Advertisement

3 Biotech

, 9:254 | Cite as

Knockout of OsPRP1, a gene encoding proline-rich protein, confers enhanced cold sensitivity in rice (Oryza sativa L.) at the seedling stage

  • Gul Nawaz
  • Yue Han
  • Babar Usman
  • Fang Liu
  • Baoxiang Qin
  • Rongbai LiEmail author
Original Article
  • 79 Downloads

Abstract

Proline-rich proteins (PRPs) play multiple physiological and biochemical roles in plant growth and stress response. In this study, we reported that the knockout of OsPRP1 induced cold sensitivity in rice. Mutant plants were generated by CRISPR/Cas9 technology to investigate the role of OsPRP1 in cold stress and 26 mutant plants were obtained in T0 generation with the mutation rate of 85% including 15% bi-allelic, 53.3% homozygous, and 16.7% heterozygous and 16 T-DNA-free lines in T1 generation. The conserved amino acid sequence was changed and the expression level of OsPRP1 was reduced in mutant plants. The OsPRP1 mutant plants displayed more sensitivity to cold stress and showed low survival rate with decreased root biomass than wild-type (WT) and homozygous mutant line with large fragment deletion was more sensitive to low temperature. Mutant lines accumulated less antioxidant enzyme activity and lower levels of proline, chlorophyll, abscisic acid (ABA), and ascorbic acid (AsA) content relative to WT under low-temperature stress. The changes of antioxidant enzymes were examined in the leaves and roots with exogenous salicylic acid (SA) treatment which resulted in increased activity of superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD), and catalase (CAT) under cold stress, while enzyme antioxidant activity was lower in untreated seedlings which showed that exogenous SA pretreatment could alleviate the low-temperature stress in rice. Furthermore, the expression of three genes encoding antioxidant enzyme activities (SOD4, POX1, and OsCAT3) was significantly down-regulated in the mutant lines as compared to WT. These results suggested that OsPRP1 enhances cold tolerance by modulating antioxidants and maintaining cross talk through signaling pathways. Therefore, OsPRP1 gene could be exploited for improving cold tolerance in rice and CRISPR/Cas9 technology is helpful to study the function of a gene by analyzing the phenotypes of knockout mutants generated.

Keywords

Cold Stress CRISPR/Cas9 Mutation Rice OsPRP1 Proline 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Prof. Liu Yaoguang from South China Agricultural University, who provided us pYCRISPR/Cas9 and gRNA vectors (pYL-U6a-b-gRNAs). We would also like to thank Mr. Mohsin Niaz and Mr. Zhao Neng for the helpful discussion and invaluable comments to make this research meaningful.

Author contributions

GN and YH conceived, designed, and performed the experiments. BU was responsible for vector construction and wrote the paper. GN and BU were responsible for final data analysis and wrote the final draft. BQ and FL participated in the experimental design, result analysis, and field trials. RL visualized the project, supervised the methodology, given feedback on data presentation, and reviewed the final draft. All the authors have read the manuscript and approved the submission.

Funding

This research was funded by the Key Technology Research and Development Program Guike, Guangxi (Guike AB16380066; Guike AB16380093).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declared no conflict of interest.

Accession numbers

Sequence data from this article can be found in the GenBank data library under accession numbers GenBank: KR029105 and KR029107 for the sgRNA intermediate plasmid and GenBank: KR029109 for the CRISPR/Cas9 binary vector.

Supplementary material

13205_2019_1787_MOESM1_ESM.docx (407 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 406 kb)
13205_2019_1787_MOESM2_ESM.docx (130 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 130 kb)
13205_2019_1787_MOESM3_ESM.docx (16 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (DOCX 15 kb)
13205_2019_1787_MOESM4_ESM.docx (118 kb)
Supplementary material 4 (DOCX 117 kb)
13205_2019_1787_MOESM5_ESM.docx (17 kb)
Supplementary material 5 (DOCX 16 kb)
13205_2019_1787_MOESM6_ESM.docx (2.3 mb)
Supplementary material 6 (DOCX 2389 kb)

References

  1. Aebi H (1984) Catalase in vitro. In: Methods in enzymology, vol 105. Academic Press, pp 121–126Google Scholar
  2. Akiyama T, Pillai MA (2003) Isolation and characterization of a gene for a repetitive proline rich protein (OsPRP) down-regulated during submergence in rice (Oryza sativa). Physiol Plant 118(4):507–513.  https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-3054.2003.00104.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alscher RG, Erturk N, Heath LS (2002) Role of superoxide dismutases (SODs) in controlling oxidative stress in plants. J Exp Bot 53(372):1331–1341.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/53.372.1331 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Arnon DI (1949) Copper enzyme in isolated chloroplast: polyphenol oxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Phyisol 24:1–15.  https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.24.1.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aroca R, Tognoni F, Irigoyen JJ, Sánchez-Díaz M, Pardossi A (2001) Different root low temperature response of two maize genotypes differing in chilling sensitivity. Plant Physiol Biochem 39(12):1067–1073.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0981-9428(01)01335-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bates LS, Waldren RP, Teare ID (1973) Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant Soil 39(1):205–207.  https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00018060 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beffa R, Martin HV, Pilet P-E (1990) In vitro oxidation of indoleacetic acid by soluble auxin-oxidases and peroxidases from maize roots. Plant Physiol 94(2):485–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bonnecarrère V, Borsani O, Díaz P, Capdevielle F, Blanco P, Monza J (2011) Response to photoxidative stress induced by cold in japonica rice is genotype dependent. Plant Sci 180(5):726–732.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2011.01.023 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Bortesi L, Fischer R (2015) The CRISPR/Cas9 system for plant genome editing and beyond. Biotechnol Adv 33(1):41–52.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2014.12.006 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Brisson LF, Tenhaken R, Lamb C (1994) Function of oxidative cross-linking of cell wall structural proteins in plant disease resistance. Plant Cell 6(12):1703–1712.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3869902 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Caverzan A, Passaia G, Rosa SB, Ribeiro CW, Lazzarotto F, Margis-Pinheiro M (2012) Plant responses to stresses: role of ascorbate peroxidase in the antioxidant protection. Genet Mol Biol 35(4):1011–1019.  https://doi.org/10.1590/s1415-47572012000600016 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Chen L, Wang S, Zhang YH, Li J, Xing ZH, Yang J, Huang T, Cai YD (2017) Identify key sequence features to improve CRISPR sgRNA efficacy. IEEE Access 5:26582–26590.  https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2017.2775703 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cook D, Fowler S, Fiehn O, Thomashow MF (2004) A prominent role for the CBF cold response pathway in configuring the low-temperature metabolome of Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci 101(42):15243–15248.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0406069101 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Engels C (1994) Effect of root and shoot meristem temperature on shoot to root dry matter partitioning and the internal concentrations of nitrogen and carbohydrates in maize and wheat. Ann Bot 73(2):211–219.  https://doi.org/10.1006/anbo.1994.1025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Feng Z, Zhang B, Ding W, Liu X, Yang DL, Wei P, Cao F, Zhu S, Zhang F, Mao Y, Zhu JK (2013) Efficient genome editing in plants using a CRISPR/Cas system. Cell Res 23(10):1229.  https://doi.org/10.1038/cr.2013.114 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Forcat S, Bennett MH, Mansfield JW, Grant MR (2008) A rapid and robust method for simultaneously measuring changes in the phytohormones ABA, JA and SA in plants following biotic and abiotic stress. Plant Methods 4(1):16.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4811-4-16 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Fowler TJ, Bernhardt C, Tierney ML (1999) Characterization and expression of four proline-rich cell wall protein genes in Arabidopsis encoding two distinct subsets of multiple domain proteins. Plant Physiol 121(4):1081–1091.  https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.121.4.1081 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Gaj T, Gersbach CA, Barbas CF III (2013) ZFN, TALEN, and CRISPR/Cas-based methods for genome engineering. Trends Biotechnol 31(7):397–405.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2013.04.004 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Gupta N, Susa K, Yoda Y, Bonventre JV, Valerius MT, Morizane R (2018) CRISPR/Cas9-based targeted genome editing for the development of monogenic diseases models with human pluripotent stem cells. Curr Protoc Stem Cell Biol 45(1):e50.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cpsc.50 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Han Y, Luo D, Usman B, Nawaz G, Zhao N, Liu F, Li R (2018) Development of high yielding glutinous cytoplasmic male sterile rice (Oryza sativa L.) lines through CRISPR/Cas9 based mutagenesis of Wx and TGW6 and proteomic analysis of anther. Agronomy 8:290.  https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy8120290 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hewitt EJ, Dickes GJ (1961) Spectrophotometric measurements on ascorbic acid and their use for the estimation of ascorbic acid and dehydroascorbic acid in plant tissues. Biochem J 78(2):384–391.  https://doi.org/10.1042/bj0780384 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Hiei Y, Ohta S, Komari T, Kumashiro T (1994) Efficient transformation of rice (Oryza sativa L.) mediated by Agrobacterium and sequence analysis of the boundaries of the T-DNA. Plant J 6(2):271–282.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313x.1994.6020271.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Huang J, Sun SJ, Xu DQ, Yang X, Bao YM, Wang ZF, Tang HJ, Zhang H (2009) Increased tolerance of rice to cold, drought and oxidative stresses mediated by the overexpression of a gene that encodes the zinc finger protein ZFP245. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 389(3):556–561.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.09.032 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Ikeda T, Tanaka W, Mikami M, Endo M, Hirano HY (2015) Generation of artificial drooping leaf mutants by CRISPR-Cas9 technology in rice. Genes Genet Syst 90(4):231–235.  https://doi.org/10.1266/ggs.15-00030 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Jang G, Lee S, Um TY, Chang SH, Lee HY, Chung PJ, Kim JK, Do Choi Y (2016) Genetic chimerism of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated rice mutants. Plant Biotech Rep 10(6):425–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jiang W, Bikard D, Cox D, Zhang F, Marraffini LA (2013) RNA-guided editing of bacterial genomes using CRISPR-Cas systems. Nat Biotechnol 31(3):233–239.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2508 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Jung YJ, Nogoy FM, Lee SK, Cho YG, Kang KK (2018) Application of ZFN for site directed mutagenesis of rice SSIVa gene. Biotechnol Bioprocess Eng 23(1):108–115.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12257-017-0420-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kandpal RP, Rao NA (1985) Alterations in the biosynthesis of proteins and nucleic acids in finger millet (Eleucine coracana) seedlings during water stress and the effect of proline on protein biosynthesis. Plant Sci 40(2):73–79.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-9452(85)90044-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kanneganti V, Gupta AK (2008) Overexpression of OsiSAP8, a member of stress associated protein (SAP) gene family of rice confers tolerance to salt, drought and cold stress in transgenic tobacco and rice. Plant Mol Biol 66(5):445–462.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11103-007-9284-2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Kim SI, Tai TH (2011) Evaluation of seedling cold tolerance in rice cultivars: a comparison of visual ratings and quantitative indicators of physiological changes. Euphytica 178(3):437–447.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-010-0343-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kim SJ, Lee SC, Hong SK, An K, An G, Kim SR (2009) Ectopic expression of a cold-responsive OsAsr1 cDNA gives enhanced cold tolerance in transgenic rice plants. Mol Cells 27(4):449–458.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10059-009-0055-6 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Kim SH, Choi HS, Cho YC, Kim SR (2012) Cold-responsive regulation of a flower-preferential class III peroxidase gene, OsPOX1, in rice (Oryza sativa L.). J Plant Biol 55(2):123–131.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12374-011-9194-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Li Q, Zhang D, Chen M, Liang W, Wei J, Qi Y, Yuan Z (2016) Development of japonica photo-sensitive genic male sterile rice lines by editing carbon starved anther using CRISPR/Cas9. J Genet Genomics 43(6):415–419.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgg.2016.04.011 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Liang G, Zhang H, Lou D, Yu D (2016) Selection of highly efficient sgRNAs for CRISPR/Cas9-based plant genome editing. Sci Rep 6:21451.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep21451 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Lin A, Wang Y, Tang J, Xue P, Li C, Liu L, Hu B, Yang F, Loake GJ, Chu C (2012) Nitric oxide and protein S-nitrosylation are integral to hydrogen peroxide-induced leaf cell death in rice. Plant Physiol 158(1):451–464.  https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.111.184531 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Ma X, Chen L, Zhu Q, Chen Y, Liu YG (2015a) Rapid decoding of sequence-specific nuclease-induced heterozygous and bi-allelic mutations by direct sequencing of PCR products. Mol plant 8(8):1285–1287.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2015.02.012 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Ma X, Zhang Q, Zhu Q, Liu W, Chen Y, Qiu R, Wang B, Yang Z, Li H, Lin Y, Xie Y (2015b) A robust CRISPR/Cas9 system for convenient, high-efficiency multiplex genome editing in monocot and dicot plants. Mol plant 8(8):1274–1284.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2015.04.007 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Miller GA, Suzuki N, Ciftci-Yilmaz SU, Mittler RO (2010) Reactive oxygen species homeostasis and signalling during drought and salinity stresses. Plant Cell Environ 33(4):453–467.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.02041.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Mittler R (2002) Oxidative stress, antioxidants and stress tolerance. Trends Plant Sci 7(9):405–410.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s1360-1385(02)02312-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Modarresi M, Nematzadeh GA, Moradian F, Alavi SM (2012) Identification and cloning of the Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase gene from halophyte plant Aeluropus littoralis. Genetika 48(1):130–134.  https://doi.org/10.1134/s1022795411100127 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Nicholas CD, Lindstrom JT, Vodkin LO (1993) Variation of proline rich cell wall proteins in soybean lines with anthocyanin mutations. Plant Mol Biol 21(1):145–156.  https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00039625 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Noctor G, Foyer CH (1998) Ascorbate and glutathione: keeping active oxygen under control. Annu Rev Plant Biol 49(1):249–279.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.49.1.249 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Osakabe Y, Watanabe T, Sugano SS, Ueta R, Ishihara R, Shinozaki K, Osakabe K (2016) Optimization of CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing to modify abiotic stress responses in plants. Sci Rep 6:26685.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep26685 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Poire R, Wiese-Klinkenberg A, Parent B, Mielewczik M, Schurr U, Tardieu F, Walter A (2010) Diel time-courses of leaf growth in monocot and dicot species: endogenous rhythms and temperature effects. J Exp Bot 61(6):1751–1759.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erq049 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Qi W, Zhu T, Tian Z, Li C, Zhang W, Song R (2016) High-efficiency CRISPR/Cas9 multiplex gene editing using the glycine tRNA-processing system-based strategy in maize. BMC Biotechnol 16(1):58.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12896-016-0289-2 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Quarrie SA, Whitford PN, Appleford NE, Wang TL, Cook SK, Henson IE, Loveys BR (1988) A monoclonal antibody to (S)-abscisic acid: its characterisation and use in a radioimmunoassay for measuring abscisic acid in crude extracts of cereal and lupin leaves. Planta 173(3):330–339.  https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00401020 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Ren H, Gao Z, Chen L, Wei K, Liu J, Fan Y, Davies WJ, Jia W, Zhang J (2007) Dynamic analysis of ABA accumulation in relation to the rate of ABA catabolism in maize tissues under water deficit. J Exp Bot 58(2):211–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Roy S, Banerjee V, Das KP (2015) Understanding the physical and molecular basis of stability of arabidopsis DNA Pol λ under UV-B and high NaCl stress. PLoS One 10(7):e0133843.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133843 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. Sakamoto M, Suzuki T (2015) Effect of root-zone temperature on growth and quality of hydroponically grown red leaf lettuce (Lactuca sativa L. cv. Red Wave). Am J Plant Sci 6(14):2350–2360.  https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2015.614238 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sato Y, Masuta Y, Saito K, Murayama S, Ozawa K (2011) Enhanced chilling tolerance at the booting stage in rice by transgenic overexpression of the ascorbate peroxidase gene, OsAPXa. Plant Cell Rep 30(3):399–406.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-010-0985-7 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Shah K, Dubey RS (1997) Effect of cadmium on proline accumulation and ribonuclease activity in rice seedlings: role of proline as a possible enzyme protectant. Biol Plant 40(1):121–130.  https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1000956803911 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Showalter AM (1993) Structure and function of plant cell wall proteins. Plant Cell 5(1):9.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3869424 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  53. Siripornadulsil S, Traina S, Verma DP, Sayre RT (2002) Molecular mechanisms of proline-mediated tolerance to toxic heavy metals in transgenic microalgae. Plant Cell 14(11):2837–2847.  https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.004853 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  54. Sun Y, Zhang X, Wu C, He Y, Ma Y, Hou H, Guo X, Du W, Zhao Y, Xia L (2016) Engineering herbicide-resistant rice plants through CRISPR/Cas9-mediated homologous recombination of acetolactate synthase. Mol Plant 9(4):628–631.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2016.01.001 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Tierney ML, Wiechert J, Pluymers D (1988) Analysis of the expression of extensin and p33-related cell wall proteins in carrot and soybean. Mol Gen Genet MGG 211(3):393–399.  https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00425691 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Venekamp JH (1989) Regulation of cytosol acidity in plants under conditions of drought. Physiol Plant 76(1):112–117.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1989.tb05461.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wang F, Wang C, Liu P, Lei C, Hao W, Gao Y, Liu YG, Zhao K (2016) Enhanced rice blast resistance by CRISPR/Cas9-targeted mutagenesis of the ERF transcription factor gene OsERF922. PLoS One 11(4):e0154027.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154027 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  58. Wu XH, Mao AJ, Wang R, Wang T, Song Y, Tong Z (2003) Cloning and characterization of OsPRP1 involved in anther development in rice. Chin Sci Bull 48:2458–2465.  https://doi.org/10.1360/03wc0299 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Xie G, Kato H, Imai R (2012) Biochemical identification of the OsMKK6–OsMPK3 signalling pathway for chilling stress tolerance in rice. Biochem J 443(1):95–102.  https://doi.org/10.1042/bj20111792 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Xu X, Kawasaki S, Fujimura T, Wang C (2005) A protocol for high-throughput extraction of DNA from rice leaves. Plant Mol Biol Rep 23(3):291–295.  https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02772759 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Xu RF, Li H, Qin RY, Li J, Qiu CH, Yang YC, Ma H, Li L, Wei PC, Yang JB (2015) Generation of inheritable and “transgene clean” targeted genome-modified rice in later generations using the CRISPR/Cas9 system. Sci Rep 5:11491.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep11491 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  62. Xu R, Yang Y, Qin R, Li H, Qiu C, Li L, Wei P, Yang J (2016) Rapid improvement of grain weight via highly efficient CRISPR/Cas9-mediated multiplex genome editing in rice. J Genet Genomics 43(8):529–532.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgg.2016.07.003 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Zhang Q, Chen Q, Wang S, Hong Y, Wang Z (2014) Rice and cold stress: methods for its evaluation and summary of cold tolerance-related quantitative trait loci. Rice 7(1):24.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12284-014-0024-3 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  64. Zheng X, Yang S, Zhang D, Zhong Z, Tang X, Deng K, Zhou J, Qi Y, Zhang Y (2016) Effective screen of CRISPR/Cas9-induced mutants in rice by single-strand conformation polymorphism. Plant Cell Rep 35(7):1545–1554.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-016-1967-1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Zhou J, Peng Z, Long J, Sosso D, Liu B, Eom JS, Huang S, Liu S, Vera Cruz C, Frommer WB, White FF (2015) Gene targeting by the TAL effector PthXo2 reveals cryptic resistance gene for bacterial blight of rice. The Plant J 82(4):632–643.  https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.12838 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Zhu Z, Wei G, Li J, Qian Q, Yu J (2004) Silicon alleviates salt stress and increases antioxidant enzymes activity in leaves of salt-stressed cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Plant Sci 167(3):527–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gul Nawaz
    • 1
  • Yue Han
    • 1
  • Babar Usman
    • 1
  • Fang Liu
    • 1
  • Baoxiang Qin
    • 1
  • Rongbai Li
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.College of Agriculture, State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-BioresourcesGuangxi UniversityNanningChina

Personalised recommendations