Skip to main content
Log in

The variation of HVL with focal spot to chamber distance as a function of beam quality for the Pantak Therapax 150 X-ray unit and the implications on dose to water determination using the IPEMB code of practice

  • Scientific Paper
  • Published:
Australasian Physical & Engineering Sciences in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using a Pantak Therapax SXT 150 system HVL values for clinical beams generated with filters 4–8, were determined as a function of FCD (30–130 cm). Aluminium absorbers were placed midway between the focus and chamber with collimation to define both narrow and broad beam geometries. For filters 4–7 with broad beam geometry the HVL initially decreases as the FCD is increased from 30 cm and then increases as the FCD approaches 130 cm. In contrast filter 8 exhibits a reduction in HVL with increasing FCD attributed to the decreasing influence of absorber scatter. With narrow beam geometry the HVL of filter 4 increases as the FCD is increased. For other filters the HVL variation is similar to that for the broader beam albeit that for a given FCD the HVL is smaller, a consequence of reduced absorber scatter. Monte Carlo BEAMnrc simulations of filter 4–8 beams demonstrated a quality dependent air attenuation effect associated with an increase in HVL for lower quality beams with increasing FCD. Thus for the beams investigated in this work the variation of HVL with FCD can be interpreted in terms of the competing influences of absorber scatter, which tends to decrease the measured HVL, and a quality dependent in air attenuation that tends to increase the HVL with increasing FCD. In terms of an absorbed dose determination it is shown that changes of HVL with FCD resulted in variations of D w,z = 0 < ±0.5 %.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Klevenhagen SC, Aukett RJ, Harrison RM, Moretti C, Nahum AE, Rosser KE (1996) The IPEMB code of practice for the determination of absorbed dose for X-rays below 300 kV generating potential (0.035 mm Al–4 mm Cu HVL; 10–300 kV generating potential). Phys Med Biol 41:2605–2625

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Trout ED, Kelley JP, Lucas AC (1960) Determination of half value layer. Am J Roentgenol Radium Therapy Nucl Med 84(4):729–740

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Seemann HE (1938) Secondary radiation intensity as a function of certain geometrical variables. Am J Roentgenol Radium Therapy 39:628–633

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jurando D, Eudaldo T, Carrasco P, Jornet N, Ruiz A, Ribas M (2005) Pantak Therapax SXT 150: performance assessment and dose determination using IAEA TRS-398 protocol. Br J Radiol 78(932):721–732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rogers DW, Faddegon BA, Ding GX, Ma CM, We J (1995) BEAM: a Monte Carlo code to simulate radiotherapy treatment units. Med Phys 22(5):503–524

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kawrakow I (2000) Accurate condensed history Monte Carlo simulation of electron transport: I. EGSnrc, the new EGS4 version. Med Phys 27:485–498

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ali ES, Rogers DW (2008) Benchmarking EGSnrc in the kilovoltage energy range against experimental measurements of charged particle backscatter coefficients. Phys Med Biol 53:1527–1543

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kim J, Hill R, \Mackonis EC, Kuncic Z (2010) An investigation of backscatter factors for kilovoltage X-rays: a comparison between Monte Carlo simulations and Gafchromic EBT film measurements. Phys Med Biol 55:783–797

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Verhaegen F, Nahum AE, Van de Putte S, Namito Y (1999) Monte Carlo modelling of radiotherapy kV X-ray units. Phys Med Biol 44(7):1767–1789

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hubbell JH, Seltzer SM (1996) Tables of X-ray mass attenuation coefficients and mass energy absorption coefficients from 1 to 20 MeV for elements Z = 1 to 92 and 48 additional substances of dosimetric interest. Radiation and Biomolecular Physics Division

  11. Baines J, Sylvander S, Beaves E (2009) The effect of anode aging on the X-ray output of a superficial treatment unit. In: kv09, Institute of Medical Physics University of Sydney, Sydney

  12. Aukett RJ, Burns JE, Greener AG, Harrison RM, Moretti C, Nahum AE, Rosser KE (2005) Addendum to the IPEMB code of practice for the determination of absorbed dose for X-rays below 300 kV generating potential (0.035 mm Al–4 mm Cu HVL). Phys Med Biol 50:2739–2748

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge Sylwia Zawlodzka-Bednarz for her contribution to the Monte Carlo modelling of X-ray spectra.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Baines.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Baines, J., Sim, L. The variation of HVL with focal spot to chamber distance as a function of beam quality for the Pantak Therapax 150 X-ray unit and the implications on dose to water determination using the IPEMB code of practice. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 37, 559–566 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-014-0289-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-014-0289-2

Keywords

Navigation