Advertisement

An affordable custom phantom for measurement of linac time delay in gated treatments with irregular breathing

  • Alexandre M. Caraça SantosEmail author
  • Justin Shepherd
Technical Paper
  • 56 Downloads

Abstract

Respiratory gated treatments are now common in order to reduce tumour motion uncertainties due to breathing. One issue associated with gated treatments is the time delay between the gating system and the linear accelerator. In this study we develop and characterise an affordable phantom to be used in routine and patient specific quality assurance (QA) of the Varian Real-Time Position Management™ (RPM) system. A photodiode has been incorporated into the phantom in order to estimate the time delay. A commercial Quasar phantom was customised to incorporate two stepper motors which independently control an anterior–posterior abdomen/thorax moving plate, and an inferior-superior moving lung insert. A photodiode placed in the path of the radiation is used to measure when beam on/off occurs. Two Arduino microcontroller boards have been utilised to control the motors, read the photodiode and write to an SD card. The measured beam on/off, correlated to the known positions of the phantom is compared to the gate window for RPM. The time delay was measured for sinusoidal movements with a period of 7.50 s and 3.75 s, and for three patient breathing traces. For the sinusoidal movements, time delays of 150 ± 34 ms and 39 ± 34 ms were measured, for 7.50 s and 3.75 s periods, respectively. In the case of the patients’ breathing traces time delays of 135 ± 26 ms, 137 ± 34 ms and 129 ± 28 ms were measured. An affordable motion phantom has been developed for routine and patient specific QA of respiratory gating systems. It is capable of reproducing a patient’s breathing waveform and performing time delay measurements with a photodiode. Results indicate a time delay of the order of 0.1–0.2 s for the RPM system.

Keywords

Respiratory gating Motion phantom Time delay 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Mr. John Schneider, from the Royal Adelaide Hospital, for constructing the motion phantom used in this study.

Funding

No funding was granted for this study.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. 1.
    Giraud P, Houle A (2013) Respiratory gating for radiotherapy: main technical aspects and clinical benefits. ISRN Pulmonol 2013:13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Underberg RWM et al (2005) Benefit of respiration-gated stereotactic radiotherapy for stage I lung cancer: an analysis of 4DCT datasets. Int J Rad Oncol Biol Phys 62(2):554–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ge J et al (2013) Accuracy and consistency of respiratory gating in abdominal cancer patients. Int J Rad Oncol Biol Phys 85(3):854–861CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Vedam SS et al (2001) Determining parameters for respiration-gated radiotherapy. Med Phys 28(10):2139–2146CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Li R et al (2012) Evaluation of the geometric accuracy of surrogate-based gated VMAT using intrafraction kilovoltage x-ray images. Med Phys 39(5):2686–2693CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Klein EE et al (2009) Task Group 142 report: quality assurance of medical acceleratorsa). Med Phys 36(9):4197–4212CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Woods K, Rong Y (2015) Technical Report: TG-142 compliant and comprehensive quality assurance tests for respiratory gating. Med Phys 42(11):6488–6497CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jin J-Y, Yin F-F (2005) Time delay measurement for linac based treatment delivery in synchronized respiratory gating radiotherapy. Med Phys 32(5):1293–1296CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Smith WL, Becker N (2009) Time delays in gated radiotherapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys 10:140–154CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wiersma RD et al (2016) Technical note: high temporal resolution characterization of gating response time. Med Phys 43(6Part1):2802–2806CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dunn L et al (2012) A programmable motion phantom for quality assurance of motion management in radiotherapy. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 35(1):93–100CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Australasian College of Physical Scientists and Engineers in Medicine 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Medical PhysicsRoyal Adelaide HospitalAdelaideAustralia
  2. 2.School of Physical SciencesUniversity of AdelaideAdelaideAustralia

Personalised recommendations