Advertisement

ASCUS (Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance) in the Cervical Smears of Women from Rural Population of Lucknow West

  • Anand N. Srivastava
  • Jata S. MisraEmail author
Original Article
  • 46 Downloads

Abstract

Background

Though Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) are not always precursors of cervical pre-malignancy but they need timely diagnosis and careful periodical follow-up.

Aim

The present study was carried out to investigate the incidence of ASCUS and SIL (squamous intraepithelial lesion of cervix) in women under rural setting.

Materials and Methods

Cervical cancer screening is in progress in rural population of West Lucknow, India, since May 2013 under auspices of Era’s Lucknow Medical College and Hospital, Lucknow, and a total of 2478 women have been cytologically examined till October 2017.

Results

The incidence of ASCUS was found to be 8.8%, which was approximately less than half of the squamous intraepithelial lesions of cervix (SIL) rate (17.9%). The ASCUS rate was higher in the symptomatic women (9.4%) than (7.4%) seen in women without symptoms. The ASCUS incidence was higher in younger sexually active group up to 40 years after which it declined. The ASCUS rate was higher in all parity groups and was commonly associated with pain in lower abdomen and vaginal discharge. The ASCUS rate was higher with erosion cervix, while the commonly associated sexually transmitted diseases (STD) were found to be Candida albicans (2.4%). Follow-up after 18–24 months was available in 40 cases of ASCUS, and progression to low-grade SIL (LSIL) was seen in 7 (17.5%) and to high-grade SIL (HSIL) in one case (2.5%).

Conclusion

The findings suggest that the ASCUS are not always precursors of SIL, but they need periodical follow-up after every 6 months. This will be ideal management of ASCUS under low-resource settings.

Keywords

ASCUS SIL Rural women 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Sincere thanks to Secretary, Era’s Educational Trust of Era’s Lucknow Medical College And Hospital, Lucknow, for the financial support.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declared that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This was obtained from the Ethical Committee of the college before starting the Rural Cancer Screening Program.

References

  1. 1.
    Solomon D, Davay DG, Kurman R, et al. The 2001 Bethesda system terminology for reporting results of cervical cytology. JAMA. 2002;287:2114–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Solomon D, Frable WJ, Voojis OP, et al. ASCUS and AGUS criteria. International Academy of cytology Task Force Summary. Diagnostic cytology towards the 21st century, international expert conference and tutorial. Acta Cytol. 1998;42:16–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cindy MM. ASCUS in Papanicolaou smears. Am J Clin Path. 2002;117(1):862–75.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Srivastava M, Srivastava OP, Jaiswal SS. Pattern of cervical smear cytology in rural medical college. Pravara Med Rev. 2011;3(1):4–8.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ganeshan S, Subbiah VN, Michael JCJ. Associated factors with cervical pre-malignant lesions among the married fisher women community of Sadras, Tamil Nadu. Asian Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2015;2(1):42–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ambedkar RKV, Srinivasmurthy BC, Balammungan M. Clinicopathological significance of Papanicolaou smear study of postmenopausal women in a rural tertiary center. Clin Cancer Investig. 2015;4(2):147–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Selvaggi SM, Haifner HK. Reporting of atypical squamous cell of undetermined significance on cervical smears. Is it significant? Diag Cytopath. 1995;13:352–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kurman RJ, Henson DE, Herbst AL, et al. Interim guidelines for management of abnormal cervical cytology. JAMA. 1994;271:1866–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Alamen KW, Elit LM, Molinaro PA, et al. Assessment of cytological follow-up as the recommended management for patients with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or low grade squamous intraepithelial lesions. Cancer. 1998;84:5–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kline MJ, Davey DD. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance, qualified. A follow-up study. Diag Cyopath. 1996;14:380–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Musa J, Taiwo B, Goblsmith S, et al. Predictors of atypical squamous cell of undetermined significance: cervical cytology with high risk Human Papilloma Virus genotypes. Arch Gynacol Obstet. 2011;283(2):1421–5.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Selvaggi SM. Clinical significance of atypical squamous cells cannot exclude high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions with histological correlation: a 9 year experience. Diag Cytopath. 2013;41(11):943–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dane C, Batmaz G, Dane B, et al. Screening properties of Human Papilloma Virus testing for predicting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in ASCUS and LSIL smears: a prospective study. Ann Diagn Pathol. 2009;13(2):73–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yarandi F, Shojaei H, Eftekhar Z, et al. Comparison of three management strategies for patients with ASCUS after 6 month delay: a 3 year experience in an Iranian University Hospital. Aust N Z J Obstet Gyanacol. 2009;49(2):207–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yoon J, Yos SC, Kim WY, et al. Role of HPV-DNA testing for detection of high grade cervical lesion in women with ASCUS: a prospective study in a Korean population. Eur J Gynacol Oncol. 2009;3:271–4.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Del Mistro A, Frayale- Salamana H, Trevisan R, et al. Triage of women with ASCUS: results of an Italian multicentric study. Gynacol Oncol. 2010;117(1):77–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Barcelos AC, Michelin MH, Adad SJ, et al. ASCUS: Bethesda classification and association with Human Papillomavirus. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 2011.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/904674.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gupta N, Srinivasan R, Nijhawan R, et al. Atypical squamous cells and LSIL in cervical cytology: cytohistological correlation and implication for management in a low resource setting. Cytopathology. 2011;22(3):189–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lavazzo C, Boutas I, Grigoriadis C, et al. Management of ASCUS finding in Papanicolaou smears: a retrospective study. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2012;33(6):605–9.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Misra JS, Srivastava S, Singh U, et al. Risk factors and strategies for control of carcinoma cervix in India: hospital based cytological screening experience of 35 years. Ind J Cancer. 2009;46(2):155–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tokmak A, Guzel AI, Ozgu E, et al. Clinical significance of ASCUS in detecting preinvasive cervical lesions in postmenopausal Turkish women. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15(6):6639–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Federation of Obstetric & Gynecological Societies of India 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PathologyEra’s Lucknow Medical College and HospitalLucknowIndia

Personalised recommendations