Ambio

, Volume 47, Issue 1, pp 86–96 | Cite as

Pillar of strength: Columnar cactus as a key factor in Yoreme heritage and wildland preservation

  • Andrew J. Semotiuk
  • Patricia Colunga-GarcíaMarín
  • David Valenzuela Maldonado
  • Exequiel Ezcurra
Report
  • 144 Downloads

Abstract

The persistence of traditional cultures and modes of land use within rapidly changing, globalized societies is a central issue in understanding ecological and cultural change in the Anthropocene. Located in the heart of the Green Revolution, the Yoreme (Mayo) people of the Mayo Valley in Mexico still obtain a significant proportion of their sustenance from wild ecosystems in the midst of this intensive technological and agricultural development. They live in and around the thornscrub dominated by pitaya (Stenocereus thurberi (Engelm.) Buxb.). In this study, we hypothesize that pitaya supports Yoreme heritage and sustenance amidst anthropogenic changes to the landscape, and we asked three specific questions: What is the land-use status of the S. thurberi habitat? What are its potential uses? Does S. thurberi provide economic value? To address these questions, we conducted interviews, vegetation surveys, and land-use analysis based on geographic information systems. We found that (a) land conversion of the pitaya-rich thornscrub is occurring at a precipitous rate, (b) local producers preserve and adapt their traditions, and (c) S. thurberi supports Yoreme heritage while providing economic benefit. The resulting land-use projections along with the cultural value of pitaya products shows the importance of conserving land and promoting sustainable projects instead of clearing land for other uses. If habitat shrinking continues at the current rate, it is likely that both Yoreme livelihoods and continued cultural practices will suffer.

Keywords

Ethnobotany Land-use change Pitaya Sonora, Mexico Stenocereus thurberi Yoreme 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank the University of California Institute for Mexico and the United States (UC MEXUS) for funding as a Dissertation Research Grant (DI 14-7). We express our utmost thanks to our local partners who assisted with networking and data collection, namely Simona Aldama, Panchita Espinoza, Eudelia Verdugo, Jesús Buaysegua, Tirzo Ontamucha, Benjamín Leyva, Martín Espinoza, Miguel Molina, and Ishmael Ibarra. We also thank Latif Ahmad, Lorena Villanueva-Almanza, Darrel Jenerette, and Nancy Semotiuk for revision of early versions of this article, and Jessica Semotiuk for help with illustrations.

Supplementary material

13280_2017_940_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (76 kb)
Protocol S1 (PDF 76 kb)

References

  1. Amarillas Valenzuela, S. 2010. Learn to speak Mayo. Hermosillo: Universidad de Sonora (In Spanish).Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, E.F. 2001. The cactus family. Portland: Timber Press.Google Scholar
  3. Arizona-Sonora Desert Museum. 2016. The Sonoran Desert region and its subdivisons. Retrieved September 5, 2016, from http://www.desertmuseum.org/desert/sonora.php.
  4. Arnold, J., and M.R. Pérez. 1998. The role of non-timber forest products in conservation and development. Bogor: Center for International Forestry Research.Google Scholar
  5. Banister, J.M. 2011. Deluges of grandeur: Water, territory, and power on Northwest Mexico’s Río Mayo, 1880–1910. Water Alternatives 4: 35.Google Scholar
  6. Beals, R.L. 1932. Aboriginal survivals in Mayo culture. American Anthropologist 34: 28–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Belcher, B., and K. Schreckenberg. 2007. Commercialisation of non-timber forest products: A reality check. Development Policy Review 25: 355–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Berry, S., and L. Doyon. 2001. Huatabampo. In Encyclopedia of prehistory, vol. 5: Middle America, ed. P.N. Peregrine, and M. Ember, 218–220. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Búrquez, A., and A. Martínez-Yrízar. 2000. The economic development and conservation of natural resources. In Sonora 2000 to debate. Problems and solutions, risks and opportunities, ed. I. Almada, 267–334. Mexico, D.F.: Ediciones Cal y Arena (In Spanish).Google Scholar
  10. Búrquez, A., A. Martínez-Yrízar, R.S. Felger, and D. Yetman. 1999. Vegetation and habitat diversity at the southern edge of the Sonoran Desert. In Ecology of Sonoran Desert plants and plant communities, ed. R. Robichaux, 36–67. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
  11. Butchart, S.H., M. Walpole, B. Collen, A. Van Strien, J.P. Scharlemann, R.E. Almond, J.E. Baillie, B. Bomhard, et al. 2010. Global biodiversity: Indicators of recent declines. Science 328: 1164–1168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. CDI. 2010. Atlas of indigenous peoples. Comisión Nacional para el desarrollo de los Pueblos Indígenas. Retrieved August 12, 2016, from http://www.cdi.gob.mx/atlas/ (In Spanish).
  13. Drezner, T.D., and B.L. Lazarus. 2008. The population dynamics of columnar and other cacti: A review. Geography Compass 2: 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Felger, R.S., and M.B. Moser. 1985. People of the desert and sea: Ethnobotany of the Seri Indians. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
  15. FIRA. 2015. Panorama of agricultural feed: Beef industry. Fideicomisos Instituidos en Relación con la Agricultura: Mexico D.F.Google Scholar
  16. Garibaldi, A., and N. Turner. 2004. Cultural keystone species: Implications for ecological conservation and restoration. Ecology and Society 9: 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. GBIF. 2016. GBIF occurrence download. Global Biodiversity Information Facility. Retrieved August 13, 2016, from http://doi.org/10.15468/dl.qiunnm.
  18. González-Abraham, C., E. Ezcurra, P.P. Garcillán, A. Ortega-Rubio, M. Kolb, and J.E.B. Creel. 2015. The human footprint in Mexico: Physical geography and historical legacies. PLoS ONE 10: e0121203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. INEGI. 2003. Natural resources: Climatology. Retrieved January 12, 2015, from http://www.inegi.org.mx/geo/contenidos/recnat/clima/default.aspx (In Spanish).
  20. International Society of Ethnobiology. 2006. International Society of Ethnobiology Code of Ethics (with 2008 additions). Retrieved February 1, 2012, from http://ethnobiology.net/code-of-ethics/.
  21. Martin, T., C. Paine, C. Conway, W. Hochachka, P. Allen, and W. Jenkins. 1997. BBIRD field protocol. Missoula: University of Montana, Montana Cooperative Wildlife Research Unit.Google Scholar
  22. Meyer, M.C. 1996. Water in the Hispanic Southwest: A social and legal history, 1550–1850. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
  23. Mizrahi, Y., A. Nerd, and P.S. Nobel. 1997. Cacti as crops. In Horticultural reviews, vol. 18, ed. J. Janick, 291–319. Toronto: Wiley.Google Scholar
  24. Moctezuma Zamarrón, J.L., and H. López Aceves. 2007. Mayos: Indigenous peoples of contemporary Mexico. Mexico, D.F.: Comisión Nacional para el Desarrollo de los Pueblos Indígenas (In Spanish).Google Scholar
  25. Molina-Freaner, F., C. Tinoco-Ojanguren, and K. Niklas. 1998. Stem biomechanics of three columnar cacti from the Sonoran Desert. American Journal of Botany 85: 1082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Morales-Romero, D., H. Godínez-Álvarez, J. Campo-Alves, and F. Molina-Freaner. 2012. Effects of land conversion on the regeneration of Pachycereus pecten-aboriginum and its consequences on the population dynamics in northwestern Mexico. Journal of Arid Environments 77: 123–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nabhan, G. 2012. A brief history of cross-border food trade. Retrieved September 5, 2016, from http://www.garynabhan.com/news/2012/03/a-brief-history-of-cross-border-food-trade/.
  28. Peel, D.S., K.H. Mathews Jr., and R.J. Johnson. 2012. Trade, the expanding Mexican beef industry, and feedlot and stocker cattle production in Mexico. Journal of Current Issues in Globalization 5: 1–24.Google Scholar
  29. Phillips Jr., D.A. 1989. Prehistory of Chihuahua and Sonora, Mexico. Journal of World Prehistory 3: 373–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pimienta-Barrios, E., and P.S. Nobel. 1994. Pitaya (Stenocereus spp., Cactaceae): An ancient and modern fruit crop of Mexico. Economic Botany 48: 76–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. R Core Team. 2013. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org/.
  32. Radonic, L. 2015. Environmental violence, water rights, and (un) due process in Northwestern Mexico. Latin American Perspectives 42: 27–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Romanelli, C., D. Cooper, D. Campbell-Lendrum, M. Maiero, W. Karesh, D. Hunter, and C. Golden. 2015. Connecting global priorities: Biodiversity and human health: A state of knowledge review. Geneva: World Health Organisation/Secretariat of the UN Convention on Biological Diversity.Google Scholar
  34. Russell, S.M., and G. Monson. 1998. The birds of Sonora. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
  35. Sahley, C.T. 2001. Vertebrate pollination, fruit production, and pollen dispersal of Stenocereus thurberi (Cactaceae). The Southwestern Naturalist 46: 261–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sanderson, E.W., M. Jaiteh, M.A. Levy, K.H. Redford, A.V. Wannebo, and G. Woolmer. 2002. The human footprint and the last of the wild: The human footprint is a global map of human influence on the land surface, which suggests that human beings are stewards of nature, whether we like it or not. BioScience 52: 891–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Semotiuk, A.J., N.L. Semotiuk, and E. Ezcurra. 2015. The eruption of technology in traditional medicine: How social media guides the sale of natural plant products in the Sonoran Desert region. Economic Botany 69: 360–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Shackleton, C., and S. Shackleton. 2004. The importance of non-timber forest products in rural livelihood security and as safety nets: A review of evidence from South Africa. South African Journal of Science 100: 658–664.Google Scholar
  39. Tugume, P., M. Buyinza, E. Kakudidi, P. Mucunguzi, J. Kalema, M. Kamatenesi, and J. Namaalwa. 2016. Non-timber forest products trade and community livelihoods around Mabira Central Forest Reserve, Uganda. Journal of Agricultural Studies 4: 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs. 2009. State of the world’s indigenous peoples, vol. 9. New York: United Nations Publications.Google Scholar
  41. Valenzuela, A.F. 1992. Organization of the ethnic identity and persistence of the Yaqui and Mayo culture. Estudios Sociológicos 10: 127–148 (In Spanish).Google Scholar
  42. Van Devender, T.R., R.S. Felger, and A. Búrquez. 1997. Exotic plants in the Sonoran Desert region, Arizona and Sonora. In Proceedings of the California exotic pest plant council symposium, vol. 3, 1–6, eds. P. Warner, J.M. Randall, and M. Kelly. Sacramento: California Exotic Pest Plant Council.Google Scholar
  43. Vasquez-León, M., and D. Liverman. 2004. The political ecology of land-use change: Affluent ranchers and destitute farmers in the Mexican municipio of Álamos. Human Organization 63: 21–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Yetman, D. 2000. Ejidos, land sales, and free trade in northwest Mexico: Will globalization affect the commons? American Studies 41: 211–234.Google Scholar
  45. Yetman, D., and T.R. Van Devender. 2002. Mayo ethnobotany: Land, history, and traditional knowledge in northwest Mexico. Los Angeles: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrew J. Semotiuk
    • 1
  • Patricia Colunga-GarcíaMarín
    • 2
  • David Valenzuela Maldonado
    • 3
  • Exequiel Ezcurra
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Botany and Plant SciencesUniversity of California RiversideRiversideUSA
  2. 2.Departamento de Agricultura, Sociedad y AmbienteEl Colegio de la Frontera SurSan Cristóbal de las CasasMexico
  3. 3.Centro de Investigación Etnobotánica para el Desarrollo SostentableNavojoaMexico

Personalised recommendations