Transboundary Socio-Ecological Effects of a Marine Protected Area in the Southwest Atlantic
- 351 Downloads
Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) have been regarded as an alternative to protect natural resources and to improve fisheries. However, MPAs may also have negative socio-economic consequences on fishing communities. We aimed to check the effectiveness of a socially conflicting MPA in Brazil by assessing target reef fish biomass in islands inside (n = 6) and outside (n = 6) the MPA, fisheries’ productivity (biomass), catch per unit of effort (CPUE), and fishers’ socio-economic status (mainly fishers’ income) in three fishing communities subjected to different degrees of influence (close, average, and long distance) of the MPA. The CPUE was higher in the fishing community that was further away from the MPA, fish biomass was higher in the islands located inside the MPA in the southern region and in the islands located outside the MPA in the northern region, while fishers were making the most money closest to the MPA, where conflicts are the highest, probably from practicing very intensive fisheries. This integrated approach showed that the studied MPA has not delivered ecological benefits, such as higher CPUE or more fish, while higher income closer to the MPA could not be clearly attributed to its effects.
KeywordsSmall-scale fisheries Fisheries conflicts Reef fishes Ecosystem-based management Fish conservation Fisheries management
We thank all the fishers and their families for supporting this study, allowing us to work in their communities, especially Sinésio, a fishmonger who let us use his space and provided valuable information. Special thanks to Robson Posidônio, a fisher from Trindade who sampled fish landings in his community and made our lives much easier by introducing us to fishers from his and other communities. Thanks to IDRC (Canada) and FAPESP (Brazil) for supporting this project (Grants Nos. 104519–004 and 2009/11154-3, respectively), to CNPq for research grants to R.A.M.S. (304377/2010-4) and to A.B., and to the FAPESP for research grant to R.A.M.S (2012/16722-2). P.F.M. Lopes thanks IDRC for an individual research grant.
- Begossi, A. 2010. Small-scale fisheries in Latin America: Management models and challenges. MAST 9: 5–12.Google Scholar
- Begossi, A., P.F.M. Lopes, L.E.C. Oliveira, and H. Nakano. 2010. Ecologia de Pescadores da Baia de Ilha Grande. Sao Carlos: Editora Rima.Google Scholar
- Begossi, A., S.V. Salivonchyk, T. Barreto, V. Nora, and R.A.M. Silvano. 2012a. Small-scale Fisheries and Conservation of Dusky Grouper Garoupa), Epinephelus marginatus (Lowe, 1834) in the Southeastern Brazilian Coast. Science Journal of Agricultural Research and Management 2012. doi: 10.7237/sjarm/174.
- Berkes, F., R. Mahon, P. McConney, R. Pollnac, and R. Pomeroy. 2006. Gestão da pesca de pequena escala: Diretrizes e metodos alternativos. Rio Grande: Editora Furg.Google Scholar
- Camargo, C., J.H. Maldonado, E. Alvarado, R. Moreno-Sánchez, S. Mendoza, N. Manrique, A. Mogollón, J.D. Osorio, et al. 2009. Community involvement in management for maintaining coral reef resilience and biodiversity in southern Caribbean marine protected areas. Biodiversity Conservation 18: 935–956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Castilla, J.C., S. Gelcich, and O. Defeo. 2007. Successes, lessons, and projections from Experience in marine benthic invertebrate artisanal fisheries in Chile. In Fisheries management progess towards sustainability, ed. T.R. McClanahan and J.C. Castilla, 25–42. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Clarke, K.R., and R.M. Warwick. 2001. Change in marine communities: An approach to statistical analysis and interpretation. Plymouth: Plymouth Marine Laboratory.Google Scholar
- Diegues, A.C. 2008. Marine protected areas and artisanal fisheries in Brazil. Chennai: Samudra Monograph, International Collective in Support of Fishworkers.Google Scholar
- FAO. 2012. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2012. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.Google Scholar
- Froese, R., and D. Pauly, eds. 2011. Fishbase. World Wide Web electronic publication.Google Scholar
- Gutiérrez, N.L., R. Hilborn, and O. Defeo. 2011. Leadership, social capital and incentives promote successful fisheries. Nature 2: 5–8.Google Scholar
- IUCN. 2013. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2013.1. Downloaded on 02 July 2013.Google Scholar
- Manly, B.F.J. 1997. Randomization, bootstrap and Monte Carlo methods in biology. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
- Pauly, D. 2006. Major trends in small-scale marine fisheries, with emphasis on developing countries, and some implications for the social sciences. Maritime Studies 4: 7–12.Google Scholar
- R Development Core Team. (2008). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, http://www.R-project.org.
- Worm, B., R. Hilborn, J. K. Baum, T.A. Branch, J.S. Collie, C. Costello, M.J. Fogarty, E.A. Fulton, et al. 2009. Rebuilding global fisheries. Science 325: 578–5.Google Scholar