Offshore Triceratops Under Impact Forces in Ultra Deep Arctic Waters

  • Srinivasan ChandrasekaranEmail author
  • R. Nagavinothini


In the recent years, offshore oil drilling and production is moving towards ultra-deep Arctic region which demands an adaptable structural form. Apart from the environmental loads, offshore structures in Arctic region will also be subjected to impact forces arising due to ship platform collision. Such loads may endanger the safety of the platform due to the combined effect of reduced temperature and impact forces on the material and geometric properties of the structure. Thus, there is a need to understand the behaviour of offshore structures under impact forces in low-temperature conditions. Offshore Triceratops is one of the recent new-generation compliant platforms proved to be suitable for ultra-deepwater applications. The main aim of this study is to assess the response of triceratops under impact forces in Arctic environment numerically. As the buoyant legs of triceratops are susceptible to impact forces arising from ship platform collision, the numerical model of a buoyant leg is developed using Ansys explicit dynamics solver. The impact analyses is then carried out with rectangular box-shaped indenter representing the stem of a ship, under both ambient conditions and Arctic temperature (− 60 °C) and the local response of the platform is studied through force deformation curves and stress contours. In order to study the global response of the platform, the numerical model of triceratops is developed in Ansys Aqwa solver and analysed under the action of impact load time history obtained from explicit analysis of buoyant leg. The impact load on the buoyant leg resulted in the continuous periodic vibration of the platform. Furthermore, parametric studies were also carried out to investigate the effect of indenter velocity, size, and location on the impact response of triceratops under Arctic temperature, and the results are discussed.


Arctic Buoyant leg Cylindrical shell Impact analysis Triceratops 



  1. Amdahl, J., & Edberg, E. (1993). Ship collision with offshore structures. In Proceedings of the 2nd European conference on structural dynamics (EURODYN’93), Trondheim, Norway, June (pp. 21–23).Google Scholar
  2. Benson, D. J. (2017). Explicit finite element methods for large deformation problems in solid mechanics. In E. Stein, R. Borst, & T. J. Hughes (Eds.), Encyclopedia of computational mechanics (2nd ed.). Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  3. Cerik, B. C., Shin, H. K., & Cho, S. R. (2015). On the resistance of steel ring-stiffened cylinders subjected to low-velocity mass impact. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 84, 108–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chandrasekaran, S., & Nagavinothini, R. (2017). Analysis and design of offshore triceratops under ultra-deep waters. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, International Journal of Civil, Environmental, Structural, Construction and Architectural Engineering, 11(11), 1520–1528.Google Scholar
  5. Chandrasekaran, S., & Nagavinothini, R. (2018a). Tether analyses of offshore triceratops under the wind, wave, and current. Marine Systems & Ocean Technology, 13(1), 34–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chandrasekaran, S., & Nagavinothini, R. (2018b). Dynamic analyses and preliminary design of offshore triceratops in ultra-deep waters. Innovative Infrastructure Solutions, 3(1), 16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chandrasekaran, S., & Nagavinothini, R. (2019). Tether analyses of offshore triceratops under ice force due to continuous crushing. Innovative Infrastructure Solutions, 4(1), 25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. DiPaolo, B. P., & Tom, J. G. (2009). Effects of ambient temperature on a quasi-static axial-crush configuration response of thin-wall, steel box components. Thin-Walled Structures, 47(8–9), 984–997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Do, Q. T., Muttaqie, T., Shin, H. K., & Cho, S. R. (2018). Dynamic lateral mass impact on steel stringer-stiffened cylinders. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 116, 105–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Harding, J. E., Onoufriou, A., & Tsang, S. K. (1983). Collisions—What is the danger to offshore rigs? Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 3(2), 31–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Karroum, C. G., Reid, S. R., & Li, S. (2007). Indentation of ring-stiffened cylinders by wedge-shaped indenters—Part 1: An experimental and finite element investigation. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 49(1), 13–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kim, K. J., Lee, J. H., Park, D. K., Jung, B. G., Han, X., & Paik, J. K. (2016). An experimental and numerical study on nonlinear impact responses of steel-plated structures in an Arctic environment. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 93, 99–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kvitrud, A. (2011). Collisions between platforms and ships in Norway in the period 2001–2010. In ASME 2011 30th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering (pp. 637–641). American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
  14. Mohammadzadeh, B., & Noh, H. C. (2015). Numerical analysis of dynamic responses of the plate subjected to impulsive loads. International Journal of Civil, Environmental, Structural, Construction and Architectural Engineering, 9(9), 1194–1197.Google Scholar
  15. Mohammadzadeh, B., & Noh, H. C. (2017). Analytical method to investigate nonlinear dynamic responses of sandwich plates with FGM faces resting on elastic foundation considering blast loads. Composite Structures, 174, 142–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mohammadzadeh, B., & Noh, H. C. (2019). An analytical and numerical investigation on the dynamic responses of steel plates considering the blast loads. International Journal of Steel Structures, 19(2), 603–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Nagavinothini, R., & Chandrasekaran, S. (2019). Dynamic analyses of offshore triceratops in ultra-deep waters under wind, wave, and current. Structures, 20, 279–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Paik, J. K., Kim, B. J., Park, D. K., & Jang, B. S. (2011). On quasi-static crushing of thin-walled steel structures in cold temperature: Experimental and numerical studies. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 38(1), 13–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Park, D. K., Kim, D. K., Park, C. H., Park, D. H., Jang, B. S., Kim, B. J., et al. (2015). On the crashworthiness of steel-plated structures in an arctic environment: an experimental and numerical study. Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, 137(5), 051501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Srinivasan, C., & Nagavinothini, R. (2019). Ice-induced response of offshore triceratops. Ocean Engineering, 180, 71–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Storheim, M., & Amdahl, J. (2014). Design of offshore structures against accidental ship collisions. Marine Structures, 37, 135–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Syngellakis, S., & Balaji, R. (1989). Tension leg platform response to impact forces. Marine structures, 2(2), 151–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Veritas, D. N. (2010a). Buckling strength of shells, recommended practice DNV-RP-C202. Det. Nor. Ver. Class. AS, Veritasveien, 1.Google Scholar
  24. Veritas, D. N. (2010b). Design against accidental loads, recommended practice DNV-RP-C204.Google Scholar
  25. White, C. N., Copple, R. W., & Capanoglu, C. (2005). Triceratops: An effective platform for developing oil and gas fields in deep and ultra-deepwater. In The fifteenth international offshore and polar engineering conference. Mountain View: International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers.Google Scholar
  26. Yan, J. B., Liew, J. R., Zhang, M. H., & Wang, J. Y. (2014). Mechanical properties of normal strength mild steel and high strength steel S690 in low temperature relevant to the Arctic environment. Materials and Design, 61, 150–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Society of Steel Construction 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Ocean EngineeringIIT MadrasChennaiIndia

Personalised recommendations