Advertisement

Genes & Genomics

, Volume 41, Issue 7, pp 781–801 | Cite as

Comparative transcriptome analysis of salt-sensitive and salt-tolerant maize reveals potential mechanisms to enhance salt resistance

  • Mingquan Wang
  • Yufeng Wang
  • Yifei Zhang
  • Chunxia Li
  • Shichen Gong
  • Shuqin Yan
  • Guoliang Li
  • Guanghui Hu
  • Honglei Ren
  • Jianfei Yang
  • Tao Yu
  • Kejun YangEmail author
Research Article
  • 166 Downloads

Abstract

Background

Salt stress is a devastating environmental stress that causes plant growth inhibition and yield reduction.

Objective

The identification of salt-tolerant genes brings hope for the generation of salinity-tolerant crop plants through molecular breeding.

Methods

In this study, one salt-sensitive and one salt-tolerant maize inbred line were screened from 242 maize inbred lines. Reactive oxygen species (ROS)-related enzyme activities were detected and salt-responsive comparative transcriptome analysis was performed for control and 220 mM NaCl treated maize leaves.

Results

Salt-tolerant maize inbred line (L87) showed higher ROS-related enzyme (SOD, POD, APX and CAT) activities and accumulated relatively lower levels of ROS under salt stress. Of the total DEGs, 1856 upregulated DEGs were specific to L87, including stress tolerance-related members of the 70kDa family of heat shock proteins (Hsp70s) and aquaporins. The DEGs involved in the abscisic acid (ABA), ethylene, jasmonic acid (JA) and salicylic acid (SA) signal transduction pathways may determine the difference in salt tolerance between the two varieties, especially one central component SnRK2, that positively regulates ABA signaling and was only upregulated in L87. Analysis of DEGs related to ROS scavenging showed that some peroxidase (POD), glutathione S-transferase (GST), catalase (CAT) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) genes specific to L87 probably enhanced its salt tolerance. The analysis of differentially expressed transcription factors (TFs) suggested that WRKY TFs could contribute to the difference in salt tolerance between the two maize lines.

Conclusion

Compared with Salt-sensitive maize inbred line (L29), L87 exhibits specific regulatory mechanisms related to salt tolerance, including plant hormone interactions, ROS scavenging and the regulation of TFs. Our study identifies new candidate genes that may regulate maize tolerance to salt stress and provides useful information for breeding maize with high salt resistance.

Keywords

Maize Salt stress RNA-Seq Differentially expressed genes Hormone signaling pathways Transcription factors 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The materials were collected from the Maize Research Institute of Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences. This work was partially supported by Grants from the National Science and Technology Support Plan of China (2013BAD07B01); the Innovation Project of Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Science (2014ZD003); the Open Project of the Experimental Station of Crop Cultivation and Observation in Northeast China, Northeast Agricultural University of China; Heilongjiang Acamedy of Agricultural Sciences Postdoctoral Programme; the Ministry of Agriculture Genetically Modified Major Project of China (SQ2016ZD080034); and the National Key Research and Development Plan of China (2016YFD0100103, 2017YFD0300502 and 2017YFD0300506).

Supplementary material

13258_2019_793_MOESM1_ESM.docx (18 kb)
Table S1. Sequences of eight gene-specific primers and primers for one internal reference gene (18S rDNA) (DOCX 17 KB)
13258_2019_793_MOESM2_ESM.xls (158 kb)
Table S2. Morphological indexes from the assay of 242 maize inbred lines under salty and normal conditions at the germination stage (XLS 157 KB)
13258_2019_793_MOESM3_ESM.xls (166 kb)
Table S3. Morphological indexes from the assay of 242 maize inbred lines under salty and normal conditions at the seedling stage (XLS 166 KB)
13258_2019_793_MOESM4_ESM.xlsx (1016 kb)
Table S4. DEGs in the salt-sensitive maize variety (L29) in response to salt stress (XLSX 1016 KB)
13258_2019_793_MOESM5_ESM.xlsx (1.7 mb)
Table S5. DEGs in the salt-tolerant maize variety (L87) in response to salt stress (XLSX 1763 KB)
13258_2019_793_MOESM6_ESM.xlsx (162 kb)
Table S6. GO enrichment of upregulated DEGs of the salt-sensitive maize variety (L29) in response to salt stress (XLSX 161 KB)
13258_2019_793_MOESM7_ESM.xlsx (138 kb)
Table S7. GO enrichment of downregulated DEGs of the salt-sensitive maize variety (L29) in response to salt stress (XLSX 138 KB)
13258_2019_793_MOESM8_ESM.xlsx (283 kb)
Table S8. GO enrichment of upregulated DEGs of the salt-tolerant maize variety (L87) in response to salt stress (XLSX 283 KB)
13258_2019_793_MOESM9_ESM.xlsx (258 kb)
Table S9. GO enrichment of downregulated DEGs of the salt-tolerant maize variety (L87) in response to salt stress (XLSX 257 KB)
13258_2019_793_MOESM10_ESM.xlsx (29 kb)
Table S10. KEGG enrichment of upregulated DEGs of the salt-sensitive maize variety (L29) in response to salt stress (XLSX 28 KB)
13258_2019_793_MOESM11_ESM.xlsx (23 kb)
Table S11. KEGG enrichment of downregulated DEGs of the salt-sensitive maize variety (L29) in response to salt stress (XLSX 23 KB)
13258_2019_793_MOESM12_ESM.xlsx (39 kb)
Table S12. KEGG enrichment of upregulated DEGs of the salt-tolerant maize variety (L87) in response to salt stress (XLSX 38 KB)
13258_2019_793_MOESM13_ESM.xlsx (31 kb)
Table S13. KEGG enrichment of downregulated DEGs of the salt-tolerant maize variety (L87) in response to salt stress (XLSX 30 KB)
13258_2019_793_MOESM14_ESM.xlsx (15 kb)
Table S14. The DEGs involved in phytohormone biosynthesis in the two cultivars (XLSX 15 KB)

References

  1. Aebi H (1984) Catalase in vitro. Methods Enzymol 105:121–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahmad P, Abdel Latef AA, Hashem A, Abd Allah EF, Gucel S, Tran LS (2016) Nitric oxide mitigates salt stress by regulating levels of osmolytes and antioxidant enzymes in chickpea. Front Plant Sci 7:347Google Scholar
  3. Ahrazem O, Rubio-Moraga A, Trapero-Mozos A, Climent MF, Gomez-Cadenas A, Gomez-Gomez L (2015) Ectopic expression of a stress-inducible glycosyltransferase from saffron enhances salt and oxidative stress tolerance in Arabidopsis while alters anchor root formation. Plant Sci 234:60–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alavilli H, Awasthi JP, Rout GR, Sahoo L, Lee BH, Panda SK (2016) Overexpression of a barley aquaporin gene, HvPIP2;5 confers salt and osmotic stress tolerance in yeast and plants. Front Plant Sci 7:1566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Alexa A, Rahnenfuhrer J, Lengauer T (2006) Improved scoring of functional groups from gene expression data by decorrelating GO graph structure. Bioinformatics 22:1600–1607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ali MA, Azeem F, Nawaz MA, Acet T, Abbas A, Imran QM, Shah KH, Rehman HM, Chung G, Yang SH, Bohlmann H (2018) Transcription factors WRKY11 and WRKY17 are involved in abiotic stress responses in Arabidopsis. J Plant Physiol 226:12–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Andjelkovic V, Thompson R (2006) Changes in gene expression in maize kernel in response to water and salt stress. Plant Cell Rep 25:71–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Apel K, Hirt H (2004) Reactive oxygen species: metabolism, oxidative stress, and signal transduction. Annu Rev Plant Biol 55:373–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM, Davis AP, Dolinski K, Dwight SS, Eppig JT, Harris MA, Hill DP, Issel-Tarver L, Kasarskis A, Lewis S, Matese JC, Richardson JE, Ringwald M, Rubin GM, Sherlock G (2000) Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat Genet 25:25–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bai J, Qin Y, Liu J, Wang Y, Sa R, Zhang N, Jia R (2017) Proteomic response of oat leaves to long-term salinity stress. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 24:3387–3399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bari R, Jones JD (2009) Role of plant hormones in plant defence responses. Plant Mol Biol 69:473–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Barrs H, Weatherley P (1962) A re-examination of the relative turgidity technique for estimating water deficits in leaves. Aust J Biol Sci 15:413–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cai R, Dai W, Zhang C, Wang Y, Wu M, Zhao Y, Ma Q, Xiang Y, Cheng B (2017) The maize WRKY transcription factor ZmWRKY17 negatively regulates salt stress tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis plants. Planta 246:1215–1231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chen J, Zhang J, Hu J, Xiong W, Du C, Lu M (2017) Integrated regulatory network reveals the early salt tolerance mechanism of Populus euphratica. Sci Rep 7:6769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cheng C, Wang Z, Ren Z, Zhi L, Yao B, Su C, Liu L, Li X (2017) SCFAtPP2-B11 modulates ABA signaling by facilitating SnRK2.3 degradation in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS Genet 13:e1006947CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chu X, Wang C, Chen X, Lu W, Li H, Wang X, Hao L, Guo X (2015) The cotton WRKY gene GhWRKY41 positively regulates salt and drought stress tolerance in transgenic Nicotiana benthamiana. PLoS One 10:e0143022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dhindsa RS, Plumb-Dhindsa P, Thorpe TA (1981) Leaf senescence: correlated with increased levels of membrane permeability and lipid peroxidation, and decreased levels of superoxide dismutase and catalase. J Exp Bot 32:93–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ding L, Li Y, Wang Y, Gao L, Wang M, Chaumont F, Shen Q, Guo S (2016) Root ABA accumulation enhances rice seedling drought tolerance under ammonium supply: interaction with aquaporins. Front Plant Sci 7:1206Google Scholar
  19. Fernandes J, Morrow DJ, Casati P, Walbot V (2008) Distinctive transcriptome responses to adverse environmental conditions in Zea mays L. Plant Biotechnol J 6:782–798CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Finkelstein RR, Gampala SS, Rock CD (2002) Abscisic acid signaling in seeds and seedlings. Plant Cell 14(Suppl):S15–S45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gao Y, Jiang W, Dai Y, Xiao N, Zhang C, Li H, Lu Y, Wu M, Tao X, Deng D, Chen J (2015) A maize phytochrome-interacting factor 3 improves drought and salt stress tolerance in rice. Plant Mol Biol 87:413–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gao Y, Cui Y, Long R, Sun Y, Zhang T, Yang Q, Kang J (2019) Salt-stress induced proteomic changes of two contrasting alfalfa cultivars during germination stage. J Sci Food Agric 99:1384–1396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Giannopolitis CN, Ries SK (1977) Superoxide dismutases: I. Occurrence in higher plants. Plant Physiol 59:309–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gill SS, Tuteja N (2010) Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Plant Physiol Biochem 48:909–930CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gondim FA, Gomes-Filho E, Costa JH, Alencar M, N.L. and Prisco JT (2012) Catalase plays a key role in salt stress acclimation induced by hydrogen peroxide pretreatment in maize. Plant Physiol Biochem 56:62–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Guan Q, Liao X, He M, Li X, Wang Z, Ma H, Yu S, Liu S (2017) Tolerance analysis of chloroplast OsCu/Zn-SOD overexpressing rice under NaCl and NaHCO3 stress. PLoS One 12:e0186052CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Guo J, Shi G, Guo X, Zhang L, Xu W, Wang Y, Su Z, Hua J (2015) Transcriptome analysis reveals that distinct metabolic pathways operate in salt-tolerant and salt-sensitive upland cotton varieties subjected to salinity stress. Plant Sci 238:33–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hayashi H, Murata N (1998) Genetically engineered enhancement of salt tolerance in higher plants, stress responses of photosynthetic organisms. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 133–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hichri I, Muhovski Y, Zizkova E, Dobrev PI, Gharbi E, Franco-Zorrilla JM, Lopez-Vidriero I, Solano R, Clippe A, Errachid A, Motyka V, Lutts S (2017) The Solanum lycopersicum WRKY3 transcription factor SlWRKY3 is involved in salt stress tolerance in tomato. Front Plant Sci 8:1343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hobo T, Kowyama Y, Hattori T (1999) A bZIP factor, TRAB1, interacts with VP1 and mediates abscisic acid-induced transcription. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:15348–15353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hückelhoven R, Fodor J, Preis C, Kogel K-H (1999) Hypersensitive cell death and papilla formation in barley attacked by the powdery mildew fungus are associated with hydrogen peroxide but not with salicylic acid accumulation. Plant Physiol 119:1251–1260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ji C, Mao X, Hao J, Wang X, Xue J, Cui H, Li R (2018) Analysis of bZIP transcription factor family and their expressions under salt stress in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Int J Mol Sci 19:2800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jin J, Tian F, Yang DC, Meng YQ, Kong L, Luo J, Gao G (2017) PlantTFDB 4.0: toward a central hub for transcription factors and regulatory interactions in plants. Nucleic Acids Res 45:D1040–D1045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kanehisa M, Araki M, Goto S, Hattori M, Hirakawa M, Itoh M, Katayama T, Kawashima S, Okuda S, Tokimatsu T, Yamanishi Y (2008) KEGG for linking genomes to life and the environment. Nucleic Acids Res 36:D480–D484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Karanja BK, Xu L, Wang Y, Muleke EM, Jabir BM, Xie Y, Zhu X, Cheng W, Liu L (2017) Genome-wide characterization and expression profiling of NAC transcription factor genes under abiotic stresses in radish (Raphanus sativus L.). PeerJ 5, e4172Google Scholar
  36. Kim D, Langmead B, Salzberg SL (2015) HISAT: a fast spliced aligner with low memory requirements. Nat Methods 12:357–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Leah R, Tommerup H, Svendsen I, Mundy J (1991) Biochemical and molecular characterization of three barley seed proteins with antifungal properties. J Biol Chem 266:1564–1573Google Scholar
  38. Li P, Cao W, Fang H, Xu S, Yin S, Zhang Y, Lin D, Wang J, Chen Y, Xu C, Yang Z (2017) Transcriptomic profiling of the maize (Zea mays L.) leaf response to abiotic stresses at the seedling stage. Front Plant Sci 8:290Google Scholar
  39. Li P, Yang H, Liu G, Ma W, Li C, Huo H, He J, Liu L (2018) PpSARK regulates moss senescence and salt tolerance through ABA related pathway. Int J Mol Sci.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19092609 Google Scholar
  40. Liang MH, Jiang JG (2017) Analysis of carotenogenic genes promoters and WRKY transcription factors in response to salt stress in Dunaliella bardawil. Sci Rep 7:37025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−∆∆CT method. Methods 25:402–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lopez-Molina L, Mongrand S, Chua NH (2001) A postgermination developmental arrest checkpoint is mediated by abscisic acid and requires the ABI5 transcription factor in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci 98:4782–4787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Love MI, Huber W, Anders S (2014) Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol 15:550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lu X, Zhang X, Duan H, Lian C, Yin W, Xia X (2018) Three stress-responsive NAC transcription factors from Populus euphratica differentially regulate salt and drought tolerance in transgenic plants. Physiol Plant 162:73–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Miller G, Suzuki N, Ciftci-Yilmaz S, Mittler R (2010) Reactive oxygen species homeostasis and signalling during drought and salinity stresses. Plant Cell Environ 33:453–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Molina A, Görlach J, Volrath S, Ryals J (1999) Wheat genes encoding two types of PR-1 proteins are pathogen inducible, but do not respond to activators of systemic acquired resistance. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 12:53–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mostek A, Borner A, Weidner S (2016) Comparative proteomic analysis of beta-aminobutyric acid-mediated alleviation of salt stress in barley. Plant Physiol Biochem 99:150–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Munns R (2005) Genes and salt tolerance: bringing them together. New Phytol 167:645–663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Munns R, Tester M (2008) Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annu Rev Plant Biol 59:651–681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Nakano Y, Asada K (1981) Hydrogen peroxide is scavenged by ascorbate-specific peroxidase in spinach chloroplasts. Plant Cell Physiol 22:867–880Google Scholar
  51. Nakashima K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K (2013) ABA signaling in stress-response and seed development. Plant Cell Rep 32:959–970CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Natali L, Vangelisti A, Guidi L, Remorini D, Cotrozzi L, Lorenzini G, Nali C, Pellegrini E, Trivellini A, Vernieri P, Landi M, Cavallini A, Giordani T (2018) How Quercus ilex L. saplings face combined salt and ozone stress: a transcriptome analysis. BMC Genom 19:872CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Peng Z, He S, Gong W, Sun J, Pan Z, Xu F, Lu Y, Du X (2014) Comprehensive analysis of differentially expressed genes and transcriptional regulation induced by salt stress in two contrasting cotton genotypes. BMC Genom 15:760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pilarska M, Wiciarz M, Jajic I, Kozieradzka-Kiszkurno M, Dobrev P, Vankova R, Niewiadomska E (2016) A different pattern of production and scavenging of reactive oxygen species in halophytic Eutrema salsugineum (Thellungiella salsuginea) plants in comparison to arabidopsis thaliana and its relation to salt stress signaling. Front Plant Sci 7:1179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Qing DJ, Lu HF, Li N, Dong HT, Dong DF, Li YZ (2009) Comparative profiles of gene expression in leaves and roots of maize seedlings under conditions of salt stress and the removal of salt stress. Plant Cell Physiol 50:889–903CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rong L, Li Q, Li S, Tang L, Wen J (2016) De novo transcriptome sequencing of Acer palmatum and comprehensive analysis of differentially expressed genes under salt stress in two contrasting genotypes. Mol Genet Genom 291:575–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Schnable PS, Ware D, Fulton RS, Stein JC, Wei F, Pasternak S, Liang C, Zhang J, Fulton L, Graves TA, Minx P, Reily AD, Courtney L, Kruchowski SS, Tomlinson C, Strong C, Delehaunty K, Fronick C, Courtney B, Rock SM, Belter E, Du F, Kim K, Abbott RM, Cotton M, Levy A, Marchetto P, Ochoa K, Jackson SM, Gillam B, Chen W, Yan L, Higginbotham J, Cardenas M, Waligorski J, Applebaum E, Phelps L, Falcone J, Kanchi K, Thane T, Scimone A, Thane N, Henke J, Wang T, Ruppert J, Shah N, Rotter K, Hodges J, Ingenthron E, Cordes M, Kohlberg S, Sgro J, Delgado B, Mead K, Chinwalla A, Leonard S, Crouse K, Collura K, Kudrna D, Currie J, He R, Angelova A, Rajasekar S, Mueller T, Lomeli R, Scara G, Ko A, Delaney K, Wissotski M, Lopez G, Campos D, Braidotti M, Ashley E, Golser W, Kim H, Lee S, Lin J, Dujmic Z, Kim W, Talag J, Zuccolo A, Fan C, Sebastian A, Kramer M, Spiegel L, Nascimento L, Zutavern T, Miller B, Ambroise C, Muller S, Spooner W, Narechania A, Ren L, Wei S, Kumari S, Faga B, Levy MJ, McMahan L, Van Buren P, Vaughn MW et al (2009) The B73 maize genome: complexity, diversity, and dynamics. Science 326:1112–1115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Shen Z, Yao J, Sun J, Chang L, Wang S, Ding M, Qian Z, Zhang H, Zhao N, Sa G, Hou P, Lang T, Wang F, Zhao R, Shen X, Chen S (2015) Populus euphratica HSF binds the promoter of WRKY1 to enhance salt tolerance. Plant Sci 235:89–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Shi H, Liu W, Yao Y, Wei Y, Chan Z (2017) Alcohol dehydrogenase 1 (ADH1) confers both abiotic and biotic stress resistance in Arabidopsis. Plant Sci 262:24–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Swarup R, Kargul J, Marchant A, Zadik D, Rahman A, Mills R, Yemm A, May S, Williams L, Millner P, Tsurumi S, Moore I, Napier R, Kerr ID, Bennett MJ (2004) Structure-function analysis of the presumptive Arabidopsis auxin permease AUX1. Plant Cell 16:3069–3083CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Tang N, Zhang H, Li X, Xiao J, Xiong L (2012) Constitutive activation of transcription factor OsbZIP46 improves drought tolerance in rice. Plant Physiol 158:1755–1768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Tang T, Yu A, Li P, Yang H, Liu G, Liu L (2016) Sequence analysis of the Hsp70 family in moss and evaluation of their functions in abiotic stress responses. Sci Rep 6:33650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Trapnell C, Roberts A, Goff L, Pertea G, Kim D, Kelley DR, Pimentel H, Salzberg SL, Rinn JL, Pachter L (2012) Differential gene and transcript expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with TopHat and Cufflinks. Nat Protoc 7:562–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wang H, Miyazaki S, Kawai K, Deyholos M, Galbraith DW, Bohnert HJ (2003) Temporal progression of gene expression responses to salt shock in maize roots. Plant Mol Biol 52:873–891CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Wang S, Bai Y, Shen C, Wu Y, Zhang S, Jiang D, Guilfoyle TJ, Chen M, Qi Y (2010) Auxin-related gene families in abiotic stress response in Sorghum bicolor. Funct Integr Genom 10:533–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Xie C, Mao X, Huang J, Ding Y, Wu J, Dong S, Kong L, Gao G, Li CY, Wei L (2011) KOBAS 2.0: a web server for annotation and identification of enriched pathways and diseases. Nucleic Acids Res 39:W316–W322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Yang R, Yang T, Zhang H, Qi Y, Xing Y, Zhang N, Li R, Weeda S, Ren S, Ouyang B, Guo YD (2014) Hormone profiling and transcription analysis reveal a major role of ABA in tomato salt tolerance. Plant Physiol Biochem 77:23–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Ying S, Zhang DF, Fu J, Shi YS, Song YC, Wang TY, Li Y (2012) Cloning and characterization of a maize bZIP transcription factor, ZmbZIP72, confers drought and salt tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis. Planta 235:253–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Yu Y, Ni Z, Chen Q, Qu Y (2017) The wheat salinity-induced R2R3-MYB transcription factor TaSIM confers salt stress tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 491:642–648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Zaharieva T, Yamashita K, Matsumoto H (1999) Iron deficiency induced changes in ascorbate content and enzyme activities related to ascorbate metabolism in cucumber roots. Plant Cell Physiol 40:273–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Zhang D, Jiang S, Pan J, Kong X, Zhou Y, Liu Y, Li D (2014) The overexpression of a maize mitogen-activated protein kinase gene (ZmMPK5) confers salt stress tolerance and induces defence responses in tobacco. Plant Biol (Stuttg) 16:558–570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Zhang F, Li L, Jiao Z, Chen Y, Liu H, Chen X, Fu J, Wang G, Zheng J (2016) Characterization of the calcineurin B-Like (CBL) gene family in maize and functional analysis of ZmCBL9 under abscisic acid and abiotic stress treatments. Plant Sci 253:118–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Zhang C, Li X, He Y, Zhang J, Yan T, Liu X (2017) Physiological investigation of C4-phosphoenolpyruvate-carboxylase-introduced rice line shows that sucrose metabolism is involved in the improved drought tolerance. Plant Physiol Biochem 115:328–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Zhao H, Jiang J, Li K, Liu G (2017) Populus simonii × Populus nigra WRKY70 is involved in salt stress and leaf blight disease responses. Tree Physiol 37:827–844CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Genetics Society of Korea 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mingquan Wang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Yufeng Wang
    • 1
  • Yifei Zhang
    • 1
  • Chunxia Li
    • 2
  • Shichen Gong
    • 2
  • Shuqin Yan
    • 2
  • Guoliang Li
    • 2
  • Guanghui Hu
    • 2
  • Honglei Ren
    • 2
  • Jianfei Yang
    • 2
  • Tao Yu
    • 2
  • Kejun Yang
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.College of AgronomyHeilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University/Key Laboratory of Crop Germplasm Improvement and Cultivation in Cold Regions of Education DepartmentDaqingChina
  2. 2.Maize Research Institute of Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural SciencesHarbinChina

Personalised recommendations