Advertisement

3 Biotech

, 8:396 | Cite as

Enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulosic materials using synthetic mixtures of purified cellulases bioengineered at N-glycosylation sites

  • Anna Dotsenko
  • Alexander Gusakov
  • Aleksandra Rozhkova
  • Olga Sinitsyna
  • Igor Shashkov
  • Arkady Sinitsyn
Original Article
  • 66 Downloads

Abstract

Mutant forms of recombinant endoglucanase II (EG II, N194A), cellobiohydrolase I (CBH I, N45A) and cellobiohydrolase II (CBH II, N219A) from Penicillium verruculosum with enhanced cellulase activities, achieved by engineering of enzyme N-glycosylation sites in our previous studies, were used as components of the binary and ternary mixtures of cellulases in hydrolysis of Avicel and milled aspen wood. Using the engineered forms of the enzymes at a dosage of 10 mg/g substrate resulted in significant boosting of the glucose release from cellulose in the presence of excess β-glucosidase relative to the performance of the corresponding wild-type mixtures at the same loading. The boosting effects reached 11–40% depending on the reaction time and substrate type. In hydrolysis of both cellulosic substrates by the binary mixtures of cellulases, all the enzyme pairs exhibited synergism. The magnitude of the synergistic effects (Ks) did not depend notably upon the induced mutations in the enzymes, and they were in the range of 1.3–1.8 for the combinations of EG II with CBH I (or CBH II), and 2.3–2.9 for the CBH I–CBH II pair. The results of this study should provide a basis for the development of a more effective fungal strain capable of producing cellulase cocktails with enhanced hydrolytic performance against lignocellulosic materials.

Keywords

Cellulase Protein engineering N-glycosylation Enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose Boosting effect Synergism 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Russian Science Foundation (Grant No. 16-14-00163).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Adney WS, Jeoh T, Beckham GT, Chou YC, Baker JO, Michener W, Brunecky R, Himmel ME (2009) Probing the role of N-linked glycans in the stability and activity of fungal cellobiohydrolases by mutational analysis. Cellulose 16:699–709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Billard H, Faraj A, Ferreira NL, Menir S, Heiss-Blanquet S (2012) Optimization of a synthetic mixture composed of major Trichoderma reesei enzymes for the hydrolysis of steam-exploded wheat straw. Biotechnol Biofuels 5:9CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Boisset C, Pétrequin C, Chanzy H, Henrissat B, Schülein M (2001) Optimized mixtures of recombinant Humicola insolens cellulases for the biodegradation of crystalline cellulose. Biotechnol Bioeng 72:339–345CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bommarius AS, Sohn M, Kang Y, Lee JH, Realff MJ (2014) Protein engineering of cellulases. Curr Opin Biotechnol 29:139–145CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. dos Santos LV, de Barros Grassi MC, Gallardo JCM, Pirolla RAS, Calderón LL, de Carvalho-Netto OV, Parreiras LS, Camargo ELO, Drezza AL, Missawa SK, Teixeira GS, Lunardi I, Bressiani J, Pereira GAG (2016) Second-generation ethanol: the need is becoming a reality. Ind Biotechnol 12:40–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dotsenko AS, Gusakov AV, Volkov PV, Rozhkova AM, Sinitsyn AP (2016a) N-Linked glycosylation of recombinant cellobiohydrolase I (Cel7A) from Penicillium verruculosum and its effect on the enzyme activity. Biotechnol Bioeng 113:283–291CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Dotsenko AS, Gusakov AV, Rozhkova AM, Sinitsyna OA, Nemashkalov VA, Sinitsyn AP (2016b) Effect of N-linked glycosylation on the activity and other properties of recombinant endoglucanase IIa (Cel5A) from Penicillium verruculosum. Protein Eng Des Sel 29:495–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fox JM, Jess P, Jambusaria RB, Moo GM, Liphardt J, Clark DS, Blanch HW (2013) A single-molecule analysis reveals morphological targets for cellulase synergy. Nature Chem Biol 9:356–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gusakov AV (2013) Cellulases and hemicellulases in the 21st century race for cellulosic ethanol. Biofuels 4:567–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gusakov AV, Salanovich TN, Antonov AI, Ustinov BB, Okunev ON, Burlingame R, Emalfarb M, Baez M, Sinitsyn AP (2007) Design of highly efficient cellulase mixtures for enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose. Biotechnol Bioeng 97:1028–1038CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Gusakov AV, Dotsenko AS, Rozhkova AM, Sinitsyn AP (2017) N-Linked glycans are an important component of the processive machinery of cellobiohydrolases. Biochimie 132:102–108CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Igarashi K, Uchihashi T, Koivula A, Wada M, Kimura S, Okamoto T, Penttilä M, Ando T, Samejima M (2011) Traffic jams reduce hydrolytic efficiency of cellulase on cellulose surface. Science 333:1279–1282CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Korotkova OG, Semenova MV, Morozova VV, Zorov IN, Sokolova LM, Bubnova TM, Okunev ON, Sinitsyn AP (2009) Isolation and properties of fungal β-glucosidases. Biochemistry 74:569–577PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Morozova VV, Gusakov AV, Andrianov RM, Pravilnikov AG, Osipov DO, Sinitsyn AP (2010) Cellulases of Penicillium verruculosum. Biotechnol J 5:871–880CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Payne CM, Knott BC, Mayes HB, Hansson H, Himmel ME, Sandgren M, Ståhlberg J, Beckham GT (2015) Fungal cellulases. Chem Rev 115:1308–1448CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Peterson GL (1979) Review of the Folin phenol protein quantitation method of Lowry, Rosebrough, Farr and Randall. Anal Biochem 100:201–220CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Proskurina OV, Korotkova OG, Rozhkova AM, Matys VY, Koshelev AV, Okunev ON, Nemashkalov VA, Sinitsyna OA, Sinitsyn AP (2013) Application of the “fusion” approach for the production of highly efficient biocatalysts based on recombinant strains of the fungus Penicillium verruculosum for the conversion of cellulose-containing biomass. Catal Ind 5:327–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sinitsyn AP, Gusakov AV, Vlasenko EY (1991) Effect of structural and physico-chemical features of cellulosic substrates on the efficiency of enzymatic hydrolysis. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 30:43–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sinitsyn AP, Korotkova OG, Sinitsyna OA, Rozhkova AM, Dotsenko GS, Proskurina OV, Osipov DO, Kondrat’eva EG, Chekushina AV (2016) Optimizing the composition of cellulase enzyme complex from Penicillium verruculosum: enhancing hydrolytic capabilities via genetic engineering. Catal Ind 8:101–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Trudeau DL, Lee TA, Arnold FH (2014) Engineered thermostable fungal cellulases exhibit efficient synergistic cellulose hydrolysis at elevated temperatures. Biotechnol Bioeng 111:2390–2397CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. van Dyk JS, Pletschke BI (2012) A review of lignocellulose bioconversion using enzymatic hydrolysis and synergistic cooperation between enzymes—factors affecting enzymes, conversion and synergy. Biotechnol Adv 30:1458–1480CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Volkov PV, Rozhkova AM, Gusakov AV, Sinitsyn AP (2014) Homologous cloning, purification and characterization of highly active cellobiohydrolase I (Cel7A) from Penicillium canescens. Prot Expr Purif 103:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Federal Research Centre “Fundamentals of Biotechnology” of the Russian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia
  2. 2.Department of ChemistryM.V. Lomonosov Moscow State UniversityMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations