How future aircraft can benefit from a steerable main landing gear for crosswind operations

  • Dennis VechtelEmail author
Original Paper


Many unconventional configurations for future aircraft, such as aircraft with very high aspect ratio wings or blended wing bodies, suffer from adverse flying characteristics for crosswind operations. Although the reasons for such undesirable behavior are different, coming from either tight geometric limitations, such as small bank angle allowances close to ground, or unfavorable flying qualities in the lateral motion, the consequences are challenging characteristics for take-off or landing under crosswind. In the presented study, a crosswind landing assistance system that makes use of a steerable main landing gear was designed and demonstrated in simulator trials. With such a system, the so-called de-crab maneuver is obsolete and the aircraft can touch down in crabbed motion. During roll-out on ground, the de-crab is performed automatically and the aircraft is kept on the runway centerline. A special concept for manual steering during this automatic de-crab on ground is introduced in the paper. The system is demonstrated in an A320 full-flight simulator with airline pilots, showing a good performance of the system and satisfactory pilot acceptance. The simulation results also show that the side forces acting on the landing gears could be reduced significantly with steerable main landing gears. This raises the hope that with such a system, the landing gear could possibly be designed lighter, saving at least some of the additional weight and cost for the necessary steering actuators of the main landing gear.


Crosswind landing Steerable landing gear Pilot assistance Simulator study 



Auto-flight system


Advanced technologies research aircraft


Air vehicle simulator


German aerospace center


Exhaust gas temperature


Engine pressure ratio


Flight control system


Flying helicopter simulator


Flight management system


Ground speed


Horizontal tail plane


Indicated airspeed


Instrument landing system


Meteorological aerodrome report


National aeronautics and space administration


Sonderforschungsbereich (collaborative research center)


Short take-off and landing

List of symbols

Fx, Fy, Fz

Longitudinal, lateral, and vertical component of the landing gear force (N)


Altitude (ft)


Gain for proportional controller (−)

ny, nz

Lateral and vertical load factor (−)


Tire pressure (N/m2)


Time constant (s)

u, v

Longitudinal and lateral velocity component of tires (m/s)/(kts)


Air speed (m/s)/(kts)


Ground speed (m/s)/(kts)


Cross-track error on the runway (m)


Proportion of braking applied (−)

\( \eta_{\text{NG}} \)

Nose gear steering angle (°)

\( \eta_{\text{MG}} \)

Main gear steering angle (°)

\( \mu_{\text{s}} \)

Side-friction coefficient (−)

\( \mu_{\text{b}} \)

Brake-friction coefficient (−)

\( \mu_{\text{r}} \)

Roll-friction coefficient (−)


Aircraft heading (°)


Runway heading (°)


Crab angle (°)


Skid angle (°)

\( \chi \)

Track angle (°)

\( \Delta \chi_{\text{chase}} \)

Chase angle (°)

\( \chi_{\text{CMD}} \)

Commanded track angle (°)



This work was supported in part by funding from the Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (Grant No. 640597).


  1. 1.
    Torenbeek, E.: Advanced Aircraft Design. Wiley, Chichester (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lee, J.J., et al.: Historical and future trends in aircraft performance, cost, and emissions. Annu. Rev. Energy Environ. 26, 167–200 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bows, A.: Aviation and climate change: confronting the challenge. Aeronaut. J. 114(1158), 459–468 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bradley, M.K., Droney, C.K.: Subsonic ultra green aircraft research: phase i final report, NASA/CR-2011-216847 (2011)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hasan, Y.J., et al.: Handling qualities assessment of a blended wing body configuration under uncertainty considerations, German Aerospace Congress, Munich, Germany, 5–7 September 2017 (2017)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Liebeck, R.H.: Design of the blended wing body subsonic transport. J. Aircr. 41(1), 10–25 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kauth, F., et al.: Progress in efficient active high-lift. In: AIAA-2017-3559, 35th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, 5–9 June 2017 (2017)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Campbell, J.P.: Status of V/STOL research and development in the United States. J. Aircr. 1(3), 97–106 (1964)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Quigley, H.C., Innis, R.C.: Handling qualities and operational problems of a large four-propeller STOL transport airplane, NASA TN D-1647 (1963)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Diekmann, J.H.: Flight mechanical challenges of STOL aircraft using active high-lift. In: AIAA-2017-3561, 35th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, 5–9 June 2017 (2017)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Flight Safety Digest, Approach and Landing Accident Reduction, Briefing Note 8.7, Crosswind Landings, Flight Safety Foundation (2000)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    N.N., A320 FCOM Bulletin, No 21, Crosswind Landing Techniques, September 1992 (1992)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    van Es, G.W.H., van der Geest, P.J., Nieuwpoort, T.M.H.: Safety aspects of aircraft operations in crosswind, Nationaal Lucht- en Ruimtevaartlaboratorium, NLR-TP-2001-217, May 2001 (2001)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Vechtel, D., Meissner, U.M., Hahn, K.-U.: On the use of a steerable main landing gear for crosswind landing assistance. CEAS Aeronaut. J. 5, 293–303 (2014). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Loudenslager, O.W.: Cross-Wind Airplane Landing Gear, US Patent US2504077, 11 April 1950 (1950)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    N.N., Aircraft Specification No. A-790, Cessna 190/195, Federal Aviation Administration FAA, Department of Transportation, Revision 36, 31 March 2003 (2003)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    The Boeing Company, B-52H Flight manual, T-O. 1B-52H-1, Change 22, 1 June 2006 (2006)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rawdon, B.K., Zachary, C.H.: Method, system, and computer program product for controlling maneuverable wheels on a vehicle, US Patent US6,722,610B1, 20 April 2004 (2004)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hahn, K.-U., Meissner, U.M.: Control device for aircraft, US Patent US 2012/0305704 A1, 6 December 2012 (2012)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    N.N., A320 Flight Crew Operating Manual Part 3 Flight Operations, 01 June 2009 (2009)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Raab, C.: Flugdynamisches simulationsmodell A320-ATRA—Validierungsversuche und Bewertung der Modellgüte (English: Flight Dynamics Simulation Model A320 ATRA – Validation Tests and Evaluation of the Model Accuracy), DLR internal report, IB 111-2012/43 (2012)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fischenberg, D.: A validated dynamic simulation model for VFW-614 ground handling, DLR internal report, IB 111-98/33 (1998)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Barnes, A.G., Jager, T.Y.: Enhancement of aircraft ground handling simulation capability, AGARDograph No. 333 (1998)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    N.N., PEP Performance Programs Manual, Airbus IndustriesGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Duda, H., Gerlach, T.: Design of the DLR AVES research flight simulator. In: AIAA-2013-4737, AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference, Boston, USA, 19–22 August 2013 (2013).
  26. 26.
    N.N., Joint Aviation Requirements, JAR-STD 1A Aeroplane Flight Simulators. JAA Joint Aviation Authorities (1999)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    N. N., U.S. Military Handbook MIL-HDBK-1797, 19 December 1997 (1997)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Dryden, H.L.: A review of the statistical theory of turbulence. Q. Appl. Math. 1(1), 7–42 (1943)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Flight SystemsGerman Aerospace Center (DLR)BrunswickGermany

Personalised recommendations