Advertisement

Ambio

, Volume 47, Issue 8, pp 869–883 | Cite as

Exploring dynamism of cultural ecosystems services through a review of environmental education research

  • Rachelle K. Gould
  • Kimberly Coleman
  • Sonya Buglion Gluck
Review
  • 197 Downloads

Abstract

The field of cultural ecosystem services (CES) explores the non-material benefits that ecosystems provide to people. Human perceptions and valuations change, for many reasons and in many ways; research on CES, however, rarely accounts for this dynamism. In an almost entirely separate academic world, research on environmental education (EE) explores how EE programming affects peoples’ attitudes and values toward the natural world. In this review of 119 EE research publications, we explore whether CES (and the adjacent concept of relational values) can be dynamic. We approach this via two lines of inquiry that explore whether EE may instigate this change. First, we investigate whether the EE community measures (and tries to affect) CES-related outcomes. Second, we ask: Has EE research detected changes in CES-related outcomes? We find the EE programs measure many CES outcomes (e.g., aesthetic appreciation, social connectedness), and that in most cases studies observe increases in these outcomes after EE experiences.

Keywords

Change Measurement Relational values Social-ecological systems 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to research assistance from Michaela Ingerman. A portion of staff time for this work was supported by the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture, McIntire-Stennis project 1003495, and by a University of Vermont EXPRESS research grant.

References

  1. Adam, F., and B. Rončević. 2003. Social capital: Recent debates and research trends. Social Science Information 42: 155–183.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018403042002001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ardoin, N.M., K. Biedenweg, and K. O’Connor. 2015. Evaluation in residential environmental education: An applied literature review of intermediary outcomes. Applied Environmental Education & Communication 14: 43–56.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1533015X.2015.1013225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ballantyne, R., and J. Packer. 2009. Introducing a fifth pedagogy: Experience-based strategies for facilitating learning in natural environments. Environmental Education Research 15: 243–262.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620802711282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Basile, C.G. 2000. Environmental education as a catalyst for transfer of learning in young children. The Journal of Environmental Education 32: 21–27.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00958960009598668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baumgartner, E., and C.J. Zabin. 2008. A case study of project-based instruction in the ninth grade: A semester-long study of intertidal biodiversity. Environmental Education Research 14: 97–114.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620801951640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bodzin, A.M. 2008. Integrating instructional technologies in a local watershed investigation with urban elementary learners. The Journal of Environmental Education 39: 47–58.  https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEE.39.2.47-58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bogner, F.X. 1999. Empirical evaluation of an educational conservation programme introduced in Swiss secondary schools. International Journal of Science Education 21: 1169–1185.  https://doi.org/10.1080/095006999290138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bourdieu, P. 1980. Le capital social. Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales 31: 2–3.Google Scholar
  9. Bradley, J.C., T.M. Waliczek, and J.M. Zajicek. 1999. Relationship between environmental knowledge and environmental attitude of high school students. The Journal of Environmental Education 30: 17–21.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00958969909601873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cachelin, A., K. Paisley, and A. Blanchard. 2009. Using the significant life experience framework to inform program evaluation: The nature conservancy’s wings & water wetlands education program. The Journal of Environmental Education 40: 2–14.  https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEE.40.2.2-14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chan, K., T. Satterfield, and J. Goldstein. 2012a. Rethinking ecosystem services to better address and navigate cultural values. Ecological Economics 74: 8–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chan, K.M.A., A.D. Guerry, P. Balvanera, S. Klain, T. Satterfield, X. Basurto, A. Bostrom, R. Chuenpagdee, et al. 2012b. Where are cultural and social in ecosystem services? A framework for constructive engagement. BioScience 62: 744–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chan, K.M.A., P. Balvanera, K. Benessaiah, M. Chapman, S. Díaz, E. Gómez-Baggethun, R. Gould, N. Hannahs, et al. 2016. Opinion: Why protect nature? Rethinking values and the environment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113: 1462–1465.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1525002113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Church, A., J. Burgess, and N. Ravenscroft. 2011. Chapter 16: Cultural Services. Cambridge: UNEP-WCMC.Google Scholar
  15. Coleman, J.S. 1988. Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology 94: S95–S120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cummins, S., and G. Snively. 2000. The effect of instruction on children’s knowledge of marine ecology, attitudes toward the ocean, and stances toward marine resource issues. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education 5: 305–326.Google Scholar
  17. Curtis, D.J., M. Howden, F. Curtis, I. McColm, J. Scrine, T. Blomfield, I. Reeve, and T. Ryan. 2013. Drama and environment: Joining forces to engage children and young people in environmental education. Australian Journal of Environmental Education 29: 182–201.  https://doi.org/10.1017/aee.2014.5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. D’Amato, L.G., and M.E. Krasny. 2011. Outdoor adventure education: Applying transformative learning theory to understanding instrumental learning and personal growth in environmental education. The Journal of Environmental Education 42: 237–254.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2011.581313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Daniel, T.C., A. Muhar, A. Arnberger, O. Aznar, J.W. Boyd, K.M.A. Chan, R. Costanza, T. Elmqvist, et al. 2012. Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences United States of America 109: 8812–8819.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1114773109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dettmann-Easler, D., and J.L. Pease. 1999. Evaluating the effectiveness of residential environmental education programs in fostering positive attitudes toward wildlife. The Journal of Environmental Education 31: 33–39.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00958969909598630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. EPA. 2017. What is Environmental Education?. Washington DC: United States Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
  22. Ernstson, H. 2013. The social production of ecosystem services: A framework for studying environmental justice and ecological complexity in urbanized landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning 109: 7–17.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.10.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fish, R., A. Church, and M. Winter. 2016. Conceptualising cultural ecosystem services: A novel framework for research and critical engagement. Ecosystem Services 21: 208–217.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.09.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fisher, B., R.K. Turner, and P. Morling. 2009. Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecological Economics 68: 643–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Geijzendorffer, I.R., E. Cohen-Shacham, A.F. Cord, W. Cramer, C. Guerra, and B. Martín-López. 2017. Ecosystem services in global sustainability policies. Environmental Science & Policy 74: 40–48.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.04.017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gould, R.K., and N.K. Lincoln. 2017. Expanding the suite of cultural ecosystem services to include ingenuity, perspective, and life teaching. Ecosystem Services 25: 117–127.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.04.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gould, R.K., S.C. Klain, N.M. Ardoin, T. Satterfield, U. Woodside, N. Hannahs, G.C. Daily, and K.M. Chan. 2015. A protocol for eliciting nonmaterial values through a cultural ecosystem services frame: Analyzing cultural ecosystem services. Conservation Biology 29: 575–586.  https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hadzigeorgiou, Y., B. Prevezanou, M. Kabouropoulou, and M. Konsolas. 2011. Teaching about the importance of trees: A study with young children. Environmental Education Research 17: 519–536.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2010.549938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Harness, H., and H. Drossman. 2011. The environmental education through filmmaking project. Environmental Education Research 17: 829–849.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2011.618626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Heimlich, J.E., and N.M. Ardoin. 2008. Understanding behavior to understand behavior change: A literature review. Environmental Education Research 14: 215–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hinds, J. 2011. Woodland adventure for marginalized adolescents: Environmental attitudes, identity and competence. Applied Environmental Education and Communication 10: 228–237.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1533015X.2011.669689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jagger, S.L. 2014. “This is more like home”: Knowing nature through community mapping. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education (CJEE) 18: 173–189.Google Scholar
  33. Johnson, B., and C.C. Manoli. 2008. Using Bogner and Wiseman’s model of ecological values to measure the impact of an earth education programme on children’s environmental perceptions. Environmental Education Research 14: 115–127.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620801951673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jorgensen, B.S., and R.C. Stedman. 2001. Sense of place as an attitude: Lakeshore owners attitudes toward their properties. Journal of environmental psychology 21: 233–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kenter, J.O., N. Jobstvogt, V. Watson, K.N. Irvine, M. Christie, and R. Bryce. 2016. The impact of information, value-deliberation and group-based decision-making on values for ecosystem services: Integrating deliberative monetary valuation and storytelling. Ecosystem Services 21: 270–290.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.06.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Knapp, D., and G.M. Benton. 2006. Episodic and semantic memories of a residential environmental education program. Environmental Education Research 12: 165–177.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620600688906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Krasny, M., L. Kalbacker, R. Stedman, and A. Russ. 2015. Measuring social capital among youth: Applications in environmental education. Environmental Education Research 21: 1–23.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2013.843647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lebo, N., and C. Eames. 2015. Cultivating attitudes and trellising learning: A permaculture approach to science and sustainability education. Australian Journal of Environmental Education 31: 46–59.  https://doi.org/10.1017/aee.2015.23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Liefländer, A.K., G. Fröhlich, F.X. Bogner, and P.W. Schultz. 2013. Promoting connectedness with nature through environmental education. Environmental Education Research 19: 370–384.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2012.697545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mayer-Smith, J., O. Bartosh, and L. Peterat. 2010. Cultivating and reflecting on intergenerational environmental education on the farm. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education (CJEE) 14: 107–121.Google Scholar
  41. Milcu, A.I., J. Hanspach, D. Abson, and J. Fischer. 2013. Cultural ecosystem services: A literature review and prospects for future research. Ecology and Society.  https://doi.org/10.5751/es-05790-180344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mocior, E., and M. Kruse. 2016. Educational values and services of ecosystems and landscapes: An overview. Ecological Indicators 60: 137–151.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.06.031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Narayan, D., and M.F. Cassidy. 2001. A dimensional approach to measuring social capital: development and validation of a social capital inventory. Current Sociology 49: 59–102.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392101049002006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Plieninger, T., S. Dijks, E. Oteros-Rozas, and C. Bieling. 2013. Assessing, mapping, and quantifying cultural ecosystem services at community level. Land Use Policy 33: 118–129.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.12.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Powers, A.L. 2004. Evaluation of one-and two-day forestry field programs for elementary school children. Applied Environmental Education and Communication 3: 39–46.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15330150490270622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pröpper, M., and F. Haupts. 2014. The culturality of ecosystem services. Emphasizing process and transformation. Ecological Economics 108: 28–35.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.09.023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Raymond, C.M., G.G. Singh, K. Benessaiah, J.R. Bernhardt, J. Levine, H. Nelson, N.J. Turner, B. Norton, et al. 2013. Ecosystem services and beyond: Using multiple metaphors to understand human-environment relationships. BioScience 63: 536–546.  https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2013.63.7.7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Raymond, C.M., J.O. Kenter, T. Plieninger, N.J. Turner, and K.A. Alexander. 2014. Comparing instrumental and deliberative paradigms underpinning the assessment of social values for cultural ecosystem services. Ecological Economics 107: 145–156.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.07.033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rieb, J.T., R. Chaplin-Kramer, G.C. Daily, P.R. Armsworth, K. Böhning-Gaese, A. Bonn, G.S. Cumming, F. Eigenbrod, et al. 2017. When, where, and how nature matters for ecosystem services: Challenges for the next generation of ecosystem service models. BioScience.  https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/bix075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rosenthal, R. 1979. The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin 86: 638–641.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ruiz-Mallen, I., L. Barraza, B. Bodenhorn, and V. Reyes-García. 2009. Evaluating the impact of an environmental education programme: An empirical study in Mexico. Environmental Education Research 15: 371–387.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620902906766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Russ, A., S.J. Peters, M.E. Krasny, and R.C. Stedman. 2015. Development of ecological place meaning in New York City. The Journal of Environmental Education 46: 73–93.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2014.999743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Russell, C. 2000. A report on an Ontario secondary school integrated environmental studies program. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education 5: 287–303.Google Scholar
  54. Satz, D., R.K. Gould, K.M.A. Chan, A. Guerry, B. Norton, T. Satterfield, B.S. Halpern, J. Levine, et al. 2013. The challenges of incorporating cultural ecosystem services into environmental assessment. Ambio 42: 675–684.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-013-0386-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Schneller, A.J. 2008. Environmental service learning: outcomes of innovative pedagogy in Baja California Sur, Mexico. Environmental Education Research 14: 291–307.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620802192418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Schneller, A.J., B. Johnson, and F.X. Bogner. 2015. Measuring children’s environmental attitudes and values in northwest Mexico: Validating a modified version of measures to test the Model of Ecological Values (2-MEV). Environmental Education Research 21: 61–75.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2013.843648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Schultz, P.W. 2002. Inclusion with nature: The Psychology of human–nature relations. In Psychology of Sustainable Development, 61–78. Boston: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Siemer, W.F., and B.A. Knuth. 2001. Effects of fishing education programs on antecedents of responsible environmental behavior. The Journal of Environmental Education 32: 23–29.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00958960109598659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sténs, A., T. Bjärstig, E.-M. Nordström, C. Sandström, C. Fries, and J. Johansson. 2016. In the eye of the stakeholder: The challenges of governing social forest values. Ambio 45: 87–99.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-015-0745-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Stern, M.J., R.B. Powell, and N.M. Ardoin. 2008. What difference does it make? Assessing outcomes from participation in a residential environmental education program. The Journal of Environmental Education 39: 31–43.  https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEE.39.4.31-43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Stern, M.J., R.B. Powell, and D. Hill. 2014. Environmental education program evaluation in the new millennium: What do we measure and what have we learned? Environmental Education Research 20: 581–611.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2013.838749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Stevenson, R.B., M. Brody, J. Dillon, and A.E.J. Wals. 2013. International Handbook of Research on Environmental Education. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  63. Theimer, S., and J. Ernst. 2012. Fostering “Connectedness to nature” through U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service education and outreach programming: A qualitative evaluation. Applied Environmental Education & Communication 11: 79–87.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1533015X.2012.751281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Thiagarajah, J., S.K.M. Wong, D.R. Richards, and D.A. Friess. 2015. Historical and contemporary cultural ecosystem service values in the rapidly urbanizing city state of Singapore. Ambio 44: 666–777.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-015-0647-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Tidball, K., and M. Krasny. 2011. Toward an ecology of environmental education and learning. Ecosphere 2: 1–17.  https://doi.org/10.1890/ES10-00153.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Unesco, U. 1977. The Tbilisi declaration. Connect 3: 1–8.Google Scholar
  67. Wiborn, P. 2013. Nature’s Services: A guide for primary school on ecosystem services. Sweden: WWF.Google Scholar
  68. Wondolleck, J.M., and S.L. Yaffee. 2000. Making collaboration work: Lessons from innovation in natural resource management. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Vermont Aiken CenterBurlingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations