Temperature Effects on Fracture Toughness Parameters for Pipeline Steels
- 75 Downloads
The present article showcases a temperature dependent cohesive zone model (CZM)-based finite element simulation of drop weight tear test (DWTT), to analyse fracture behavior of pipeline steel (PS) at different temperatures. By co-relating the key CZM parameters with known mechanical properties of PS at varying temperature, a temperature dependent CZM for PS is proposed. A modified form of Johnson and Cook model has been used for the true stress–strain behavior of PS. The numerical model, using Abaqus/CAE 6.13, has been validated by comparing the predicted results with load–displacement curves obtained from test data. During steady-state crack propagation, toughness parameters (such as CTOA and CTOD) were found to remain fairly constant at a given temperature. These toughness parameters, however, show an exponential increase with increase in temperature. The present paper offers a plausible approach to numerically analyze fracture behavior of PS at varying temperature using a temperature dependent CZM.
KeywordsDynamic fracture Pipeline steel Temperature effect Cohesive zone model Steady-state crack propagation Finite element
The present research is supported by NSERC (Natural Science and Engineering Research Council) of Canada (CRD program CRDPJ 399497) and TransCanada Pipelines Ltd. The valuable suggestions of YJ Wang, University of Alberta are much appreciated.
- Chanda, S. (2015). temperature effects on dynamic fracture of pipeline steel. M. Sc. Thesis, University of Alberta.Google Scholar
- Chanda, S. & Ru, C. Q. (2015a). Cohesive zone model for temperature dependent fracture analysis of pipeline steel. In Proceedings of 25th Canadian congress on applied mechanics (pp. 1–4). London, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
- Chanda, S. & Ru, C. Q. (2015b). FEA modeling of dynamic fracture of pipeline steel at low temperatures. In 9th European solid mechanics conference. Leganés-Madrid, Spain.Google Scholar
- Coseru, A., Capelle, J., & Pluvinage, G. (2013). On the use of Charpy transition temperature as reference temperature for the choice of a pipe steel. In 5th international conference on computational mechanics and virtual engineering (pp. 1–10). Brasov, Romania.Google Scholar
- Ebrahimi, F., & Seo, H. K. (1996). Ductile crack initiation. Acta Metallurgica, 44(2), 831–843.Google Scholar
- Lam, P.-S., Kim, Y., & Chao, Y. J. (2005). Crack tip openinig displacement and angle for a growing crack in carbon steel. In ASME pressure vessels and piping division conference (pp. 1–8). Denver, Colorado, USA.Google Scholar
- Park, K., & Paulino, G. H. (2013). Cohesive zone models : A critical review of traction-separation relationships across fracture surfaces. Applied Mechanics Reviews, 64(2011), 20.Google Scholar
- Shim, D. J., Wilkowski, G., Duan, D. M., & Zhou, J. (2010). Effect of fracture speed on ductile fracture resistance—part 1: Experimental. In Proceedings of the 8th international pipeline conferencence. Calgary, Alberta, Canada.Google Scholar
- Wang, X., Roy, G., Xu, S., & Tyson, W. R. (2007). Numerical simulation of ductile crack growth in pipeline steels. In ASME pressure vessels and piping division (pp. 1–7). San Antonio, Texas, USA.Google Scholar
- Wang, Y. J. & Ru, C. Q. (2015). Determination of cohesive zone model’s parameters based on the uniaxial stress–strain curve. In Proceedings of the XIII international conference on mathematics and computational mechanics. Barcelona, Spain.Google Scholar