Optimization of culture conditions for mass production and bio-formulation of Trichoderma using response surface methodology
- 72 Downloads
Use of agro-waste for production of value added products is a good alternative for developing low-cost carriers for formulation of Trichoderma-based bio-products. It provides avenues for safe utilization of wastes, while reducing cost and environment pollution load of waste disposal. The present study was undertaken to find suitable agro-waste for economical and higher mass production of Trichoderma lixii TvR1 under solid-state fermentation, optimizing culture conditions using mathematical model and assessing effect of formulated bio-product on growth of Spinach (Spinacia oleracea). Among various agro-wastes screened, sugarcane bagasse was observed to support maximum growth (20.08 × 107 spores/g) of T. lixii TvR1 which was significantly (p ≤ 0.05) higher than the others. The Response Surface Methodology (RSM) was used to optimize culture conditions using optimal point prediction analysis which predicted that maximum spore production of T. lixii TvR1 (19.1245 × 107 spores/g) will be obtained at 30 °C and 68.87% of moisture content after 31 days of incubation. Amendment of formulated bio-product of T. lixii TvR1 in soil at concentration 15% w/w promoted biomass, photosynthetic pigments, and protein content of spinach (significant at p ≤ 0.05). After 6 weeks of sowing the shoot length, root length, and photosynthetic pigments of plants irrigated daily and on alternate days were reported to be increased by 66.97, 185.03, and 82.80%; and 56.56, 71.36, and 74.64%, respectively; over the no amendment.
KeywordsAgro-waste Sub-optimal irrigation Trichoderma Optimal point prediction analysis Photosynthetic pigments
Authors gratefully acknowledge University Grant Commission, New Delhi, India for providing UGC Major Research Project; MRP-MAJOR-ENV-2013-11912 and UGC-Senior Research Fellowship grant to Swati Sachdev.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
There is no conflict of interest.
- Bae H, Sicher RC, Kim MS, Kim SH, Strem MD, Melnick RL, Bailey BA (2009) The beneficial endophyte Trichoderma hamatum isolate DIS 219b promotes growth and delays the onset of the drought response in Theobroma cacao. J Exp Bot 60:3279–3295. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erp165 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Contreras-Cornejo HA, Macias-Rodriguez L, Cortes-Penagos C, Lopez-Bucio J (2009) Trichoderma virens, a plant beneficial fungus, enhances biomass production and promotes lateral root growth through an auxin-dependent mechanism in arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 149:1579–1592. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.108.130369 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Eltem R, Sayit S, Sozer S, Sukan FV (2017) Production of Trichoderma citrinoviride micropropagules as a biocontrol agent by means of an economical process. US Patent 9551012Google Scholar
- Garnica-Vergara A, Barrera-Ortiz S, Munoz-Parra E, Raya-Gonzalez J, Mendez-Bravo A, Macias-Rodriguez L, Ruiz-Herrera LF, López-Bucio J (2015) The volatile 6-pentyl-2H-pyran-2-one from Trichoderma atroviride regulates Arabidopsis thaliana root morphogenesis via auxin signaling and ethylene insensitive 2 functioning. N Phytol 209:1496–1512. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13725 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hyder S, Inam-ul-Haq MD, Bibi S, Malik AH, Ghuffar S, Iqbal S (2017) Novel potential of Trichoderma spp. as biocontrol agent. J Entomol Zool Stud 5(4):214–222Google Scholar
- Lowry OH, Rosembrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ (1951) Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem 193(1):265–275Google Scholar
- Mohiddin FA, Bashir I, Padder SA, Hamid B (2017) Evaluation of different substrates for mass multiplication of Trichoderma species. J Pharmacogn Phytochem 6(6):563–569Google Scholar
- Pang PK, Darah I, Poppe L, Szakacs G, Ibrahim CO (2006) Xylanase production by a local isolate, Trichoderma spp. FETL c3-2 via solid state fermentation using agricultural wastes as substrates. Malays J Microbiol 2(1):7–14Google Scholar
- Rajput AQ, Shahzad S (2015) Growth and sporulation of Trichoderma polysporum on organic substrate by addition of carbon and nitrogen sources. Pak J Bot 47(3):979–986Google Scholar
- Rama SS, Singh HV, Singh P, Kaur J (2001) A comparison of different substrates for the mass production of Trichoderma. Ann Pl Protec Sci 9(2):248–253Google Scholar
- Rini CR, Sulochana KK (2007) Substrate evaluation for multiplication of Trichoderma spp. J Trop Agric 45(1–2):58–60Google Scholar
- Shahid M, Singh A, Srivastava M, Mishra RP, Biswas SK (2011) Effect of temperature, pH and media for growth and sporulation of Trichoderma longibrachiatum and self life study in carrier based formulations. Ann Pl Protec Sci 19(1):147–149Google Scholar
- Shamshad A, Vinayak VP, Richa K, Ashwani K, Suresh BNK (2018) Optimization of nutrient stress using C. pyrenoidosa for lipid and biodiesel production in integration with remediation in dairy industry wastewater using response surface methodology. 3 Biotech 8:326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-018-1342-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Shoresh M (2010) Induced systemic resistance and plant responses to fungal biocontrol agents. Annu Rev Phytopathol 48:21–43. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-phyto-073009-114450 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Siddhartha NS, Amara KV, Ramya Mol KA, Saju KA, Harsha KN, Sharanappa P, Kumar KP (2017) Evaluation of substrates for mass production of Trichoderma harzianum and its compatibility with Chlorpyrifos + Cypermethrin. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci 6(8):3628–3635. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.608.437 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Tewari L, Bhanu C (2004) Evaluation of agro-industrial waste for conidia based inoculum production of biocontrol agent: Trichoderma harzianum. J Sci Ind Res 63:807–812Google Scholar