A. K. Das
    • 2
  • Sanjay Kalra
    • 3
    Email author
  • Rakesh Sahay
    • 4
  • Banshi Saboo
    • 5
  • Sambit Das
    • 6
  • M. Shunmugavelu
    • 7
  • Jubbin Jacob
    • 8
  • Gagan Priya
    • 9
  • Deepak Khandelwal
    • 10
  • Deep Dutta
    • 11
  • Manoj Chawla
    • 12
  • Vineet Surana
    • 13
  • Mangesh Tiwaskar
    • 14
  • Ameya Joshi
    • 15
  • Pradip Krishna Shrestha
    • 16
  • Jyoti Bhattarai
    • 17
  • Bishwajit Bhowmik
    • 18
  • Tint Swe Latt
    • 19
  • Than Than Aye
    • 20
  • G. Vijayakumar
    • 21
  • Manash Baruah
    • 22
  • Fatema Jawad
    • 23
  • A. G. Unnikrishnan
    • 24
  • Subhankar Chowdhury
    • 25
  • Md. Faruqe Pathan
    • 26
  • Noel Somasundaram
    • 27
  • Manilka Sumanathilaka
    • 28
  • Abbas Raza
    • 29
  • Silver K. Bahendeka
    • 30
  • Ankia Coetzee
    • 31
  • Sundeep Ruder
    • 32
  • Kaushik Ramaiya
    • 33
  • Roberta Lamptey
    • 34
  • Charlotte Bavuma
    • 35
  • Khalid Shaikh
    • 36
  • Andrew Uloko
    • 37
  • Sandeep Chaudhary
    • 38
  • Abdurezak Ahmed Abdela
    • 39
  • Zhanay Akanov
    • 40
  • Joel Rodrìguez-Saldaña
    • 41
  • Raquel Faradji
    • 42
  • Armindo Tiago
    • 43
  • Ahmed Reja
    • 44
  • Leszek Czupryniak
    • 45
  1. 1.Department of MedicineMLN Medical CollegeAllahabadIndia
  2. 2.Department of MedicineJIPMERPuducherryIndia
  3. 3.Department of Diabetes and EndocrinologyBharti HospitalKarnalIndia
  4. 4.Department of EndocrinologyOsmania Medical College and HospitalHyderabadIndia
  5. 5.Diacare—Diabetes Care and Hormone ClinicAhmedabadIndia
  6. 6.Department of EndocrinologyApollo HospitalsBhubaneswarIndia
  7. 7.Trichy Diabetes Speciality Centre (P) Ltd.TrichyIndia
  8. 8.Endocrine and Diabetes Unit, Department of MedicineChristian Medical College and HospitalLudhianaIndia
  9. 9.Fortis HospitalMohaliIndia
  10. 10.Department of EndocrinologyMaharaja Agrasen HospitalDelhiIndia
  11. 11.Department of Endocrinology, Diabetology and Metabolic DisordersVenkateshwar HospitalNew DelhiIndia
  12. 12.Lina Diabetes Care and Mumbai Diabetes Research CentreMumbaiIndia
  13. 13.Manipal HospitalsNew DelhiIndia
  14. 14.Shilpa Medical Research CentreMumbaiIndia
  15. 15.Bhaktivedanta Hospital and Research InstituteThaneIndia
  16. 16.Nidan Hospital Pvt. Ltd.PatanNepal
  17. 17.Metro Kathmandu HospitalKathmanduNepal
  18. 18.Centre for Global Health Research, Diabetic Association of BangladeshDhakaBangladesh
  19. 19.University of Medicine 2YangonMyanmar
  20. 20.University of Medicine 2, Myanmar Society of Endocrinology and Metabolism (MSEM)YangonMyanmar
  21. 21.Apollo Specialty Hospital and Diabetes Medicare CentreChennaiIndia
  22. 22.Excel Care HospitalsGuwahatiIndia
  23. 23.Journal of Pakistan Medical AssociationKarachiPakistan
  24. 24.Chellaram Diabetes HospitalPuneIndia
  25. 25.Department of EndocrinologyIPGME&R and SSKM HospitalKolkataIndia
  26. 26.Department of EndocrinologyBIRDEM General HospitalDhakaBangladesh
  27. 27.Diabetes and Endocrine UnitNational Hospital of Sri LankaColomboSri Lanka
  28. 28.National Hospital of Sri Lanka, Sri Lanka College of EndocrinologistsColomboSri Lanka
  29. 29.Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research CenterLahorePakistan
  30. 30.Mother Kevin Postgraduate Medical SchoolMartyrs University, St. Francis HospitalKampalaUganda
  31. 31.Division of Endocrinology, Department of MedicineStellenbosch University and Tygerberg Hospital, Society for Endocrinology, Diabetes and MetabolismCape TownSouth Africa
  32. 32.Life Fourways Hospital, University of the WitwatersrandCape TownSouth Africa
  33. 33.Shree Hindu Mandal HospitalDar e SalaamTanzania
  34. 34.Korle Bu Teaching Hospital, University of Ghana School of Medicine and DentistryAccraGhana
  35. 35.College of Medicine and Health ScienceUniversity of RwandaKigaliRwanda
  36. 36.Department of Diabetes, Faculty of Internal MedicineRoyal Oman Police HospitalMuscatOman
  37. 37.College of Health SciencesBayero UniversityKanoNigeria
  38. 38.NMC Speciality HospitalDubaiUAE
  39. 39.Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, CHSAddis Ababa UniversityAddis AbabaEthiopia
  40. 40.Kazakh Society for Study of DiabetesAlmatyKazakhstan
  41. 41.Multidisciplinary Diabetes Center of MexicoMexico CityMexico
  42. 42.Clinica EnDi, RENACED Diabetes Tipo 1, Escuela de Medicina, TEC-ABC, Centro Médico ABC, Sociedad Mexicana de Nutrición y EndocrinologíaMexico CityMexico
  43. 43.Mozambican Diabetic AssociationMaputo Central HospitalMaputoMozambique
  44. 44.Department of Internal MedicineAddis Ababa UniversityAddis AbabaEthiopia
  45. 45.Department of Diabetology and Internal Medicine, Central University HospitalWarsaw Medical UniversityWarsawPoland

Personalised recommendations