Advertisement

Feasibility of 3D printed air slab diode caps for small field dosimetry

  • Benjamin PerrettEmail author
  • Paul Charles
  • Tim Markwell
  • Tanya Kairn
  • Scott Crowe
Scientific Paper
  • 141 Downloads

Abstract

Commercial diode detectors used for small field dosimetry introduce a field-size-dependent over-response relative to an ideal, water-equivalent dosimeter due to high density components in the body of the detector. An air gap above the detector introduces a field-size-dependent under-response, and can be used to offset the field-size-dependent detector over-response. Other groups have reported experimental validation of caps containing air gaps for use with several types of diodes in small fields. This paper examines two designs for 3D printed diode air caps for the stereotactic field diode (SFD)—a cap containing a sealed air cavity, and a cap with an air cavity at the face of the SFD. Monte Carlo simulations of both designs were performed to determine dimensions for an air cavity to introduce the desired dosimetric correction. Various parameter changes were also simulated to estimate the dosimetric uncertainties introduced by 3D printing. Cap layer dimensions, cap density changes due to 3D printing, and unwanted air gaps were considered. For the sealed design the optimal air gap size for water-equivalent cap material was 0.6 mm, which increased to 1.0 mm when acrylonitrile butadiene styrene in the cap was simulated. The unsealed design had less variation, a 0.4 mm air gap is optimal in both situations. Unwanted air pockets in the bore of the cap and density changes introduced by the 3D printing process can potentially introduce significant dosimetric effects. These effects may be limited by using fine print resolutions and minimising the volume of cap material.

Keywords

Small field Dosimetry Diode 3D printing Correction free Monte Carlo 

Notes

Acknowledgements

BFB 3D Touch and ABS printing material were provided by the Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal Brisbane & Womens Hospital, Herston, Australia. Computational resources and services used in the work were provided by the High Performance Computing and Research Support Unit, QUT, Brisbane, Australia.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflicts of interest

All authors declare they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by the authors.

References

  1. 1.
    Das IJ, Ding GX, Ahnesjö A (2008) Small fields: nonequilibrium radiation dosimetry. Med Phys 35(1):206–215CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Charles PH, Cranmer-Sargison G, Thwaites DI, Crowe SB, Kairn T, Knight RT, Kenny J, Langton CM, Trapp JV (2014) A practical and theoretical definition of very small field size for radiotherapy output factor measurements. Med Phys 41(4):041707CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Alfonso R, Andreo P, Capote R, Huq MS, Kilby W, Kjäll P, Mackie TR, Palmans H, Rosser K, Seuntjens J et al (2008) A new formalism for reference dosimetry of small and nonstandard fields. Med Phys 35(11):5179–5186CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    McEwen M, DeWerd L, Ibbott G, Followill D, Rogers DWO, Seltzer S, Seuntjens J (2014) Addendum to the AAPM’s TG-51 protocol for clinical reference dosimetry of high-energy photon beams. Med Phys 41(4):041501CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Capote R, Sánchez-Doblado F, Leal A, Lagares JI, Arráns R, Hartmann GH (2004) An EGSnrc Monte Carlo study of the microionization chamber for reference dosimetry of narrow irregular IMRT beamlets. Med Phys 31(9):2416–2422CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bouchard H, Seuntjens J (2004) Ionization chamber-based reference dosimetry of intensity modulated radiation beams. Med Phys 31(9):2454–2465CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Scott AJD, Kumar S, Nahum AE, Fenwick JD (2012) Characterizing the influence of detector density on dosimeter response in non-equilibrium small photon fields. Phys Med Biol 57(14):4461CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fenwick JD, Kumar S, Scott AJD, Nahum AE (2013) Using cavity theory to describe the dependence on detector density of dosimeter response in non-equilibrium small fields. Phys Med Biol 58(9):2901CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Underwood TSA, Winter HC, Hill MA, Fenwick JD (2013) Detector density and small field dosimetry: integral versus point dose measurement schemes. Med Phys 40(8):082102CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cranmer-Sargison G, Weston S, Evans JA, Sidhu NP, Thwaites DI (2012) Monte Carlo modelling of diode detectors for small field MV photon dosimetry: detector model simplification and the sensitivity of correction factors to source parameterization. Phys Med Biol 57(16):5141CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Francescon P, Kilby W, Satariano N, Cora S (2012) Monte Carlo simulated correction factors for machine specific reference field dose calibration and output factor measurement using fixed and iris collimators on the cyberknife system. Phys Med Biol 57(12):3741CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Charles PH, Cranmer-Sargison G, Thwaites DI, Kairn T, Crowe SB, Pedrazzini G, Aland T, Kenny J, Langton CM, Trapp JV (2014) Design and experimental testing of air slab caps which convert commercial electron diodes into dual purpose, correction-free diodes for small field dosimetry. Med Phys 41(10):101701CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    P Andreo, DT Burns, K Hohlfeld, MS Huq, T Kanai, F Laitano, VG Smyth, S Vynckier (2000) Absorbed dose determination in external beam radiotherapy. Technical Report TRS 398. International Atomic Energy Agency, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Charles PH, Crowe SB, Kairn T, Kenny J, Lehmann J, Lye J, Dunn L, Hill B, Knight RT, Langton CM et al (2012) The effect of very small air gaps on small field dosimetry. Phys Med Biol 57(21):6947CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Charles PH, Crowe SB, Kairn T, Knight RT, Hill B, Kenny J, Langton CM, Trapp JV (2013) Monte Carlo-based diode design for correction-less small field dosimetry. Phys Med Biol 58(13):4501CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Charles PH, Crowe SB, Kairn T, Knight R, Hill B, Kenny J, Langton CM, Trapp JV (2013) The influence of Monte Carlo source parameters on detector design and dose perturbation in small field dosimetry. J Phys 489:012006Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Underwood TSA, Winter HC, Hill MA, Fenwick JD (2013) Mass-density compensation can improve the performance of a range of different detectors under non-equilibrium conditions. Phys Med Biol 58(23):8295CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Underwood TSA, Thompson J, Bird L, Scott AJD, Patmore P, Winter HC, Hill MA, Fenwick JD (2015) Validation of a prototype DiodeAir for small field dosimetry. Phys Med Biol 60(7):2939CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kairn T, Crowe SB, Markwell T (2015) Use of 3D printed materials as tissue-equivalent phantoms. In: IFMBE Proceedings 51. Springer, New York, pp 728–731Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kawrakow I, Mainegra-Hing E, Tessier F (2009) BRB Walters. The EGSnrc C++ class library. NRC Report PIRS-898 (rev A)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kairn T, Aland T, Franich RD, Johnston PN, Kakakhel MB, Kenny J, Knight RT, Langton CM, Schlect D, Taylor ML et al (2010) Adapting a generic BEAMnrc model of the BrainLAB m3 micro-multileaf collimator to simulate a local collimation device. Phys Med Biol 55(17):N451CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kairn T, Kenny J, Crowe SB, Fielding AL, Franich RD, Johnston PN, Knight RT, Langton CM, Schlect D, Trapp JV (2010) Technical note: Modeling a complex micro-multileaf collimator using the standard BEAMnrc distribution. Med Phys 37(4):1761–1767CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kawrakow I, Fippel M (2000) Investigation of variance reduction techniques for Monte Carlo photon dose calculation using XVMC. Phys Med Biol 45(8):2163CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bits from Bytes, 3D systems (2012) Axon 2 user manual, 1.0.0 ednGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ultimaker (2016) Ultimaker 3 installation and user manual, 1.0 ednGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Australasian College of Physical Scientists and Engineers in Medicine 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Benjamin Perrett
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Paul Charles
    • 1
    • 2
  • Tim Markwell
    • 3
  • Tanya Kairn
    • 1
    • 4
  • Scott Crowe
    • 1
    • 5
  1. 1.Science and Engineering FacultyQueensland University of TechnologyBrisbaneAustralia
  2. 2.Department of Radiation OncologyPrincess Alexandra HospitalWoolloongabbaAustralia
  3. 3.Mater Cancer Care CentreSouth BrisbaneAustralia
  4. 4.Genesis Cancer Care QueenslandThe Wesley Medical CentreAuchenflowerAustralia
  5. 5.Cancer Care ServicesRoyal Brisbane and Womens HospitalHerstonAustralia

Personalised recommendations