A new observation on feeding behaviour of pink bollworm and its application in screening Bt-resistant population
- 87 Downloads
The pink bollworm (PBW), Pectinophora gossypiella (Saund.) does not feed on leaves in natural circumstances. We made an attempt with the first instar larva (5 days old) and found it eats the leaf in the absence of other foods. Utilizing this new feeding behaviour, a simple methodology was developed for screening of resistance in PBW against Bt cotton plants. The PBW collected from BGII Bt cotton fields (BGII-resistant population) and NBAIR culture (susceptible population) were reared under laboratory conditions for two generations. Laboratory reared 5-day old larvae of PBW were released on cotton leaf discs individually for screening. The BGII-resistant and susceptible larvae fed an average leaf area of 75.52 ± 16.68 and 5.95 ± 0.93 mm2 with survival rate of 90 and 4% respectively, in BGII Bt cotton leaves. Whereas in case of non-Bt cotton (MCU13), the BGII-resistant and susceptible larvae consumed average leaf area of 114.84 ± 23.70 and 116.80 ± 24.14 mm2 with survival rate of 93.34 and 95.33%, respectively. In addition to the screening process, the larval survivors were transferred to an artificial diet after 7 days of experiment and observed up to their emergence as adults. To confirm the development of resistance in PBW, sequencing of larval DNA amplicons was carried out and it revealed mutation in the cadherin gene of the BGII-resistant PBW population. Hence, the detached leaf bit feeding assay described here could be used in a simple manner for screening of resistance developed by PBW against Bt cotton and also for evaluating Bt cotton plants for their inherent resistance to PBW. This method could also be used for studying toxicity of Bt isolates by coating spore-crystal mixture on non-transgenic cotton leaf discs.
KeywordsPectinophora gossypiella Bioassay Resistance Bt cotton Cadherin
We thank Science and Engineering Research Board (SERB), Department of Science and Technology (DST), India, for sponsoring the National Post-Doctoral Fellowship (NPDF) to Dr. Reyaz Ahmad Lone (Fellowship reference no. PDF/2016/000399). We would like to thank Dr. A. Sitha Rama Sarma, Scientist (Entomology), Regional Agricultural Research Station (RARS), Nandyal, for his kind help during the collection of cotton bolls from Andhra Pradesh. We extend our sincere thanks to NBAIR, Bengaluru, India, for providing the pink bollworm culture maintained in their institution.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.
Supplementary material 2 (MP4 32475 KB)
- Caccia S, Hernandez-Rodriguez CS, Mahon RJ, Downes S, James W, Bautsoens N, Rie JV, Ferré J (2010) Binding site alteration is responsible for field-isolated resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis Cry2A insecticidal proteins in two Helicoverpa species. PLoS One 5:9975. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0009975 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Chapman AJ, Noble LW, Robertson OT, Fife LC, (1960) Survival of the pink bollworm under various cultural and climatic conditions. USDA Prod Res Rep 34:21Google Scholar
- Fabrick JA, Ponnuraj J, Singh A, Tanwar RK, Unnithan GC, Yelich AJ, Xianchun L, Carriere Y, Tabashnik BE (2014) Alternative splicing and highly variable cadherin transcripts associated with field-evolved resistance of pink bollworm to Bt cotton in India. PLoS One 9(5):e97900. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0097900 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Hall TA (1999) BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser 41:95–98Google Scholar
- ICAR-AICRP (Cotton) Annual Report (2016–17), ICAR—All India Coordinated Research Project on Cotton, Coimbatore-641 003, Tamil NaduGoogle Scholar
- ISAAA (2016) Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops: 2016. ISAAA Brief No. 52. ISAAA: IthacaGoogle Scholar
- Jackson RE, Bradley JR, Duyn JWV (2003) Field performance of transgenic cottons expressing one or two Bacillus thuringiensis endotoxins against bollworm, Helicoverpa zea (Boddie). J Cotton Sci 7:57–64Google Scholar
- Knowles BH, Ellar DJ (1987) Colloid-osmotic lysis is a general feature of the mechanism of action of Bacillus thuringiensis endotoxins with different insect specificity. Biochim Biophys Acta 924:507–518Google Scholar
- Kranthi (2015) Pink bollworm strikes Bt cotton. Cotton Stat News 35:1–6Google Scholar
- Monsanto (2010) Cotton in India. http://www.monsanto.com/newsviews/ Pages/india-pink-bollworm.aspx (subsequently revised to ‘‘Pink bollworm resistance to GM cotton in India’)
- Morin S, Biggs RW, Sisterson MS, Shriver L, Ellers-Kirk C, Higginson D, Holley D, Gahan LJ, Heckel DG, Carrière Y, Dennehy TJ, Brown JK, Tabashnik BE (2003) Three cadherin alleles associated with resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis in pink bollworm. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:5004–5009CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Singh AK, Paritosh K, Kant U, Burma PK, Pental D, (2016). High expression of Cry1Ac protein in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) by combining independent transgenic events that target the protein to cytoplasm and plastids. PLoS One. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158603 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar