Ambio

, Volume 44, Issue 6, pp 521–531 | Cite as

A method to estimate the impact of clear-cutting on nutrient concentrations in boreal headwater streams

  • Marjo Palviainen
  • Leena Finér
  • Ari Laurén
  • Tuija Mattsson
  • Lars Högbom
Report

Abstract

Large-scale forestry operations, like clear-cutting, may impair surface water quality if not done with environmental considerations in mind. Catchment and country level estimates of nutrient loads from forestry are generally based on specific export values, i.e., changes in annual exports due to the implemented forestry operations expressed in kg ha−1. We introduce here a specific concentration approach as a method to estimate the impact of clear-cutting on nutrient concentrations and export in headwater streams. This new method is potentially a more dynamic and flexible tool to estimate nutrient loads caused by forestry, because variation in annual runoff can be taken into account in load assessments. We combined water quality data from eight boreal headwater catchment pairs located in Finland and Sweden, where the effect of clear-cutting on stream water quality has been studied experimentally. Statistically significant specific concentration values could be produced for total nitrogen, nitrate, ammonium, and phosphate. The significant increases in the concentrations of these nutrients occurred between 2 and 6 years after clear-cutting. Significant specific concentration values could not be produced for total phosphorus and total organic carbon with the whole dataset, although in some single studies significant increases in their concentrations after clear-cutting were observed. The presented method enables taking into account variation in runoff, temporal dynamics of effects, and the proportional size of the treated area in load calculations. The number of existing studies considering large site-specific variation in responses to clear-cutting is small, and therefore further empirical studies are needed to improve predictive capabilities of the specific concentration values.

Keywords

Final cutting Nitrogen Phosphorus Site preparation Specific concentration Total organic carbon 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Swedish Environmental protection Agency and Nordic Forest Research Co-operation Committee for financial support (project: Leaching of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus from forest land in the Nordic and Baltic countries, SNS project no 110) and Mr. Jaakko Heinonen for statistical advice.

References

  1. Abdelnour, A., M. Stieglitz, F. Pan, and R. McKane. 2011. Catchment hydrological responses to forest harvest amount and spatial pattern. Water Resources Research W09521 47: 1–18.Google Scholar
  2. Adamson, J.K., M. Hornung, D.G. Pyatt, and A.R. Anderson. 1987. Changes in solute chemistry of drainage waters following the clearfelling of a Sitka spruce plantation. Forestry 60: 165–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahtiainen, M., and P. Huttunen. 1999. Long-term effects of forestry managements on water quality and loading in brooks. Boreal Environment Research 4: 101–114.Google Scholar
  4. Akselsson, C., O. Westling, and G. Örlander. 2004. Regional mapping of nitrogen leaching from clearcuts in southern Sweden. Forest Ecology and Management 202: 235–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Andersson, L., and A. Lepistö. 2000. Annual variability of nitrogen concentrations and export from forested catchments: A consequence of climatic variability, sampling strategies or human interference? Boreal Environment Research 5: 221–233.Google Scholar
  6. Arheimer, B., L. Andersson, and A. Lepistö. 1996. Variations of N concentration in forest streams—Influences of flow, seasonality, and catchment characteristics. Journal of Hydrology 179: 281–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bergknut, M., H. Laudon, S. Jansson, A. Larsson, T. Gocht, and K. Wiberg. 2011. Atmospheric deposition, retention, and stream export of dioxins and PCBs in a pristine boreal catchment. Environmental Pollution 159: 1592–1598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bredemeier, M., K. Blanck, Y.-J. Xu, A. Tietema, A.W. Boxman, B. Emmet, F. Moldan, P. Gundersen, et al. 1998. Input-output budgets at the NITREX sites. Forest Ecology and Management 101: 57–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Buffam, I., H. Laudon, J. Seibert, C.-M. Mörth, and K. Bishop. 2008. Spatial heterogeneity of the spring flood acid pulse in a boreal stream network. Science of the Total Environment 407: 708–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Conley, D.J., H.W. Paerl, R.W. Howarth, D.F. Boesch, S.P. Seitzinger, K.E. Havens, C. Lancelot, and G.E. Likens. 2009. Controlling eutrophication: Nitrogen and phosphorus. Science 323: 1014–1015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Feller, M.C. 2005. Forest harvesting and streamwater inorganic chemistry in western North America: A review. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 41: 785–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Feller, M.C., and J.P. Kimmins. 1984. Effects of clear-cutting and slash burning on streamwater chemistry and watershed nutrient budgets in southwestern British Columbia. Water Resources Research 20: 29–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Finér, L., M. Ahtiainen, H. Mannerkoski, V. Möttönen, S. Piirainen, P. Seuna, and M. Starr. 1997. Effects of harvesting and scarification on water and nutrient fluxes. A description of catchment and methods, and results from the pretreatment calibration period. The Finnish Forest Research Institute, Research Papers 648, 38 pp.Google Scholar
  14. Finér, L., T. Mattsson, S. Joensuu, H. Koivusalo, A. Laurén, T. Makkonen, M. Nieminen, S.E. Tattari, et al. 2010. Metsäisten valuma-alueiden vesistökuormituksen laskenta (A method for calculating nitrogen, phosphorus and sediment load from forest catchment). The Finnish Environment 10: 1–33.Google Scholar
  15. Futter, M.N., E. Ring, L. Högbom, S. Entenmann, and K.H. Bishop. 2010. Consequences of nitrate leaching following stem-only harvesting of Swedish forests are dependent on spatial scale. Environmental Pollution 158: 3552–3559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Grip, H. 1982. Water chemistry and runoff in forest streams at Kloten. UNGI Report 58. Division of Hydrology, Department of Physical Geography, Uppsala University, 144 pp.Google Scholar
  17. Gundersen, P., I.K. Schmidt, and K. Raulund-Rasmussen. 2006. Leaching of nitrate from temperate forests—Effects of air pollution and forest management. Environmental Reviews 14: 1–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gundersen, P., A. Laurén, L. Finér, E. Ring, H. Koivusalo, M. Sætersdal, J.-O. Weslien, B.D. Sigurdsson, et al. 2010. Environmental services provided from riparian forests in the nordic countries. AMBIO 39: 555–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Haapanen, M., K. Kenttämies, P. Porvari, and T. Sallantaus. 2006. Kivennäismaan uudistushakkuun vaikutus kasvinravinteiden ja orgaanisen aineen huuhtoutumiseen; raportti Kurussa ja Janakkalassa sijaitsevien tutkimusalueiden tuloksista. (The effect of clear-cutting on the export of nutrients and organic matter; a report from Kuru and Janakkala study catchments). The Finnish Environment 816: 43–59.Google Scholar
  20. Idé, J., L. Finér, A. Laurén, S. Piirainen, and S. Launiainen. 2013. Effects of clear-cutting on annual and seasonal runoff from a boreal forest catchment in eastern Finland. Forest Ecology and Management 304: 482–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jansson, M., A.-K. Bergström, P. Blomquist, and S. Drakare. 2000. Allochthonous organic carbon and phytoplankton/bacterioplankton production relationships in lakes. Ecology 81: 3250–3255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kalbitz, K., B. Glaser, and R. Bol. 2004. Clear-cutting of a Norway spruce stand: Implications for controls on the dynamics of dissolved organic matter in the forest floor. European Journal of Soil Science 55: 401–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kenttämies, K. 2006. A method for calculating nutrient loads from forestry: Principles and national applications in Finland. Verhandlungen des Internationalen Verein Limnologie 29: 1591–1594.Google Scholar
  24. Köhler, S.J., I. Buffam, J. Seibert, K.H. Bishop, and H. Laudon. 2009. Dynamics of stream water TOC concentrations in a boreal headwater catchment: Controlling factors and implications for climate scenarios. Journal of Hydrology 373: 44–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kortelainen, P., T. Mattsson, L. Finér, M. Ahtiainen, S. Saukkonen, and T. Sallantaus. 2006. Controls on the export of C, N, P and Fe from undisturbed boreal catchments, Finland. Aquatic Sciences 68: 453–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kreutzweiser, D.P., P.W. Hazlett, and J.M. Gunn. 2008. Logging impacts on the biogeochemistry of boreal forest soils and nutrient export to aquatic systems: A review. Environmental Reviews 16: 157–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lamontagne, S., R. Carignan, P. D’Arcy, Y.T. Prairie, and D. Paré. 2000. Element export in runoff from eastern Canadian Boreal Shield drainage basins following forest harvesting and wildfires. Canadian Journal Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 57: 118–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Laudon, H., J. Hedtjärn, J. Schelker, K. Bishop, R. Sørensen, and A. Ågren. 2009. Response of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) following forest harvesting in a boreal forest. AMBIO 7: 381–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Laudon, H., M. Berggren, A. Ågren, I. Buffam, K. Bishop, T. Grabs, M. Jansson, and S. Köhler. 2011. Patterns and dynamics of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) in boreal streams: The role of processes, connectivity, and scaling. Ecosystems 14: 880–893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Laurén, A., J. Heinonen, H. Koivusalo, S. Sarkkola, S. Tattari, T. Mattsson, M. Ahtiainen, S. Joensuu, et al. 2009. Implications of uncertainty in a pre-treatment dataset when estimating treatment effects in paired catchment studies: Phosphorus loads from forest clear-cuts. Water, Air, and Soil pollution 196: 251–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lepistö, A., K. Granlund, P. Kortelainen, and A. Räike. 2006. Nitrogen in river basins: Sources, retention in the surface waters and peatlands, and fluxes to estuaries in Finland. Science of the Total Environment 365: 238–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Löfgren, S., E. Ring, C. von Brömssen, R. Sørensen, and L. Högbom. 2009. Short-term effects of clear-cutting on the water chemistry of two boreal streams in northern Sweden: A paired catchment study. AMBIO 38: 347–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mattsson, T., L. Finér, P. Kortelainen, and T. Sallantaus. 2003. Brook water quality and background leaching from unmanaged forested catchments in Finland. Water, Air, and Soil pollution 147: 275–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Meyer, J.L., and C.M. Tate. 1983. The effects of watershed disturbance on dissolved organic carbon dynamics of a stream. Ecology 64: 33–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nieminen, M., E. Ahti, H. Koivusalo, T. Mattsson, S. Sarkkola, and A. Laurén. 2010. Export of suspended solids and dissolved elements from peatland areas after ditch network maintenance in south-central Finland. Silva Fennica 44: 39–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Paavolainen, L., and A. Smolander. 1998. Nitrification and denitrification in soil from a clear-cut Norway spruce (Picea abies) stand. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 30: 775–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Palviainen, M., L. Finér, A.-M. Kurka, H. Mannerkoski, S. Piirainen, and M. Starr. 2004. Decomposition and nutrient release from logging residues after clear-cutting of mixed boreal forest. Plant and Soil 263: 53–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Palviainen, M., L. Finér, A. Laurén, H. Mannerkoski, S. Piirainen, and M. Starr. 2007. Development of ground vegetation biomass and nutrient pools in a clear-cut disc-plowed boreal forest. Plant and Soil 297: 43–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Palviainen, M., L. Finér, A. Laurén, S. Launiainen, S. Piirainen, T. Mattsson, and M. Starr. 2014. Nitrogen, phosphorus, carbon, and suspended solids loads from forest clear-cutting and site preparation: Long-term paired catchment studies from Eastern Finland. AMBIO 43: 218–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Piirainen, S., L. Finér, H. Mannerkoski, and M. Starr. 2002. Effects of forest clear-cutting on the carbon and nitrogen fluxes through podzolic soil horizons. Plant and Soil 239: 301–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Piirainen, S., L. Finér, H. Mannerkoski, and M. Starr. 2004. Effects of forest clear-cutting on the sulphur, phosphorus and base cations fluxes through podzolic soil horizons. Biogeochemistry 69: 405–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Porvari, P., M. Verta, J. Munthe, and M. Haapanen. 2003. Forestry practices increase mercury and methyl mercury output from boreal forest catchments. Environmental Science and Technology 37: 2389–2393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Reynolds, B., P.A. Stevens, S. Hughes, J.A. Parkinson, and N.S. Weatherley. 1995. Stream chemistry impacts of conifer harvesting in Welsh catchments. Water, Air, and Soil pollution 79: 147–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ring, E. 2007. Estimation of leaching of nitrogen and phosphorus from forestry in northern Sweden. In How to estimate N and P losses from forestry in northern Sweden, vol. 146, ed. S. Löfgren, 6–13. Stockholm: KSLA Tidskrift.Google Scholar
  45. Rosén, K., J.-A. Aronson, and H.M. Eriksson. 1996. Effects of clear-cutting on streamwater quality in forest catchments in central Sweden. Forest Ecology and Management 83: 237–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Schelker, J., K. Eklöf, K. Bishop, and H. Laudon. 2012. Effects of forestry operations on dissolved organic carbon concentrations and export in boreal first-order streams. Journal of Geophysical Research 117: G01011. doi: 10.1029/2011JG001827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Schelker, J., K. Öhman, S. Löfgren, and H. Laudon. 2014. Scaling of increased dissolved organic carbon inputs by forest clear-cutting—What arrives downstream? Journal of Hydrology 508: 299–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Smolander, A., V. Kitunen, and E. Mälkönen. 2001. Dissolved soil organic nitrogen and carbon in a Norway spruce stand and adjacent clear-cut. Biology and Fertility of Soils 33: 190–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Statistical Yearbook of Finland. 2013. Statistics Finland, vol. 108, 699 pp.Google Scholar
  50. Stednick, J.D. 1996. Monitoring the effects of timber harvest on annual water yield. Journal of Hydrology 176: 79–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Swedish Forest Agency. 2013. Swedish Statistical Yearbook of Forestry 2013, 374 pp. http://www.skogsstyrelsen.se/en/.
  52. Vitousek, P.M., J.R. Gosz, C.C. Grier, J.M. Melillo, W.A. Reiners, and R.L. Todd. 1979. Nitrate losses from disturbed ecosystems. Science 204: 469–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wiklander, G., G. Nordlander, and R. Andersson. 1991. Leaching of nitrogen from a forest catchment at Söderåsen in southern Sweden. Water, Air, and Soil pollution 55: 263–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Ylitalo, E. 2013. Statistical Yearbook of Forestry 2013. Sastamala: Finnish Forest Research Institute, 448 pp.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marjo Palviainen
    • 1
  • Leena Finér
    • 2
  • Ari Laurén
    • 2
  • Tuija Mattsson
    • 3
  • Lars Högbom
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Forest SciencesUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland
  2. 2.Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke)JoensuuFinland
  3. 3.Finnish Environment Institute (SYKE)HelsinkiFinland
  4. 4.SkogforskThe Forestry Research Institute of SwedenUppsalaSweden

Personalised recommendations