Ambio

, Volume 47, Issue 2, pp 231–244 | Cite as

A spatial evaluation of historic iron mining impacts on current impaired waters in Lake Superior’s Mesabi Range

Report

Abstract

This paper examines the water quality legacies of historic and current iron mining in the Mesabi Range, the most productive iron range in the history of North America, producing more than 42% of the world’s iron ore in the 1950s. Between 1893 and 2016, 3.5 × 109 t of iron ore were shipped from the Mesabi Range to steel plants throughout the world. We map historic sites and quantities of iron mining, ore processing, water use, and tailings deposition within subwatershed boundaries. We then map the locations of impaired lakes within HUC-12 subwatershed boundaries within the Mesabi Range, using government datasets created for US federal Clean Water Act reporting. Comparing watersheds with and without historic mining activity, watersheds with historic mining activity currently contain a greater percentage of impaired lakes than control watersheds within the same range. These results suggest that historic iron ore mining and processing in the Mesabi Range affected water quality on a landscape scale, and these legacies persist long after the mines have closed. This paper outlines a novel spatial approach that land managers and policy makers can apply to other landscapes to assess the effects of past mining activity on watershed health.

Keywords

Environmental history Geospatial analysis Historical geographic information systems (HGIS) Historical mining Iron mining 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Science Foundation (Grant #R56645, Toxic Mobilizations in Iron Mining Contamination). The authors thank Kelley Christensen at Michigan Tech for helpful feedback and support. We thank the anonymous reviewers who provided invaluable feedback on an earlier draft of this manuscript. We also thank the MPCA for providing watershed datasets to the public.

References

  1. Agency, Minnesota Pollution Control. 2008. Appendix A: Impaired Waters and TMDL Fact Sheets and Maps. St. Paul, MN: Minnesota Pollution Control Agency.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, P. 2016. Guidance Manuel for Assessing the Quality of Minnesota Surface Waters for Determination of Impairment: 305(b) Report and 303(d) List. 2016 Assessment and Listing Cycle.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, P., and I. Martin. 2015. Standard Operating Procedures (SOP): Lake Water Quality Sampling. St. Paul, MN: Minnesota Pollution Control Agency.Google Scholar
  4. Anderson, P., W. Bouchard, D. Chrisopherson, and M. Feist. 2014. Guidance Manual for Assessing the Quality of Minnesota’s Surface Waters for Determination of Impairment: 305(b) Report and 303(d) List. St. Paul, MN: Minnesota Pollution Control Agency.Google Scholar
  5. Angelstam, P., K. Andersson, M. Isacson, D.V. Gavrilov, R. Axelsson, M. Bäckström, E. Degerman, M. Elbakidze, et al. 2013. Learning about the history of landscape use for the future: Consequences for ecological and social systems in Swedish Bergslagen. Ambio 42: 146–159. doi: 10.1007/s13280-012-0369-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Axler, R., C. Larsen, C. Tikkanen, M. McDonald, S. Yokom, and P. Aas. 1996. Water quality issues associated with aquaculture: A case study in mine pit lakes. Water Environment Research 68: 995–1011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Axler, Richard, S. Yokom, C. Tikkanen, M. McDonald, H. Runke, D. Wilcox, and B. Cady. 1998. Restoration of a Mine Pit lake from aquacultural nutrient enrichment. Restoration Ecology 6: 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Baeten, J., N. Langston, and D. Lafreniere. 2016. A geospatial approach to uncovering the hidden waste footprint of Lake Superior’s Mesabi Iron Range. The Extractive Industries and Society 3: 1031–1045. doi: 10.1016/j.exis.2016.09.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bernhardt, E.S., B.D. Lutz, R.S. King, J.P. Fay, C.E. Carter, A.M. Helton, D. Campagna, and J. Amos. 2012. How many mountains can we mine? Assessing the regional degradation of central appalachian rivers by surface coal mining. Environmental Science and Technology 46: 8115–8122. doi: 10.1021/es301144q.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bird, G. 2016. The influence of the scale of mining activity and mine site remediation on the contamination legacy of historical metal mining activity. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 23: 23456–23466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Braungardt, C.B., E.P. Achterberg, F. Elbaz-Poulichet, and N.H. Morley. 2003. Metal geochemistry in a mine-polluted estuarine system in Spain. Applied Geochemistry 18: 1757–1771. doi: 10.1016/S0883-2927(03)00079-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Byrne, P., P.J. Wood, and I. Reid. 2012. The impairment of river systems by metal mine contamination: A review including remediation options. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology 42: 2017–2077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cherry, D.S., R.J. Currie, D.J. Soucek, H.A. Latimer, and G.C. Trent. 2001. An integrative assessment of a watershed impacted by abandoned mined land discharges. Environmental Pollution 111: 377–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Church, S.E., P. von Guerrard, and S.E. Finger. 2007. Integrated Investigations of Environmental Effects of Historical Mining in the Animas River Watershed, San Juan County, Colorado. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1651.Google Scholar
  15. Clifford, J. 2017. West Ham and the River Lea: A Social and Environmental History of London’s Industrialized Marshland, 1839–1914. Vancouver, BC: UBC Press.Google Scholar
  16. Cummins, A., and I. Given. 1973. SME Mining Engineering Handbook, vol. 2. New York: Society of Mining Engineers.Google Scholar
  17. Cunfer, G. 2008. Scaling the dust bowl. In Placing History: How Maps, Spatial Data, and GIS are Changing Historical Scholarship, ed. A.K. Knowles, 95–122. Redlands, CA: ESRI Press.Google Scholar
  18. Davis, E.W. 1964. Pioneering with Taconite. St. Paul, MN: Minnesota Historical Society.Google Scholar
  19. Forbes, J. 1953. Iron ore. In Minerals yearbook metals and minerals. Bureau of mines. Washington: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  20. Grosbois, C., M. Meybeck, L. Lestel, I. Lefevre, and F. Moatar. 2012. Severe and contrasted polymetallic contamination patterns (1900–2009) in the Loire River sediments (France). Science of the Total Environment 435: 290–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gutmann, M., D. Brown, A. Cunningham, J. Dykes, S. Hautaniemi Leonard, J. Little, J. Mikecz, P. Rhode, et al. 2016. Migration in the 1930s: Beyond the dust bowl. Social Science History 40: 707–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hanak, E., J. Lund, A. Dinar, B. Gray, R. Howitt, J. Mount, P. Moyle, and B. Thompson. 2011. Managing California’s Water: From Conflict to Reconciliation. San Francisco, CA: Public Policy Institute of California.Google Scholar
  23. Haunch, S., and A. MacDonald. 2011. The environmental legacy of historic mining activities in the Almond River catchment, Scotland. In Mine WaterManaging the Challenges. Aachen, Germany.Google Scholar
  24. Haunch, S. 2013. Legacy of historic mining and water quality in a heavily mined Scottish river catchment. PhD thesis, Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  25. Hubbard, J. 1948. Spiral concentration. Mining World 13: 41–44.Google Scholar
  26. Hudson-Edwards, K. 2016. Tackling mine wastes. Science 352: 288–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hudson-Edwards, K., M. Macklin, and M. Taylor. 1997. Historic metal mining inputs to Tess river sediment. The Science of the Total Environment 194: 437–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hunerlach, M.P., J.J. Rytuba, and C.N. Alpers. 1999. Mercury contamination from hydraulic placer-gold mining in the Dutch Flat Mining District, California. U.S. Geological Survey, Water-Resources Investigations Report 99-4018B, pp. 179–189.Google Scholar
  29. Hunt, M. 1951. Taconite: Iron ore bonanza. Steelways, Iron and Steel Institute.Google Scholar
  30. Impaired Lakes. 2012. Minnesota Geospatial Commons (version Shapefile). St. Paul, MN: Minnesota Pollution Control Agency.Google Scholar
  31. Iron Ore Concentrating Plants of Minnesota. 1920. Skillings’ Mining Review, September 4.Google Scholar
  32. Isenberg, A. 2005. Mining California: An Ecological History. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
  33. James, L.A., and W.A. Marcus. 2006. The human role in changing fluvial systems: Retrospect, inventory and prospect. Geomorphology 79: 152–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Johnson, D.B., and K. Hallberg. 2005. Acid mine drainage remediation options: A review. Science of the Total Environment 338: 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Keeling, A., and J. Sandlos. 2015. Mining and communities in Northern Canada: History, politics, and memory. Calgary: University of Calgary Press.Google Scholar
  36. Kohn, C., and R. Specht. 1958. The mining of taconite, lake superior iron mining district. Geographical Review 48: 528–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lakes and water quality. 2017. Government. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency.Google Scholar
  38. Langston, N. 2017. Sustaining Lake Superior. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. LeCain, T. 2009. Mass Destruction: The Men and Giant Mines that Wired America and Scared the Planet. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  40. LeClerc, E., and Y. Wiersma. 2017. Assessing post-industrial land cover change at the Pine Point Mine, NWT, Canada using multi-temporal Landsat analysis and landscape metrics. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 189: 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. LiDAR Elevation, Arrowhead Region, NE Minnesota, 2011. Shape and File GeoDataBase. St. Paul, MN: Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. Davis, Kellogg & Severance Law Firm Records.Google Scholar
  42. LiDAR Elevation, Central Lakes Region, Minnesota, 2012. Shape and File GeoDataBase. St. Paul, MN: Minnesota Department of Natural Resources.Google Scholar
  43. Limerick, P.N., J.N. Ryan, T.R. Brown, and T.A. Comp. 2005. Cleaning up abandoned hardrock mines in the west: Prospecting for a better future. Report from the Center #7, Center of the American West, University of Colorado at Boulder, 47 pp.Google Scholar
  44. MacFarlane, D. 2016. Waukesha and great lakes water: some historical background. NiCHE: Network in Canadian History & Environment. http://niche-canada.org/2016/06/22/waukesha-and-great-lakes-water-some-historical-background/.
  45. MacKenzie, A.B., and I.D. Pulford. 2002. Investigation of contaminant metal dispersal from a disused mine site at Tyndrum, Scotland, using concentration gradients and stable Pb isotope ratios. Applied Geochemistry 17: 1093–1103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Macklin, M.G., K.A. Hudson-Edwards, and E.J. Dawson. 1997. The significance of pollution from historic metal mining in the Pennine orefields on river sediment contaminant fluxes to the North Sea. Science of the Total Environment 194: 391–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Manuel, J.T. 2015. Taconite Dreams: The Struggle to Sustain Mining on Minnesota’s Iron Range, 1915–2000. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. McGarvey, D.J., and J.M. Johnston. 2013. “Fishing” for alternatives to mountaintop mining in Southern West Virginia. Ambio 42: 298–308. doi: 10.1007/s13280-012-0346-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Miller, J. 1997. The role of fluvial geomorphic processes in the dispersal of heavy metals from mine sites. Journal of Geochemical Exploration 58: 101–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Mineland Reclamation: Minnesota’s Program. 1988. Division of Lands and Minerals. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources.Google Scholar
  51. Mineral Resources Data System. 2005. Shape and File GeoDataBase. Reston, VA: U.S. Geological Survey.Google Scholar
  52. Minnesota’s Impaired Waters List. 2017. Government. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency.Google Scholar
  53. Moore, J.N., and H.W. Langer. 2012. Can a river heal itself? Natural attenuation of metal contamination in river sediment. Environmental Science and Technology 46: 2616–2623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Moore, J.N., and S.N. Luoma. 1990. Hazardous wastes from large-scale metal extraction. Environmental Science and Technology 24: 1278–1285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Mud from Brazil dam disaster is toxic, UN says, despite mine operator denials. 2015. The Guardian, November 25.Google Scholar
  56. Muskie, E. 1972. Clean Water Act. 40 C.F.R. Google Scholar
  57. Pellicori, D.A., C.H. Gammons, and S.R. Poulson. 2005. Geochemistry and stable isotope composition of the Berkeley pit lake and surrounding mine waters, Butte, Montana. Applied Geochemistry 20: 2116–2137. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2005.07.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Plumlee, G.S., R.A. Morton, T.P. Boyle, J.H. Medlin, and J.A. Centeno. 2000. An Overview of Mining-Related Environmental and Human Health Issues, Marinduque Island, Philippines: Observations from a Joint US Geological Survey-Armed Forces Institute of Pathology Reconnaissance Field Evaluation, May 12–19, 2000. US Geological Survey Open-File Report.Google Scholar
  59. Quivik, F. 1998. Smoke and tailings: An environmental history of copper smelting technologies in Montana, 1880–1930. Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  60. Ross, M.R., B.L. McGlynn, and E.S. Bernhardt. 2016. Deep impact: Effects of mountaintop mining on surface topography, bedrock structure, and downstream waters. Environmental Science and Technology 50: 2064–2074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Savage, K., D. Bird, and R. Ashley. 2010. Legacy of the California gold rush: Environmental geochemistry of arsenic in the southern Mother Lode Gold District. International Geology Review 42: 385–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Seaber, P., P. Kapinos, and G. Knapp. 1994. Hydrologic Unit Maps. United States Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 2294. U.S. Department of the Interior.Google Scholar
  63. Singer, M.B., R. Aalto, L.A. James, N. Kilham, J. Higson, and S. Ghoshal. 2013. Enduring legacy of a toxic fan via episodic redistribution of California gold mining debris. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110: 18436–18441. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1206191109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Sullivan, M. 2014. Tainted Earth: Smelters, Public Health, and the Environment. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Surface Mining: Complete Reconciliation of the Abandoned Mine Land Fund Needed. 1988. GAO/RCED-89-35. Government Accountability Office.Google Scholar
  66. Taggart, A. 1927. Handbook of Ore Dressing. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  67. Technical Resource Document: Extraction and Beneficiation of Ores and Minerals. 1994. EPA 530-R-94-030. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Office of Surface Waste.Google Scholar
  68. The 8, 10, and 12 hydrologic unit boundaries for Minnesota. 2008. Vector Digital Data. Mounds View, MN: USGS.Google Scholar
  69. The Lake Superior District. 1920. The Iron Trade Review 66.Google Scholar
  70. Thomas, M.A., C.H. Conaway, D.J. Steding, M. Marvin-DiPasquale, K.E. Abu-Saba, and A.R. Flegal. 2002. Mercury contamination from historic mining in water and sediment, Guadalupe River and San Francisco Bay, California. Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis 2: 211–217.Google Scholar
  71. Van Allen, N., and D. Lafreniere. 2016. Rebuilding the landscape of the rural post office: A geo spatial analysis of the 19th century postal space and networks. Rural Landscapes: Society, Environment, History 3: 1–19.Google Scholar
  72. Van Barneveld, C.E. 1913. Iron Mining in Minnesota. Minnesota School of Mines Experiment Station Bulletin 1. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
  73. Walker, S.R., H.E. Jamieson, A. Lanzirotti, G.E.M. Hall, and R.C. Peterson. 2015. The effect of ore roasting on arsenic oxidation state and solid phase speciation in gold mine tailings. Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis 15: 273–291.Google Scholar
  74. Water Quality: Describing Water Quality. 2017. Government. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/whaf/about/5-component/wq_concepts.html. Accessed 25 July 2017.
  75. Water Quality Standards. 2017. Government. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. https://www.pca.state.mn.us/water/water-quality-standards. Accessed 28 Feb 2017.
  76. Wernstedt, K., and R. Hersh. 2010. Abandoned Hardrock Mines in the United States: Escape from a Regulatory Impasse. William & Mary Environmental Law and Policy Review 1: 25.Google Scholar
  77. Worrall, R., D. Neil, D. Brereton, and D. Mulligan. 2009. Towards a sustainability criteria and indicators framework for legacy mine land. Journal of Cleaner Production 17: 1426–1434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Watershed Boundary Dataset (WBD). ESRI Shape and File GeoDataBase. USGS and USDA-NRCS.Google Scholar
  79. Yellishetty, M., P.G. Ranjith, and A. Tharumarajah. 2010. Iron ore and steel production trends and material flows in the world: Is this really sustainable? Resources, Conservation and Recycling 54: 1084–1094. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.03.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Young, G. 1932. Elements of Mining. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company Inc.Google Scholar
  81. Younger, P., and C. Wolkersdorfer. 2004. Mining impacts on fresh water environment: Technical and managerial guidelines for catchment scale management. ERMITE Report: D6, The European Commission Fifth Framework Programme, Energy Environment and Sustainable Development.Google Scholar
  82. Zellie, C. 2005. Mesabi Iron Range Historic Contexts, Itasca and St. Louis Counties, Minnesota Phase III Mitigation Study TH 169. St. Paul, MN: Federal Highway Administration and Minnesota Department of Transportation.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Social SciencesMTUHoughtonUSA

Personalised recommendations