Advertisement

Ambio

pp 1–12 | Cite as

Understanding conservation conflicts associated with rodent outbreaks in farmland areas

  • Valentin LauretEmail author
  • Miguel Delibes-Mateos
  • François Mougeot
  • Beatriz Arroyo-Lopez
Research Article

Abstract

Rodent outbreaks affect many farmland areas worldwide and the negative environmental impacts of control campaigns cause intense social tensions. In such conservation conflicts, understanding stakeholders’ viewpoints is critical to promote ecologically sustainable management. We used Q-methodology, a framework standing between qualitative and quantitative social research, to investigate human subjectivity and understand conflicts caused by rodent outbreaks in Spain. We interviewed farmers, conservationists, hunters, and governmental agencies, and identified five main discourses about the origins and consequences of the conflictive situation. Finding sustainable management is impaired by opposing views about causes and consequences of vole outbreaks and their management, which are at the root of the conflict. Social tensions will likely remain until the underlying conflicts between people holding different views are also managed. Decision-making should therefore focus on mitigating underlying conflicts. Using trained independent mediators would help the effective resolution of conservation conflicts caused by rodent outbreaks and their management.

Keywords

Farmland pest Human dimensions Microtus arvalis Socioecological systems Sustainable conservation Wildlife management 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to all the respondents of this study for their cooperation. We warmly thank Juan José Luque-Larena for his help with the fieldwork, and for reviewing the pilot Q-samples. V.L had a full-time salary funded by the Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon.

Supplementary material

13280_2019_1256_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (637 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 638 kb)

References

  1. Alomar, H., A. Chabert, M. Coeurdassier, D. Vey, and P. Berny. 2018. Accumulation of anticoagulant rodenticides (chlorophacinone, bromadiolone and brodifacoum) in a non-target invertebrate, the slug, Deroceras reticulatum. Science of the Total Environment 610–611: 576–582.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bennett, N.J., R. Roth, S.C. Klain, K.M.A. Chan, D.A. Clark, G. Cullman, G. Epstein, M.P. Nelson, et al. 2017. Mainstreaming the social sciences in conservation: Mainstreaming the Social Sciences. Conservation Biology 31: 56–66.  https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bredin, Y.K., N. Lescureux, and J.D.C. Linnell. 2018. Local perceptions of jaguar conservation and environmental justice in Goiás, Matto Grosso and Roraima states (Brazil). Global Ecology and Conservation 13: e00369.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2017.e00369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown, S.R. 1993. A primer on Q methodology. Operant subjectivity 16: 91–138.Google Scholar
  5. Cairns, R., S.M. Sallu, and S. Goodman. 2014. Questioning calls to consensus in conservation: A Q study of conservation discourses on Galápagos. Environmental Conservation 41: 13–26.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892913000131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chandelier, M., A. Steuckardt, R. Mathevet, S. Diwersy, and O. Gimenez. 2018. Content analysis of newspaper coverage of wolf recolonization in France using structural topic modeling. Biological Conservation 220: 254–261.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2018.01.029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Coeurdassier, M., R. Riols, A. Decors, A. Mionnet, F. David, T. Quintaine, D. Truchetet, R. Scheifler, et al. 2014. Unintentional wildlife poisoning and proposals for sustainable management of rodents: Sustainable management of rodents. Conservation Biology 28: 315–321.  https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Delibes-Mateos, M. 2017. Rumours about wildlife pest introductions: European rabbits in Spain. Ambio 46: 237–249.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-016-0817-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Delibes-Mateos, M., A.T. Smith, C.N. Slobodchikoff, and J.E. Swenson. 2011. The paradox of keystone species persecuted as pests: A call for the conservation of abundant small mammals in their native range. Biological Conservation 144: 1335–1346.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2011.02.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Delibes-Mateos, M., F. Mougeot, B. Arroyo, and X. Lambin. 2015. Hunted predators: Charisma confounds. Science 349: 1294–1295.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.349.6254.1294-a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dickman, A.J. 2010. Complexities of conflict: The importance of considering social factors for effectively resolving human-wildlife conflict: Social factors affecting human-wildlife conflict resolution. Animal Conservation 13: 458–466.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-1795.2010.00368.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dziopa, F., and K. Ahern. 2011. A systematic literature review of the applications of Q-technique and its methodology. Methodology 7: 39–55.  https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241/a000021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fernandez-de-Simon, J., M. Coeurdassier, G. Couval, I. Fourel, and P. Giraudoux. 2018. Do bromadiolone treatments to control grassland water voles (Arvicola scherman) affect small mustelid abundance? Pest Management Science.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.5194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gall, S.C., and L.D. Rodwell. 2016. Evaluating the social acceptability of Marine Protected Areas. Marine Policy 65: 30–38.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2015.12.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hadidian, J., C.H. Fox, and W.S. Lynn. 2006. The ethics of wildlife control in humanized landscapes. Habitat, and Land Management 13: 6.Google Scholar
  16. Han, B.A., J.P. Schmidt, S.E. Bowden, and J.M. Drake. 2015. Rodent reservoirs of future zoonotic diseases. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112: 7039–7044.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1501598112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Haslam, S.A., S.D. Reicher, and M.J. Platow. 2010. The new psychology of leadership: Identity, influence and power. E. Sussex: Psychology Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hodgson, I.D., S.M. Redpath, A. Fischer, and J. Young. 2018. Fighting talk: Organisational discourses of the conflict over raptors and grouse moor management in Scotland. Land Use Policy 77: 332–343.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.05.042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Inskip, C., and A. Zimmermann. 2009. Human-felid conflict: A review of patterns and priorities worldwide. Oryx 43: 18.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S003060530899030X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jacob, J., and E. Tkadlec. 2010. Rodent outbreaks in Europe: dynamics and damage, 207–223. Rodent outbreaks: Ecology and impacts, International Rice Research Institute, Los Banos, Philippines 289.Google Scholar
  21. Jareño, D., J. Viñuela, J.J. Luque-Larena, L. Arroyo, B. Arroyo, and F. Mougeot. 2015. Factors associated with the colonization of agricultural areas by common voles Microtus arvalis in NW Spain. Biological Invasions 17: 2315–2327.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-015-0877-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Löe, J., and E. Röskaft. 2004. Large carnivores and human safety: A review. Ambio 33: 283–288.  https://doi.org/10.1579/0044-7447-33.6.283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Luque-Larena, J.J., F. Mougeot, J. Viñuela, D. Jareño, L. Arroyo, X. Lambin, and B. Arroyo. 2013. Recent large-scale range expansion and outbreaks of the common vole (Microtus arvalis) in NW Spain. Basic and Applied Ecology 14: 432–441.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2013.04.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Luque-Larena, J.J., F. Mougeot, D.V. Roig, X. Lambin, R. Rodríguez-Pastor, E. Rodríguez-Valín, P. Anda, and R. Escudero. 2015. Tularemia outbreaks and common vole (Microtus arvalis) irruptive population dynamics in Northwestern Spain, 1997–2014. Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases 15: 568–570.  https://doi.org/10.1089/vbz.2015.1770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Luque-Larena, J.J., F. Mougeot, B. Arroyo, M.D. Vidal, R. Rodríguez-Pastor, R. Escudero, P. Anda, and X. Lambin. 2017. Irruptive mammal host populations shape tularemia epidemiology. Edited by Kimberly A. Kline. PLOS Pathogens 13: e1006622.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1006622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Luque-Larena, J.J., F. Mougeot, B. Arroyo, and X. Lambin. 2018. “Got rats?” Global environmental costs of thirst for milk include acute biodiversity impacts linked to dairy feed production. Global Change Biology 24: 2752–2754.  https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Madden, F., and B. McQuinn. 2014. Conservation’s blind spot: The case for conflict transformation in wildlife conservation. Biological Conservation 178: 97–106.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2014.07.015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Maurer, G., B.S. Rashford, V. Chanthavong, B. Mulot, and O. Gimenez. 2017. Wild-captive interactions and economics drive dynamics of Asian elephants in Laos. Scientific Reports.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-13907-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Meerburg, B.G., F.W. Brom, and A. Kijlstra. 2008. The ethics of rodent control. Pest Management Science 64: 1205–1211.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.1623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mendenhall, V.M., and L.F. Pank. 1980. Secondary poisoning of owls by anticoagulant rodenticides. Wildlife Society Bulletin 1973–2006 (8): 311–315.Google Scholar
  31. Moon, K., and D. Blackman. 2014. A guide to understanding social science research for natural scientists: Social science for natural scientists. Conservation Biology 28: 1167–1177.  https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nilsen, E.B., E.J. Milner-Gulland, L. Schofield, A. Mysterud, N.C. Stenseth, and T. Coulson. 2007. Wolf reintroduction to Scotland: Public attitudes and consequences for red deer management. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 274: 995–1003.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2006.0369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Olea, P.P., I.S. SáNchez-Barbudo, J. ViñUela, I. Barja, P. Mateo-TomáS, A. PiñEiro, R. Mateo, and F.J. Purroy. 2009. Lack of scientific evidence and precautionary principle in massive release of rodenticides threatens biodiversity: Old lessons need new reflections. Environmental Conservation 36: 1.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892909005323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Oñate, J.J., and B. Peco. 2005. Policy impact on desertification: Stakeholders’ perceptions in southeast Spain. Land Use Policy 22: 103–114.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2004.01.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Palis, F.G., G. Singleton, Z. Sumalde, and M. Hossain. 2007. Social and cultural dimensions of rodent pest management. Integrative Zoology 2: 174–183.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-4877.2007.00057.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Paz, A., D. Jareño, L. Arroyo, J. Viñuela, B. Arroyo, F. Mougeot, J.J. Luque-Larena, and J.A. Fargallo. 2013. Avian predators as a biological control system of common vole (Microtus arvalis) populations in north-western Spain: experimental set-up and preliminary results: Biological control of common voles. Pest Management Science 69: 444–450.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.3289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Redpath, S.M., J. Young, A. Evely, W.M. Adams, W.J. Sutherland, A. Whitehouse, A. Amar, R.A. Lambert, et al. 2013. Understanding and managing conservation conflicts. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 28: 100–109.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2012.08.021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Redpath, S.M., S. Bhatia, and J. Young. 2015. Tilting at wildlife: Reconsidering human–wildlife conflict. Oryx 49: 222–225.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605314000799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Redpath, S.M., J.D.C. Linnell, M. Festa-Bianchet, L. Boitani, N. Bunnefeld, A. Dickman, R.J. Gutiérrez, R.J. Irvine, et al. 2017. Don’t forget to look down—Collaborative approaches to predator conservation: Collaborative carnivore conservation. Biological Reviews 92: 2157–2163.  https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rodríguez-Pastor, R., J.J. Luque-Larena, X. Lambin, and F. Mougeot. 2016. “Living on the edge”: The role of field margins for common vole (Microtus arvalis) populations in recently colonised Mediterranean farmland. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 231: 206–217.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2016.06.041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rodríguez-Pastor, R., R. Escudero, D. Vidal, F. Mougeot, B. Arroyo, X. Lambin, A.M. Vila-Coro, I. Rodríguez-Moreno, et al. 2017. Density-dependent prevalence of Francisella tularensis in fluctuating vole populations, Northwestern Spain. Emerging Infectious Diseases 23: 1377–1379.  https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2308.161194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Roos, D., C. Caminero Saldaña, B. Arroyo, F. Mougeot, J.J. Luque-Larena, and X. Lambin. 2019. Unintentional effects of environmentally-friendly farming practices: Arising conflicts between zero-tillage and a crop pest, the common vole (Microtus arvalis). Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 272: 105–113.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2018.11.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rust, N.A. 2017. Can stakeholders agree on how to reduce human–carnivore conflict on Namibian livestock farms? A novel Q-methodology and Delphi exercise. Oryx 51: 339–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rust, N.A., A. Abrams, D.W.S. Challender, G. Chapron, A. Ghoddousi, J.A. Glikman, C.H. Gowan, C. Hughes, et al. 2017. Quantity does not always mean quality: The importance of qualitative social science in conservation research. Society & Natural Resources.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2017.1333661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sánchez-Barbudo, I.S., P.R. Camarero, and R. Mateo. 2012. Primary and secondary poisoning by anticoagulant rodenticides of non-target animals in Spain. Science of the Total Environment 420: 280–288.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.01.028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sandbrook, C., I.R. Scales, B. Vira, and W.M. Adams. 2010. Value plurality among conservation professionals: Value plurality in conservation. Conservation Biology.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01592.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Singleton, G.R., S. Belmain, P.R. Brown, K. Aplin, and N.M. Htwe. 2010. Impacts of rodent outbreaks on food security in Asia. Wildlife Research 37: 355–359.  https://doi.org/10.1071/WR10084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Skogen, K., I. Mauz, and O. Krange. 2008. Cry Wolf!: Narratives of wolf recovery in France and Norway. Rural Sociology 73: 105–133.  https://doi.org/10.1526/003601108783575916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Stenseth, N.C., H. Leirs, A. Skonhoft, S.A. Davis, R.P. Pech, H.P. Andreassen, G.R. Singleton, M. Lima, et al. 2003. Mice, rats, and people: The bio-economics of agricultural rodent pests. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 1: 367–375.  https://doi.org/10.1890/1540-9295(2003)001%5b0367:mraptb%5d2.0.co;2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sutherland, W.J., L.V. Dicks, M. Everard, and D. Geneletti. 2018. Qualitative methods for ecologists and conservation scientists. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 9: 7–9.  https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Van Exel, J., and G. De Graaf. 2005. Q methodology: A sneak preview. Retrieved 24 Jan. https://qmethodblog.files.wordpress.com/2016/01/qmethodologyasneakpreviewreferenceupdate.pdf.
  52. Vantassel, S. 2008. Ethics of wildlife control in humanized landscapes: A response, vol. 7. San Diego, CA: University of California.Google Scholar
  53. Villafuerte, R., J. Viñuela, and J.C. Blanco. 1998. Extensive predator persecution caused by population crash in a game species: The case of red kites and rabbits in Spain. Biological Conservation 84: 181–188.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(97)00094-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Zabala, A. 2014. qmethod: A package to explore human perspectives using Q methodology. The R Journal 6: 163.  https://doi.org/10.32614/RJ-2014-032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CEFE, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, Univ Paul Valéry Montpellier 3, EPHE, IRDMontpellierFrance
  2. 2.Instituto de Investigación en Recursos Cinegéticos (IREC), CSIC-UCLM-JCCMCiudad RealSpain
  3. 3.Département de BiologieEcole Normale Supérieure de LyonLyonFrance
  4. 4.Instituto de Estudios Sociales Avanzados (IESA-CSIC)CórdobaSpain
  5. 5.Departamento de Biología Vegetal y Ecología, Facultad de BiologíaUniversidad de SevillaSevilleSpain

Personalised recommendations