Integrated FEM and CFD Simulation for Offshore Wind Turbine Structural Response
This paper implements Finite Element Model (FEM)-enabled computational fluid dynamic (CFD) analysis to enable wind and wave time-history analysis with multiple force-induced soil–structure-interaction. The soil–structure interaction of steel monopile supported 5 MW wind turbine has been simulated with two common and applicable soil profiles. Lateral soil springs were used according to the American Petroleum Institute (API) Code for p–y curves, while vertical soil springs were generated according to the t–z and q–z API standards. A modal analysis was performed to verify the joint CFD-FEM exhibited a fundamental frequency in the desired range. A verification of the load applications was completed for maximum force and moment under specific wind and wave loading parameters. Deflection results were generated and compared with reliable results published in past studies. Results reveal that a variation in wind speed has a higher impact on soil structure interaction causing a larger deflection than a variance in the significant wave height. It is also evident that the heterogeneous sand profile has a high enough stiffness to cause fatigue damage during extreme multi-hazard loading. It is anticipated that this proposed modeling technique will provide a basis for more accurate application of multi-wind-wave simulations coupled with soil–monopile-interaction.
KeywordsMulti-hazard simulation Soil spring Offshore Wind turbine Structural modeling
This research was sponsored by the Maryland Offshore Wind Energy Research Challenge Program (Grant Number: MOWER 14-01), for which is financial support is provided by the Maryland Energy Administration (MEA) and the Maryland Higher Education Commission (MHEC). The financial support is gratefully acknowledged.
- Achmus, M., & Abdel-Rahman, K. (2005). Finite element modelling of horizontally loaded monopile foundations for offshore wind energy converters in Germany. In S. Gourvenec & M. Cassidy (Eds.), Frontiers in offshore geotechnics. Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
- ANSYS/ED. (1997). Computer software. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- API (2000). Recommended practice for planning, designing and constructing fixed offshore platforms—Working stress design. API recommended practice, RP 2A-WSD.Google Scholar
- Bhattacharya, S. (2014). Challenges in design of foundations for offshore wind turbines. Engineering & Technology Reference. https://doi.org/10.1049/etr.2014.0041. ISSN: 2056-4007.
- Bush, E., & Manuel, L. (2009). Foundation models for offshore wind turbines. In 47th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting including the new horizons forum and aerospace exposition, Orlando, Florida, 5–8 January.Google Scholar
- Cathie, D. (2006). OPILE, version 22.214.171.124. Cathie Associates.Google Scholar
- Iliopoulos, A., Shirzadeh, R., Weijtjens, W., Guillaume, P., Hemelrijck, D. V., & Devriendt, C. (2016). A modal decomposition and expansion approach for prediction of dynamic responses on a monopile offshore wind turbine using a limited number of vibration sensors. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 68–69, 84–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Jara, F. A. V. (2009). Foundations for an offshore wind turbine. Construction Engineering Magazine, 24(1), 33–48.Google Scholar
- Kalvig, S. M. (2014). On wave–wind interactions and implications for offshore wind turbines.Google Scholar
- LeBlanc, C. (2009). Design of offshore wind turbine support structures. Aalborg: Department of Civil Engineering, Aalborg University.Google Scholar
- Li, M., Song, H., Zhang, H., & Guan, H. (2010). Structural response of offshore monopile foundations to ocean waves. Mountain View: International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers.Google Scholar
- Seo, J., Head, M., & Tuhin, I. (2015). Study on foundation anchorages of offshore wind turbines under severe environmental condition. In The 25th international ocean and polar engineering conference, Hawaii, USA, June 21–26.Google Scholar
- Seo, J., & Pokhrel, J. (2018). Analytical study on multi-hazard risk of offshore wind turbine subjected to hydrodynamic and aerodynamic loads. In The 28th international ocean and polar engineering conference, Sapporo, Japan, June 10–15.Google Scholar
- Seo, J., Schaffer, W., Head, M., & Shokouhian, M. (2017). Retrofitting of Monopile Transition Piece for Offshore Wind Turbines. In The 27th international ocean and polar engineering conference, San Francisco, USA, June 25–30.Google Scholar