Advertisement

Improving Seismic Behavior of MRFs by U-shaped Hysteretic Damper Along Diagonal Brace

  • Seyed M. Zahrai
  • Mohammad Froozanfar
Article
  • 11 Downloads

Abstract

This paper presents seismic assessment of a U-shaped hysteretic damper as an enhancement system, in moment resisting frames. The proposed system is consisted of a damping box at the middle of a diagonal brace. The box includes U-shaped steel plates welded to the side plates. When a transverse load, like earthquake, is exerted to the building, relative displacement between the stories forms and will be transmitted to the braces where energy dissipation will be achieved by adding a displacement-dependent U-shaped damper. For this purpose, the system is applied to a 2D 2-span 3-story frame to which by applying eight different earthquake records, far-field, near-field and mid-field, seismic response are evaluated. The responses are the roof displacement, inter-story drifts, root mean squared of roof displacement and base shear. Result verification is carried out via calibrating characteristics of this damper with an experimental work on a somewhat similar device conducted at the University of Toronto. The results showed that by using this system, the roof maximum displacement decreased 38.9, 40.0 and 37.1% and the maximum base shear decreased 36.5, 28.5 and 39.5% respectively under near-field, mid-field and far-field records, averagely. Similar results were observed in inter-story drifts and roof displacement RMS.

Keywords

Seismic behaviour U-shaped hysteretic damper Energy dissipation Near-field and far-field earthquakes Diagonal brace 

References

  1. ABAQUS/PRE (2012). User’s manual, Hibbit, Karlsson and Sorensen. Version 6.12, Inc.Google Scholar
  2. Aghlara, R., Tahir, M. M., & Adnan, A. (2015). Comparative study of eight metallic yielding dampers. Jurnal Teknologi, 77(16), 119–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bagheri, S., Barghian, M., Saieri, F., & Farzinfar, A. (2015). U-shaped metallic-yielding damper in building structures: Seismic behavior and comparison with a friction damper. Structure, 3, 163–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bayat, M., & Bayat, M. (2014). Seismic behavior of special moment-resisting frames with energy dissipating devices under near source ground motions. Steel and Composite Structures, 16(5), 533–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Calado, L., Proenca, J. M., Espinha, M., & Castiglioni, C. A. (2013). Hysteretic behavior of dissipative welded fuses for earthquake resistant composite steel and concrete frames. Steel and Composite Structures, 14(6), 547–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Deng, K., Pan, P., Su, Y., & Xue, Y. (2015). Shape optimization of U-shaped damper for improving its bi-directional performance under cyclic loading. Engineering Structures, 93, 27–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Di Cesare, A., Ponzo, F. C., Nigro, D., Dolce, M., & Moroni, C. (2012). Experimental and numerical behavior of hysteretic and visco-re-centring energy dissipating bracing systems. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-012-9363-x.Google Scholar
  8. Dolce, M., Filardi, B., Marnetto, R., & Nigro, D. (1996). Experimental tests and applications of a new biaxial elasto-plastic device for the passive control of structures. In B. Atkinson (Ed.), Fourth world congress on joint sealants and bearing systems for concrete structures. Sacramento, CA: ACI SP-164.Google Scholar
  9. Gao, J.Z., & Ye, R.X. (1995). Research on diagonal braces with energy dissipation metal plates. Journal of Chinese Institute of Civil & Hydraulic Engineering, 7(1).Google Scholar
  10. Garivani, S., Aghakouchak, A. A., & Shahbeyk, S. (2016). Numerical and experimental study of comb-teeth metallic yielding dampers. International Journal of Steel Structures, 16(1), 177–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gray, M.G., Christopoulos, C., & Packer, J.A. (2010). Cast steel yielding fuse for concentrically braced frames. In Proceedings of the 9th US National and 10th Canadian Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Toronto, Canada, 25–29 July.Google Scholar
  12. Gray, M.G., Christopoulos, C., & Packer, J.A. (2012a). Full-scale testing of the cast steel yielding brace system. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference STESSA, Santiago, Chile, 9–11 January.Google Scholar
  13. Gray, M. G., Christopoulos, C., & Packer, J. A. (2014). Cast steel yielding brace system (YBS) for concentrically braced frames: concept development and experimental validations. Journal of Structural Engineering, 140(4), 4013095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gray, M.G., Christopoulos, C., Packer, J.A., & Lignos, D.G. (2012b). Development, validation and modeling of the new cast steel yielding brace system. In Proceedings of Structures Congress, ASCE: Chicago, 71–82.Google Scholar
  15. Kelly, J. M., Skinner, R. I., & Heine, A. J. (1972). Mechanisms of energy absorption in special devices for use in earthquake-resistant structures. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 5(3), 63–88.Google Scholar
  16. Krawinkler, H., Gupta, A., Medina, R., & Luco, N. (2000). Loading histories for Seismic performance testing of SMRF components and assemblies. In SAC Joint Venture, Report No. SAC/BD-00/10.Google Scholar
  17. Li, Y. S., Dajing, Q. Y., & Shen, S. K. (2004). Experimental and theoretical research on vibration control of the steel frame structure with mild steel damper. Journal of Building Structures, 4, 1–7.Google Scholar
  18. Martinez-Rueda, J. E. (2002). On the evolution of energy dissipation devices for seismic design. Earthquake Spectra, 18(2), 309–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sahoo, D. R., Singhai, T., Taraithia, S. S., & Saini, A. (2015). Cyclic behavior of shear-and-flexural yielding metallic dampers. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 114(13), 247–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sang, H. O., Sung, H. S., Sang, H. L., & Hyung, J. K. (2012). Seismic response of base isolating systems with U-shaped hysteretic dampers. International Journal of Steel Structures, 125(2), 285–298.Google Scholar
  21. SAP2000. (2008). Integrated structural analysis and design software. Berkeley, CA: Computers and Structures Inc.Google Scholar
  22. Skinner, R. I., Kelly, J. M., & Heine, A. J. (1974). Hysteretic dampers for earthquake-resistant structures. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 3(3), 287–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Tsai, K. C., Chen, H. W., & Hong, C. P. (1993). Design of steel triangular plate energy absorbers for seismic-resistant construction. Earthquake Spectra, 9(3), 505–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Tyler, R. G. (1978). Tapered steel energy dissipators for earthquake resistant structures. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 11(4), 282–294.Google Scholar
  25. Whittaker, A.S., Bertero, V.V., Alonso, L.J., & Thompson, C.L. (1989). Earthquake simulator testing of steel plate added damping and stiffness elements. In Report No. UBC/EERC 89/02; Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
  26. Xing, S. T., & Guo, X. (2003). Research on the mechanical property and vibration control performance of a new type of mild steel damper. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 12, 179–186.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Society of Steel Construction 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center of Excellence for Engineering and Management of Civil Infrastructures, School of Civil EngineeringThe University of TehranTehranIran

Personalised recommendations