Advertisement

Ambio

, Volume 47, Issue 8, pp 924–934 | Cite as

Ecological changes and local knowledge in a giant honey bee (Apis dorsata F.) hunting community in Palawan, Philippines

  • Denise Margaret S. Matias
  • Christian Borgemeister
  • Henrik von Wehrden
Research Article

Abstract

One of the traditional livelihood practices of indigenous Tagbanuas in Palawan, Philippines is wild honey hunting and gathering from the giant honey bee (Apis dorsata F.). In order to analyze the linkages of the social and ecological systems involved in this indigenous practice, we conducted spatial, quantitative, and qualitative analyses on field data gathered through mapping of global positioning system coordinates, community surveys, and key informant interviews. We found that only 24% of the 251 local community members surveyed could correctly identify the giant honey bee. Inferential statistics showed that a lower level of formal education strongly correlates with correct identification of the giant honey bee. Spatial analysis revealed that mean NDVI of sampled nesting tree areas has dropped from 0.61 in the year 1988 to 0.41 in 2015. However, those who correctly identified the giant honey bee lived in areas with high vegetation cover. Decreasing vegetation cover limits the presence of wild honey bees and this may also be limiting direct experience of the community with wild honey bees. However, with causality yet to be established, we recommend conducting further studies to concretely model feedbacks between ecological changes and local knowledge.

Keywords

Integrated conservation and development Social-ecological system Spatial analysis Wild honey bee 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Lenita Nangcod, Loreta Alsa, the Tagbanua community in Sagpangan, NATRIPAL, NTFP-EP Philippines, Andrea Alberti, Guido Lüchters, and Robert Feller for their assistance in data gathering and analysis. The authors also thank Graciela Rusch and two anonymous reviewers for their comments. This work was supported by the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD), Foundation fiat panis, and The Eva Crane Trust.

Supplementary material

13280_2018_1038_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (47 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 48 kb)

References

  1. Argyris, C., and D.A. Schön. 1974. Theory in practice: Increasing professional effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  2. Ballard, H.L., M.E. Fernandez-Gimenez, and V.E. Sturtevant. 2008. Integration of local ecological knowledge and conventional science: A study of seven community-based forestry organizations in the USA. Ecology and Society 13: 37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berkes, F., J. Colding, and C. Folke. 2003. Part III. Social-ecological learning and adaptation. In Navigating social-ecological systems: Building resilience for complexity and change, ed. F. Berkes, J. Colding, and C. Folke, 187–188. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Berkes, F., and C. Folke. 2002. Chapter 5. Back to the future: Ecosystem dynamics and local knowledge. In Panarchy: Understanding transformations in human and natural systems, ed. L.H. Gunderson, and C.S. Holling, 121–146. Washington: Island Press.Google Scholar
  5. Berkes, F., and N. Turner. 2006. Knowledge, learning and the evolution of conservation practice for social-ecological system resilience. Human Ecology 34: 479–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Biggs, R., M. Schlüter, and M.L. Schoon. 2015. An introduction to the resilience approach and principles to sustain ecosystem services in social-ecological systems. In Principles for building resilience, ed. R. Biggs, M. Schlüter, and M.L. Schoon, 1–31. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brandt, P., A. Ernst, F. Gralla, C. Luederitz, D.J. Lang, J. Newig, F. Reinert, D.J. Abson, and H. von Wehrden. 2013. A review of transdisciplinary research in sustainability science. Ecological Economics 92: 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carter, N.H., B.K. Shrestha, J.B. Karki, N.M.B. Pradhan, and J. Liu. 2012. Coexistence between wildlife and humans at fine spatial scales. PNAS 109: 15360–15365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Crane, E. 1999. The world history of beekeeping and honey hunting. New York and Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Cundill, G., A.M. Leitch, L. Schultz, D. Armitage, and G. Peterson. 2015. Principle 5–Encourage learning. In Principles for building resilience, ed. R. Biggs, M. Schlüter, and M.L. Schoon, 174–200. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dakos, V., A. Quinlan, J.A. Baggio, E. Bennett, O. Bodin, and S. BurnSilver. 2015. Principle 2—Manage connectivity. In Principles for building resilience, ed. R. Biggs, M. Schlüter, and M.L. Schoon, 80–104. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Davis, A., and K. Ruddle. 2010. Constructing confidence: Rational skepticism and systematic enquiry in local ecological knowledge research. Ecological Applications 20: 880–894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Defries, R.S., and J.R.G. Townshend. 1994. NDVI-derived land cover classifications at a global scale. International Journal of Remote Sensing 15: 3567–3586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations). 2016. State of the world’s forests 2016. Forests and agriculture: Land-use challenges and opportunities.. Rome: FAO Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  15. Fischer, J., T.A. Gardner, E.M. Bennett, P. Balvanera, R. Biggs, S. Carpenter, T. Daw, C. Folke, et al. 2015. Advancing sustainability through mainstreaming a social-ecological systems perspective. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 14: 144–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Flood, R.L., and N.R.A. Romm. 1996. Diversity management: Triple loop learning. Chicester: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Funtowicz, S.O., J. Martinez-Alier, G. Munda, and J.R. Ravetz. 1999. Information tools for environmental policy under conditions of complexity. Luxembourg: European Environmental Agency.Google Scholar
  18. Gadgil, M., P. Olsson, F. Berkes, and C. Folke. 2003. Exploring the role of local ecological knowledge in ecosystem management: Three case studies. In Navigating social-ecological systems: Building resilience for complexity and change, ed. F. Berkes, J. Colding, and C. Folke, 189–209. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Garnett, S.T., J. Sayer, and J. du Toit. 2007. Improving the effectiveness of interventions to balance conservation and development: A conceptual framework. Ecology and Society 12: 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gibbons, M., C. Limoges, H. Nowotny, S. Schwartzman, P. Scott, and M. Trow. 1994. The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  21. Hair Jr., J.F., R.E. Anderson, R.L. Tatham, and W.C. Black. 1995. Multivariate data analysis. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  22. Hirsch-Hadorn, G., D. Bradley, C. Pohl, S. Rist, and U. Wiesmann. 2006. Implications of transdisciplinarity for sustainability research. Ecological Economics 60: 119–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. IFAD (International Fund for Agricultural Development). 2016. Rural development report 2016: Fostering inclusive rural transformation. Rome: Quintily.Google Scholar
  24. Iniesta-Arandia, I., D. Garcia del Amo, A.P. García-Nieto, C. Piñeiro, C. Montes, and B. Martín-López. 2014. Factors influencing local ecological knowledge maintenance in Mediterranean watersheds: Insights for environmental policies. Ambio 44: 285–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jerneck, A., L. Olsson, B. Ness, S. Anderberg, M. Baier, E. Clark, T. Hickler, A. Hornborg, et al. 2011. Structuring sustainability science. Sustainability Science 6: 69–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jönsson, A.M., L. Eklundh, M. Hellström, L. Bärring, and P. Jönsson. 2010. Annual changes in MODIS vegetation indices of Swedish coniferous forests in relation to snow dynamics and tree phenology. Remote Sensing of Environment 114: 2719–2730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Joshi, S.R., and M.G. Gurung. 2005. Non-destructive method of honey hunting. Bee World 86: 63–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kates, R.W., W.C. Clark, R. Correll, M.J. Hall, C.C. Jaeger, I. Lowe, J.J. McCarthy, H.J. Schnellnhuber, et al. 2001. Sustainability science. Science 292: 641–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Koehler, C. 2017. Crucial role of indigenous knowledge in formal education systems. In Handbook of research on social, cultural, and educational considerations of indigenous knowledge in developing countries, ed. P. Ngulube, 60–79. Pennsylvania: IGI Global.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Koeniger, G., S. Tingek, and N. Koeniger. 2010. Honey bees of Borneo: Exploring the center of Apis diversity. Borneo: Natural History Publications.Google Scholar
  31. Lazic, S.E. 2010. The problem of pseudoreplication in neuroscientific studies: Is it affecting your analysis? BMC Neuroscience 11: 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Marquardt, D.W. 1970. Generalized inverses, ridge regression, biased linear estimation, and nonlinear estimation. Technometrics 12: 591–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Matias, D.M.S., T. Stellmacher, C. Borgemeister, J.G. Cayron, and H. von Wehrden. 2017. Mapping giant honey bee nests in Palawan, Philippines through a transdisciplinary approach. Development in Practice 27: 903–912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. May, S., and S. Aikman. 2003. Indigenous education: Addressing current issues and developments. Comparative Education 39: 139–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Millenium Ecosystem Assessment. 2005. Ecosystems and human well being. General synthesis. Millenium Ecosystem Assessment. Retrieved January 11, 2018, from http://www.millenniumassessment.org/en/Synthesis.aspx.
  36. Mitchell, M.N. 2015. Stata for the behavioral sciences. Texas: Stata Press.Google Scholar
  37. Merriam-Webster. 2016. Learning. Retrieved January 11, 2018, from http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/learning.
  38. Molina, J.G.J., and A. Neef. 2016. Integration of indigenous knowledge into disaster risk reduction and management (DRRM) policies for sustainable development: The case of the Agta in Casiguran, Philippines. In Sustainable development and disaster risk reduction, ed. J.I. Uitto, and R. Shaw, 247–264. Tokyo: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Oldroyd, B.P., and P. Nanork. 2009. Conservation of Asian honey bees. Apidologie 40: 296–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Oldroyd, B.P., and S. Wongsiri. 2006. Asian honey bees. Biology, conservation, and human interactions. Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Ostrom, E. 2009. A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological Systems. Science 325: 419–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Partelow, S., and K.J. Winkler. 2016. Interlinking ecosystem services and Ostrom’s framework through orientation in sustainability research. Ecology and Society 21: 27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Philippine Statistics Authority. 2016. Population of Region IV-B—MIMAROPA (Based on the 2015 Census of Population). Retrieved January 04, 2018, from https://www.psa.gov.ph/sites/default/files/attachments/hsd/pressrelease/R04B.xlsx.
  44. Quinlan, M., and R.J. Quinlan. 2007. Modernization and medicinal plant knowledge in a Caribbean horticultural village. Medical Anthropology Quarterly 21: 169–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Reyes-García, V. 2013. Introduction to special section: On the relations between schooling and local knowledge. Guest editiorial. Learning and Individual Differences 27: 201–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rist, S., and F. Dahdouh-Guebas. 2006. Ethnosciences—A step towards the integration of scientific and indigenous forms of knowledge in the management of natural resources for the future. Environment, Development and Sustainability 8: 467–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rogers, K.H., R. Luton, H. Biggs, R. Biggs, S. Blignaut, A.G. Choles, C.G. Palmer, and P. Tangwe. 2013. Fostering complexity thinking in action research for change in social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society 18: 31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Shackleton, C., S. Shackleton, and P. Shanley. 2011. Building a holistic picture: An integrative analysis of current and future prospects for non-timber forest products in a changing world. In Non-timber forest products in the global context, ed. S. Shackleton, C. Shackleton, and P. Shanley, 255–280. Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Shanley, P., A.R. Pierce, S.A. Laird, C.L. Binnqüist, and M.R. Guariguata. 2015. From lifelines to livelihoods: Non-timber forest products into the twenty-first century. In Tropical forestry handbook, ed. L. Pancel, and M. Köhl, 1–50. Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  50. Sills, E., P. Shanley, F. Paumgarten, J. de Beer, and A. Pierce. 2011. Evolving perspectives on non-timber forest products. In Non-timber forest products in the global context, ed. S. Shackleton, C. Shackleton, and P. Shanley, 23–51. Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sternberg, R. 1997. Successful intelligence. New York: Plume.Google Scholar
  52. Sternberg, R., C. Nokes, P. Geissler, R. Prince, F. Okatcha, D. Bundy, and E. Grigorenko. 2001. The relationship between academic and practical intelligence: A case study in Kenya. Intelligence 29: 401–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. UNICEF (United Nations Children’s Fund). 2016. Indigenous children from Palawan talk about the issues that affect their communities. Retrieved January 11, 2018, from https://medium.com/@unicefphils/indigenous-children-from-palawan-talk-about-the-issues-that-affect-their-communities-e69653285c2e#.79dhfav3l.
  54. UNGA (United Nations General Assembly). 2015. Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015 70/1. Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. Retrieved January 11, 2018, from http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/70/1&Lang=E.
  55. UNGA (United Nations General Assembly). 2016. Report of the special rapporteur of the Human Rights Council on the rights of indigenous peoples, Victoria Tauli-Corpuz. Retrieved January 11, 2018, from http://unsr.vtaulicorpuz.org/site/images/docs/annual/2016-annual-ga-a-71-229-en.pdf.
  56. USGS (United States Geological Survey). 2015. NDVI, the foundation for remote sensing phenology. Retrieved January 11, 2018, from http://phenology.cr.usgs.gov/ndvi_foundation.php.
  57. Weier, J., and D. Herring. 2000. Measuring vegetation (NDVI & EVI). Retrieved February 07, 2018, from https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/MeasuringVegetation/.
  58. Wilshusen, P.R., S.R. Brechin, C.L. Fortwangler, and P.C. West. 2002. Reinventing a square wheel: Critique of a resurgent “protection paradigm” in international biodiversity conservation. Society and Natural Resources 15: 17–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Ecology and Natural Resources Management, Center for Development Research (Zentrum für Entwicklungsforschung) BonnUniversity of BonnBonnGermany
  2. 2.Programme on Environmental Governance and Transformation to Sustainability, German Development Institute / Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik (DIE)BonnGermany
  3. 3.Center for Methods, Institute of Ecology, Faculty of SustainabilityLeuphana UniversityLüneburgGermany

Personalised recommendations