Pinching in Steel Rack Joints: Numerical Modelling and Effects on Structural Response
- 60 Downloads
The structural behaviour of beam-to-column joints plays a key role in the seismic response of frame structures. Regarding to steel storage pallet racks, experimental tests have highlighted that the hysteresis loop of their joints is characterized by the pinching, with the consequence of a reduction of the dissipated hysteretic energy and load carrying capacity. In this paper the authors propose a simplified numerical pinching model capable to simulate the mechanical response of beam-to-column joints under cyclic loads. To develop and check this model, several comparisons are performed with both literature data and experimental results of laboratory tests. The proposed model is characterised by three links placed in parallel: two “composed links” describe the non-linear bending moment-rotation curve of the joint, and a linear elastic link transfers the axial and shear force from the beam to the column. The model is appropriate for predicting the down-aisle seismic response of rack systems and it can be easily implemented in commercial software packages, commonly used for non-linear seismic vulnerability analyses. Moreover, features of the model can be estimated from a few structural data and it does not require to perform expensive cyclic experimental tests. For a deeper understanding of the effects of pinching in the seismic response and to highlight the potentiality of the proposed model a case-study example is also considered. The case-study concerns a rack system, whose beam-to-column joints are modelled using two numerical approaches which differ in the deterioration of the rotational stiffness of joints. Non-linear dynamic analyses, with simulated ground acceleration time-histories, have been carried.
KeywordsBeam-to-column joints F.E. numerical models Steel rack systems Seismic vulnerability analysis Pinching effects
The authors gratefully acknowledge the Italian Rack Manufacturing Company ROSSS SpA, Scarperia and San Piero, Florence (IT), especially the President Stefano Bettini and Engineer Giovanni Lavacchini, for supporting this research work and kindly supplying specimens and hosting the experimental setup. Moreover, the authors greatly appreciate the skillful work of Mr. S. Giordano, Mr. F. Bruni and Mr. E. Barlacchi of the SMTL of the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering of Florence for their assistance in the experimental work.
- Alath, S., & Kunnath, S. K. (1995). Modeling inelastic shear deformation in RC beam-column joints. In Proceedings of tenth conference on engineering mechanics (pp. 822–825). Boulder: University of Colorado.Google Scholar
- ATC-24. (1992). Guidelines for cyclic seismic testing of components of steel structures for buildings. Report No. ATC-24, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, CA.Google Scholar
- Bernuzzi, C., Chesi, C., & Parisi, M. A. (2004). Seismic behaviour and design of steel storage racks. In 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Vancouver, B.C., Canada 1-6, Paper No. 481.Google Scholar
- Bertocci, L., Comparini, D., Lavacchini, G., Orlando, M., Salvatori, L., & Spinelli. P. (2017). Experimental, numerical, and regulatory P-Mx-My domains for cold-formed perforated steel uprights of pallet-racks. Thin-Walled Structures, 119, 151–165. ISSN:0263-8231.Google Scholar
- Brambilla, G., et al. (2015). Seisracks2: Progetto di ricerca EU-RECCS Reasearch Project, Comportamento sismico di scaffalature metalliche porta pallet. Costruzioni Metalliche.Google Scholar
- Castiglioni, C. A., Kanyilmaz, A., Angeretti, M., Brambilla, G., Chiarelli, G. P., & Bernuzzi, C. (2014). Experimental results of full scale pushover tests of project SEISRACK2 (seismic behaviour of steel storage pallet racking systems). In Proceedings of 2nd European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Istanbul 25–29.Google Scholar
- Dowell, R. K., Seible, F., & Wlson, E. L. (1998). Pivot hysteresis model for reinforced concrete members. ACI Structural Journal, 95, 607–617.Google Scholar
- El-Metwally, S., & Chen, W. F. (1988). Moment–rotation modeling of reinforced concrete beam–column connections. ACI Structural Journal, 85(4), 384–394.Google Scholar
- EN 15512. (2009). Steel static storage systems—Adjustable pallet racking systems—Principles for structural design. CEN European Committee for Standardization; 137.Google Scholar
- EN16681. (2013). Steel static storage systems—Adjustable pallet racking system—Principle for seismic design. CEN European Committee for Standardization.Google Scholar
- EN 1993-1-1, Eurocode 3. (2005). Design of steel structures—Part 1-1: General rules and rules for buildings.Google Scholar
- EN 1993-1-8, Eurocode 3. (2005). Design of steel structures—Part 1-8: Design of joints.Google Scholar
- EN 1998-1-1, Eurocode 8. (2004). Design of structures for earthquake resistance—Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings.Google Scholar
- Faella, C., Piluso, V., & Rizzano, G. (2000). Structural semi-rigid connections—Theory, design and software. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
- FEM 10.2.02. (2001). The design of static steel pallet racks. Federation Europeen de la Manutention, Vers. 1.02.Google Scholar
- FEM 10.2.08. (2011). Recommendations for the design of static steel storage pallet racks in seismic conditions. Federation Européenne de Manutention, Vers. 1.00.Google Scholar
- Gelfi, P. (2012). SIMQKE_GR developed by P. Gelfi. Version 2.7–9th.Google Scholar
- Giordano, S., Gusella, F., Lavacchini, G., Orlando, M., & Spinelli, P. (2017). Experimental tests on beam-end connectors of cold-formed steel storage pallet racks. In Proc. 8th European Conference on Steel and Composite Structures, Eurosteel 2017, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
- Haque, A. B. M. R., & Alam, M. S. (2015). Preliminary investigation on the over-strength and force reduction factors for industrial racks clad buildings. In Proceedings of the 11th Canadian Conference on Earthquake Engineering.Google Scholar
- Kim, J. H., Ghaboussi, J., & Elnashai, A. S. (2010). Hybrid mathematical-informational modeling of beam-to-column connections. Report No. 10-02. Mid-America Eartquake Center, April 2010.Google Scholar
- Krawinkler, H. (2009). Loading histories for cyclic tests in support of performance assessment of structural components. In Proceedings of 3rd international conference on advances in experimental structural engineering, San Francisco.Google Scholar
- McKenna, F., Fenves, G. L., Jeremic, B., & Scott, M. H. (2000). Open system for earthquake engineering simulation. http://opensees.berkely.edu.
- Mitra N. (2012). Pinching4 model (OpenSees User Documetation). http://opensees.berkeley.edu/wiki/index.php/Pinching4_Material.
- Moen, C. D., Tao, F., & Cole, R. (2016). Monotonic and cyclic backbone response of single shear cold-formed steel screw-fastened connections. In Proceedings of the international colloquium on stability and ductility of steel structures, SDSS2016, Timisoara, Romania.Google Scholar
- NTC 2008, Ministero delle Infrastrutture. (2008). DM 14 gennaio 2008. Norme Tecniche per le Costruzioni.Google Scholar
- Orlando, M., Lavacchini, G., Ortolani, B., & Spinelli, P. (2017). Experimental capacity of perforated cold-formed steel open sections under compression and bending. Journal of Steel and Composite Structures, 24, 201–211. ISSN:1229-9367.Google Scholar
- Rosin, I., Calado, L., Proença, J., Carydis, P., Mouzakis, H., Castiglioni, C., et al. (2009). Storage racks in seismic areas. Final report. Research Fund for Coal and Steel, European Commission.Google Scholar
- SAP 2000. (2016). CSI Analysis Reference Manual for SAP 2000. Berkeley, CA: Computers and Structures Inc.Google Scholar
- Saws Model. (OpenSees User Documentation). 2010. http://opensees.berkeley.edu/wiki/index.php/SAWS_Material.
- Shah, S. N. R., Ramli Sulong, N. H., Khan, R., Jumaat, M. Z., & Shariati, M. (2016). Behavior of Industrial Steel Rack Connections. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 70–71, 72–740.Google Scholar
- Ślęczka, L., & Kozłowski, A. (2007). Experimental and theoretical investigations of pallet racks connections. Advanced Steel Construction, 3(2), 607–627.Google Scholar
- Takeda, T., Sozen, M. A., & Nielsen, N. N. (1970). Reinforced concrete response to simulated earthquakes. Journal, Structural Division, ASCE, 96(ST12), 2557–2573.Google Scholar
- Tao, F., Cole, R., & Moen, C. D. (2016). Monotonic and cyclic backbone response of single shear sheathing-to-cold-formed steel screw-fastened connections. In Wei-Wen Yu International Specialty Conference on Cold-Formed Steel Structures 2016—Recent Research and Developments in Cold-Formed Steel Design and Construction, Baltimore, Maryland.Google Scholar