Projecting Climate Change Effects on Forest Net Primary Productivity in Subtropical Louisiana, USA
- 282 Downloads
This study projected responses of forest net primary productivity (NPP) to three climate change scenarios at a resolution of 5 km × 5 km across the state of Louisiana, USA. In addition, we assessed uncertainties associated with the NPP projection at the grid and state levels. Climate data of the scenarios were derived from Community Climate System Model outputs. Changes in annual NPP between 2000 and 2050 were projected with the forest ecosystem model PnET-II. Results showed that forest productivity would increase under climate change scenarios A1B and A2, but with scenario B1, it would peak during 2011–2020 and then decline. The projected average NPP under B1 over the years from 2000 to 2050 was significantly different from those under A1B and A2. Forest NPP appeared to be primarily a function of temperature, not precipitation. Uncertainties of the NPP projection were due to large spatial resolution of the climate variables. Overall, this study suggested that in order to project effects of climate change on forest ecosystem at regional level, modeling uncertainties could be reduced by increasing the spatial resolution of the climate projections.
KeywordsClimate change Subtropical forests Net primary productivity Pnet-II Uncertainty Community Climate System Model 3.0 (CCSM3.0)
This study was mainly supported by the Louisiana Board of Regents under award LEQSF (2004-07)-RD-A-04. We would like to thank the two anonymous referees for providing us with valuable comments on our manuscript.
- Birdsey, R., K. Pregitzer, and L. Lucier. 2005. Forest carbon management in the United States: 1600–2100. The Third USDA Symposium on Greenhouse Gases & Carbon Sequestration in Agriculture and Forestry, Baltimore, Maryland.Google Scholar
- California Soil Resource Lab. 2006. Profile water storage as calculated from SSURGO. http://casoilresource.lawr.ucdavis.edu/drupal/node/295. Accessed 01 September 2008.
- Campbell, J.L., L.E. Rustad, E.W. Boyer, S.F. Christopher, C.T. Driscoll, I.J. Fernandez, P.M. Groffman, D. Houle, et al. 2009. Consequences of climate change for biogeochemical cycling in forests of northeastern North America. Canadian Journal of Forest Research-Revue Canadienne De Recherche Forestiere 39: 264–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- IPCC. 2007a. Climate change 2007: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability—Contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- IPCC. 2007b. Climate change 2007: The physical science basis—Working group I contribution to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, United Kingdom; New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Maier, C.A., S. Palmroth, and E. Ward. 2008. Short-term effects of fertilization on photosynthesis and leaf morphology of field-grown loblolly pine following long-term exposure to elevated CO2 concentration. Tree Physiology 28: 597–606.Google Scholar
- McNulty, S.G., L. Iverson, R. Abt, B. Smith, B. Murray, R.A. Mickler, and J.D. Aber. 2000. Application of linked regional scale growth, biogeography, and economic models for southeastern United States pine forests. World Resource Review 12: 298–320.Google Scholar
- McNulty, S.G., J.M. Vose, and W.T. Swank. 1996. Potential climate change effects on loblolly pine forest productivity and drainage across the southern United States. Ambio 25: 449–453.Google Scholar
- Meehl, G.A., T.F. Stocker, W.D. Collins, P. Friedlingstein, A.T. Gaye, J.M. Gregory, A. Kitoh, and R. Knutti. 2007. Global climate projections. In Climate change 2007: The physical science basis—Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, ed. S. Solomon, D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K.B. Averyt, M. Tignor, H.L. Miller, et al., 748–845. Cambridge, United Kingdom; New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Multi-Resolution Land Characteristics Consortium. 1992. 1992 national land cover data. http://www.epa.gov/mrlc/nlcd.html. Accessed 05 March 2008.
- Multi-Resolution Land Characteristics Consortium. 2001. 2001 national land cover data. http://www.epa.gov/mrlc/nlcd-2001.html. Accessed 12 March 2008.
- Nakicenovic, N., J. Alcamo, G. Davis, B. de Vries, J. Fenhann, S. Gaffin, K. Gregory, A. Grübler, et al. 2000. Special report on emissions scenarios: A special report of working group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Norby, R.J., J. Ledford, C.D. Reilly, N.E. Miller, and E.G. O’Neill. 2004. Fine-root production dominates response of a deciduous forest to atmospheric CO2 enrichment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 101:9689–9693.Google Scholar
- Rosson Jr., J.F. 1995. Forest resources of Louisiana, 1991. United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Forest Experiment Station, 78 pp.Google Scholar
- Soil Survey Staff. 2004. Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) Database. United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 89 pp.Google Scholar
- Springer, C.J., E.H. DeLucia, and R.B. Thomas. 2005. Relationships between net photosynthesis and foliar nitrogen concentrations in a loblolly pine forest ecosystem grown in elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide. Tree Physiology 25: 385–394.Google Scholar
- Tang, Z.M., M.A. Sayer, J.L. Chambers, and J.P. Barnett. 2004. Interactive effects of fertilization and throughfall exclusion on the physiological responses and whole-tree carbon uptake of mature loblolly pine. Canadian Journal of Botany-Revue Canadienne De Botanique 82: 850–861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Tian, H.Q., G.S. Chen, M.L. Liu, C. Zhang, G. Sun, C.Q. Lu, X.F. Xu, W. Ren, et al. 2010. Model estimates of net primary productivity, evapotranspiration, and water use efficiency in the terrestrial ecosystems of the southern United States during 1895–2007. Forest Ecology and Management 259: 1311–1327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- USDA Forest Service. 2007. The forest inventory and analysis database: Database description and users guide version 2.1. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, National Forest Inventory and Analysis Program, 210 pp.Google Scholar
- Winter, K., M. Garcia, R. Gottsberger, and M. Popp. 2001. Marked growth response of communities of two tropical tree species to elevated CO2 when soil nutrient limitation is removed. Flora 196: 47–58.Google Scholar