Advertisement

3 Biotech

, 9:446 | Cite as

Enhancement of glycerol production by UV-mutagenesis of the marine yeast Wickerhamomyces anomalus HH16: kinetics and optimization of the fermentation process

  • Heba Hawary
  • Abdel-Hamied M. RasmeyEmail author
  • Akram A. Aboseidah
  • El-Shahat El-Morsi
  • Mohamed Hafez
Original Article
  • 61 Downloads

Abstract

The current study aims to enhance glycerol production using UV-mutagenesis of the marine yeast Wickerhamomyces anomalus HH16 isolated from marine sediment collected from South Sinai Governorate, Egypt. Besides optimization of the culture conditions and analyzing the kinetic parameters of growth and glycerol biosynthesis by the mutant strain were studied. The marine yeast isolate HH16 was selected as the front runner glycerol-producer among all tested isolates, with glycerol yield recorded as 66.55 gl−1. The isolate was identified based on the phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of W. anomalus. The genotypic characterization based on the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequence was deposited in the GenBank database with the accession number MK182824. UV-mutagenesis of W. anomalus HH16 by its exposure to UV radiation (254 nm, 200 mW cm−2) for 5 min; increased its capability in the glycerol production rate with 16.97% (80.15 g l−1). Based on the kinetic and Monod equations, the maximum specific growth rate (μmax) and maximum specific glycerol production rate (vmax) by the mutant strain W. anomalus HH16MU5 were 0.21 h−1 and 0.103 g g−1, respectively. Optimization of the fermentation parameters such as nitrogen source, salinity and pH has been achieved. The maximum glycerol production 86.55 g l−1 has been attained in a fermentation medium composed of 200 g l−1 glucose, 1 g l−1 peptone, 3 g l−1 yeast extract, and 58.44 g l−1 NaCl, this medium was adjusted at pH 8 and incubated for 3 days at 30° C. Moreover, results indicated the ability of this yeast to produce glycerol (73.33 g l−1) using a seawater based medium. These findings suggest the applicability of using the yeast isolate W. anomalus HH16MU5 as a potential producer of glycerol for industrial purposes.

Keywords

Fermentation Marine yeast Glycerol Optimization Kinetic study Genotyping Wickerhamomyces anomalus 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Abdel Nasser A, El-Moghaz (2010) Comparative study of salt tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Pichia pastoris yeast strains. Adv Bioresour 1:169–176Google Scholar
  2. Agarwal GP (1990) Glycerol. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol 41:95–128Google Scholar
  3. Ali N, Khan MN (2014) Screening, identification and characterization of alcohol tolerant potential bioethanol producing yeasts. Curr Res Microbiol Biotechnol 2(1):316–324Google Scholar
  4. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ (1990) Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215(3):403–410PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Aslankoohi E, Rezaei MN, Vervoort Y, Courtin CM, Verstrepen KJ (2015) Glycerol production by fermenting yeast cells is essential for optimal bread dough fermentation. PLoS One 10(3):e0119364PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Babazadeh R, Lahtvee PJ, Adiels CB, Goksör M, Nielsen JB, Hohmann S (2017) The yeast osmostress response iscarbon source dependent. Sci Rep 7(1):990PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Bamforth CW (2005) The science underpinning food fermentations. Fermentation and micro-organisms, vol 1. Blackwell Science Ltd Publishing, Oxford, pp 78–84Google Scholar
  8. Bhasin S, Modi HA (2012) Optimization of fermentation medium for the production of glucose isomerase using Streptomyces sp. SB-P1. Biotechnol Res Int Article ID 874152:1–10Google Scholar
  9. Bubnová M, Zemančíková J, Sychrová H (2014) Osmotolerant yeast species differ in basic physiological parameters and in tolerance of non-osmotic stresses. Yeast 31:309–321PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Butinar L, Santos S, Spencer-Marrtins I, Gunde-Cimerman N (2005) Yeast diversity in hypersaline habitats. FEMS Microbiol Lett 244:229–234PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Chen G, Yao S (2013) The effect of created local hyperosmotic microenvironment in microcapsule for the growth and metabolism of Osmotolerant Yeast Candida krusei. BioMed Res Inter 2013(4):467263Google Scholar
  12. Connell L, Redman R, Craig S, Scorzetti G, Iszard M, Rodriguez R (2008) Diversity of soil yeasts isolated from South Victoria Land, Antarctica. Microbiol Ecol 56:448–459Google Scholar
  13. Costa E, Teixidό N, Usall J, Atarés E, Viñas I (2002) The effect of nitrogen and carbon sources on growth of the biocontrol agent Pantoeaagglomerans strain CPA-2. Lett Appl Microbiol 35:117–120PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Ehsani M, Fernández MR, Biosca JA, Julien A, Dequin S (2009) Engineering of 2,3-butanediol dehydrogenase to reduce acetoin formation by glycerol-overproducing, low-alcohol Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:3196–3205PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Fan X, Burton R, Zhou Y (2010) Glycerol (byproduct of biodiesel production) as a source for fuels and chemicals—mini review. Open Fuel Energy Sci 3:17–22Google Scholar
  16. Fernanda L, Magda S, Candida L (1999) Active glycerol uptake is a mechanism underlying halotolerance in yeasts: a study of 42 species. Microbiol 45:2577–2585Google Scholar
  17. Freeman GG, Donald GMS (1957) Fermentation processes leading to glycerol: II. Studies on the effect of sulfites on viability, growth and fermentation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Microbiol 5:211–215PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Ghindea R, Vassu T, Stoica I, Tanase AM, Csutak O (2009) Preliminary taxonomic studies on yeast strains isolated from dairy products. Rom Biotechnol Lett 14(1):4170–4179Google Scholar
  19. Grembecka M (2015) Sugar alcohols-their role in the modern world of sweeteners: a review. Eur Food Res Technol 241:1–14Google Scholar
  20. Hohmann S (2002) Osmotic stress signaling and osmoadaptation in yeasts. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 66:300–372PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Ikehata H, Tetsuya O (2011) The mechanisms of UV mutagenesis. J Radiat Res 52:115–125PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Junior M, Batistote M, Ernandes J (2008) Glucose and fructose fermentation by wine yeasts in media containing structurally complex nitrogen sources. J Inst Brew 114:199–204Google Scholar
  23. Kalle GP, Naik SC, Lashkari BZ (1985) Improved glycerol production from cane molasses by the sulfite process with vacuum or continuous carbon dioxide sparging during fermentation. J Ferment Technol 63:231–237Google Scholar
  24. Klein M, Swinnen S, Thevelein JM, Nevoigt E (2017) Glycerol metabolism and transport in yeast and fungi: established knowledge and ambiguities. Environ Microbiol 19(3):878–893PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Kuhn J, Müller H, Salzig D, Czermak P (2015) A rapid method for an offline glycerol determination during microbial fermentation. Electron J Biotechnol 18(3):252–255Google Scholar
  26. Kumar A, Poonam B, Lal CR (2010) Isolation and molecular characterization of phosphate solubilizing Enterobacter and Exiguobacterium species from paddy fields of Eastern Uttar Pradesh, India. Afr J Microbiol Res 4:820–829Google Scholar
  27. Kumari R, Pramanik K (2012) Improvement of multiple stress tolerance in yeast strain by sequential mutagenesis for enhanced bioethanol production. J Biosci Bioeng 114(6):622–629PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Kurtzman CP, Fell JW, Boekhout T (2011) The yeasts, a taxonomy study, 5th edn. Elsevier Science Publisher, Amsterdam, p 2354Google Scholar
  29. Kurtzman CP, Fell JW (1998) The yeasts-a taxonomic study, vol 149, 4th edn. Elsevier Science Publ BV, Amsterdam, p 1055Google Scholar
  30. Leandro MJ, Sychrova H, Prista C, Loureiro-Dias MC (2011) The osmotolerant fructophilic yeast Zygosaccharomyces rouxii employs two plasma-membrane fructose uptake systems belonging to a new family of yeast sugar transporters. Microbiology 157(2):601–608PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Lin Y, Tanka S (2006) Ethanol fermentation from biomass resources: current state and prospects. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 69:627–642PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Lodder J, Kreger-Van Rij NJW (1952) The yeasts: a taxonomic study. North-Holland Pub, Amsterdam, p 713Google Scholar
  33. Martinez F, Corio-Costet MF, Levis C, Coarer M, Fermaud M (2008) New PCR primers applied to characterize distribution of Botrytis cinerea populations in French vineyards. Vitis 47:217–226Google Scholar
  34. Miller GL (1959) Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Anal Biochem 31:426–428Google Scholar
  35. Mirończuk AM, Rzechonek DA, Biegalska A, Rakicka M, Dobrowolski A (2016) A novel strain of Yarrowia lipolytica as a platform for value-added product synthesis from glycerol. Biotechnol Biofuels 9:180PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Nancib N, Nancib A, Boudjelal A, Benslimane C, Blanchard F, Boudrant J (2001) The effect of supplementation by different nitrogen sources on the production of lactic acid from date juice by Lactobacillus casei subsp, rhamnosus. Bioresour Technol 78:149–153PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Nissen T, Hamann CW, Kielland-Brandt MC, Nielsen J, Villadsen J (2000) Anaerobic and aerobic batch cultivations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutants impaired in glycerol synthesis. Yeast 16:463–474PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Orlic S, Arroyo-Lopez FN, Huic-Babic K, Lucilla I, Querol A, Barrio E (2010) A comparative study of the wine fermentation performance of Saccharomyces paradoxus under different nitrogen concentrations and glucose/fructose ratios. J Appl Microbiol 108:73–80PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Overkamp KM, Bakker BM, Kötter P, Luttik MAH, van Dijken JP, PronK JT (2002) Metabolic engineering of glycerol production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol 68(6):2814–2821PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Padilla B, Gil J, Manzanares P (2018) Challenges of the non-conventional yeast Wickerhamomyces anomalus in winemaking. Ferment 4(3):68Google Scholar
  41. Passoth V, Fredlund E, Druvefors UÄ, Schnürer J (2006) Biotechnology, physiology and genetics of the yeast Pichia anomala. FEMS Yeast Res 6(1):3–13PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Patil SV (2013) Kinetics, simulation and scale up of process for fermentative production of glycerol and arabitol using Hansenula anomala. PhD thesis in biotechnology, University of Pune, India, p 258Google Scholar
  43. Petrovska B, Winkelhausen E, Kuzmanova S (1999) Glycerol production by yeasts under osmotic and sulfite stress. Can J Microbiol 45:695–699PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Piddocke M, Kreisz S, Heldt-Hansen H, Nielsen K, Olsson L (2009) Physiological characterization of brewer’s yeast in high-gravity beer fermentations with glucose or maltose syrups as adjuncts. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 84:453–464PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Remize F, Barnavon L, Dequin S (2001) Glycerol export and glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, but not glycerol phosphatase, are rate limiting for glycerol production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Metab Eng 3:301–312PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Revin V, Atykyan N, Lyovina E, Dragunova Y, Ushkina V (2018) Effect of ultraviolet radiation on physiological and biochemical propertiesof yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae during fermentation of ultradispersed starch raw material. Electron J Biotechnol 31:61–66Google Scholar
  47. Sahoo DK, Agarwal GP (2001) An investigation on glycerol biosynthesis by an osmophilic yeast in a bioreactor. Process Biochem 36:839–846Google Scholar
  48. Sancar GB, Smith FW (1989) Interactions between yeast photolyase and nucleotide excision repair proteins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Escherichia coli. Mol Cell Biol 9(11):4767–4776PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. Savergave LS, Gadre RV, Vaidya BK, Jogdand VV (2013) Two-stage fermentation process for enhanced mannitol production using Candida magnoliae mutant R9. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 36:193–203PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Shahsavarani H, Sugiyama M, Kaneko Y, Chuenchit B, Harashima S (2012) Superior thermotolerance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for efficient bioethanol fermentation can be achieved by overexpression of RSP5 ubiquitin ligase. Biotechnol Adv 30(6):1289–1300PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Shen B, Hohmann S, Jensen RG, Bohnert HJ (1999) Roles of sugar alcohols in osmotic stress adaptation. replacement of glycerol by mannitol and sorbitol in yeast. Plant Physiol 121:45–52PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  52. Silva-Graça M, Lucas C (2003) Physiological studies on long-term adaptation to salt stress in the extremely halotolerant yeast Candida versatilis CBS 4019 (syn. C. halophila). FEMS Yeast Res 3(3):247–260PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Sivasankaran C, Ramanujam PK, Shanmugam S, Sathendra R, Balasubramanian B, Mani J (2014) Comparative study on Candida sp. for the production of glycerol. Chem Tech 6(12):5058–5063Google Scholar
  54. Snoep L, Mrwebi M, Schuurmans M, Rohwer JM, Teixeira de Mattos MJ (2009) Control of specific growth rate in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiology 155:1699–1707PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Sulieman A, Esra AM, Abdelgadir WS (2015) Isolation and identification of yeasts from the different stages of Hulu-mur fermentation. J Microbiol Res 5(2):71–76Google Scholar
  56. Taherzadeh MJ, Adler L, Lidén G (2002) Strategies for enhancing fermentative production of glycerol—a review. Enz Microb Technol 31:53–66Google Scholar
  57. Tapia VE, Anschau A, Coradini AL, Franco T, Deckmann AC (2012) Optimization of lipid production by the oleaginous yeast Lipomyces starkeyi by random mutagenesis coupled to cerulenin screening. AMB Express 2:1–8Google Scholar
  58. Thome PE (2007) Cell wall involvement in the glycerol response to high osmolarity in the halotolerant yeast Debaryomyces hansenii. Antonie Leeuwenhoek 91:229–235PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Varela C, Pizarro F, Agosin E (2004) Biomass content governs fermentation rate in nitrogen-deficient wine musts. Appl Environ Microbiol 70(6):3392–3400PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  60. Vijaikishore P, Karanth NG (1986) Glycerol production by immobilized cells of Pichia farinosa. Biotechnol Lett 8:257–260Google Scholar
  61. Walker GM (1998) Yeast physiology and biotechnology. Wiley, London, p 362 (ISBN: 978-0-471-96446-9) Google Scholar
  62. Walker GM (2011) Pichia anomala: cell physiology and biotechnology relative to other yeasts. Antonie Leeuwenhoek 99(1):25–34PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Wang ZX, Zhuge J, Fang H, Prior BA (2001) Glycerol production by microbial fermentation: a review. Biotechnol Adv 19:201–223PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Watanabe T, Watanabe I, Yamamoto M, Ando A, Nakamura T (2011) A UV-induced mutant of Pichia stipitis with increased ethanol production from xylose and selection of a spontaneous mutant with increased ethanol tolerance. Bioresour Technol 102(2):1844–1848PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor JW (1990) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ (eds) PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications. Academic Press Inc, New York, pp 315–322Google Scholar
  66. Yaçlin SK, Ӧzbas ZY (2005) Determination of growth and glycerol production kinetics of a wine yeast strain Saccharomyces cerevisiae Kalecik1 in different substrate media. World J Microb Biot 21:1303–1310Google Scholar
  67. Yaçlin SK, Ӧzbas ZY (2008) Effects of pH and temperature on growth and glycerol production kinetics of two indigenous wine strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae from Turkey. Braz J Microbiol 39:325–332Google Scholar
  68. Yin Y, Petes TD (2013) Genome-wide high-resolution mapping of UV-induced mitotic recombination events in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Genet 9(10):e1003894PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  69. Zhang J, Liu D, Xie D, Wang Y, Sun Y (2002) Production of glycerol by fermentation using osmophilic yeast Cadida krusei with different starchy substrates. Enz Microbiol Technol 30(6):758–762Google Scholar
  70. Zhang G, Lin Y, Qi X, Wang L, He P, Wang Q, Ma Y (2015a) Genome shuffling of the nonconventional yeast Pichia anomala for improved sugar alcohol production. Microb Cell Fact 14(1):112PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  71. Zhang M, Shi J, Jianga L (2015b) Modulation of mitochondrial membrane integrity and ROS formation by high temperature in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Electron J Biotechnol 18(3):202–209Google Scholar
  72. Zhang M, Wu W, Gu, X, Weichen Y, Qi F, Jiang X, Huang J (2018) Mathematical modeling of fed-batch fermentation of Schizochytrium sp. FJU-512 growth and DHA production using a shift control strategy. Biotech 3:162. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5840084/
  73. Zhao XQ, Bai FW (2009) Mechanisms of yeast stress tolerance and its manipulation for efficient fuel ethanol production. J Biotechnol 144(1):23–30PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Zhao X, Procopio S, Becker T (2015) Flavor impacts of glycerol in the processing of yeast fermented beverages: a review. J Food Sci Technol 52(12):7588–7598PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  75. Zhuge J, Fang HY, Wang ZX, Chen DZ, Jin HR, Gu HL (2001) Glycerol production by a novel osmotolerant yeast Candida glycerinogenes. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 55:686–692PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Heba Hawary
    • 1
  • Abdel-Hamied M. Rasmey
    • 1
    Email author
  • Akram A. Aboseidah
    • 1
  • El-Shahat El-Morsi
    • 1
  • Mohamed Hafez
    • 1
  1. 1.Botany and Microbiology Department, Faculty of ScienceSuez UniversitySuezEgypt

Personalised recommendations