Advertisement

3 Biotech

, 9:37 | Cite as

Effect of different extraction techniques on total phenolic and flavonoid contents, and antioxidant activity of betelvine and quantification of its phenolic constituents by validated HPTLC method

  • Suryasnata Das
  • Asit Ray
  • Noohi Nasim
  • Sanghamitra Nayak
  • Sujata MohantyEmail author
Original Article
  • 149 Downloads

Abstract

The objective of the study is to analyze the effect of different extracting methods on the polyphenolic content and antioxidant activities in Piper betle leaves. In the present research, P. betle leaf extract was prepared by sonication, Soxhlet and maceration methods using acetone (100%, v/v). The efficiency of the extraction methods was estimated by quantifying the total phenolic content (TPC) by the Folin–Ciocalteu method and total flavonoid content (TFC) by AlCl3 colorometric methods, and antioxidant power of the various extracts was determined by DPPH (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl) and ABTS 2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzthiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) radical scavenging assay. Thin-layer chromatography (TLC) bioautography was carried out to identify antioxidants, and their amount was determined by the newly developed high-performance thin-layer chromatography (HPTLC) method. DPPH free radical scavenging capacity of the different extracts from strongest to weakest was as follows: ascorbic acid (4.27 µg/mL) > sonication (5.35 µg/mL) >, maceration (5.53 µg/mL)>, soxhlet extraction (5.83 µg/mL). Same trend was also observed for the ABTS radical scavenging capacity. Similarly, findings of this study also showed that sonication extract possessed highest phenolic and flavonoid contents followed by maceration and Soxhlet extraction. In addition, important bioactive phenolic constituents which contribute largely towards antioxidant potential such as eugenol and eugenol acetate were quantified using HPTLC (high-performance thin-layer chromatography) method. The average percent recovery of eugenol and eugenol acetate was found to be 97.28% and 98.04%, respectively. The LOD (limit of detection) and LOQ (limit of quantification) for eugenol were 5 and 15 ng/spot, whereas that of eugenol acetate were 10 and 30 ng/spot. The HPTLC densitometric determination also supported the results of antioxidant assays by revealing the presence of higher amount of identified antioxidants in sonication followed by maceration and Soxhlet extraction. The developed HPTLC chromatogram profile may be used as a reference for the standardization of P. betle leaf extracts.

Keywords

HPTLC DPPH Eugenol Phenolic Flavonoid 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Prof. Dr. S.C. Si, Dean, Centre for Biotechnology, and Prof. Dr. M.R. Nayak, President, Siksha ‘O’ Anusandhan (Deemed to be University), Odisha, India, for providing facilities and encouragement throughout.

References

  1. Al-Massarani SM, El Gamal AA, Alam P, Al-Sheddi ES, Al-Oqail MM, Farshori NN (2016) Isolation, biological evaluation and validated HPTLC-quantification of the marker constituent of the edible Saudi plant Sisymbrium irio L. Saudi Pharm J.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsps.2016.10.012 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Annegowda HV, Tan PY, Mordi MN, Ramanathan S, Hamdan MR, Sulaiman MH, Mansor SM (2013) TLC—bioautography-guided isolation, HPTLC and GC–MS-assisted analysis of bioactives of piper betle leaf extract obtained from various extraction techniques: in vitro evaluation of phenolic content, antioxidant and antimicrobial activities. Food Anal Methods.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12161-012-9470-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arambewela LS, Arawwawala LD, Ratnasooriya WD (2005) Antidiabetic activities of aqueous and ethanolic extracts of Piper betle leaves in rats. J Ethnopharmacol 102:239–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chang CC, Yang MH, Wen HM et al (2002) Estimation of total flavonoid content in propolis by two complementary colorimetric methods. J Food Drug Anal 10:178–182Google Scholar
  5. Chemat S, Lagha A, Aitamar H, Bartels PV, Chemat F (2004) Comparison of conventional and ultrasound-assisted extraction of carvone and limonene from caraway seeds. Flav Fragr J 19:188–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chitnis KS (2017) Quantitation of eugenol in betel leaf varieties by HPTLC. Int J Pharm Sci Res 8(11):4858–4862Google Scholar
  7. Choudhary D, Kale RK (2002) Antioxidant and non-toxic properties of Piper betle leaf extract: in vitro and in vivo studies. Phytother Res 16:461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chung H, Ji X, Canning C, Sun S, Zhou K (2010) Comparison of different strategies for soybean antioxidant extraction. J Agric Food Chem 58:4508–4512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Das K, Tiwari R, Shrivastava D (2010) Techniques for evaluation of medicinal plant products as antimicrobial agent: current methods and future trends. J Med Plants Res 4(2):104–111Google Scholar
  10. Dasgupta N, De B (2004) Antioxidant activity of Piper betle L. Leaf extract in vitro. Food Chem 88:219–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dhanani T, Shah S, Gajbhiye NA, Kumar S (2017) Effect of extraction methods on yield, phytochemical constituents and antioxidant activity of Withania somnifera. Arab J Chem 10:1193–1199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ennajar M, Bouajila J, Lebrihi A, Mathieu F, Abderraba M, Raies A, Romdhane M (2009) Chemical composition and antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of essential oils and various extracts of Juniperus phoenicea L. (Cupressacees). J Food Sci 74:M364–M371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Guha P (2006) Betel leaf: the neglected green gold of India. J Health Econ 19:87–93Google Scholar
  14. Gülçin İ (2010) Antioxidant activity of eugenol: a structure—activity relationship study. J Med Food 14:975.  https://doi.org/10.1089/jmf.2010.0197 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hajare R, Darvhekar VM, Shewale A, Patil V (2011) Evaluation of antihistaminic activity of piper betel leaf in guinea pig. Afr J Pharm Pharmacol 5:113–117Google Scholar
  16. Jaganath IB (2000) Ng Lt Piper betle. In herbs-the green pharmacy of Malaysia. Malaysian Agricultural Research and Development Institute, Kuala Lumpur, pp 81–83Google Scholar
  17. Jena S, Ray A, Banerjee A, Sahoo A, Nasim N, Sahoo S, Kar B, Patnaik J, Panda PC, Nayak S (2017) Chemical composition and antioxidant activity of essential oil from leaves and rhizomes of Curcuma angustifolia Roxb. Nat Product Res 31(18):2188–2191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kamila PK, Ray A, Jena S, Mohapatra PK, Panda PC (2017) Chemical composition and antioxidant activities of the essential oil of Hypericum gaitii Haines—an endemic species of Eastern India. Nat Product Res.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14786419.2017.1338283 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Khan TA, Goheli AK, Mallya R (2016) Standardisation and HPTLC method development of marketed ayurvedic formulation—balarishta. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci 8(3):201–209Google Scholar
  20. Mazura MP, Nuziah H, Rasadah MA, Ling SK (2007) Evaluation of Piper betle on platelet activating factor (PAF) receptor binding activities. Malays J Sci 26:79–83Google Scholar
  21. Nalina T, Rahim Z (2007) The crude aqueous extract of Piper betle L. and its antibacterial effect towards Streptococcus mutans. Am J Biochem Biotech 3:10–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nijveldt RJ, Van Nood E, Van Hoorn DEC, Boelens PG, Van Norren K, Van Leeuwen PAM (2001) Flavonoids: a review of probable mechanisms of action and potential applications. Am J Clin Nutr 74:418–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pak-Dek MS, Osman A, Sahib NG, Saari N, Markom M, Hamid AA, Anwar F (2011) Effects of extraction techniques on phenolic components and antioxidant activity of Mengkudu (Morinda citrifolia L.) leaf extracts. J Med Plants Res 5(20):5050–5057Google Scholar
  24. Periyanayagam K, Jagadeesan M, Kavimani S, Vetriselvan T (2012) Pharmacognostical and phyto-physicochemical profile of the leaves of Piper betle L. var Pachaikodi (Piperaceae)—valuable assessment of its quality. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed 2(2):S506–S510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pham-Huy LA, He H, Pham-Huy C (2008) Free radicals, antioxidants in disease and health. Int J Biomed Sci 492:89–96Google Scholar
  26. Pin KY, Luqman CA, Abdull RA, Mazura MP, Fadzureena J, Vimala S, Rasadah MA (2010) Antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities of Extracts of betel leaves (Piper betle) from solvents with different polarities. J Trop For Sci 22:448–455Google Scholar
  27. Priyanga S, Hemmalakshmi S, Sowmya S, Vidya B, Chella Perumal P, Gopalakrishnan VK, Devaki K (2015) In vitro enzyme inhibitory evaluation and free radical scavenging potential of ethanolic leaf extract of Macrotyloma uniflorum (L.). Int J Curr Pharm Rev Res 6:169–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rai MP, Thilakchand KR, Palatty PL, Rao P, Rao S, Bhat HP, Baliga MS (2011) Piper betel Linn (betelvine), the maligned Southeast Asian medicinal plant possesses cancer preventive effects: time to reconsider the wronged opinion. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 12(9):2149–2156PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Ray A, Dash B, Sahoo S, Sahoo A, Jena A, Kar B, Chatterjee T, Ghosh B, Nayak S (2016) Development and validation of an HPTLC method for estimation of coronarin D in Hedychium coronarium rhizome. Acta Chromatogr.  https://doi.org/10.1556/1326.2017.29.3.11 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Re R, Pellegrini N, Proteggente A, Pannala A, Yang M, Rice-Evans C (1999) Antioxidant activity applying an improved ABTS radical cation decolorization assay. Free Radic Biol Med 26:1231–1237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Shetty S, Vijayalaxmi KK (2012) Phytochemical investigation of extract / solvent fractions of Piper nigrum Linn. Seeds and P.betle Linn. Leaves. Int J Pharma Bio Sci 3(2):344–349Google Scholar
  32. Shiban MS, Al-Otaibi MM, Al-zoreky NS (2012) Antioxidant Activity of Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) Fruit Peels. Food Nutr Sci 3(7):991–996Google Scholar
  33. Shulammithi R, Sharanya M, Tejaswini R, Kiranmai M (2016) Standardization and quality evaluation of herbal drugs. J Pharm Bio Sci 11(5):89–100Google Scholar
  34. Vanin AB, Orlando T, Piazza SP, Puton BM, Cansian RL, Oliveira D, Paroul N (2014) Antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of clove essential oil and eugenyl acetate produced by enzymatic esterification. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 174:1286.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-014-1113-x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Xia T, Shi S, Wan X (2006) Impact of ultrasonic-assisted extraction on the chemical and sensory quality of tea infusion. J Food Eng 74:557–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Suryasnata Das
    • 1
  • Asit Ray
    • 1
  • Noohi Nasim
    • 1
  • Sanghamitra Nayak
    • 1
  • Sujata Mohanty
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Centre for Biotechnology, School of Pharmaceutical SciencesSiksha ‘O’ Anusandhan (Deemed to be University)BhubaneswarIndia
  2. 2.PG Department of BiotechnologyRama Devi Women’s UniversityBhubaneswarIndia

Personalised recommendations