Advertisement

Ambio

pp 1–17 | Cite as

Water–energy sustainability synergies and health benefits as means to motivate potable reuse of coalbed methane-produced waters

  • Udayan Singh
  • Lisa M. Colosi
Perspective
  • 77 Downloads

Abstract

Management of coalbed methane (CBM)-produced water is a crucial part of the water–energy nexus, especially as CBM is projected to play a key role as a bridge fuel in major economies. In this paper, we consider one management technique, i.e., desalination of CBM-produced water to generate potable water. We discuss a confluence of geographic, sociotechnical, regulatory, and other circumstances that could make this concept viable for select coal-bearing regions. Having said that, for maximizing benefits, it is prudent to take a synergistic view targeting multiple objectives (water access, health, environmental impacts, and ease of waste management). Thus, we make design recommendations and suggest a system-evaluation framework for making sustainable decisions related to produced-to-potable water systems. For instance, a key question is whether such systems should be centralized or decentralized—and this paper highlights crucial tradeoffs that are present in both the cases.

Keywords

Coalbed methane Point-of-use Produced water Reverse osmosis Water–energy nexus 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Dr. Andres F. Clarens (University of Virginia) for his comments and suggestions on an initial version of this paper. No specific funding was received for this research.

References

  1. Adane, M., B. Mengistie, G. Medhin, H. Kloos, and W. Mulat. 2017. Piped water supply interruptions and acute diarrhea among under-five children in Addis Ababa slums, Ethiopia: A matched case–control study. PLoS ONE 12: e0181516.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahern, J. 2011. From fail-safe to safe-to-fail: Sustainability and resilience in the new urban world. Landscape and Urban Planning 100: 341–342.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahmed, M., A. Arakel, D. Hoey, M.R. Thumarukudy, M.F.A. Goosen, M. Al-Haddabi, and A. Al-Belushi. 2003. Feasibility of salt production from inland RO desalination plant reject brine: A case study. Desalination 158: 109–117.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0011-9164(03)00441-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Akash, A.R., A.B. Rao, and M.K. Chandel. 2017. Relevance of carbon capture & sequestration in India’s energy mix to achieve the reduction in emission intensity by 2030 as per INDCs. Energy Procedia 114: 7492–7503.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ang, W.S., A. Tiraferri, K.L. Chen, and M. Elimelech. 2011. Fouling and cleaning of RO membranes fouled by mixtures of organic foulants simulating wastewater effluent. Journal of Membrane Science 376: 196–206.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2011.04.020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Annala, L., A. Sarin, and J.L. Green. 2018. Co-production of frugal innovation: Case of low cost reverse osmosis water filters in India. Journal of Cleaner Production 171: S110–S118.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.065.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Arnell, N.W. 2004. Climate change and global water resources: SRES emissions and socio-economic scenarios. Global Environmental Change 14: 31–52.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2003.10.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bahl, M.R. 1976. Impact of piped water supply on the incidence of typhoid fever and diarrhoeal diseases in Lusaka. Medical Journal of Zambia 10: 98–99.Google Scholar
  9. Bartholomew, T.V., and M.S. Mauter. 2016. Multiobjective optimization model for minimizing cost and environmental impact in shale gas water and wastewater management. ACS Sustainable Chemistry and Engineering 4: 3728–3735.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b00372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bhunia, R., R. Ramakrishnan, Y. Hutin, and M.D. Gupte. 2009. Cholera outbreak secondary to contaminated pipe water in an urban area, West Bengal, India, 2006. Indian Journal of Gastroenterology 28: 62–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. BIS. 2012. Indian Standard: Drinking Water-Specification. New Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standards. Retrieved November 2, 2017, from http://cgwb.gov.in/Documents/WQ-standards.pdf.
  12. Boopathy, R., and G. Sekaran. 2017. Studies on process development for the separation of sodium chloride from residue after evaporation of reverse osmosis reject solution. Separation and Purification Technology 183: 127–135.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2017.04.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bouska, V. 1981. Geochemistry of coal–coal science and technology 1. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  14. Boysen, D.B., J.E. Boysen, and J.A. Boysen. 2002. Strategic produced water management and disposal economics in the Rocky Mountain region. Retrieved April 16, 2018, from http://www.gwpc.org/sites/default/files/event-sessions/Deidre_B_Boysen_PWC2002_0.pdf.
  15. Brick, T., B. Primrose, R. Chandrasekhar, S. Roy, J. Muliyil, and G. Kang. 2004. Water contamination in urban south India: Household storage practices and their implications for water safety and enteric infections. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health 207: 473–480.  https://doi.org/10.1078/1438-4639-00318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. City Report of Dhanbad, India. 2018. Eighth Regional 3R Forum in Asia and the Pacific. Achieving clean water, clean land and clean air through 3R and resource efficiency-A 21st. Indore, India. Retrieved May 1, 2018, from http://www.uncrd.or.jp/content/documents/6185City%20Report_India_Dhanbad.pdf.
  17. Clasen, T. 2015. Household water treatment and safe storage to prevent diarrheal disease in developing countries. Current Environmental Health Reports 2: 69–74.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40572-014-0033-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cohen, Y., R. Semiat, and A. Rahardianto. 2017. A perspective on reverse osmosis water desalination: Quest for sustainability. AIChE Journal 63: 1771–1784.  https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.15726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dahm, K.G., K.L. Guerra, and J.E. Drewes. 2011. Composite geochemical database for coalbed methane produced water quality in the Rocky Mountain Region. Environmental Science and Technology 45: 7655–7663.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es201021n.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dodson, S. 2014. Coalbed methane in China: Challenges and obstacles. World Coal. Retrieved October 13, 2014, from https://www.worldcoal.com/cbm/22082014/cbm-in-china-special-report-cbm100/.
  21. Eichler, H., S.X. Kong, W.C. Gerth, P. Mavros, and B. Jonsson. 2004. Use of cost-effectiveness analysis in health-care resource allocation decision-making: How are cost-effectiveness thresholds expected to emerge? Value in Health 7: 518–528.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2004.75003.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Elder, C.H., and M.A. Trevits. 1975. Gas production from the Pocahontas No.-3 coalbed, Island Creek Mines, Buchanan County, WV. Bruceton Station, PA: Bureau of Mines.Google Scholar
  23. El-Naas, M.H., A.F. Mohammad, M.I. Suleiman, M. Al Musharfy, and A.H. Al-Marzouqi. 2017. A new process for the capture of CO2 and reduction of water salinity. Desalination 411: 69–75.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2017.02.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. El-Naas, M., A.H. Al-Marzouqi, and O. Chaalal. 2010. A combined approach for the management of desalination reject brine and capture of CO2. Desalination 251: 70–74.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2009.09.141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Flores, R.M. 2014. Coal and coalbed gases. Waltham, MA: Elsevier.  https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-396972-9.00008-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fricko, O., S.C. Parkinson, N. Johnson, M. Strubegger, M.T.H. van Vliet, and K. Riahi. 2016. Energy sector water use implications of a 2 °C climate policy. Environmental Research Letters 11: 034011.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/3/034011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Galhardi, J.A., and D.M. Bonotto. 2016. Hydrogeochemical features of surface water and groundwater contaminated with acid mine drainage (AMD) in coal mining areas: A case study in southern Brazil. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 23: 18911–18927.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-7077-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Garg, A., V. Tiwari, and S. Vishwanathan. 2017. Relevance of clean coal technology for India’s energy security: A policy perspective. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 76: 012001.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/76/1/012001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gatade, S. 2015. Silencing caste, sanitising oppression: Understanding Swachh Bharat Abhiyan. Economic & Political Weekly 50: 29–35.Google Scholar
  30. Gede Wenten, I., D. Ariono, M. Purwasasmita, and Khoirudin. 2017. Integrated processes for desalination and salt production: A mini-review. AIP Conference Proceedings 1818: 020065.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4976929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ghosh, R. 1993. Remote sensing for analysis of ground water availability in an area with long unplanned mining history. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing 21: 119–126.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02992108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gui-Hong, L., and H.P. Sjursen. 2013. Characteristics of produced water during coalbed methane (CBM) development and its feasibility as irrigation water in Jincheng, China. Journal of Coal Science and Engineering (China) 19: 369–374.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12404-013-0317-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Haibin, L., and L. Zhenling. 2010. Recycling utilization patterns of coal mining waste in China. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 54: 1331–1340.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.05.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hossain, M.A., M.M. Rahman, M. Murrill, B. Das, B. Roy, S. Dey, and D. Chakraborti. 2013. Water consumption patterns and factors contributing to water consumption in arsenic affected population of rural West Bengal, India. Science of the Total Environment 463: 1217–1224.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.06.057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Immerzeel, W.W., L.P.H. van Beek, and M.F.P. Bierkens. 2010. Climate change will affect the Asian water towers. Science 328: 1382–1385.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1183188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. IPCC. 2008. Climate change and water. Geneva: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. https://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/technical-papers/climate-change-water-en.pdf.
  37. Jalan, J., and M. Ravallion. 2003. Does piped water reduce diarrhea for children in rural India? Journal of Econometrics 112: 153–173.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(02)00158-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ji, X., E. Curcio, S. Al Obaidani, G. Di Profio, E. Fontananova, and E. Drioli. 2010. Membrane distillation-crystallization of seawater reverse osmosis brines. Separation and Purification Technology 71: 76–82.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2009.11.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kinnon, E.C.P., S.D. Golding, C.J. Boreham, K.A. Baublys, and J.S. Esterle. 2010. Stable isotope and water quality analysis of coal bed methane production waters and gases from the Bowen Basin, Australia. International Journal of Coal Geology 82: 219–231.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2009.10.014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kumpel, E., and K.L. Nelson. 2013. Comparing microbial water quality in an intermittent and continuous piped water supply. Water Research 47: 5176–5188.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2013.05.058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Li, M. 2011. Reducing specific energy consumption in Reverse Osmosis (RO) water desalination: An analysis from first principles. Desalination 276: 128–135.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2011.03.031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Liu, L., M. Hejazi, P. Patel, P. Kyle, E. Davies, Y. Zhou, L. Clarke, and J. Edmonds. 2015. Water demands for electricity generation in the U.S.: Modeling different scenarios for the water–energy nexus. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 94: 318–334.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.11.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Liu, Y., M. Hejazi, P. Kyle, S.H. Kim, E. Davies, D.G. Miralles, A.J. Teuling, Y. He, and D. Niyogi. 2016. Global and regional evaluation of energy for water. Environmental Science and Technology 50: 9736–9745.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b01065.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lu, Y., S. Song, R. Wang, Z. Liu, J. Meng, A.J. Sweetman, A. Jenkins, et al. 2015. Impacts of soil and water pollution on food safety and health risks in China. Environment International 77: 5–15.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2014.12.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Macedonio, F., L. Katzir, N. Geisma, S. Simone, E. Drioli, and J. Gilron. 2011. Wind-Aided Intensified eVaporation (WAIV) and Membrane Crystallizer (MCr) integrated brackish water desalination process: Advantages and drawbacks. Desalination 273: 127–135.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2010.12.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mahato, M.K., G. Singh, P.K. Singh, A.K. Singh, and A.K. Tiwari. 2017. Assessment of mine water quality using heavy metal pollution index in a coal mining area of Damodar River Basin, India. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 99: 54–61.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-017-2097-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mahato, M.K., P.K. Singh, A.K. Tiwari, and A.K. Singh. 2008. Risk assessment due to intake of metals in groundwater of East Bokaro Coalfield, Jharkhand, India. Exposure and Health 8: 265–275.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12403-016-0201-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Mall, R.K., A. Gupta, R. Singh, R.S. Singh, and L.S. Rathore. 2006. Water resources and climate change: An Indian perspective. Current Science 90: 1610–1626.Google Scholar
  49. Mallants, D., J. Simunek, and S. Torkzaban. 2017. Determining water quality requirements of coal seam gas produced water for sustainable irrigation. Agricultural Water Management 189: 52–69.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2017.04.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Marten, R., D. McIntyre, C. Travassos, S. Shishkin, W. Longde, S. Reddy, and J. Vega. 2014. An assessment of progress towards universal health coverage in Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa (BRICS). Lancet 384: 2164–2171.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60075-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mazlan, N.M., D. Peshev, and A.G. Livingston. 2016. Energy consumption for desalination: A comparison of forward osmosis with reverse osmosis, and the potential for perfect membranes. Desalination 377: 138–151.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2015.08.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Mekonnen, M.M., and A.Y. Hoekstra. 2016. Four billion people facing severe water scarcity. Science Advances 2: e1500323.  https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1500323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Ministry of Health of China. 2006. Standards for drinking water quality. National Standard of the People’s Republic of China (GB 5749-2006).Google Scholar
  54. Mo, H., K.G. Tay, and H.Y. Ng. 2008. Fouling of reverse osmosis membrane by protein (BSA): Effects of pH, calcium, magnesium, ionic strength and temperature. Journal of Membrane Science 315: 28–35.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2008.02.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Moore, T.A. 2012. Coalbed methane: A review. International Journal of Coal Geology 101: 36–81.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2012.05.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Mu, F., W. Zhong, X. Zhao, C. Che, Y. Chen, J. Zhu, and B. Wang. 2015. Strategies for the development of CBM gas industry in China. Natural Gas Industry B 2: 383–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. National Research Council. 2010. Management and effects of coalbed methane produced water in the Western United States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  58. NCMH. 2005. Report of the national commission on macroeconomics and health. New Delhi: Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India. Retrieved January 16, 2017, from http://www.who.int/macrohealth/action/Report%20of%20the%20National%20Commission.pdf.
  59. Neumann, P.J., J.T. Cohen, and M.C. Weinstein. 2014. Updating cost-effectiveness: The curious resilience of the $50,000-per-QALY threshold. The New England Journal of Medicine 371: 796–797.  https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1405158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. NHMRC, NRMMC. 2011. Australian drinking water guidelines paper 6 national water quality management strategy. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia. Retrieved November 2, 2017, from https://www.clearwater.asn.au/user-data/resource-files/Aust_drinking_water_guidelines.pdf.
  61. NML. 2017. Coal mine water reclamation. CSIR-NML. Retrieved November 4, 2017, from http://www.nmlindia.org/download/Tech_HB/files/assets/downloads/page0011.pdf.
  62. O’Connor, C.L. 2016. Decentralized water treatment in urban India, and the potential impacts of reverse osmosis water purifiers. SM Thesis, Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Retrieved February 4, 2018, from http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/106259.
  63. Orem, W., C. Tatu, M. Varonka, H. Lerch, A. Bates, M. Engle, L. Crosby, and J. McIntosh. 2014. Organic substances in produced and formation water from unconventional natural gas extraction in coal and shale. International Journal of Coal Geology 126: 20–31.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2014.01.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Perry, M., S. Wyllie, V. Prajapati, J. Menten, A. Raab, J. Feldmann, D. Chakraborti, et al. 2015. Arsenic, antimony, and Leishmania: Has arsenic contamination of drinking water in India led to treatment resistant kala-azar? Lancet 385: S80.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60395-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Pinto, P.X., S.R. Al-Abed, D.A. Balz, B.A. Butler, R.B. Landy, and S.J. Smith. 2016. Bench-scale and pilot-scale treatment technologies for the removal of total dissolved solids from coal mine water: A review. Mine Water and the Environment 35: 94–112.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10230-015-0351-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Poudyal, S., V.D. Zheljazkov, C.L. Cantrell, and T. Kelleners. 2016. Coal-bed methane water effects on dill and its essential oils. Journal of Environmental Quality 45: 728–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Qu, W., W. Zheng, S. Wang, and Y. Wang. 2012. China’s new national standard for drinking water takes effect. The Lancet 380: e8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61884-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Ramirez, P. 2005. Assessment of contaminants associated with coal bed methane-produced water and its suitability for wetland creation or enhancement projects. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Retrieved August 22, 2018, from https://www.fws.gov/mountain-prairie/contaminants/papers/documents/R6721C05.pdf.
  69. Rawat, V.S. 2013. Water purifier market to touch Rs 7,000 cr by 2015. Business Standard. Retrieved October 14, 2017, from http://www.business-standard.com/article/companies/water-purifier-market-to-touch-rs-7-000-cr-by-2015-113041700369_1.html.
  70. Reese, H., P. Routray, B. Torondel, G. Sclar, M.G. Delea, S.S. Sinharoy, L. Zambrano, et al. 2017. Design and rationale of a matched cohort study to assess the effectiveness of a combined household-level piped water and sanitation intervention in rural Odisha, India. BMJ Open 7: e012719.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Ren, D., L.M. Colosi, and J.A. Smith. 2013. Evaluating the sustainability of ceramic filters for point-of-use drinking water treatment. Environmental Science and Technology 47: 11206–11213.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es4026084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Research and Markets. 2017. Global reverse osmosis (RO) systems marketforecasts from 2017 to 2022. Knowledge sourcing intelligence LLP. Retrieved October 14, 2017, from https://www.researchandmarkets.com/research/sgzn9k/global_reverse.
  73. Routray, P., B. Torondel, M.W. Jenkins, T. Clasen, and W. Schmidt. 2017. Processes and challenges of community mobilisation for latrine promotion under Nirmal Bharat Abhiyan in rural Odisha, India. BMC Public Health 17: 453.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4382-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Rustan, A., C. Cunningham, W. Fourney, K.R.Y. Simha, and A.T. Spathis. 2010. Mining and rock construction technology desk reference. Boca Raton: CRC Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Salmachi, A., and C. Özgen Karacan. 2017. Cross-formational flow of water into coalbed methane reservoirs: Controls on relative permeability curve shape and production profile. Environmental Earth Sciences 76: 200.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-017-6505-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Schnoor, J.L. 2011. Water–energy nexus. Environmental Science and Technology 45: 5065.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es2016632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Semenza, J.C., L. Roberts, A. Henderson, J. Bogan, and C.H. Rubin. 1998. Water distribution system and diarrheal disease transmission: A case study in Uzbekistan. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 59: 941–946.  https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.1998.59.941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Shaffer, D.L., L.H. Arias Chavez, M. Ben-Sasson, S.R. Castrillón, N.Y. Yip, and M. Elimelech. 2013. Desalination and reuse of high-salinity shale gas produced water: Drivers, technologies, and future directions. Environmental Science and Technology 47: 9569–9583.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es401966e.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Sharma, N., and S.S. Mahapatra. 2018. A preliminary analysis of increase in water use with carbon capture and storage for Indian coal-fired power plants. Environmental Technology & Innovation 9: 51–62.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2017.10.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Shiao, T., and A. Maddocks. 2014. Finding solutions for South Africa’s coal-fired water and energy problems. The Guardian. Retrieved October 14, 2017, from https://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/2014/sep/18/south-africa-coal-water-energy-problems-mining.
  81. Shrivastava, A., S. Rosenberg, and M. Peery. 2015. Energy efficiency breakdown of reverse osmosis and its implications on future innovation roadmap for desalination. Desalination 368: 181–192.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2015.01.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Shukla, P.R., and S. Dhar. 2016. India’s GHG emission reduction and sustainable development. In Enabling Asia to stabilise the climate, ed. S. Nishioka, 41–54. Singapore: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Singh, A.K., and P.N. Hajra. 2018. Coalbed methane in India: Opportunities, issues and challenges for recovery and utilization. Cham: Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66465-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Singh, A.K., G.C. Mondal, S. Singh, P.K. Singh, T.B. Singh, B.K. Tewary, and A. Sinha. 2007. Aquatic geochemistry of Dhanbad, Jharkhand: Source evaluation and quality assessment. Journal of Geological Society of India 69: 1088–1102.Google Scholar
  85. Singh, A.K., M.K. Mahato, B. Neogi, and K.K. Singh. 2010. Quality assessment of mine water in the Raniganj Coalfield Area, India. Mine Water and the Environment 29: 248–262.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10230-010-0108-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Singh, G. 1994. Augmentation of underground pumped out water for potable purposes from coal mines of coal mines of Jharia coalfield. In 5th international mine water conference, 679–689. Nottingham, UK: IMWA.Google Scholar
  87. Singh, U. 2017. Design and development of experimental and simulation framework for emerging challenges in Indian natural gas industry. BTech Thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Institute of Technology Rourkela, Rourkela, India.Google Scholar
  88. Sobsey, M.D., T. Handzel, and L. Venczel. 2003. Chlorination and safe storage of household drinking water in developing countries to reduce waterborne disease. Water Science and Technology 47: 221–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Spencer, T., M. Colombier, O. Sartor, A. Garg, V. Tiwari, J. Burton, T. Caetano, F. Green, F. Teng, and J. Wiseman. 2018. The 1.5 °C target and coal sector transition: At the limits of societal feasibility. Climate Policy 18: 335–351.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2017.1386540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Srinath Reddy, K., V. Patel, P. Jha, V.K. Paul, A.K. Shiva Kumar, and L. Dandona. 2011. Towards achievement of universal health care in India by 2020: A call to action. Lancet 377: 760–768.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61960-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Srinivasan, S., N. Kholod, V. Chaturvedi, P.P. Ghosh, R. Mathur, L. Clarke, M. Evans, et al. 2017. Water for electricity in India: A multi-model study of future challenges and linkages to climate change mitigation. Applied Energy 210: 673–684.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.04.079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Standing Committee on Petroleum and Natural Gas. 2016. Production of Coalbed MethaneFourteenth Report. New Delhi: Lok Sabha Secretariat. http://164.100.47.193/lsscommittee/Petroleum%20&%20Natural%20Gas/16_Petroleum_And_Natural_Gas_14.pdf.
  93. Sureau, S., B. Mazjin, S.R. Garrido, and W.M.J. Achten. 2018. Social life-cycle assessment frameworks: A review of criteria and indicators proposed to assess social and socioeconomic impacts. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 23: 904–920.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-017-1336-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Tchobanoglous, G., and F.L. Burton. 1991. Wastewater engineering: Treatment, disposal and reuse. Boston: Irwin McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  95. Thomas, T. 2016. CBM to contribute 5% of India’s gas production by 2017: Pradhan. Business Line. Retrieved October 13, 2017, from http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/economy/cbm-to-contribute-5-of-indias-gas-production-by-2017-pradhan/article8614589.ece.
  96. Tiwary, R.K. 2001. Environmental impact of coal mining on water regime and its management. Water, Air, and Soil pollution 132: 185–199.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012083519667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1994. Washington, DC: Technical Document—Acid Mine Drainage Prediction. Retrieved May 1, 2018, from https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-09/documents/amd.pdf.
  98. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2010. Washington, DC: Coalbed Methane Extraction: Detailed Study Report. Retrieved August 14, 2018, from https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPURL.cgi?Dockey=P100MQJE.TXT.
  99. UNEP. 2017. The emissions gap report 2017—A UN environment synthesis report. Nairobi. Retrieved November 2, 2017 from https://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/22070/EGR_2017.pdf.
  100. USGS. 2000. Water produced with coal-bed methane. Retrieved April 14, 2018, from https://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/fs-0156-00/fs-0156-00.pdf.
  101. Wang, Z., X. Tian, and X. Wu. 2018. Hydrochemical characteristics and quality assessment of shallow groundwater and CBM co-produced water in the Shizhuangnan block, Qinshui Basin, China. Environmental Earth Sciences 77: 57.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-017-7212-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Werber, J.R., A. Deshmukh, and M. Elimelech. 2017. Can batch or semi-batch processes save energy in reverse-osmosis desalination? Desalination 402: 109–122.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2016.09.028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Wheaton, J., and J. Metesh. 2002. Potential ground-water drawdown and recovery from coalbed methane development in the Powder River Basin, Montana. Butte: Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.521.5320&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
  104. Zapata, C.B., C. Yang, S. Yeh, J. Ogden, and M.J. Kleeman. 2017. Low carbon energy generates public health savings in California. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 18: 4817–4830.  https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2017-796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Zimdars, C., A. Haas, and S. Pfister. 2018. Enhancing comprehensive measurement of social impacts in S-LCA by including environmental and economic aspects. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 23: 133–146.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-017-1305-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringUniversity of VirginiaCharlottesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations