AMBIO

, Volume 40, Issue 3, pp 256–263 | Cite as

When Ecosystem Services Crash: Preparing for Big, Fast, Patchy Climate Change

  • David D. Breshears
  • Laura López-Hoffman
  • Lisa J. Graumlich
Review Paper

Abstract

Assessments of adaptation options generally focus on incremental, homogeneous ecosystem responses to climate even though climate change impacts can be big, fast, and patchy across a region. Regional drought-induced tree die-off in semiarid woodlands highlights how an ecosystem crash fundamentally alters most ecosystem services and poses management challenges. Building on previous research showing how choice of location is linked to adaptive capacity and vulnerability, we developed a framework showing how the options for retaining desired ecosystem services in the face of sudden crashes depend on how portable the service is and whether the stakeholder is flexible with regard to the location where they receive their services. Stakeholders using portable services, or stakeholders who can move to other locations to obtain services, may be more resilient to ecosystem crashes. Our framework suggests that entering into cooperative networks with regionally distributed stakeholders is key to building resilience to big, fast, patchy crashes.

Keywords

Climate change Drought Ecosystem services Forest tree die-off 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This article concept was developed in association with a Fellowship to DDB from the Udall Center for Studies in Public Policy. Associated research was supported by NSF (DIRENet # DEB-0443526), DOE NICCR (Western Region: DE-FCO2-O6ER64159) and the state of Arizona (Ag Experiment Station and TRIF). We thank CD Allen, USGS, for use of the photo in Fig. 1.

References

  1. Adams, H.D., A.K. Macalady, D.D. Breshears, C.D. Allen, N.L. Stephenson, S.R. Saleska, and T.E. Huxman. 2010. Climate-induced tree mortality: Earth system consequences. Eos Transaction AGU 91: 153–154.Google Scholar
  2. Adams, H.D., M. Guardiola-Claramonte, G.A. Barron-Gafford, J.C. Villegas, D.D. Breshears, C.B. Zou, P.A. Troch, and T.E. Huxman. 2009. Temperature sensitivity of drought-induced tree mortality portends increased regional die-off under global-change-type drought. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 106: 7063–7066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allen, C.D., and D.D. Breshears. 1998. Drought-induced shift of a forest-woodland ecotone: Rapid landscape response to climate variation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 95: 14839–14842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Allen, C.D., A.K. Macalady, H. Chenchouni, D. Bachelet, N. McDowell, M. Vennetier, T. Kitzberger, A. Rigling, et al. 2010. A global overview of drought and heat-induced tree mortality reveals emerging climate change risks for forests. Forest Ecology and Management 250: 660–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Alley, R.B., J. Marotzke, W.D. Nordhaus, J.T. Overpeck, D.M. Peteet, R.A. Pielke, P.B. Rhines, T.F. Stocker, et al. 2003. Abrupt climate change. Science 299: 2005–2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blacklund, P., A. Janetos, and D. Schimel. 2008. The effects of climate change on agriculture, land resources, water resources, and biodiversity in the United States. Washington, DC: United States Climate Change Science Program.Google Scholar
  7. Blaikie, P., T. Cannon, I. Davis, and B. Wisner. 1994. At risk: Natural hazards, people’s vulnerability, and disaster. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Boose, E.R., D.R. Foster, and M. Fluet. 1994. Hurricane impacts to tropical and temperate forest landscapes. Ecological Monographs 64: 369–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bowman, D.M.J.S., J.K. Balch, P. Artaxo, W.J. Bond, J.M. Carlson, M.A. Cochrane, C.M. D’Antonio, R.S. DeFries, et al. 2009. Fire in the Earth system. Science 324: 481–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Breshears, D.D. 2006. The grassland-forest continuum: Trends in ecosystem properties for woody plant mosaics? Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 4: 96–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Breshears, D.D., and C.D. Allen. 2002. The importance of rapid, disturbance-induced losses in carbon management and sequestration. Ecological sounding. Global Ecology Biogeography 11: 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Breshears, D.D., N.S. Cobb, P.M. Rich, K.P. Price, C.D. Allen, R.G. Balice, W.H. Romme, J.H. Kastens, et al. 2005. Regional vegetation die-off in response to global-change-type drought. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 102: 15144–15148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Breshears, D.D., O.B. Myers, C.W. Meyer, F.J. Barnes, C.B. Zou, C.D. Allen, N.G. McDowell, and W.T. Pockman. 2009. Tree die-off in response to global-change-type drought: Mortality insights from a decade of plant water potential measurements. Frontiers Ecology Environment 7: 185–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brown, J.H., T.G. Whitham, S.K. Morgan Ernest, and C.A. Gehring. 2001. Complex species interactions and the dynamics of ecological systems: Long-term experiments. Science 293: 643–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Carlton, J. 2006. Some in Santa Fe pine for a lost symbol, but others move on: drought-killed piñon trees become fuel, mulch, art, bash it with a fence post. Wall Street Journal: 31 July 2006.Google Scholar
  16. Dizney, L., P.D. Jones, and L.A. Ruedas. 2010. Natural history of sin nombre virus infection in deer mice in urban parks in Oregon. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 46: 433–441.Google Scholar
  17. Flannigan, M. D., M. A. Krawchuk, W. J. deGroot, B. M. Wotton, and L. M. Gowman. 2009. Implications of changing climate for global wildland fire. International Journal of Wildland Fire 18: 483–507.Google Scholar
  18. Floyd, M.L. (ed.). 2003. Ancient piñon-juniper woodlands: A natural history of Mesa Verde County. Boulder: University of Colorado Press.Google Scholar
  19. Folke, C., S. Carpenter, T. Emqvist, L. Gunderson, C.S. Holling, and B. Walker. 2002. Resilience and sustainable development: Building adaptive capacity in a world of transformations. Ambio 31: 437–440.Google Scholar
  20. Gehring, C.A., T.C. Theimer, T.G. Whitham, and P. Keim. 1988. Ectomycorrhizal fungal community structure of pinyon pines growing in two environmental extremes. Ecology 79: 1562–1572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gitlin, A.R., C.M. Sthultz, M.A. Bowker, S. Stumpf, K.L. Paxton, K. Kennedy, A. Muñoz, J.K. Bailey, and T.G. Whitham. 2006. Mortality gradients within and among dominant plant populations as barometers of ecosystem change during extreme drought. Conservation Biology 20: 1477–1486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Heller, N.E., and E.S. Zavaleta. 2008. Biodiversity management in the face of climate change: A review of 22 years of recommendations. Biological Conservation 42: 14–32.Google Scholar
  23. IPCC. 2007. Climate Change 2007: Synthesis report. Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change, ed. Core Writing Team, R. K. Pachauri, and A. Reisinger, 104 pp. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  24. Kelly, P.M., and W.M. Adger. 2002. Theory and practice in assessing vulnerability to climate change and facilitating adaptation. Climatic Change 47: 325–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lanner, R.M. 1981. The piñon pine: A natural and cultural history. Las Vegas: University of Nevada Press.Google Scholar
  26. Leary, N., et al. 2008. For whom the bell tolls: Vulnerabilities in a changing climate. In Climate change and vulnerability, ed. N. Leary, C. Conde, J. Kulkarni, A. Nyong, and J. Pulhin. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  27. López-Hoffman, L., R.G. Varady, K.W. Flessa, and P. Balvanera. 2009. Ecosystem services across borders: A framework for transboundary conservation policy. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 8: 84–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Luis, A.D., R.J. Douglass, J.N. Mills, and O.N. Bjornstad. 2010. The effect of seasonality, density, and climate on the population dynamics of Montana deer mice, important reservoir hosts for Sin Nombre hantavirus. Journal of Animal Ecology 79: 462–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. McDowell, N., W.T. Pockman, C.D. Allen, D.D. Breshears, N. Cobb, T. Kolb, J. Plaut, J. Sperry, et al. 2008. Tansley review. Mechanisms of plant survival and mortality during drought: Why do some plants survive while others succumb to drought? New Phytologist 178: 719–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Millar, C.I., N.L. Stephenson, and S.L. Stephens. 2007. Climate change and forest of the future: Managing in the face of uncertainty. Ecological Applications 17: 2145–2151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA). 2003. Ecosystems and human well-being: A framework for assessment. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  32. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA). 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: Our human planet. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  33. Milly, P.C.D., R.T. Wetherald, K.A. Dunne, and T.L. Delworth. 2002. Increasing risk of great floods in a changing climate. Nature 415: 514–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mueller, R.C., and C.A. Gehring. 2006. Interactions between an above-ground plant parasite and below-ground ectomycorrhizal fungal communities on pinyon pine. Journal of Ecology 94: 276–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Murphy, K.L., J.M. Klopatek, and C.C. Klopatek. 1998. The effects of litter quality and climate on decomposition along an elevational gradient. Ecological Applications 8: 1061–1071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Overpeck, J.T., and J.E. Cole. 2006. Abrupt change in Earth’s climate system. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 31: 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Raffa, K.F., B.H. Aukema, B.J. Bentz, A.L. Carroll, J.A. Hicke, M.G. Turner, and W.H. Romme. 2008. Cross-scale drivers of natural disturbances prone to anthropogenic amplification: The dynamics of bark beetle eruptions. BioScience 58: 501–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rich, P.M., D.D. Breshears, and A.B. White. 2008. Phenology of mixed woody-herbaceous ecosystems following extreme events: Net and differential responses. Ecology 89: 342–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Royer, P.D., D.D. Breshears, C.B. Zou, N.S. Cobb, and S.A. Kurc. 2010. Ecohydrological energy inputs for coniferous gradients: Responses to management- and climate-induced tree reductions. Forest Ecology and Management 260: 1646–1655.Google Scholar
  40. Scheffer, M.S., S. Carpenter, J.A. Foley, C. Folke, and B. Walker. 2002. Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems. Nature 413: 591–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Shaw, J.D., B.E. Steed, and L.T. DeBlander. 2005. Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) annual inventory answers the question: What is happening to pinyon-juniper woodlands? Journal of Forestry 103: 280–285.Google Scholar
  42. Smit, B., and J. Wandel. 2006. Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability. Global Environmental Change—Human and Policy Dimensions 16: 282–292.Google Scholar
  43. Stenseth, N.C., A. Mysterud, G. Ottersen, J.W. Hurrell, Kung-Sik Chan, and N. Lima. 2002. Ecological effects of climate fluctuations. Science 297: 1292–1296.Google Scholar
  44. Turner, B.L., R.E. Kasperson, P. Matson, J.J. McCarthy, R.J. Corell, L. Christensen, N. Eckley, J.X. Kasperson, et al. 2003. A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 100: 8074–8079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wellman, J. 2004. What to do with a dead piñon. Victoria, Canada: Trafford.Google Scholar
  46. Westerling, A.L., H.G. Hidalgo, D.R. Cayan, and T.W. Swetnam. 2006. Warming and earlier spring increase western U.S. wildfire activity. Science 313: 940–943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wilcox, B.P. 2010. Transformative ecosystem change and ecohydrology: ushering in a new era for watershed management. Ecohydrology 3: 126–130.Google Scholar
  48. Yohe, G., and R.S.J. Tol. 2002. Indicators for social and economic coping capacity—moving toward a working definition of adaptive capacity. Global Environmental Change—Human and Policy Dimensions 12: 25–40.Google Scholar
  49. Zou, C.B., P.F. Ffolliott, and M. Wine. 2010. Streamflow responses to vegetation manipulations along a gradient of precipitation in the Colorado River Basin. Forest Ecology and Management 259: 1268–1276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • David D. Breshears
    • 1
    • 2
  • Laura López-Hoffman
    • 1
    • 3
  • Lisa J. Graumlich
    • 4
  1. 1.School of Natural Resources and the EnvironmentThe University of ArizonaTucsonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyThe University of ArizonaTucsonUSA
  3. 3.Udall Center for Studies in Public PolicyThe University of ArizonaTucsonUSA
  4. 4.College of the EnvironmentThe University of WashingtonSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations