AMBIO

, Volume 44, Issue 2, pp 131–141 | Cite as

Functional Relationships with N Deposition Differ According to Stand Maturity in Calluna-Dominated Heathland

Report

Abstract

Plant and soil bio(chemical) indicators are increasingly used to provide information on N deposition inputs and effects in a wide range of ecosystem types. However, many factors, including climate and site management history, have the potential to influence bioindicator relationships with N due to nutrient export and changing vegetation nutrient demands. We surveyed 33 heathlands in England, along a gradient of background N deposition (7.2–24.5 kg ha−1 year−1), using Calluna vulgaris growth phase as a proxy for time since last management. Our survey confirmed soil nutrient accumulation with increasing time since management. Foliar N and phosphorus (P) concentrations in pioneer- and mature-phase vegetation significantly increased with N deposition. Significant interactions between climate and N deposition were also evident with, for example, higher foliar P concentrations in pioneer-phase vegetation at sites with higher temperatures and N deposition rates. Although oxidized N appeared more significant than reduced N, overall there were more, stronger relationships with total N deposition; suggesting efforts to control all emissions of N (i.e., both oxidized and reduced forms) will have ecological benefits.

Keywords

Habitat management Oxidized N Reduced N Lowland heathland Calluna growth phase Bioindicators 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support and permission for site access given by the owners and managers of sites visited during this survey. We are also grateful to Ron Smith (CEH Edinburgh) for provision of modeled N deposition data for survey sites and to Dr. Emma Green for guidance in analytical techniques. This project was funded by the UK Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, as part of the UKREATE programme (Contract Number CPEA18).

Supplementary material

13280_2014_529_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (83 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 83 kb)

References

  1. Aber, J.D. 1992. Nitrogen cycling and nitrogen saturation in temperate forest ecosystems. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 7: 220–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aerts, R. 1993. Competition between dominant plant species in heathlands. In Heathlands: Patterns and processes in a changing environment, ed. R.H. Aerts, and G.W. Heil, 51–84. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aerts, R., and F. Berendse. 1988. The effect of increased nutrient availability on vegetation dynamics in wet heathlands. Vegetatio 76: 63–69.Google Scholar
  4. Allen, S.E., J.A. Parkinson, C.C. Evans, H.M. Grimshaw, and D.K. Lindley. 1974. Chemical analysis of ecological materials. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Scientific.Google Scholar
  5. Barclay-Estrup, P. 1970. The description and interpretation of cyclical processes in a heath community: II. Changes in biomass and shoot production during the Calluna cycle. Journal of Ecology 58: 243–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barker, C.G., S.A. Power, J.N.B. Bell, and C.D.L. Orme. 2004. Effects of habitat management on heathland response to atmospheric N deposition. Biological Conservation 120: 41–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. British Geological Survey. 2005. British Geological Survey Geoindex. Retrieved April 15, 2005, from http://www.bgs.ac.uk/geoindex/home.html.
  8. Britton, A.J., and J.F. Fisher. 2008. Growth responses of low-alpine dwarf-shrub heath species to N deposition and management. Environmental Pollution 153: 564–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Britton, A.J., R.J. Pakeman, P.D. Carey, and R.H. Marrs. 2001. Impacts of climate, management and N deposition on the dynamics of lowland heathland. Journal of Vegetation Science 12: 797–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bobbink, R., K. Hicks, J. Galloway, T. Spranger, R. Alkemade, M. Ashmore, M. Bustamante, S. Cinderby, et al. 2010. Global assessment of nitrogen deposition effects on plant terrestrial biodiversity: A synthesis. Ecological Applications 20: 30–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chapman, S.B., R.J. Rose, and M. Basanta. 1989. Phosphorous adsorption by soils from heathlands in Southern England in relation to successional change. Journal of Applied Ecology 26: 673–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Crawley, M.J. 2007. The R book. London: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fenn, M.E., M.A. Poth, J.D. Aber, J.S. Baron, B.T. Bormann, D.W. Johnson, A.D. Lemly, S.G. McNulty, et al. 1998. Nitrogen excess in North American ecosystems: Predisposing factors, ecosystem responses and management strategies. Ecological Applications 8: 706–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gimingham, C.H. 1972. Ecology of heathlands. London, UK: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
  15. Hardtle, W., M. Niemeyer, T. Niemeyer, T. Assmann, and S. Fottner. 2006. Can management compensate for atmospheric nutrient deposition in heathland ecosystems? Journal of Applied Ecology 43: 759–769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hicks, W.K., I.D. Leith, S.J. Woodin, and D. Fowler. 2000. Can the foliar N concentration of upland vegetation be used for prediction atmospheric N deposition? Evidence from field surveys. Environmental Pollution 107: 367–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jacquemyn, H., R. Brys, and M. Hermy. 2003. Short-term effects of different management regimes on the response of calcareous grassland vegetation to increased nitrogen. Biological Conservation 111: 137–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. JNCC. 2010. Legislation, policy and designation of UK lowland heathland habitats, Joint Nature Conservation Committee. Retrieved April 03, 2012, from http://jncc.defra.gov.uk/page-5944.
  19. Johnson, D., J.R. Leake, J.A. Lee, and C.D. Campbell. 1998. Changes in soil microbial biomass and microbial activities in response to 7 years simulated pollutant N deposition on heathland and two grasslands. Environmental Pollution 103: 239–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jones, A.G., and S.A. Power. 2012. Field-scale evaluation of the effects of nitrogen deposition on the functioning of heathland ecosystems. Journal of Ecology 100: 331–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Larsen, K.S., L.C. Andresen, C. Beier, S. Jonasson, K.R. Albert, P. Ambus, M.F. Arndal, M.S. Carter, et al. 2011. Reduced N cycling in response to elevated CO2, warming, and drought in a Danish heathland: Synthesizing results of the CLIMAITE project after two years of treatments. Global Change Biology 17: 1884–1899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Leprince, F., and H. Quiquampoix. 1996. Extracellular enzyme activity in soil: Effect of pH and ionic strength on the interaction with montmorillonite of two acid phosphatases secreted by the ectomycorrhizal fungus Hebeloma cylindrosporum. European Journal of Soil Science 47: 511–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lovett, G.M., and H. Rueth. 1999. Soil transformation in beech and maple stands along an N deposition gradient. Ecological Applications 9: 1330–1344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Marrs, R.H., and A.J. Britton. 2000. Conservation problems on Breckland heaths: From theory to practice. Biological Conservation 95: 143–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Maskell, L.C., S.M. Smart, J.M. Bullock, K. Thompson, and C.J. Stevens. 2010. Nitrogen deposition causes widespread loss of species richness in British habitats. Global Change Biology 16: 671–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Niemeyer, T., M. Niemeyer, A. Mohamed, S. Fottner, and W. Hardtle. 2005. Impact of prescribed burning on the nutrient balance of heathlands with particular reference to N and phosphorus. Applied Vegetation Science 8: 183–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Payne, R.J., C.J. Stevens, N.B. Dise, D.J. Gowing, M.G. Pilkington, G.K. Phoenix, B.A. Emmett, and M.R. Ashmore. 2011. Impacts of atmospheric pollution on the plant communities of British acid grasslands. Environmental Pollution 159: 2602–2608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Payne, R.J., S.J. Caporn, C.J. Stevens, J.A. Carroll, J.L. Edmondson, D.J. Gowing, and N.B. Dise. 2013. Inferring nitrogen deposition from plant community composition. Ecological Indicators 26: 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pearson, J., and G.R. Stewart. 1993. Tansley review No. 56. The deposition of atmospheric ammonia and its effects on plants. New Phytologist 125: 283–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Phoenix, G.K., R.E. Booth, J.R. Leake, D.J. Read, P. Grime, and J.A. Lee. 2003. Simulated pollutant N deposition increases P demand and enhances root-surface phosphatase activities of three plant functional types in a calcareous grassland. New Phytologist 161: 279–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Phoenix, G.K., B.A. Emmett, A.J. Britton, S.J.M. Caporn, N.B. Dise, R. Helliwell, L. Jones, J.R. Leake, et al. 2012. Impacts of atmospheric nitrogen deposition: responses of multiple plant and soil parameters across contrasting ecosystems in long-term field experiments. Global Change Biology 18: 1197–1215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pilkington, M.G., S.J.M. Caporn, J.A. Carroll, N. Cresswell, J.A. Lee, B.A. Emmett, and D. Johnson. 2005. Effects of increased deposition of atmospheric N on an upland Calluna moor: Nitrogen budgets and nutrient accumulation. Environmental Pollution 138: 473–484.Google Scholar
  33. Pitcairn, C.E.R., and D. Fowler. 1995. Deposition of fixed atmospheric N and foliar N content of bryophytes and Calluna vulgaris (L.) Hull. Environmental Pollution 88: 193–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Power, S.A., and C.M. Collins. 2010. Use of Calluna vulgaris to detect signals of nitrogen deposition across an urban-rural gradient. Atmospheric Environment 44: 1772–1780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Power, S.A., M.R. Ashmore, and D.A. Cousins. 1998. Impacts and fate of experimentally enhanced N deposition on a British lowland heath. Environmental Pollution 102: 27–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Power, S.A., C.G. Barker, E.A. Allchin, M.R. Ashmore, and J.N.B. Bell. 2001. Habitat management: A tool to modify ecosystem impacts of N deposition? The Scientific World 1: 714–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Power, S.A., E.R. Green, C.G. Barker, N.B. Bell, and M.R. Ashmore. 2006. Ecosystem recovery: Heathland response to a reduction in N deposition. Global Change Biology 12: 1241–1252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Prieto, P., J. Penuelas, U. Niinemets, R. Ogaya, I.K. Schmidt, C. Beier, A. Tietema, A. Sowerby, et al. 2009. Changes in the onset of spring growth in shrubland species in response to experimental warming along a north–south gradient in Europe. Global Ecology and Biogeography 18: 473–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Price, E.A.C. 2003. Lowland grassland and heathland habitats, Habitat Guides. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  40. R Development Core Team. 2011. R: A language and environment for statistical computing, reference index version 2.12.2. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Retrieved February 11, 2011, from http://www.R-project.org.
  41. Rowe, E.C., S.M. Smart, V.H. Kennedy, B.A. Emmett, and C.D. Evans. 2008. N deposition increases the acquisition of phosphorus and potassium by heather Calluna vulgaris. Environmental Pollution 155: 201–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Selsted, M.B., L. Linden, A. Ibrom, A. Michelsen, K.S. Larsen, J.K. Pedersen, T.N. Mikkelsen, N. Teis, et al. 2012. Soil respiration is stimulated by elevated CO2 and reduced by summer drought: Three years of measurements in a multifactor ecosystem manipulation experiment in a temperate heathland (CLIMAITE). Global Change Biology 18: 1216–1230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Soil Survey of England and Wales. 1980. Soils of England and Wales maps: Sheets 3–5. Harpenden, UK: Soil Survey of England and Wales.Google Scholar
  44. Southon, G.E., C. Field, S.J. Caporn, A.J. Britton, and S.A. Power. 2013. Nitrogen deposition reduces plant diversity and alters ecosystem functioning: Field-scale evidence from a nationwide survey of UK heathlands. PLoS ONE 8: e59031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Stevens, C.J., N.B. Dise, O.J. Mountford, and D.J. Gowing. 2004. Impact of N deposition on the species richness of grasslands. Science 303: 1876–1881.Google Scholar
  46. Stevens, C.J., N.B. Dise, J.O. Mountford, and D.J. Gowning. 2006. Loss of forb diversity in relation to N deposition in the UK: Regional trends and potential controls. Global Change Biology 12: 1823–1833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Symes, N., and J. Day. 2003. A practical guide to the restoration and management of lowland heathland. Sandy, UK: RSPB.Google Scholar
  48. Tabatabai, M.A., and J.M. Bremner. 1969. Use of p-nitrophenyl phosphate for assay of soil phosphatase activity. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 1: 301–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Terry, A.C., M.R. Ashmore, S.A. Power, E.A. Alchin, and G.W. Heil. 2004. Modelling the impacts of atmospheric nitrogen deposition on Calluna-dominated ecosystems in the UK. Journal of Applied Ecology 41: 897–909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. van den Berg, L.J.L., C.J.H. Peters, M.R. Ashmore, and J.G.M. Roelofs. 2008. Reduced nitrogen has a greater effect than oxidized nitrogen on dry heathland vegetation. Environmental Pollution 154: 359–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. von Oheimb, G., S.A. Power, K. Falk, U. Friedrich, A. Mohamed, A. Krug, N. Boschatzke, and W. Härdtle. 2010. N:P ratio and the nature of nutrient limitation in Calluna-dominated heathlands. Ecosystems 13: 317–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Watt, A.S. 1936. Studies in the ecology of Breckland. I. Climate, soil and vegetation. Journal of Ecology 24: 117–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. White, R.E. 1997. Principles and practice of soil science: The soil as a natural resource, 3rd ed. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of BiologyImperial College LondonBerkshireUK
  2. 2.University of Western Sydney, Hawkesbury Institute for the EnvironmentPenrithAustralia
  3. 3.Earthwatch InstituteOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations