Advertisement

Innovative Force-PRO device to measure force and implant position in total hip arthroplasty

  • Udomporn Manupibul
  • Chaiyanun Vijittrakarnrung
  • Paphon Sa-ngasoongsong
  • Praman Fuangfa
  • Suphaneewan Jaovisidha
  • Warakorn CharoensukEmail author
Scientific Paper
  • 17 Downloads

Abstract

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is the appropriate treatment for hip pain, dislocation, and dysfunction. THA refers to surgery to replace a hip implant, which is an effective way to recover normal hip function. The design of an implant imitates hip functions and allows bone growth in the implant area. However, it should be noted that the implant can dislocate after surgery. The main factor that should be considered during surgery is the correct position of the implant component. The acetabular cup of the hip implant should be positioned at \(15 \pm 10^{\circ }\) anteversion and \(40 \pm 10^{\circ }\) inclination. The evaluation of the implant inclination and anteversion during the operation decrease the risk of the implant dislocation after surgery. Developing a new innovative Force-PRO device can aid the doctor in evaluating the force on the surface of the acetabular liner and the angle of the acetabular liner during the hip implant operation. This device consists of two main sensors—force sensors and inertial measurement unit sensors. Furthermore, the 3D printings of an implant’s parts should be specifically designed to integrate with these sensors. To develop the graphical user interface application, C\(\#\) should be the programming language of use. The graphical user interface application communicates between the device and user via a wireless communication system. CT-based imaging and force gauge measurement are the methods to evaluate the efficiency of this device. For this purpose, the sterile method is considered.

Keywords

Anteversion CT imaging Force sensing Implant dislocation Inclination Total hip arthroplasty 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Barrack RL (2003) Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: implant design and orientation. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 11(2):89–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bicanic G, Delimar D, Delimar M, Pecina M (2009) Influence of the acetabular cup position on hip load during arthroplasty in hip dysplasia. Int Orthop 33(2):397–402.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-008-0683-z CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Daigle ME, Weinstein AM, Katz JN, Losina E (2012) The cost-effectiveness of total joint arthroplasty: a systematic review of published literature. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 26(5):649–658.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.berh.2012.07.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dargel J, Oppermann J, Brüggemann GP, Eysel P (2014) Dislocation following total hip replacement. Deutsches Arzteblatt International 111(51–52):884–890.  https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2014.0884 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    DiGioia AM, Jaramaz B, Blackwell M, Simon DA, Morgan F, Moody JE, Nikou C, Colgan BD, Aston CA, Labarca RS, Kischell E, Kanade T (1998) The Otto Aufranc Award. Image guided navigation system to measure intraoperatively acetabular implant alignment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 355:8–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Digioia AMr, Jaramaz B, Plakseychuk AY, Moody JEJ, Nikou C, Labarca RS, Levison TJ, Picard F (2002) Comparison of a mechanical acetabular alignment guide with computer placement of the socket. J Arthroplasty 17(3):359–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hassan DM, Johnston GH, Dust WN, Watson G, Dolovich AT (1998) Accuracy of intraoperative assessment of acetabular prosthesis placement. J Arthroplasty 13(1):80–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Herrlin K, Pettersson H, Selvik G (1988) Comparison of two- and three-dimensional methods for assessment of orientation of the total hip prosthesis. Acta Radiol (Stockholm, Sweden : 1987) 29(3):357–361Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Learmonth ID, Young C, Rorabeck C (2007) The operation of the century: total hip replacement. Lancet (London, England) 370(9597):1508–1519.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60457-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Leenders T, Vandevelde D, Mahieu G, Nuyts R (2002) Reduction in variability of acetabular cup abduction using computer assisted surgery: a prospective and randomized study. Comput Aided Surg 7(2):99–106.  https://doi.org/10.1002/igs.10033 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Martinot P, Blairon A, Putman S, Pasquier G, Girard J, Migaud H (2018) Course of dislocated posterior hip arthroplasty: a continuous 232-patient series at a mean 10 years’ follow up (range, 1–22 years). Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 104(3):325–331.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2017.10.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Moskal JT, Capps SG (2010) Improving the accuracy of acetabular component orientation: avoiding malposition. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 18(5):286–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Myers CA, Register BC, Lertwanich P, Ejnisman L, Pennington WW, Giphart JE, LaPrade RF, Philippon MJ (2011) Role of the acetabular labrum and the iliofemoral ligament in hip stability: an in vitro biplane fluoroscopy study. Am J Sports Med 39(Suppl):85S–91S.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546511412161 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pedley M (2013) Tilt sensing using a three-axis accelerometer. Freescale Semicond Appl Note 1:2012–2013Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sanz-Reig J, Lizaur-Utrilla A, Miralles-Munoz F (2015) Risk factors for total hip arthroplasty dislocation and its functional outcomes. Revista espanola de cirugia ortopedica y traumatologia 59(1):19–25.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.recot.2014.05.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Saxler G, Marx A, Vandevelde D, Langlotz U, Tannast M, Wiese M, Michaelis U, Kemper G, Grutzner PA, Steffen R, von Knoch M, Holland-Letz T, Bernsmann K (2004) The accuracy of free-hand cup positioning-a CT based measurement of cup placement in 105 total hip arthroplasties. Int Orthop 28(4):198–201.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-004-0542-5 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tanino H, Higa M, Ito H, Sato T, Matsuno T, Banks SA (2010) Intraoperative soft-tissue tension measurements during total hip arthroplasty. In: 56th Annual Meeting of the Orthpaedic Research Society, p. Poster No. 2405. The Unibersity of Pennsylvania. http://www.ors.org/Transactions/56/2405.pdf
  18. 18.
    Tanino H, Ito H, Harman MK, Matsuno T, Hodge WA, Banks SA (2008) An in vivo model for intraoperative assessment of impingement and dislocation in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 23(5):714–720.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2007.07.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tezuka T, Heckmann ND, Bodner RJ, Dorr LD (2019) Functional safe zone is superior to the Lewinnek Safe Zone for total hip arthroplasty: why the Lewinnek Safe Zone is not always predictive of stability. J Arthroplasty 34(1):3–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2018.10.034 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wang RY, Xu WH, Kong XC, Yang L, Yang SH (2017) Measurement of acetabular inclination and anteversion via CT generated 3D pelvic model. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 18(1):373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Woolson ST, Rahimtoola ZO (1999) Risk factors for dislocation during the first 3 months after primary total hip replacement. J Arthroplasty 14(6):662–668CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Australasian College of Physical Scientists and Engineers in Medicine 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Udomporn Manupibul
    • 1
  • Chaiyanun Vijittrakarnrung
    • 2
  • Paphon Sa-ngasoongsong
    • 2
  • Praman Fuangfa
    • 3
  • Suphaneewan Jaovisidha
    • 3
  • Warakorn Charoensuk
    • 1
    • 4
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of EngineeringMahidol UniversityPhuttamonthonThailand
  2. 2.Department of Orthopedics, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi HospitalMahidol UniversityBangkokThailand
  3. 3.Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi HospitalMahidol UniversityBangkokThailand
  4. 4.SMART Motion Analysis and Rehabilitation Technology Laboratory, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of EngineeringMahidol UniversityPhuttamonthonThailand

Personalised recommendations