International Journal of Steel Structures

, Volume 18, Issue 5, pp 1666–1683 | Cite as

Seismic Behavior Investigation on Blind Bolted CFST Frames with Precast SCWPs

  • Jingfeng WangEmail author
  • Qihan Shen
  • Beibei Li


To explore seismic behavior of blind bolted concrete-filled steel tube (CFST) frames infilled with precast sandwich composite wall panels (SCWPs), a series tests of blind bolted square CFST frames with precast SCWPs under lateral low-cyclic loading were conducted. The influence of the type of wall concrete, wall-to-frame connection and steel brace setting, etc. on the hysteretic curves and failure modes of the type of composite structure was investigated. The seismic behavior of the blind bolted CFST frames with precast SCWPs was evaluated in terms of lateral load–displacement relation curves, strength and stiffness degradation, crack patterns of SCWPs, energy dissipation capacity and ductility. Then, a finite element (FE) analysis modeling using ABAQUS software was developed in considering the nonlinear material properties and complex components interaction. Comparison indicated that the FE analytical results coincided well with the test results. Both the experimental and numerical results indicated that setting the external precast SCWPs could heighten the load carrying capacities and rigidities of the blind bolted CFST frames by using reasonable connectors between frame and SCWPs. These experimental studies and FE analysis would enable improvement in the practical design of the SCWPs in fabricated CFST structure buildings.


CFST frame Seismic behavior Sandwich composite wall panels (SCWPs) Blind bolt Finite element (FE) analysis 



This work described in paper is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Projects 51478158 and 51178156) and the New Century Excellent Talents in University (Project NCET-12-0838) which is greatly appreciated. The authors would also like to acknowledge the assistance of Dr. Jiaxin Wang and Xuebei Pan of Hefei University of Technology.


  1. Abdel-Rahman, N., & Sivakumaran, K. S. (1997). Material properties models for analysis of cold-formed steel members. Journal of Structural Engineering, 123(9), 1135–1143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agheshlui, H., Goldsworthy, H., Gad, E., & Fernando, S. (2016a). Tensile behaviour of anchored blind bolts in concrete filled square hollow sections. Materials and Structures, 49(4), 1511–1525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Agheshlui, H., Goldsworthy, H., Gad, E., & Huang, Y. (2016b). Tensile behavior of groups of anchored blind bolts within concrete-filled steel square hollow section. Journal of Structural Engineering, 142(2), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. ATC63. (2009). Quantification of building seismic performance factors. Washington: Applied Technology Council (ATC), Federal Emergency Management Agency.Google Scholar
  5. Benayoune, A., Samad, A. A. A., Abang, A. A. A., & Trikha, D. N. (2007a). Response of pre-cast reinforced composite sandwich panels to axial loading. Construction and Building Materials, 21(3), 677–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Benayoune, A., Samad, A. A. A., Abang, A. A. A., Trikha, D. N., & Ashrabov, A. A. (2007b). Structural behaviour of eccentrically loaded precast sandwich panels. Construction and Building Materials, 20(9), 713–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bush, T. D., & Stine, G. L. (1994). Flexural behaviour of composite precast concrete sandwich panels with continuous truss connectors. PCI Journal., 39(2), 112–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Einea, A., Salmon, D. C., Tadros, M. K., & Culp, T. (1994). A new structurally and thermally efficient precast sandwich panel system. PCI Journal, 39(4), 90–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fang, M. J., Wang, J. F., & Li, G. Q. (2013). Shaking table test of steel frame with ALC external wall panels. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 80(1), 278–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. GB50010-2010. (2010). Code for design of concrete structures. Beijing: Architecture Industrial Press of China. (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  11. GB50011-2010. (2010). Code for seismic design of buildings. Beijing: Architecture Industrial Press of China. (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  12. GB50017-2010. (2010). Code for design of steel structures. Beijing: China Plan Press. (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  13. Han, L. H., He, S. H., & Liao, F. Y. (2011). Performance and calculations of concrete filled steel tubes (CFST) under axial tension. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 67(11), 1699–1709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Han, L. H., Yao, G. H., & Zhao, X. L. (2005). Tests and calculations of hollow structural steel (HSS) stub columns filled with self-consolidating concrete (SCC). Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 61(9), 1241–1269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hanaor, A. (2005). Experimental investigation of composite shear panels under cyclic loading. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 61(3), 345–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hou, H. T., Chou, C. C., Zhou, J., et al. (2016). Cyclic test of steel frames with composite lightweight infill walls. Earthquakes and Structures, 10(1), 163–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Huang, Y., Goldsworthy, H., & Gad, E. (2008). Experimental and numerical investigation of the tensile behavior of blind-bolted T-Stub connections to concrete-filled circular columns. Journal of Structural Engineering, 134(2), 198–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. JGJ101-2015. (2015). Specification for seismic test of buildings. Beijing: Architecture Industrial Press of China. (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  19. Markulak, D., Radić, I., & Sigmund, V. (2013). Cyclic testing of single bay steel frames with various types of masonry infill. Engineering Structures, 51(2), 267–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Memaria, A. M., Aghakcuchakb, A. A., Ashtianyc, M. G., & Tiv, M. (1999). Full-scale dynamic testing of a steel frame building during construction. Engineering Structures, 21(12), 1115–1127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mirza, O., & Uy, B. (2011). Behavior of composite beam–column flush end-plate connections subjected to low-probability, high-consequence loading. Engineering Structures, 33(2), 647–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Moghadam, H. A. (2004). Lateral load behavior of masonry infilled steel frames with repair and retrofit. Journal of Structural Engineering, 130(1), 55–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Moghadam, H. A., Mohammadi, M. G., & Ghaemian, M. (2006). Experimental and analytical investigation into crack strength determination of infilled steel frames. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 62(12), 1341–1352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Moon, J., Roeder, C. W., Lehman, D. E., & Lee, H. E. (2012). Analytical modeling of bending of circular concrete-filled steel tubes. Engineering Structures, 42(12), 349–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pagoulatou, M., Sheehan, T., Dai, X. H., & Lam, D. (2014). Finite element analysis on the capacity of circular concrete-filled double-skin steel tubular (CFDST) stub columns. Engineering Structures, 72, 102–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sun, G. H., He, R. Q., Gu, Q., & Fang, Y. Z. (2011). Cyclic behavior of partially-restrained steel frame with RC infill walls. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 67(12), 1821–1834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tasnimi, A. A., & Mohebkhah, A. (2011). Investigation on the behavior of brick-infilled steel frames with openings: Experimental and analytical approaches. Engineering Structures, 33(3), 968–980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tong, X. D., Hajjar, J. F., Schultz, A. E., & Shield, C. K. (2005). Cyclic behavior of steel frame structures with composite reinforced concrete infill walls and partially-restrained connections. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 61(1), 531–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wang, B., Wang, J. F., Gong, X. D., & Liu, B. K. (2015). Experimental studies on circular CFST frames with ALC walls under cyclic loadings. International Journal of Steel Structures, 14(4), 755–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wang, J. F., Han, L. H., & Uy, B. (2009). Hysteretic behaviour of flush end plate joints to concrete-filled steel tubular columns. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 65(8–9), 1644–1663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wang, J. F., & Li, B. B. (2017). Cyclic testing of square CFST frames with ALC panel or brick walls. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 130, 264–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wang, J. F., & Zhang, H. J. (2017). Seismic performance assessment of blind bolted steel-concrete composite joints based on pseudo-dynamic testing. Engineering Structures, 131, 192–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wang, J. F., & Zhang, N. (2016). Performance of circular CFST column to steel beam joints with blind bolts. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 130, 36–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wang, J. F., Zhang, N., & Guo, S. P. (2016). Experimental and numerical analysis of blind bolted moment joints to CFTST columns. Thin-Walled Structures, 109, 185–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zahrai, S. M., Khalili, B. G., & Mousavi, S. A. (2015). Seismic behavior of steel frames with lightweight-low strength industrialized infill walls. Earthquakes and Structures, 9(6), 1273–1290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Society of Steel Construction 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Civil EngineeringHefei University of TechnologyHefeiChina
  2. 2.Anhui Civil Engineering Structures and Materials LaboratoryHefeiChina

Personalised recommendations