Advertisement

Ambio

pp 1–9 | Cite as

A framework for evaluating biodiversity mitigation metrics

  • Kevin Bracy KnightEmail author
  • Emily S. Seddon
  • Theodore P. Toombs
Perspective
  • 21 Downloads

Abstract

Biodiversity mitigation is a cornerstone of applied conservation. Mitigation encompasses a suite of practices, ranging from planned avoidance of impacts to creation of new natural habitats. Accurate and appropriate metrics quantifying impacts to natural systems and the effectiveness of restoration are necessary to measure the success of different mitigation strategies. Because effective mitigation requires adequate metrics, we developed a Biodiversity Metrics Framework to assist practitioners and policy makers in assessing biodiversity mitigation metrics. Based on Noss’ Hierarchy of Biodiversity, the Scorecard highlights the mismatch between scientifically defined best practices and metrics required by policy. The Framework may serve a vital role in standardizing and validating mitigation projects into the future.

Keywords

Biodiversity metrics Biodiversity offsets Conservation Design Mitigation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported, in part, by the Marie-Jose and Henry R Kravis Foundation. We thank Joseph Bull, Eric Anderson, David Wolfe, and Scott Chiavacci for feedback on biodiversity metrics and the thoughtful reviewers for feedback on manuscript drafts.

Supplementary material

13280_2019_1266_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (720 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 721 kb)

References

  1. Alvarado-Quesada, I., L. Hein, and H.P. Weikard. 2014. Market-based mechanisms for biodiversity conservation: A review of existing schemes and an outline for a global mechanism. Biodiversity and Conservation.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-013-0598-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arlidge, W.N.S.S., J.W. Bull, P.F.E.E. Addison, M.J. Burgass, D. Gianuca, T.M. Gorham, C.D.S.C. Jacob, N. Shumway, et al. 2018. A global mitigation hierarchy for nature conservation. BioScience.  https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biy029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barnosky, A.D., N. Matzke, S. Tomiya, G.O.U. Wogan, B. Swartz, T.B. Quental, C. Marshall, J.L. McGuire, et al. 2011. Has the Earth’s sixth mass extinction already arrived? Nature 471: 51–57.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. BBOP & UNEP. 2015. A cross-sector guide for implementing the Mitigation Hierarchy: Executive summary and overview.Google Scholar
  5. BenDor, T. 2009. A dynamic analysis of the wetland mitigation process and its effects on no net loss policy. Landscape and Urban Planning 89: 17–27.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.09.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bezombes, L., C. Kerbiriou, and T. Spiegelberger. 2019. Do biodiversity offsets achieve no net loss? An evaluation of offsets in a french department. Biological Conservation 231: 24–29.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.01.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bidaud, C., M. Hrabanski, and P. Meral. 2015. Voluntary biodiversity offset strategies in Madagascar. Ecosystem Services 15: 181–189.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.02.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Van Bochove, J.-W., R. Mitchell, J. Pilgrim, L. Bennun, and J. Ekstrom. 2016. Integrating IFC’s Performance Standard 6 into impact assessment. Vol. 6.Google Scholar
  9. Brown, S.C., and P.L.M. Veneman. 2001. Effectiveness of compensatory wetland mitigation in Massachusetts, USA. Wetlands 21: 508–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brownlie, S., N. King, and J. Treweek. 2013. Biodiversity tradeoffs and offsets in impact assessment and decision making: can we stop the loss? Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 31: 24–33.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2012.736763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bull, J.W., K.B. Suttle, A. Gordon, N.J. Singh, and E.J. Milner-Gulland. 2013. Biodiversity offsets in theory and practice. Oryx 47: 369–380.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S003060531200172X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bull, J.W., S.P. Lloyd, and N. Strange. 2017. Implementation gap between the theory and practice of biodiversity offset multipliers. Conservation Letters 00: 1–14.  https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Business and Biodiversity Offsets Programme (BBOP). 2012. Biodiversity Offset Design Handbook—updated: 112.Google Scholar
  14. Cadenasso, M., S.T.A. Pickett, and M. Grove. 2006. Dimensions of ecosystem complexity: Heterogeneity, connectivity, and history. Ecological Complexity 3: 1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2005.07.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gamarra, M.J.C., and T.P. Toombs. 2017. Thirty years of species conservation banking in the U.S.: comparing policy to practice. Biological Conservation 214: 6–12.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2017.07.021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gamarra, C., J. Maria, J.P. Lassoie, J.C. Milder, M.J.C. Gamarra, J.P. Lassoie, and J.C. Milder. 2018. Accounting for no net loss: A critical assessment of biodiversity offsetting metrics and methods. Journal of Environmental Management 220: 36–43.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.05.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ceballos, G., P.R. Ehrlich, A.D. Barnosky, A. García, R.M. Pringle, and T.M. Palmer. 2015. Accelerated modern human—Induced species losses: entering the sixth mass extinction. Sciences Advances 1: 1–5.  https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1400253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Curran, M., S. Hellweg, and J. Beck. 2015. The jury is still out on biodiversity offsets: Reply to Quétier et al. Ecological Applications 25: 1741–1746.  https://doi.org/10.1890/14-2363.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dietz, J. M., A. J. Baker, and J. D. Ballou. 2000. Demographic evidence of inbreeding depression in wild golden lion tamarins. In Genetics, Demography and Viability of Fragmented Populations, ed. A. G. Young and G. M. E. Clarke, 203–212. Conservation Biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511623448.014.
  20. Duffy, J.E., B.J. Cardinale, K.E. France, P.B. McIntyre, E. Thébault, and M. Loreau. 2007. The functional role of biodiversity in ecosystems: Incorporating trophic complexity. Ecology Letters 10: 522–538.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01037.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ekstrom, J.M., L.A. Bennun, and R. Mitchell. 2015. A cross-sector guide for implementing the mitigation hierarchy. Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  22. Evans, D.M., P. Barnard, L.P. Koh, C.A. Chapman, R. Altwegg, T.W.J. Garner, M.E. Gompper, I.J. Gordon, et al. 2012. Funding nature conservation: Who pays? Animal Conservation 15: 215–216.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-1795.2012.00550.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Franklin, J.F., W. Denison, A. Mckee, and F. Swanson. 1981. Ecological characteristics of old-growth Douglas-fir forests. Portland, OR.  https://doi.org/10.2737/PNW-GTR-118.
  24. Gelcich, S., C. Vargas, M.J. C, J.C. Castilla, and C.J. Donlan. 2017. Achieving biodiversity benefits with offsets: Research gaps, challenges, and needs. Ambio 46: 184–189.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-016-0810-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gonçalves, B., A. Marques, A.M.V.D.M. Soares, and H.M. Pereira. 2015. Biodiversity offsets: From current challenges to harmonized metrics. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 14: 61–67.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2015.03.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gordon, A., W.T. Langford, J.A. Todd, M.D. White, D.W. Mullerworth, and S.A. Bekessy. 2011. Assessing the impacts of biodiversity offset policies. Environmental Modelling & Software 26: 1481–1488.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.07.021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gourevitch, J., C.C. Nicholson, L.J. Sonter, A.J. Schwartz, T.H. Ricketts, N.K. Singh, L.L. Richardson, I. Koh, et al. 2018. Biodiversity offsets may miss opportunities to mitigate impacts on ecosystem services. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 16: 143–148.  https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Habib, T.J., D.R. Farr, R.R. Schneider, and S. Boutin. 2013. Economic and ecological outcomes of flexible biodiversity offset systems. Conservation Biology 27: 1313–1323.  https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12098.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. International Finance Corporation. 2012. IFC Performance Standards on Environmental and Social Sustainability.Google Scholar
  30. Jerry, F., and Franklin. 1993. Preserving biodiversity: Species, ecosystems, or landscapes? Ecological Applications 3: 202–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kiesecker, J.M., H. Copeland, A. Pocewicz, N. Nibbelink, B. McKenney, J. Dahlke, M. Holloran, and D. Stroud. 2009. A framework for implementing biodiversity offsets: Selecting sites and determining scale. BioScience 59: 77–84.  https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2009.59.1.11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lindenmayer, D.B., M. Crane, M.C. Evans, M. Maron, P. Gibbons, S. Bekessy, and W. Blanchard. 2017. The anatomy of a failed offset. Biological Conservation 210: 286–292.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2017.04.022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Madsen, B., N. Carroll, D. Kandy, and G. Bennett. 2011. 2011 Update: State of biodiversity markets. Forest Trends’s Ecosystem Marketplace. Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  34. Maron, M., R.J. Hobbs, A. Moilanen, J.W. Matthews, K. Christie, T.A. Gardner, D.A. Keith, D.B. Lindenmayer, et al. 2012. Faustian bargains? Restoration realities in the context of biodiversity offset policies. Biological Conservation 155: 141–148.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2012.06.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Maron, M., C.D. Ives, H. Kujala, J.W. Bull, F.J.F. Maseyk, S. Bekessy, A. Gordon, J.E.M. Watson, et al. 2016. Taming a wicked problem: Resolving controversies in biodiversity offsetting. BioScience.  https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biw038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ngo, H. T., M. Guèze, J. Agard Trinidad, A. Arneth, P. Balvanera, K. Brauman, R. Watson, I. Baste, et al. 2019. Global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystems. New York.Google Scholar
  37. Noss, R.F. 1983. A regional landscape approach to maintain diversity. BioScience 33: 700–706.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1309350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Noss, R.F. 1990. Indicators for monitoring biodiversity: A hierarchical approach. Conservation Biology 4: 355–364.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.1990.tb00309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pilla, E. 2014. Towards the development of metrics for no net loss of biodiversity in Peru. Inter-American Development Bank.  https://doi.org/10.1006/bijl.1996.0096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pimm, S.L. 1984. The complexity and stability of ecosystems. Nature 307: 321–326.  https://doi.org/10.1038/307321a0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Robb, J.T. 2002. Assessing wetland compensatory mitigation sites to aid in establishing mitigation ratios. Wetlands 22: 435–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Temple, H. J., S. Anstee, J. Ekstrom, J. D. Pilgrim, J. Rabenantoandro, J.-B. Ramanamanjato, F. Randraitafika, and M. Vincellette. 2012. Forecasting the path towards a Net Positive Impact on biodiversity for Rio Tinto QMM. IUCN and Rio Tinto Technical Series No. 2. ISBN: 978-2-8317-1441-7Google Scholar
  43. ten Kate, K., J. Bishop, R. Bayon, K. ten Tate, J. Bishop, and R. Bayon. 2004. Biodiversity offsets: Views, experience, and the business case. Diversity. ISBN: 2-8317-0854-0.Google Scholar
  44. United States Department of Agriculture. 2015. Common Questions & Answers BLM-USFS Greater Sage-Grouse Conservation Plans.Google Scholar
  45. Vaissière, A.C., and H. Levrel. 2015. Corrigendum to “Biodiversity offset markets: What are they really? An empirical approach to wetland mitigation banking” [ECOLEC 110 (2015) 81-88]. Ecological Economics 114: 242.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.04.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. van Teeffelen, A.J.A., P. Opdam, F. Wätzold, F. Hartig, K. Johst, M. Drechsler, C.C. Vos, S. Wissel, et al. 2014. Ecological and economic conditions and associated institutional challenges for conservation banking in dynamic landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning 130: 64–72.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.06.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Waldron, A., A.O. Mooers, D.C. Miller, N. Nibbelink, D.W. Redding, and T.S. Kuhn. 2013. Targeting global conservation funding to limit immediate biodiversity declines. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110: 1–5.  https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.p69t1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Walker, S., A.L. Brower, R.T.T.T. Stephens, and W.G. Lee. 2009. Why bartering biodiversity fails. Conservation Letters 2: 149–157.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-263X.2009.00061.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. zu Ermgassen, S.O.S.E., J. Baker, R.A. Griffiths, N. Strange, M.J. Struebig, and J.W. Bull. 2019. The ecological outcomes of biodiversity offsets under “no net loss” policies: A global review. Conservation Letters.  https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Environmental Defense FundBoulderUSA
  2. 2.LovelandUSA

Personalised recommendations