Comparison of Effectiveness of Sublingual and Vaginal Misoprostol for Second-Trimester Abortion
- 5 Downloads
The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of sublingual and vaginal misoprostol in second-trimester termination of pregnancy in 24 and 48 h.
This is a retrospective study of 240 pregnant women seeking termination in second trimester (13–18.5 weeks), in which the patients are subdivided into two groups—first group received 400 mcg of misoprostol sublingually (n = 120), and second group received 400 mcg of misoprostol vaginally (n = 120) every 4 h for a maximum of five doses. The course of misoprostol was repeated if the patient did not abort within 24 h.
The mean induction-to-abortion interval was shorter in sublingual group (10.28 ± 3.1 h) versus 14.68 ± 4.2 h in vaginal group in 24 h (p = 0.0001), and 36.9 ± 4.4 h in sublingual versus 29.7 ± 14 in vaginal group in 48 h (p = 0.0933). Mean dose requirement for misoprostol by sublingual route was low as compared to vaginal misoprostol (1048 ± 301 mg versus 1250 ± 375 mg; p = 0.0001 in 24 h and 1110 ± 833 mg versus 1325 ± 536 mg; p = 0.0231 in 48 h). No significant difference was found in the success rate (both at 24 and 48 h) and in side effects among the two comparison groups.
Misoprostol as such by any route has been proven as an effective abortifacient in second trimester. Both sublingual and vaginal routes are effective for medical abortion. But shorter induction-to-abortion interval in sublingual route, less dose requirement and higher acceptability makes sublingual route as a better choice.
KeywordsSecond-trimester termination Misoprost Sublingual Vaginal
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Disclosure of potential conflict of interest
There are no conflicts of interests for any author (financial or otherwise).
Ethical committee approval has been obtained before the study.
Informed consent has been taken.
Human and Animal Rights
This article does not contain any studies with animal subjects.
- 1.Wildschut H, Both MI, Medema S, et al. Medical methods for mid-trimester termination of pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;(1):CD005216.Google Scholar
- 2.The care of women requiring induced abortion. RCOG. https://www.rcog.org.uk/en/guidelines-research-services/guidelines/the-care-of-women-requesting-induced-abortion/. Accessed 13 Oct 2018.
- 3.Misoprostol only recommended regimens. https://www.figo.org/sites/default/files/uploads/project-publications/Miso/FIGO_Dosage_Chart%20EN_0.pdf. Accessed 11 Oct 2018.
- 5.Milani F, Sharami SH, Arjmandi S. Comparison of sublingual and vaginal misoprostol for second-trimester pregnancy terminations. J Family Reprod Health. 2014;8(1):41–4.Google Scholar
- 11.Tanha FD, Golgachi T, Niroomand N, Ghajarzadeh M, Nasr R. Sublingual versus Vaginal misoprostol for second trimester termination: a randomized clinical trial. Arch Gynecolobstet. 2013;287:65–9.Google Scholar