Impact of geography on adaptation of Phyllanthus amarus seeds
The present study was aimed to evaluate adaptive mechanism in terms of seed characters of Phyllanthus amarus collected from ten different locations of Tamil Nadu, India. The adaptive variations among the collected populations were assessed based on the sink and float percentages of the seeds in water, the percentage of seed germination, total protein, carbohydrates and their seedling’s growth ability such as shoot and root lengths. From this, we observed that the population had a significantly higher germination percentage of sinking seeds that were attributed to its relatively higher carbohydrate and protein contents than the floating seeds. A comparison of the seed population by cluster analysis and principal coordinate analysis showed that the Chennai population constituted a single clade that was very distinct from the other nine populations, which were further grouped into two sub-clusters. They exhibited a trend consistent with their geographical proximity. Standardised Mantel’s t tests had revealed that the adaptive diversity of the P. amarus population was significantly affected by the geographic distance (r = 0.78, t = 2.68, P > 0.001), altitude (r = 0.35, t = 21.53, P > 0.05), minimum temperature (r = 0.43, t = 1.49, P > 0.01) and maximum temperature (r = 0.49, t = 1.67, P > 0.001). Seed’s characteristics and geographical conditions were correlated along with 19 bioclimatic variables. In dry season, the seedling’s rooting ability showed positive correlation, while its protein content exhibited a negative correlation. It is clearly evident from this study that the geographical variables significantly influence the adaptive ability of the P. amarus.
KeywordsPhyllanthus amarus Geographic variation Mantel’s t test PCoA analysis Population diversity
Our team would like to thank Mr. Sridhar, Mr. Lakshman and Mr. Ezkiel Raj for their help in the preparation of field bed to grow the Phyllanthus amarus seeds for ex situ studies. The first author is thankful to the land owners for giving details and permission to collect this plant, and we are also grateful to UGC-CPEPA, New Delhi, India, for providing financial support to carry out this work.
Conceived and designed the experiments: PP, SNK. Performed the experiments: SNK, MS. Analysed the data: EER, PR. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: GVB, EER, MS. Wrote the paper: SNK, PP.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The author declares that they have no conflict of interest in the publication.
- Engler R, Randin CF, Thuiller W, Dullinger S, Zimmermann NE, Araojo MB, Pearman PB, Lay GL, Piedallu C, Albert CH, Choler P, Coldea G, Lamo XD, Dirnbock T, Gegout JC, Garcia DG, Grytnes JA, Heegaard E, Hoistad F, Bravo DN, Normand S, Puscar M, Sebastia MT, Stanisci A, Theurillant JP, Trivedi MR, Vittoz P, Guisan A (2011) 21st century climate change threatens mountain flora unequally across Europe. Glob Chang Biol 17:2330–2341. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02393.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ghosh L, Singh L (2011) Variation in seed and seedling characters of Jatropha curcas L. with varying zones and provenances. Trop Ecol 52:113–122Google Scholar
- McCauley DE (1997) The relative contributions of seed and pollen movement to the local genetic structure of Silene alba. J Hered 88:257–263. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a023103 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rousset F (1997) Genetic differentiation and estimation of gene flow from F-statistics under isolation by distance. Genetics 145:1219–1228Google Scholar
- Sáenz-Romero C, Tapia-Olivares BL (2003) Pinus oocarpa isoenzymatic variation along an altitudinal gradient in Michoacán, México. Silvae Genet 52:237–240Google Scholar
- Sutherland WJ, Broad S, Caine J, Clout M, Dicks LV, Doran H, Entwistle AC, Fleishman E, Gibbons DW, Keim B, LeAnstey B, Lickorish FA, Markillie P, Monk AK, Mortimer D, Ockendon N, Pearce-Higgins PW, Peck LS, Pretty J, Rockström J, Spalding MD, Tonneijck FH, Wintle BC (2016) A horizon scan of global conservation issues for 2016. Trends Ecol Evol 31:44–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2015.11.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar