Simplified Estimation Method for Collective Uncertainty-Propagations of Hysteretic Energy Dissipating Device’s Properties
- 66 Downloads
Hysteretic energy dissipating devices (HEDDs) have been increasingly applied to building construction to improve the seismic performance. The seismic responses of such damped structures are significantly affected by HEDD’s structural properties. An accurate investigation on the propagation of HEDD’s structural properties is required for reasonable evaluation of the seismic performance of a structure. This study aims to develop simplified methods that can estimate the collective uncertainty-propagation to the seismic response of damped structures employing HEDDs. To achieve this, three- and six-story steel moment-resisting frames were selected and the propagations of the individual HEDD’s property-uncertainties were evaluated when they are subjected to various levels of seismic demand. Based on the result of individual uncertainty-propagations, a simplified method is proposed to evaluate the variation of seismic response collectively propagated by HEDD’s property-uncertainties and is verified by comparing with the exact collective uncertainty-propagation calculated using the Monte Carlo simulation method. The proposed method, called as a modified SRSS method in this study, is established from a conventional square root of the sum of the squares (SRSS) method with the relative contributions of the individual HEDD’s property-uncertainty propagations. This study shows that the modified SRSS method provides a better estimation than the conventional SRSS method and can significantly reduce computational time with reasonable accuracy compared with the Monte Carlo simulation method.
KeywordsHysteretic energy dissipating devices Collective uncertainty-propagation Relative contribution Modified SRSS method Monte Carlo simulation
This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) Grant funded by the Korea Government (MSIP) (No. NRF-2016R1A2B4011900).
- ASCE/SEI 7. (2010). Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. Blacksburg, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers.Google Scholar
- Carr, A. J. (2009). User’s manual of RUAUMOKO, the Maori god of Volcanoes and earthquakes. Christchurch: Department of Civil Engineering, University of Canterbury.Google Scholar
- Christopoulo, C., & Filiatrault, A. (2007). Principles of passive supplemental damping and seismic isolation. Pavia: IUSS Press.Google Scholar
- Cornell, C. A. (1968). Engineering seismic risk analysis. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 58(5), 1583–1606.Google Scholar
- FEMA 356. (2000). Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. Washington, DC: Federal Emergency Management Agency.Google Scholar
- FEMA-P695. (2009). Quantification of building seismic performance factors. Washington, DC: Federal Emergency Management Agency.Google Scholar
- Lee, T. H., & Mosalam, K. M. (2006) Probabilistic seismic evaluation of reinforced concrete structural components and systems. PEER technical report, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
- Mohamed, N. E., & Kim, J. K. (2013). Sensitivity analysis of pile-founded fixed steel jacket platforms subjected to seismic loads. Ocean Engineering, 85, 1–11.Google Scholar
- Ramirez, O. M., Constantinou, M. C., Kircher, C. A., Whittaker, A. S., Johnson, M. W, Gomez, J. D., & Chrysostomou, C. Z. (2001). Development and evaluation of simplified procedures for analysis and design of buildings with passive energy dissipation systems. Report No. MCEER 00-0010. Revision 1. Buffalo, NY: Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, University at Buffalo, State University of New York.Google Scholar
- Rosenblueth, E. (1951) A basis for a seismic design, Ph.D. thesis. University of Illinois Urbana, Illinois.Google Scholar
- Surana, M., Singh, Y., & Lang, D. H. (2018). Seismic characterization and vulnerability of building stock in Hilly Regions. Natural Hazards Review (ASCE), 19(1), 04017024 1-16.Google Scholar
- US Geological Survey Hazard Curve Application, https://earthquake.usgs.gov/hazards/interactive/. Accessed January 2018.
- Vamvatsikos, D., & Fragiadakis, M. (2010). Incremental dynamic analysis for estimating seismic performance sensitivity and uncertainty. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 39(2), 141–163.Google Scholar
- Whittaker, A. S., Bertero, V. V., Alonso, L. J., & Thompson, C. L. (1989) Earthquake simulator testing of steel plate added damping and stiffness elements. Report UCB/EERC-89/02. Engineering Research Center, University of California at Berkeley.Google Scholar