Advertisement

Ambio

pp 1–11 | Cite as

Bioenergy development and the implications for the social wellbeing of Indigenous peoples in Canada

  • Melanie ZurbaEmail author
  • Ryan Bullock
Research Article

Abstract

In this article, we focus on wellbeing as an important concept relating to bioenergy development in Canada. We use a three-dimensional or social approach to understanding wellbeing, which includes subjective and relational aspects in addition to the more traditional material dimension of wellbeing (e.g. financial resources, a healthy environment). Indigenous business leaders engaged in forestry, energy, and related resource sectors were recruited through our partner organization, the Canadian Council for Aboriginal Business, as a representative sample of key people to be engaged in the scoping of existing and future bioenergy partnerships in Canada. Participants often responded in ways that did not discretely fit into categories, but instead reflected a perspective on their own and their community’s dimensions of social wellbeing, which we captured through open coding for emergent themes. Our findings on material wellbeing illustrate that relationships between different wellbeing dimensions need to be considered for community-appropriate bioenergy development.

Keywords

Bioenergy Indigenous partnerships Renewable energy Social wellbeing 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) of Canada (#872-2016-1036), SSHRC Canada Research Chair in Human-Environmental Interactions (950-231641), and BiofuelNet Canada (#SO-3-Bullock). In-kind support was provided by the Canadian Council for Aboriginal Business. The authors thank the study participants for sharing their knowledge. Thanks also to our capable research assistants, Shannon Ganter and Miranda Hamilton. Any errors or omissions are our own.

Supplementary material

13280_2019_1166_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (161 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 162 kb)

References

  1. Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada (AANDC). 2018. Land Management. Retrieved from https://www.aadnc-aandc.gc.ca/eng/1100100034737/1100100034738.
  2. Aguilar-Støen, M. 2016. Beyond transnational corporations, food and biofuels: The role of extractivism and agribusiness in land grabbing in Central America. Forum for Development Studies 43: 155–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Armitage, D., C. Béné, A.T. Charles, D. Johnson, and E.H. Allison. 2012. The interplay of well-being and resilience in applying a social–ecological perspective. Ecology & Society 17: 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ashton, B., T. Needham, and T. Beckley. 2007. How is crown forest policy developed? Probing New Brunswick’s protected areas strategy. Forestry Chronicle 83: 689–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. BC Energy Network. n.d. Capacity building. Retrieved from http://bcbioenergy.ca/what-we-do/capacity-building/. Accessed 2 May 2018.
  6. Berg, S., E. Valinger, T. Lind, T. Suominen, and D. Tuomasjukka. 2016. Comparison of co-existing forestry and reindeer husbandry value chains in northern Sweden. Silva Fennica 50: 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berkes, F., and H. Ross. 2013. Community resilience: Toward an integrated approach. Society & Natural Resources 26: 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Big-Canoe, K., and C.A.M. Richmond. 2014. Anishinabe youth perceptions about community health: Toward environmental repossession. Health & Place 26: 127–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Breslow, S.J., B. Sojka, R. Barnea, X. Basurto, C. Carothers, S. Charnley, S. Coulthard, N. Dolšak, et al. 2016. Conceptualizing and operationalizing human wellbeing for ecosystem assessment and management. Environmental Science & Policy 66: 250–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bullock, R., and M. Zurba. 2017. Framing Indigenous partnerships in energy and allied renewable resource sectors. Final knowledge synthesis report for the Social Science and Humanities Research Council of Canada. Centre for Forest Interdisciplinary Research, The University of Winnipeg. Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada: 24 pp.Google Scholar
  11. Bullock, R., D. Kirchhoff, I. Mauro, and M. Boerchers. 2017. Indigenous capacity for collaboration in Canada’s energy, forestry and mining sectors: Research metrics and trends. Environment, Development and Sustainability 20: 883–895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bullock, R., M. Zurba, J. Parkins, and M. Skudra. Indigenous business leaders’ perspectives on renewable (bio)energy: Risks, barriers, benefits and opportunities. Energy Policy (under review).Google Scholar
  13. Caine, K.J., and N. Krogman. 2010. Powerful or just plain power-full? A power analysis of Impact and Benefit Agreements in Canada’s North. Organization & Environment 23: 76–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Coates, K., and B.L. Crowley. 2013. New beginnings: How Canada’s natural resource wealth could re-shape relations with aboriginal people., Aboriginal Canada and the Natural Resource Economy Series Ottawa: MacDonald-Laurier Institute.Google Scholar
  15. Cook, C.C. 2005. Assessing the impact of transport and energy infrastructure on poverty reduction. Manila: Asian Development Bank.Google Scholar
  16. Coulthard, S. 2012. Can we be both resilient and well, and what choices do people have? Incorporating agency into the resilience debate from a fisheries perspective. Ecology and Society 17: 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Coulthard, S., D. Johnson, and J.A. McGregor. 2011. Poverty, sustainability and human wellbeing: A social wellbeing approach to the global fisheries crisis. Global Environmental Change 21: 453–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Council of the Federation. 2015. Canadian Energy Strategy. https://www.gov.mb.ca/jec/energy/pubs/canadian_energy_strategy.pdf.
  19. Country, B., S. Wright, S. Suchet-Pearson, K. Lloyd, L. Burarrwanga, R. Ganambarr, M. Ganambarr-Stubbs, B. Ganambarr, et al. 2015. Co-becoming Bawaka: Towards a relational understanding of place/space. Progress in Human Geography 40: 455–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Craft, A. 2013. Breathing life into the Stone Fort Treaty. Saskatoon: Purich Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
  21. Cresswell, J. W. 2012. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE: p. 472.Google Scholar
  22. Cresswell, J.W., and C.N. Poth. 2016. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Singapore: SAGE.Google Scholar
  23. D’Anna, L.M., and G.D. Murray. 2015. Perceptions of shellfish aquaculture in British Columbia and implications for well-being in marine social–ecological systems. Ecology and Society 20: 57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Eckerberg, K. 2015. Future forest governance: Multiple challenges, diverging responses. In The Future use of nordic forests, ed. F. Kraxner, K. Beland Lindahl, and E. Westholm, 83–97. Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  25. Égré, D., V. Roquet, and C. Durocher. 2007. Monetary benefit sharing from dams: A few examples of financial partnerships with Indigenous communities in Québec (Canada). International Journal of River Basin Management 5: 235–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Geertz, C. 2008. Thick description: toward an interpretive theory of culture. In The cultural geography reader, ed. P.L. Price and T. Oakes. New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  27. Gris, P. 2013. Responsible energy development in Canada. Environment and Aboriginal Issues: Charrette on Energy.Google Scholar
  28. Hunsberger, C., S. Bolwig, E. Corbera, and F. Creutzig. 2014. Livelihood impacts of biofuel crop production: Implications for governance. Geoforum 54: 248–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Johnson, J.T., R. Howitt, G. Cajete, F. Berkes, R.P. Louis, and A. Kliskey. 2016. Weaving Indigneous and sustainability sciences to diversify our methods. Sustainability Sciences 11: 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jones, J., and B. Bradshaw. 2015. Addressing historical impacts through impact and benefit agreements and health impact assessment: Why it matters for Indigenous wll-being. The Northern Review 41: 81–109.Google Scholar
  31. Karanasios, K., and P. Parker. 2016. Recent developments in renewable energy in remote aboriginal communities, Ontario, Canada. Papers in Canadian Economic Development 16: 82–97.Google Scholar
  32. Krupa, J. 2012. Blazing a new path forward: A case study on the renewable energy initiatives of the Pic River First Nation. Environmental Development 3: 109–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Krupa, J., L. Galbraith, and S. Burch. 2015. Participatory and multi-level governance: Applications to Aboriginal renewable energy projects. Local Environment 20: 81–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Maclean, K., C.J. Robinson, and D.C. Natcher. 2015. Consensus building or constructive conflict? Aboriginal discursive strategies to enhance participation in natural resource management in Australia and Canada. Society & Natural Resources 28: 197–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Merriam, S.B. 2016. Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco: Wiley.Google Scholar
  36. Natural Resources Canada (NRCan). 2012. Evaluation of the Sustainable Bioenergy Strategic Priority. Retrieved from http://www.nrcan.gc.ca/evaluation/reports/2012/798. Accessed 12 Sept 2017.
  37. Natural Resources Canada (NRCan). 2018a. Bioenergy systems. Retrieved from http://www.nrcan.gc.ca/energy/renewable-electricity/bioenergy-systems/7311. Accessed 2 May 2018.
  38. Natural Resources Canada (NRCan). 2018b. How does the forest industry contribute to the economy? Retrieved from http://www.nrcan.gc.ca/forests/report/economy/16517. Accessed 2 May 2018.
  39. Natural Resources Canada (NRCan). 2018c. Bioenergy from biomass. Retrieved from http://www.nrcan.gc.ca/forests/industry/bioproducts/13323. Accessed 2 May 2018.
  40. Natural Resources Canada (NRCan). n.d. Solid biofuels bulletin No. 1. Accessed May 2, 2018, from https://www.nrcan.gc.ca/sites/www.nrcan.gc.ca/files/NRCAN_BB_no1_e_accessible.pdf.
  41. O’Flaherty, R.M., I.J. Davidson-Hunt, and M. Manseau. 2008. Indigenous knowledge and values in planning and sustainable forestry: Pikangikum First Nation and the Whitefeather Forest Initiative. Ecology and Society 13: 6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Palinkas, L.A., S.M. Horwitz, C.A. Green, J.P. Wisdom, N. Duan, and K. Hoagwood. 2015. Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed methods implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research 42: 533–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Popp, J., Z. Lanker, M. Harangi-Rákos, and M. Fári. 2014. The effect of bioenergy expansion: Food, energy, and environment. Renewable Sustainable Energy Review 32: 559–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Reo, N.J., K.P. Whyte, D. McGregor, M.A. Smith, and J.F. Jenkins. 2017. Factors that support Indigenous involvement in multi-actor environmental stewardship. AlterNative 13: 58–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sikka, M., T.F. Thornton, and R. Worl. 2013. Sustainable biomass energy and Indigenous cultural models of wellbeing in Alaska forest ecosystems. Ecology & Society 18: 38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Srigley, K., and A. Varley. 2018. Learning to unlearn: Building relationships on Anishinaabeg territory. In Indigenous research: Theories, practices, and relationships, ed. D. McGregor, J.-P. Restoule, and R. Johnston, 46–64. Toronto: Canadian Scholars Press.Google Scholar
  47. Stetson, G. 2012. Oil politics and Indigenous resistance in Peruvian Amazon: The rhetoric of modernity against the reality of coloniality. Journal of Environment & Development 21: 76–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Strickland-Munro, J., and S. Moore. 2013. Indigenous involvement and benefits from tourism in protected areas: A study of Purnululu National Park and Warmun Community, Australia. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 21: 26–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tobias, J.K., and C.A.M. Richmond. 2014. “That land means everything to us as Anishinaabe…”: Environmental dispossession and resilience on the North Shore of Lake Superior. Health & Place 29: 26–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. van Manen, M. 1990. Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. London: State University Pres.Google Scholar
  51. Vermeulen, S., and L. Cotula. 2010. Over the heads of local people: Consultation, consent, and recompense in large-scale land deals for biofuels projects in Africa. The Journal of Peasant Studies 37: 899–916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Weeratunge, N., C. Béné, R. Siriwardane, A. Charles, D. Johnson, E.H. Allison, P.K. Nayak, and M.C. Badjeck. 2014. Small-scale fisheries through the wellbeing lens. Fish and Fisheries 15: 255–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wesche, S.D., M.A.F. O’Hare-Gordon, M.A. Robidoux, and C.W. Mason. 2016. Land-based programs in Northwest Territories: Building Indigenous food security and well-being from the ground up. Canadian Food Studies 3: 23–48.Google Scholar
  54. Wilson, S. 2008. Research is ceremony: Indigenous research methods. Winnipeg: Fernwood.Google Scholar
  55. Zurba, M. 2019. Framing the governance lifecycle of First Nation-industry forestry collaboration in northwestern Ontario. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, online first.Google Scholar
  56. Zurba, M., and R. Bullock. 2018. Framing indigenous bioenergy partnerships. The International Indigenous Policy Journal 9: 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zurba, M., and M. Trimble. 2014. Youth as the inheritors of collaboration: Crises and factors that influence participation of the next generation in natural resources management. Environmental Science & Policy 42: 78–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School for Resource and Environmental Studies and the College of SustainabilityDalhousie UniversityHalifaxCanada
  2. 2.Environmental Studies and SciencesThe University of WinnipegWinnipegCanada

Personalised recommendations