Advertisement

Ambio

pp 1–18 | Cite as

Exploring greenhouse gas mitigation strategies for agriculture in Africa: The case of Nigeria

  • Michael O. DiohaEmail author
  • Atul Kumar
Research Article

Abstract

We used the Agriculture and Land Use National Greenhouse Gas Inventory Software to estimate the total greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the Nigerian agriculture sector in 2010. We went ahead to project future GHG emissions up to 2050. Two alternative GHG mitigation scenarios such as moderate (MS) and aggressive (AS) scenarios were developed and examined. Our results showed that total GHG emissions from Nigerian agriculture in 2010 were around 34.9 million tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent. GHG emissions from livestock accounted for about 69.2 % of the total emissions, making it the largest source of GHG emissions in the sector. Nigeria’s agriculture GHG emissions are expected to increase by 94 % in 2050 relative to 2010 levels. Mitigation strategies in the Nigerian agriculture sector that do not compromise food security are limited. However, with the implementation of different GHG mitigation strategies in the alternative scenarios, emissions are expected to fall by around 13.2 % and 26.7 % by 2050 in the MS and AS, respectively, compared to the baseline scenario. While the mitigation potentials are significant, we argue that robust and dedicated policies are required to accelerate climate-smart agriculture in Nigeria.

Keywords

ALU software program Enteric fermentation Greenhouse gas IPCC Livestock Nigeria 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge Dr. Stephen Ogle of Colorado State University, USA for granting the license to use the ALU software program.

Supplementary material

13280_2019_1293_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (205 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 206 kb)

References

  1. Ajala, A.S., and A. Gana. 2015. Analysis of challenges facing rice processing in Nigeria. Journal of Food Processing 2015: 1–6.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/893673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ali, M.A., M.A. Hoque, and P.J. Kim. 2013. Mitigating global warming potentials of methane and nitrous oxide gases from rice paddies under different irrigation regimes. Ambio 42: 357–368.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-012-0349-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arai, H., Y. Hosen, V.N. Pham Hong, N.T. Thi, C.N. Huu, and K. Inubushi. 2015. Greenhouse gas emissions from rice straw burning and straw-mushroom cultivation in a triple rice cropping system in the Mekong Delta. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 61: 719–735.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00380768.2015.1041862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aruya, E.I., R.O. Yusuf, and Y.O. Yusuf. 2016. An assessment of crop residue characteristics and factors militating against efficient management in the Ikara local government area of Kaduna state, Nigeria. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment.  https://doi.org/10.2495/WM160301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Atteh, J.P. 1990. Rural poultry production in western middle belt region of Nigeria. In Rural poultry in Africa. Proceedings of an International Workshop held at the Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife. 13–16 November, 1989, ed. E.B. Sonaiya. Ile-Ife: Thelia Publishers.Google Scholar
  6. Beauchemin, K.A., and S.M. McGinn. 2005. Methane emissions from feedlot cattle fed barley or corn diets1. Journal of Animal Science 83: 653–661.  https://doi.org/10.2527/2005.833653x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beauchemin, K.A., M. Kreuzer, F. O’mara, and T.A. McAllister. 2008. Nutritional management for enteric methane abatement: A review. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48: 21–27.  https://doi.org/10.1071/EA07199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bertora, C., F. Alluvione, L. Zavattaro, J.W. van Groenigen, G. Velthof, and C. Grignani. 2008. Pig slurry treatment modifies slurry composition, N2O, and CO2 emissions after soil incorporation. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 40: 1999–2006.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SOILBIO.2008.03.021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bhatia, A., P.K. Aggarwal, N. Jain, and H. Pathak. 2012. Greenhouse gas emission from rice- and wheat-growing areas in India: spatial analysis and upscaling. Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology 2: 115–125.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ghg.1272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Biswas, B., and P.M. Gresshoff. 2014. The role of symbiotic nitrogen fixation in sustainable production of biofuels. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 15: 7380–7397.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms15057380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bustamante, M.M.C., C.A. Nobre, R. Smeraldi, A.P.D. Aguiar, L.G. Barioni, L.G. Ferreira, K. Longo, P. May, et al. 2012. Estimating greenhouse gas emissions from cattle raising in Brazil. Climatic Change 115: 559–577.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-012-0443-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cassman, K.G., A.R. Dobermann, and D.T. Walters. 2002. Agroecosystems, nitrogen-use efficiency, and nitrogen management. Ambio 31: 132–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Castesana, P.S., L.E. Dawidowski, L. Finster, D.R. Gómez, and M.A. Taboada. 2018. Ammonia emissions from the agriculture sector in Argentina; 2000–2012. Atmospheric Environment 178: 293–304.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ATMOSENV.2018.02.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. CBN. 2017. Central Bank of Nigeria Annual Reports. Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN), Abuja https://www.cbn.gov.ng/documents/annualreports.asp.
  15. Cervigni, R., J. A. Rogers, and I. Dvorak. 2013. Assessing low-carbon development in Nigeria: An analysis of four Sectors. In ed. R. Cervigni, I. Dvorak, and J.A. Rogers. Washington, DC: The World Bank.  https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-9973-6.Google Scholar
  16. Chantigny, M.H., D.A. Angers, P. Rochette, G. Bélanger, D. Massé, and D. Côté. 2007. Gaseous nitrogen emissions and forage nitrogen uptake on soils fertilized with raw and treated swine manure. Journal of Environment Quality 36: 1864.  https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2007.0083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chiles, R.M., E.E. Fabian, D. Tobin, S.J. Colby, and S.M. DePue. 2018. Greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture: Reconciling the epistemological, ethical, political, and practical challenges. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 31: 341–348.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-018-9728-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chiodi, A., T. Donnellan, J. Breen, P. Deane, K. Hanrahan, M. Gargiulo, and B.P.Ó. Gallachóir. 2016. Integrating agriculture and energy to assess GHG emissions reduction: A methodological approach. Climate Policy 16: 215–236.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2014.993579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Clay, N., T. Garnett, and J. Lorimer. 2019. Dairy intensification: Drivers, impacts and alternatives. Ambio.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-019-01177-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Colomb, V., O. Touchemoulin, L. Bockel, J.-L. Chotte, S. Martin, M. Tinlot, and M. Bernoux. 2013. Selection of appropriate calculators for landscape-scale greenhouse gas assessment for agriculture and forestry. Environmental Research Letters 8: 015029.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/1/015029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. de Urzedo, D.I., M.P. Franco, L.M. Pitombo, and J.B. do Carmo. 2013. Effects of organic and inorganic fertilizers on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in tropical forestry. Forest Ecology and Management 310: 37–44.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FORECO.2013.08.018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Denef, K., K. Paustian, S. Archibeque, S. Biggar, and D. Pape. 2012. Report of Greenhouse Gas Accounting Tools for Agriculture and Forestry Sectors (Interim Report to USDA under Contract No. GS23F8182H 140).Google Scholar
  23. FAO. 2015. Estimating Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Agriculture: A Manual to Address Data Requirements for Developing Countries. http://www.fao.org/3/a-i4260e.pdf.
  24. FGN. 2014. Nigeria’s Second National Communication under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.Google Scholar
  25. Forabosco, F., Z. Chitchyan, and R. Mantovani. 2017. Methane, nitrous oxide emissions and mitigation strategies for livestock in developing countries: A review. South African Journal of Animal Science 47: 268.  https://doi.org/10.4314/sajas.v47i3.3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Garg, M.R., B.T. Phondba, P.L. Sherasia, and H.P.S. Makkar. 2016. Carbon footprint of milk production under smallholder dairying in Anand district of Western India: A cradle-to-farm gate life cycle assessment. Animal Production Science 56: 423.  https://doi.org/10.1071/AN15464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Habib, G., and A.A. Khan. 2018. Assessment and mitigation of methane emissions from livestock sector in Pakistan. Earth Systems and Environment 2: 601–608.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s41748-018-0076-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Henry, B., and R. Eckard. 2009. Greenhouse gas emissions in livestock production systems. Tropical Grasslands 43: 232–238.Google Scholar
  29. IEA. 2016. CO 2emissions from fuel combustion. OECD/IEA. Paris: OECD Publishing.  https://doi.org/10.1787/co2_fuel-2016-en.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. IEA. 2017. World Energy Outlook 2017. Special report: Energy access outlook. Paris: International Energy Agency (IEA) and the Organisation of Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD).Google Scholar
  31. IPCC. 1997. Greenhouse gas inventory reporting instructions. Revised 1996 IPCC guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Bracknell: UNEP, WMO, OECD and IEA.Google Scholar
  32. IPCC. 2000. Good practice guidance and uncertainty management in national greenhouse gas inventories. In ed. J. Penman et al. IPCC National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme, Technical Support Unit. Hayama, Japan.Google Scholar
  33. IPCC. 2006. 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Prepared by the National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme, IGES. ed. K. Tanabe H.S. Eggleston, L. Buendia, K. Miwa, T. Ngara. Japan.Google Scholar
  34. IPCC. 2014. Annex II: Glossary [Mach, K.J., S. Planton and C. von Stechow (eds.)]. In: Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Core Writing Te. In, 117–130. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland: IPCC.Google Scholar
  35. Islam, S.F., J.W. van Groenigen, L.S. Jensen, B.O. Sander, and A. de Neergaard. 2018. The effective mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions from rice paddies without compromising yield by early-season drainage. Science of the Total Environment 612: 1329–1339.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2017.09.022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Jain, N., A. Bhatia, and H. Pathak. 2014. Emission of air pollutants from crop residue burning in India. Aerosol and Air Quality Research 14: 422–430.  https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2013.01.0031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Jekayinfa, S.O., and O.S. Omisakin. 2005. The energy potentials of some agricultural wastes as local fuel materials in Nigeria. Agricultural Engineering International: the CIGR Ejournal 7: 1–10.Google Scholar
  38. Kalu, E. 2015. Poultry litter/manure management practices in intensively managed poultry farms in portharcourt. IOSR Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Science Ver II 8: 53–58.  https://doi.org/10.9790/2380-08325358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Koneswaran, G., and D. Nierenberg. 2008. Global farm animal production and global warming: Impacting and mitigating climate change. Environmental Health Perspectives 116: 578–582.  https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.11034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kumari, S., R.P. Dahiya, N. Kumari, and I. Sharawat. 2014. Estimation of methane emission from livestock through enteric fermentation using system dynamic model in India. International Journal of Environmental Research and Development 4: 2249–3131.Google Scholar
  41. Kundermann, B. 2014. Potentials for greenhouse gas mitigation in agriculture: Review of research findings, options for mitigation and recommendations for development cooperation. Bonn: GIZ.Google Scholar
  42. Kusin, F.M., N.I.M. Akhir, F. Mohamat-Yusuff, and M. Awang. 2015. The impact of nitrogen fertilizer use on greenhouse gas emissions in an oil palm plantation associated with land use change. Atmósfera 28: 243–250.  https://doi.org/10.20937/atm.2015.28.04.03.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lampayan, R.M., R.M. Rejesus, G.R. Singleton, and B.A.M. Bouman. 2015. Adoption and economics of alternate wetting and drying water management for irrigated lowland rice. Field Crops Research 170: 95–108.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2014.10.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Liu, H., J. Li, X. Li, Y. Zheng, S. Feng, and G. Jiang. 2015. Mitigating greenhouse gas emissions through replacement of chemical fertilizer with organic manure in a temperate farmland. Science Bulletin 60: 598–606.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-014-0679-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mamman, M., and J.O. Folorunsho. 2016. Assessment of open burning of agricultural waste in biu local government area of Borno State, Nigeria. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal.  https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.36.1801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Millar, N., J. E. Doll, and G. P. Robertson. 2014. Management of Nitrogen Fertiliser to Reduce N2O Emissions from Field Crops. Climate Change and Agriculture Fact Sheet SeriesMSU Extension Bulletin E3152 November 2014.Google Scholar
  47. Murali, S., R. Shrivastava, and M. Saxena. 2010. Green house gas emissions from open field burning of agricultural residues in India. Journal of Environmental Science & Engineering 52: 277–284.Google Scholar
  48. NBS. 2016. Post GDP Rebasing Revision 19812010. National Bureau of Statistics (NBS), Abuja.Google Scholar
  49. NBS. 2017. Annual Abstract of Statistics 2016. Vol. 1. National Bureau of Statistics (NBS), Abuja.Google Scholar
  50. NPC. 2017. Censuses. Nigeria Population Commission (NPC), Abuja.Google Scholar
  51. Nunes, F.A., M. Seferin, V.G. Maciel, S.H. Flôres, and M.A.Z. Ayub. 2016. Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions from rice production systems in Brazil: A comparison between minimal tillage and organic farming. Journal of Cleaner Production 139: 799–809.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2016.08.106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ogle, S. M., S. Spencer, M. Hartman, L. Buendia, L. Stevens, L. du Toit, J. Witi, S. Del Grosso, et al. 2016. Developing National Baseline GHG Emissions and Analyzing Mitigation Potentials for Agriculture and Forestry Using an Advanced National GHG Inventory Software System. In Synthesis and modeling of greenhouse gas emissions and carbon storage in agricultural and forest systems to guide mitigation and adaptation, advancesinagric: pp. 129–148. American Society of Agronomy, Inc., Crop Science Society of America, Inc., and Soil Science Society of America, Inc.  https://doi.org/10.2134/advagricsystmodel6.2013.0009.Google Scholar
  53. Ogundiran, M.B., E.F. Ademola, and S.A. Adejumo. 2015. Poultry litter management in Lagos and effects of its soil application on the growth of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus). African Journal of Plant Science 9: 427–438.  https://doi.org/10.5897/AJPS2015.1325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Olusoji, A.J., and O.C. Sunday. 2016. Livestock waste management practices in Oyo state, Nigeria. Journal of Environment and Waste Management 3: 139–141.Google Scholar
  55. Onweremadu, E.U., C.C. Asiabaka, C.P. Anyanwu, G.A. Anyanwu, E.B. Etuk, and B.O. Esonu. 2007. Survey of animal manure production, management, use and effect on a degraded Kandiudult. International Journal of Agricultural Research 2: 929–936.  https://doi.org/10.3923/ijar.2007.929.936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rejesus, R.M., F.G. Palis, D.G.P. Rodriguez, R.M. Lampayan, and B.A.M. Bouman. 2011. Impact of the alternate wetting and drying (AWD) water-saving irrigation technique: Evidence from rice producers in the Philippines. Food Policy 36: 280–288.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2010.11.026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sejian, V., R.S. Prasadh, A.M. Lees, J.C. Lees, Y.A.S. Al-Hosni, M.L. Sullivan, and J.B. Gaughan. 2018. Assessment of the carbon footprint of four commercial dairy production systems in Australia using an integrated farm system model. Carbon Management 9: 57–70.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2017.1418595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Senbayram, M., C. Wenthe, A. Lingner, J. Isselstein, H. Steinmann, C. Kaya, and S. Köbke. 2016. Legume-based mixed intercropping systems may lower agricultural born N2O emissions. Energy, Sustainability and Society 6: 1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-015-0067-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sertoğlu, K., S. Ugural, and F.V. Bekun. 2017. The contribution of agricultural sector on economic growth of Nigeria. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues 7: 547–552.Google Scholar
  60. Setyanto, P., A. Pramono, T.A. Adriany, H.L. Susilawati, T. Tokida, A.T. Padre, and K. Minamikawa. 2018. Alternate wetting and drying reduces methane emission from a rice paddy in Central Java, Indonesia without yield loss. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 64: 23–30.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00380768.2017.1409600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Signor, D., C.E.P. Cerri, and R. Conant. 2013. N2O emissions due to nitrogen fertilizer applications in two regions of sugarcane cultivation in Brazil. Environmental Research Letters 8: 015013.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/1/015013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Smith, P., M. Bustamante, H. Ahammad, H. Clark, H. Dong, E. A. Elsiddig, H. Haberl, R. Harper, et al. 2014. Chapter 11 - Agriculture, forestry and other land use (AFOLU). In Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. IPCC Working Group III Contribution to AR5. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  63. Tabbal, D.F., B.A.M. Bouman, S.I. Bhuiyan, E.B. Sibayan, and M.A. Sattar. 2002. On-farm strategies for reducing water input in irrigated rice; case studies in the Philippines. Agricultural Water Management 56: 93–112.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3774(02)00007-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Tirado, R., S.R. Gopikrishna, R. Krishnan, and P. Smith. 2010. Greenhouse gas emissions and mitigation potential from fertilizer manufacture and application in India. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 8: 176–185.  https://doi.org/10.3763/ijas.2009.0422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Tongwane, M., M. Moeletsi, V. Mliswa, T. Mdlambuzi, M. Tsubo, and L. Grootboom. 2016. Greenhouse gas emissions from different crop production and management practices in South Africa. Environmental Development 19: 23–35.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2016.06.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Vallejo, A., U.M. Skiba, L. García-Torres, A. Arce, S. López-Fernández, and L. Sánchez-Martín. 2006. Nitrogen oxides emission from soils bearing a potato crop as influenced by fertilization with treated pig slurries and composts. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 38: 2782–2793.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SOILBIO.2006.04.040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Zhang, B., H. Tian, W. Ren, B. Tao, C. Lu, J. Yang, K. Banger, and S. Pan. 2016. Methane emissions from global rice fields: Magnitude, spatiotemporal patterns, and environmental controls. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 30: 1246–1263.  https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GB005381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Zheng, H., H. Huang, L. Yao, J. Liu, H. He, and J. Tang. 2014. Impacts of rice varieties and management on yield-scaled greenhouse gas emissions from rice fields in China: A meta-analysis. Biogeosciences 11: 3685–3693.  https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-3685-2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Energy & EnvironmentTERI School of Advanced StudiesNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations