Advertisement

International Journal of Steel Structures

, Volume 19, Issue 2, pp 366–380 | Cite as

Experimental Study and Numerical Simulation of G550 High Strength Cold-Formed Steel Z-Section Members Under Pure Bending and Moment Gradient

  • Jin-you ZhaoEmail author
  • Cheng Yu
Article
  • 53 Downloads

Abstract

This paper presents a series of bending tests performed on G550 high strength cold-formed steel Z-section members under pure bending and moment gradient. In tests, failure resulted from distortional buckling or the interaction between local and distortional buckling. The test results indicated that the bending strength for moment gradient is greater than that for pure bending. The increasing magnitude is closely bound up with the member’s buckling modes since moment gradient has a significant effect on distortional buckling but has a minor effect on local buckling. Moreover, finite element analysis was applied to verify the tests and the numerical results agree well with test data according to bending strength and failure modes. Furthermore, the test results were compared with the Direct Strength Method (DSM) formulas stipulated in AISI (2016), and it is found that the DSM provides a good agreement with the bending strength for distortional buckling but provides unconservative predictions for the bending strength for interaction between local and distortional buckling.

Keywords

High strength cold-formed steel flexural members Bending strength Failure mode Pure bending Moment gradient Direct Strength Method (DSM) 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research is financially supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2572017CB01), the Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province (E2015056) and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2015M581411), which are gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. AISI S100: 2016. (2016). North American specifications for the design of cold-formed steel structural members.Google Scholar
  2. AS 1397: 1993. (1993). Steel sheet and strip-Hot-dipped zinc-coated or aluminum/zinc coated.Google Scholar
  3. AS/NZS 4600: 2005. (2005). Cold-formed steel structures, Standards Australia.Google Scholar
  4. ASTM A653: 1997. (1997). Standard specification for steel sheet, zinc-coated (galvanized) or zinc-iron alloy-coated (galvannealed) by the hot-dip process, American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM).Google Scholar
  5. Chi, H., Leroy, G., & David, A. N. (2016). Moment redistribution in cold-formed steel continuous beams. Thin-Walled Structures, 98, 465–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dubina, D., & Ungureany, V. (1998). Effect of imperfections on numerical simulation of instability behavior of cold-formed steel members. Thin-Walled Structures, 40, 239–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. GB/T228: 2002. (2002). Chinese standard for metallic materials-tensile testing at ambient temperature.Google Scholar
  8. Hancock, G. J., & Rogers, C. A. (1998). Design cold-formed steel structures of high strength steel. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 46, 167–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kwon, Y. B., Kim, B. S., & Hancock, G. J. (2009). Compression tests of high strength cold-formed steel channels with buckling interaction. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 65, 278–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Li, Y. Q., Wang, S. K., & Shen, Z. Y. (2010). Experimental study and load-carrying capacity analysis of high-strength cold-formed thin-walled steel channel column under axial compression. Journal of Building Structure, 31(11), 17–25.Google Scholar
  11. Schafer, B. W., & Pekoz, T. (1998). Computational modeling of cold-formed steel: characterizing geometric imperfections and residual stresses. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 47, 193–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Wang, H. M., & Zhang, Y. C. (2009). Experimental and numerical investigation on cold-formed steel C-section flexural members. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 65, 1225–1235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Wang, C. G., Zhang, Z. N., Zhao, D. Q., & Liu, Q. Q. (2016). Compression tests and numerical analysis of web-stiffened channels with complex edge stiffeners. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 116, 29–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Wu, S. J., Yu, W. W. & LaBoube, R. A. (1996). Strength of flexural members using structural Grade 80 of A653 steel (deck panel tests). The Second Progress Report, Missouri University of Science and Technology, USA, May.Google Scholar
  15. Yang, D., & Hancock, G. J. (2004a). Compression tests of cold-reduced high strength steel sections. I: stub columns. Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE, 130(11), 1772–1781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Yang, D., & Hancock, G. J. (2004b). Compression tests of cold-reduced high strength steel sections. II: long columns. Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE, 130(11), 1782–1789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Yang, D., & Hancock, G. J. (2004c). Compression tests of high strength steel channel columns with interaction between local and distortional buckling. Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE, 130(12), 1954–1963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Yu, C., & Schafer, B. W. (2007). Simulation of cold-formed steel beams in local and distortional buckling with application to the direct strength method. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 63, 581–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Society of Steel Construction 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Civil EngineeringNortheast Forestry UniversityHarbinChina
  2. 2.Department of Engineering TechnologyUniversity of North TexasDentonUSA

Personalised recommendations