Role of Pseudomonas aeruginosa lipopolysaccharides in modulation of biofilm and virulence factors of Enterobacteriaceae
- 57 Downloads
Enterobacteriaceae members are largely distributed in the environment and responsible for a wide range of bacterial infections in hospitalized patients. Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) causes severe nosocomial infections associated with severe inflammation due to its potent virulent factors including lipopolysaccharide (LPS). The aim of this study is to assess the bacterial LPS effect on Enterobacteriaceae biofilm and other virulence factors in vitro. The effect of P. aeruginosa LPS on biofilm formation of two other species of Enterobacteriaceae (Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae) was assessed using a standard biofilm assay. PCR was performed on genes of biofilm and virulence factors. Expression of biofilm, type-1-fimbriae and serum resistance genes in treated and untreated cells was measured with RT-PCR. P. aeruginosa LPS has the ability to stimulate biofilm formation and stabilize the already formed biofilm significantly in all tested strains. In addition, LPS significantly increased the level of expression of Bss, FimH, and Iss genes when measured by RT-PCR. P. aeruginosa LPS has a direct stimulatory effect on the biofilm formation, type-1-fimbriae, and serum resistance in both E. coli and K. pneumoniae. So, the presence of P. aeruginosa in mixed infection with Enterobactereacea leads to increase their virulence.
KeywordsP. aeruginosa LPS E. coli K. pneumoniae Biofilm Virulence factors
All thanks and appreciation to Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1, Canada, for providing the standard strains used in this study. This work was performed at the Microbiology Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mansoura University, Egypt and Department of Pharmaceutics and Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Taibah University, AlMadinah Al Munawwarah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The author declares that there is no conflict of interest.
- Behzadi P, Behzadi E, Yazdanbod H, Aghapour R, Akbari Cheshmeh M, Salehian Omran D (2010) A survey on urinary tract infections associated with the three most common uropathogenic bacteria. Maedica (Buchar) 5:111–115Google Scholar
- Beloin C, Roux A, Ghigo JM (2008) Escherichia coli biofilms. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 322:249–289Google Scholar
- Benitez JA, Spelbrink RG, Silva A, Phillips TE, Stanley CM, Boesman-Finkelstein M, Finkelstein RA (1997) Adherence of Vibrio cholerae to cultured differentiated human intestinal cells: an in vitro colonization model. Infect Immun 65:3474–3477Google Scholar
- Galil KAE, El-Mahdy A, Naggar WE, Hassan R, Sawy aEE (2011) Phenotypic and genotypic expression of some virulence factors in Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolated from urinary tract infections in Mansoura hospitals. Egypt J Med Microbiol 20:67–77Google Scholar
- Goncalves Mdos S et al (2014) Anti-biofilm activity: a function of Klebsiella pneumoniae capsular polysaccharide. PLoS One 9:e99995. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099995PONE-D-14-05673 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Li B et al (2018) Overexpression of outer membrane protein X (OmpX) compensates for the effect of TolC inactivation on biofilm formation and curli production in extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli (ExPEC). Front Cell Infect Microbiol 8:208. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2018.00208 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Manu Chaudhary, Kumar S, Payasi A (2013) Role of CSE1034 in Escherichia coli biofilm destruction. J Microb Biochem Technol 5:054–058Google Scholar
- Montoro E, Lemus D, Echemendia M, Martin A, Portaels F, Palomino JC (2005) Comparative evaluation of the nitrate reduction assay, the MTT test, and the resazurin microtitre assay for drug susceptibility testing of clinical isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Antimicrob Chemother 55:500–505. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dki023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Morrison DC, Ryan JL (1987) Endotoxins and disease mechanisms. Annu Rev Med 38:417–432. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.me.38.020187.002221 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- O’Toole G, Kaplan HB, Kolter R (2000) Biofilm formation as microbial development. Annu Rev Microbiol 54:49–79. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.micro.54.1.4954/1/49 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pawlak A et al (2017) Salmonella O48 serum resistance is connected with the elongation of the lipopolysaccharide O-antigen containing sialic acid. Int J Mol Sci 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18102022
- Rendueles O, Kaplan JB, Ghigo J-M (2012) Antibiofilm polysaccharides. Environ Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2012.02810
- Rossi E, Paroni M, Landini P (2018) Biofilm and motility in response to environmental and host-related signals in Gram negative opportunistic pathogens. J Appl Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.14089
- Samaranayake LP (1990) Oral candidosis: an old disease in new guises. Dent Update 17:36–38Google Scholar
- Seaton D (ed) (2000) Pneumonia. Vol 1. Crofton and Douglas’s respiratory diseases. Blackwell Science, MaldenGoogle Scholar
- X L, Z Y, J X (2003) Quantitative variation of biofilms among strains in natural populations of Candida albicans. Microbiology 149:352–362Google Scholar