3 Biotech

, 9:253 | Cite as

Bioaugmentation of soil with Enterobacter cloacae AKS7 enhances soil nitrogen content and boosts soil microbial functional-diversity

  • Poulomi Chakraborty
  • Ranojit Kumar Sarker
  • Rupsa Roy
  • Abhrajyoti Ghosh
  • Debasish Maiti
  • Prosun TribediEmail author
Original Article


Biofertilizer happens to be a promising alternative of chemical fertilizer in the establishment of sustainable agricultural practices. Following this observation, several nitrogen-fixing bacteria were isolated from the soil in which an isolate (AKS7) was selected for further studies as AKS7 showed considerable competence in growth on nitrogen-free growth medium. Acetylene reduction assay confirmed that AKS7 can fix atmospheric nitrogen efficiently. The result of Kjeldahl assay revealed that the organism (AKS7) could fix nitrogen up to 12 mg in 8 days. A strong positive correlation (r = 0.987) was observed between microbial cell biomass and the amount of nitrogen fixed by AKS7 over a period of 8 days. The organism was identified as Enterobacter cloacae through molecular and biochemical tests. To investigate the in situ nitrogen fixation by E. cloacae AKS7, naturally attenuated (AKS7 not-inoculated) and bioaugmented (AKS7-inoculated) soil microcosms were prepared. The bioaugmented microcosm showed higher level of soil nitrogen content than naturally attenuated microcosm. A large number of heterotrophic as well as nitrogen-fixing microorganisms were counted in bioaugmented microcosm than naturally attenuated microcosm. Results of the carbon source utilization patterns of BiOLOG ECO plate revealed that bioaugmented microcosm exhibited higher level of functional richness and evenness that lead to the exhibition of higher level of microbial functional-diversity in bioaugmented microcosm than the naturally attenuated microcosm. Taken together, the results indicated that augmentation of E. cloacae AKS7 into soil enhanced the nitrogen content and soil microbial functional-diversity considerably.


Soil fertility Microbial nitrogen fixation Soil microbial activity Microbial functional-diversity 



The authors’ would like to express sincere gratitude to the learned experts for their immense guidance and cooperation in improving the manuscript. We sincerely thank Ms. Rakshita Dave and Ms. Sutirtha Dutta for their help in correcting the language of the manuscript. This current work was supported by a grant in aid from the Department of Science and Engineering research board (SERB), DST, Govt. of India (Sanction number: YSS/2015/000387). Reagents like fluorescein diacetate (FDA) and 2,3,5-triphenyl tetrazolium chloride (TTC) were received as a kind gift from Dr. Alok Kumar Sil (Department of Microbiology, University of Calcutta) and Mr. Tapan Saha (Institute of Environmental Studies and Wetland Management, Kolkata), respectively.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Authors’ declare that they do not have any conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

13205_2019_1791_MOESM1_ESM.doc (123 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 123 kb)


  1. Adam G, Duncan H (2001) Development of a sensitive and rapid method for the measurement of total microbial activity using fluorescein diacetate (FDA) in a range of soils. Soil Biol Biochem 33:943–951CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alef K, Nannipieri P (1995) Methods in applied soil microbiology and biochemistry. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. APHA (2005) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. American Public Health Association, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  4. Ausubel FM, Brent R, Kingston RE, Moore DD, Seidman JG, Smith JA, Struhl K (1994) Current protocols in molecular biology. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Bardi L, Malusà E (2012) Drought and nutritional stresses in plant: alleviating role of rhizospheric microorganisms. Abiotic stress: new research. Nova Science Publishers Inc., Hauppauge, pp 1–57Google Scholar
  6. Bhardwaj D, Ansari MW, Sahoo RK, Tuteja N (2014) Biofertilizers function as key player in sustainable agriculture by improving soil fertility, plant tolerance and crop productivity. Microb Cell Fact 13(1):66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chakraborty P, Tribedi P (2019) Functional diversity performs a key role in the isolation of nitrogen-fixing and phosphate-solubilizing bacteria from soil. Folia Microbiol (Praha). (Epub ahead of print) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Choi KH, Dobbs FC (1999) Comparison of two kinds of BiOLOG microplates (GN and ECO) in their ability to distinguish among aquatic microbial communities. J Microbiol Methods 36:203–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clark CM, Flynn DF, Butterfield BJ, Reich PB (2012) Testing the link between functional diversity and ecosystem functioning in a Minnesota grassland experiment. PLoS One 7:e52821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dilworth MJ (1966) Acetylene reduction by nitrogen-fixing preparations from Clostridium pasteurianum. Biochim Biophys Acta 127:285–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dubey RC, Maheshwari DK (2012) Practical microbiology, 5th edn. S. Chand Publishing, New Delhi (ISBN: 9788121921534) Google Scholar
  12. Epelde L, Mijangos I, Becerril JM, Garbisu C (2009) Soil microbial community as bioindicator of the recovery of soil functioning derived from metal phytoextraction with sorghum. Soil Biol Biochem 41:1788–1794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Glick BR (2012) Plant growth promoting bacteria: mechanisms and applications. Scientifica 2012:15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gu Y, Wag P, Kong C (2009) Urease, invertase, dehydrogenase and polyphenoloxidase activities in paddy soils influenced by allelophatic rice variety. Eur J Soil Biol 45:436–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hoffman BM, Dean DR, Seefeldt LC (2009) Climbing nitrogenase: toward a mechanism of enzymatic nitrogen fixation. Acc Chem Res 42:609–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jetiyanon K, Pliabanchang P (2012) Potential of Bacillus cereus strain RS87 for partial replacement of chemical fertilisers in the production of Thai rice cultivars. J Sci Food Agric 92:1080–1085CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kayasth M, Gera R, Dudeja SS, Sharma PK, Kumar V (2014) Studies on salinization in Haryana soils on free-living nitrogen-fixing bacterial populations and their activity. J Basic Microbiol 54:170–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kessler PS, Leigh JA (1999) Genetics of nitrogen regulation in Methanococcus maripaludis. Genetics 152:1343–1351PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K (2016) MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol 33:1870–1874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mahanty T, Bhattacharjee S, Goswami M, Bhattacharyya P, Das B, Ghosh A, Tribedi P (2017) Biofertilizers: a potential approach for sustainable agriculture development. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 24:3315–3335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Malusa E, Vassilev N (2014) A contribution to set a legal framework for biofertilisers. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 98:6599–6607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mason NW, Mouillot D, Lee WG, Wilson JB (2005) Functional richness, functional evenness and functional divergence: the primary components of functional diversity. Oikos 111:112–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mazid M, Khan TA (2015) Future of bio-fertilizers in Indian agriculture: an overview. Int J Agric Food Res 3:10–23Google Scholar
  24. Park M, Kim C, Yang J, Lee H, Shin W, Kim S, Sa T (2005) Isolation and characterization of diazotrophic growth promoting bacteria from rhizosphere of agricultural crops of Korea. Microbiol Res 160:127–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Salazar S, Sanchez L, Alvarez J, Valverde A, Galindo P, Igual J, Peix A, Santa-Regina I (2011) Correlation among soil enzyme activities under different forest system management practices. Ecol Eng 37:1123–1131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Singh J, Singh DK (2005) Dehydrogenase and phosphomonoesterase activities in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) field after diazinon, imidacloprid and lindane treatments. Chemosphere 60:32–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Smith BE, Richards RL, Newton WE (eds) (2013) Catalysts for nitrogen fixation: nitrogenases, relevant chemical models and commercial processes, vol 1. Springer, Berlin, p 340Google Scholar
  28. Tribedi P, Sil AK (2013) Bioaugmentation of polyethylene succinate contaminated soil with Pseudomonas sp. AKS2 results in increased microbial activity and better polymer degradation. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 20:1318–1326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tribedi P, Sarkar S, Mukherjee K, Sil AK (2012) Isolation of a novel Pseudomonas sp. from soil that can efficiently degrade polyethylene succinate. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 19:2115–2124CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Poulomi Chakraborty
    • 1
  • Ranojit Kumar Sarker
    • 1
  • Rupsa Roy
    • 2
  • Abhrajyoti Ghosh
    • 2
  • Debasish Maiti
    • 3
  • Prosun Tribedi
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of BiotechnologyThe Neotia UniversityKolkataIndia
  2. 2.Department of BiochemistryBose Institute Centenary CampusKolkataIndia
  3. 3.Department of Human PhysiologyTripura University (A Central University)AgartalaIndia

Personalised recommendations