Advertisement

3 Biotech

, 9:20 | Cite as

Transcriptomic analysis of the red and green light responses in Columba livia domestica

  • Ying Wang
  • Haiming YangEmail author
  • Chen Zi
  • Zhiyue Wang
Original Article

Abstract

In this study, 108 paired White King pigeons, randomly divided into three compartments were exposed to green light, red light, and white light followed by 15 h of light exposure, for a 6-month period. Three female birds from each group were selected and ovarian stromal tissue was collected. Pigeon reproductive data were also recorded every day. We performed transcriptome assembly on several tissue samples using Illumina Hiseq 2000 and analyzed differentially expressed genes involving follicle development mechanisms. Reproductive data confirmed that exposure to red and green lights improved pigeon reproduction. In total, approximately 158,080 unigenes with an average length of 753 bp were obtained using the Trinity program. Gene ontology, clusters of orthologous groups, and the Kyoto encyclopedia of genes were used to annotate and classify these unigenes. Large numbers of differentially expressed genes were discovered through pairwise comparisons between groups treated with monochromatic light versus white light. Some of these genes are associated with steroid hormone biosynthesis, cell cycle and circadian rhythm. Furthermore, qRT-PCR was used to detect the relative expression levels of randomly selected genes. A total of 17,419 potential simple sequence repeats were also identified. Our study provides insights into potential molecular mechanisms and genes that regulate pigeon reproduction in response to monochromatic light exposure. Our results and data will facilitate a further investigation into the molecular mechanisms behind the effects of red and green lights on follicle development and reproduction in the pigeon.

Keywords

Green light Pigeons Red light Reproduction Transcriptome assembly 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the National Science Foundation for Young Scientists of China (Grant No. 31702155) and the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD; Jiangsu, China).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary material

13205_2018_1551_MOESM1_ESM.doc (348 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 348 KB)

References

  1. Benjamini Y, Yekutieli D (2011) The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency. Ann Stat 1165–1188Google Scholar
  2. Birrenkott GP, Shoop MA, Cooper K, Wiggins M (1988) Research note: ovarian follicular growth and maturation in the domestic pigeon and guinea fowl (Numida meleagris). Poult Sci 67:1783–1786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bu Z, Xie P, Fu SY, Tong HB, Dai X (2015) Effect of energy and protein levels on performance, egg quality, and nutrient digestibility of laying pigeons. J Appl Poult Res 24:371–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cai Z, Jiang X, Pan Y, Chen L, Zhang L, Zhu K, Chen M (2015) Transcriptomic analysis of hepatic responses to testosterone deficiency in miniature pigs fed a high-cholesterol diet. BMC Genom 16:59–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Case JP, Laude JR, Zentall TR (2015) Delayed matching to sample in pigeons: effects of delay of reinforcement and illuminated delays. Learn Motiv 49:51–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Casey JM, Harrison PC, Latshaw JD, Mcginnis J (1969) Effects of photoperiod and colored lights on the sexual maturity of domestic fowl. Poult Sci 48:1794Google Scholar
  7. Cave NA (1990) Effects of feeding level during pullet-layer transition and of pretransition lighting on performance of broiler breeders. Poult Sci 69:1141–1146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cobrinik D (2005) Pocket proteins and cell cycle control. Oncogene 24:2796–2809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Conesa A, Götz S, García-Gómez JM, Terol J, Talón M, Robles M (2005) Blast2GO: a universal tool for annotation, visualization and analysis in functional genomics research. Bioinformatics 21:3674–3676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Drummond AE (2005) TGFβ signalling in the development of ovarian function. Cell Tissue Res 322:107–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Emmerton J, Delhis JD (1980) Wavelength discrimination in the ‘visible’ and ultraviolet spectrum by pigeons. J Comp Physio 141:47–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Forde N, Carter F, Fair T, Crowe MA, Evans AC, Spencer TE et al (2009) Progesterone-regulated changes in endometrial gene expression contribute to advanced conceptus development in cattle. Biol Reprod 81:784–794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Foss DC, White JL (1983) Early sexual maturity of brown-egg pullets cage-grown in narrow-band light with high nutrient density diets. Poult Sci 62:1424Google Scholar
  14. Gongruttananun N (2011) Influence of red light on reproductive performance, eggshell ultrastructure, and eye morphology in Thai-native hens. Poult Sci 90:2855–2863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Grabherr MG, Haas BJ, Yassour M, Levin JZ, Thompson DA, Amit I et al (2011) Trinity: reconstructing a full-length transcriptome without a genome from RNA-Seq data. Nat Biotechnol 29:644–652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Halevy O, Piestun Y, Rozenboim I, Yablonka-Reuveni Z (2006) In ovo exposure to monochromatic green light promotes skeletal muscle cell proliferation and affects myofiber growth in posthatch chicks. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 290:1062–1070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hansen EW (1966) Squab-induced crop growth in ring dove foster parents. J Comp Physiol Psychol 62:120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Harrison P, McGinnis J, Schumaier G, Lauber J (1969) Sexual maturity and subsequent reproductive performance of White Leghorn chickens subjected to different parts of the light spectrum. Poult Sci 48:878–883CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hartwig HG, Van VT (1979) Spectral characteristics of visible radiation penetrating into the brain and stimulating extraretinal photoreceptors. J Comp Physiol 130:277–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hou ST, Xie X, Baggley A, Park DS, Chen G, Walker T (2002) Activation of the Rb/E2F1 pathway by the nonproliferative p38 MAPK during Fas (APO1/CD95)- mediated neuronal apoptosis. J Biol Chem 277:48764–48770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Huang LH, Li JL, Wang SR (1998) Glutamatergic neurotransmission from the optic tectum to the contralateral nucleus rotundus in pigeons. Brain Behav Evol 52:55–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jones JE, Hughes BL, Thurston RJ, Hess RA, Froman DP (1982) The effect of red and white light during the prebreeder and breeder periods on egg production and feed consumption in Large White turkeys. Poult Sci 61:1930–1932CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kanehisa M, Araki M, Goto S, Hattori M, Hirakawa M, Itoh M et al (2008) KEGG for linking genomes to life and the environment. Nucl Acids Res 36:480–484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Khargharia G, Goswin RN, Das D (2003) Performance of domestic pigeon of Assam in respect of some traits of reproduction. Indian Vet J 80:163–165Google Scholar
  25. Langmead B, Salzberg SL (2012) Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie2. Nat methods 9:357–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lewis PD, Morris TR (2000) Poultry and coloured light. Worlds Poult Sci J 56:189–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lewis PD, Caston L, Leeson S (2007) Green light during rearing does not significantly affect the performance of egg-type pullets in the laying phase. Poult Sci 86:739–743CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Liu L, Li D, Gilbert ER, Xiao Q, Zhao X, Wang Y, Zhu Q (2015) Effect of monochromatic light on expression of estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) in ovarian follicles of chicken. PLoS ONE 10:e0144102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2– ∆∆CT method. Methods 25:402–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ma P, Pan H, Montgomery RL, Olson EN, Schultz RM (2012) Compensatory functions of histone deacetylase 1 (HDAC1) and HDAC2 regulate transcription and apoptosis during mouse oocyte development. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109:481–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Martin J, Bruno VM, Fang Z, Meng X, Blow M, Zhang T et al (2010) Rnnotator: an automated transcriptome assembly pipeline from stranded RNA-Seq reads. BMC Genom 11:663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Michael AE, Thurston LM, Rae MT (2003) Glucocorticoid metabolism and reproduction: a tale of two enzymes. Reproduction 126:425–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Moore RK, Shimasaki S (2005) Molecular biology and physiological role of the oocyte factor, BMP-15. Mol Cell Endocrinol 234:67–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mortazavi A, Williams BA, McCue K, Schaeffer L, Wold B (2008) Mapping and quantifying mammalian transcriptomes by RNA-SEq. Nat methods 5:621–628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nagashima T, Li Q, Clementi C, Lydon JP, DeMayo FJ, Matzuk MM (2013) BMPR2 is required for postimplantation uterine function and pregnancy maintenance. J Clin Invest 123:2539–2550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nicholas G, Paul EH (2002) Central and peripheral circadian oscillator mechanisms in flies and manmmals. J Cell Sci 115:3369–3377Google Scholar
  37. Oakley AE, Breen KM, Clarke IJ, Karsch FJ, Wagenmaker ER, Tilbrook AJ (2009) Cortisol reduces gonadotropin-releasing hormone pulse frequency in follicular phase ewes: influence of ovarian steroids. Endocrinology 150:341–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pertea G, Huang X, Liang F, Valentin A, Sultana R, Karamycheva S et al (2003) TIGR Gene Indices clustering tools (TGICL): a software system for fast clustering of large EST datasets. Bioinformatics 19:651–652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pomianowski JF, Mikulski D, Pudyszak K, Cooper RG, Angowski M, Jóźwik A et al (2009) Chemical composition, cholesterol content, and fatty acid profile of pigeon meat as influenced by meat-type breeds. Poult Sci 88:1306–1309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Prescott NB, Wathes CM (1999) Spectral sensitivity of the domestic fowl (Gallus g. domesticus). Br Poult Sci 40:332–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rosenkranz R, Borodina T, Lehrach H, Himmelbauer H (2008) Characterizing the mouse ES cell transcriptome with Illumina sequencing. Genomics 92:187–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sanderson JT (2006) The steroid hormone biosynthesis pathway as a target for endocrine-disrupting chemicals. Toxicol Sci 94:3–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sharma PC, Grover A, Kahl G (2007) Mining microsatellites in eukaryotic genomes. Trends Biotechnol 25:490–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Shimasaki S, Moore RK, Erickson GF, Otsuka F (2002) The role of bone morphogenetic proteins in ovarian function. Reprod Suppl 61:323–337Google Scholar
  45. Silver R (1984) Prolactin and parenting in the pigeon family. J Exp Zool 232:617–625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Simmons RM, Satterfield MC, Welsh TH, Bazer FW, Spencer TE (2010) HSD11B1, HSD11B2, PTGS2, and NR3C1 expression in the peri-implantation ovine uterus: effects of pregnancy, progesterone, and interferon tau. Biol Reprod 82:35–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Simpson ER, Mahendroo MS, Means GD, Kilgore MW, Hinshelwood MM, Graham-Lorence S et al (1994) Aromatase cytochrome P450, the enzyme responsible for estrogen biosynthesis. Endocr Rev 15:342–355PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Teaniniuraitemoana V, Huvet A, Levy P, Klopp C, Lhuillier E, Gaertner-Mazouni N et al (2014) Gonad transcriptome analysis of pearl oyster Pinctada margaritifera: identification of potential sex differentiation and sex determining genes. BMC Genom 15:491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tsuchiya Y, Nakajima M, Yokoi T (2005) Cytochrome P450-mediated metabolism of estrogens and its regulation in human. Cancer Lett 227:115–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Vandeputte PJ, Van GG (1967) L’evolution postembryonnaire du poids du pigeon domestique. Z Vgl Physiol 54:423–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wang L, Feng Z, Wang X, Wang X, Zhang X (2010) DEGseq: an R package for identifying differentially expressed genes from RNA-seq data. Bioinformatics 26:136–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wang Y, Ding JT, Yang HM, Cao W, Li YB (2015) The effect of new monochromatic light regimes on egg production and expression of the circadian gene BMAL1 in pigeons. Poult Sci 94:836–840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Westerhof I, Mol JA, Van den Brom WE, Lumeij JT, Rijnberk A (1994) Diurnal rhythms of plasma corticosterone concentrations in racing pigeons (Columba livia domestica) exposed to different light regimens, and the influence of frequent blood sampling. Avian Dis 38:428–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wilting RH, Yanover E, Heideman MR, Jacobs H, Horner J, Van der Torre J et al (2010) Overlapping functions of Hdac1 and Hdac2 in cell cycle regulation and haematopoiesis. EMBO J 29:2586–2597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wozney JM, Rosen V, Celeste AJ, Mitsock LM, Whitters MJ, Kriz RW et al (1988) Novel regulators of bone formation: molecular clones and activities. Science 242:1528–1534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wu L, Timmers C, Maiti B, Saavedra HI, Sang L, Chong GT et al (2001) The E2F1-3 transcription factors are essential for cellular proliferation. Nature 414:457–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Xiao Q, Frost BJ (2009) Looming responses of telencephalic neurons in the pigeon are modulated by optic flow. Brain Res 21305:40–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Yamada H, Oshima I, Sato K, Ebihara S (1988) Loss of the circadian rhythms of locomotor activity, food intake, and plasma melatonin concentration induced by constant bright light in the pigeon (Columba livia). J Comp Physiol A 163:459–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Yan C, Wang P, DeMayo J, DeMayo FJ, Elvin JA, Carino C et al (2001) Synergistic roles of bone morphogenetic protein 15 and growth differentiation factor 9 in ovarian function. Mol Endocrinol 15:854–866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Yang X, Downes M, Ruth TY, Bookout AL, He WM, Straume M et al (2006) Nuclear receptor expression links the circadian clock to metabolism. Cell 126:801–810CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Zhang Y, Woodford N, Xia X, Hamburger AW (2003) Repression of E2F1-mediated transcription by the ErbB3 binding protein Ebp1 involves histone deacetylases. Nucl Acids Res 31:2168–2177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Zhao QY, Wang Y, Kong YM, Da L, Li X, Hao P (2011) Optimizing de novo transcriptome assembly from short-read RNA-Seq data: a comparative study. BMC Bioinform 12:S2CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Animal Science and TechnologyYangzhou UniversityYangzhouChina
  2. 2.Department of PathologyLinyi People’s HospitalLinyiChina

Personalised recommendations