Advertisement

Mechanism of inhibition of graphene oxide/zinc oxide nanocomposite against wound infection causing pathogens

  • D. Prema
  • J. Prakash
  • S. Vignesh
  • Pandiyarasan Veluchamy
  • C. Ramachandran
  • Debashree Banita Samal
  • Deog-Hwan Oh
  • S. Sahabudeen
  • G. Devanand VenkatasubbuEmail author
Original Article
  • 9 Downloads

Abstract

Infection and colony formation by microbes has been a negative consequence in wound care. Graphene oxide (GO) has a large surface area and it is biocompatible. Zinc oxide (ZnO) exhibits antimicrobial activity against various infectious microbes. In GO/ZnO nanocomposite, ZnO nanoparticle is homogeneously supported on the GO sheet. It controls the infection in wound area and promotes angiogenesis. The synthesized nanocomposite was characterized using XRD, FTIR, Raman Spectroscopy, UV-DRS, FESEM with EDS, TEM and ICP-OES. Antibacterial activity was studied using the well diffusion method, growth curve, death kinetics, sensitivity coefficient, biofilm inhibition and colony counting method. Reactive oxygen species assay (ROS), lactate dehydrogenase leakage assay (LDH) and DNA fragmentation studies were done to analyze the mechanism of inhibition of nanocomposite against bacteria. A hemolytic study was done to confirm the blood biocompatibility of the nanocomposites. The mechanism of bacterial inhibition is by the production of ROS, loss of membrane integrity, not by DNA fragmentation. The nanocomposites enhanced its antibacterial activity in the presence of visible light compared to dark conditions.

Keywords

Graphene oxide LDH ROS DNA fragmentation Biofilm Hemolysis 

Notes

Acknowledgement

The authors D. Prema and G. Devanand Venkatasubbu would like to thank the Department of Physics and Nanotechnology, SRM Institute of Science and Technology for providing the necessary lab facilities. The authors would like to acknowledge SRM Institute of Science and Technology for providing Micro Raman facilities.

References

  1. Archana S, Kumar KY, Jayanna BK, Olivera S, Anand A, Prashanth MK, Muralidhara HB (2018) Versatile graphene oxide decorated by star shaped zinc oxide nanocomposites with superior adsorption capacity and antimicrobial activity. J Sci Adv Mater Devices 3(2):167–174.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsamd.2018.02.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baskar K, Anusuya T, Devanand Venkatasubbu G (2017) Mechanistic investigation on microbial toxicity of nano hydroxyapatite on implant associated pathogens. Mater Sci Eng, C 73:8–14.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2016.12.060 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beggs CB, Noakes CJ, Sleigh PA, Fletcher LA, Kerr KG (2006) Methodology for determining the susceptibility of airborne microorganisms to irradiation by an upper-room UVGI system. J Aerosol Sci 37(7):885–902.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2005.08.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bhaisare ML, Wu BS, Wu MC, Khan MS, Tsengb MH, Wu HF (2016) MALDI MS analysis, disk diffusion and optical density measurements for the antimicrobial effect of zinc oxide nanorods integrated in graphene oxide nanostructures. Biomater Sci 4(1):183–194.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c5bm00342c CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burlui V, Popa M, Cadinoiu AN, Stadoleanu C, Mihalache G, Zamaru V, Dartu L, Folescu E, Rata DM (2015) Physico-chemical characterization and in vitro hemolysis evaluation of titanium dioxide nanoparticles. Biomaterials 5(2):124–130Google Scholar
  6. Chen D, Wang D, Ge Q, Ping G, Fan M, Qin L, Bai L, Lv C, Shu K (2015) Graphene-wrapped ZnO nanospheres as a photocatalyst for high performance photocatalysis. Thin Solid Films 574:1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2014.11.051 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Devanand Venkatasubbu G, Anusuya T (2017) Investigation on curcumin nanocomposite for wound dressing. Int J Biol Macromol 98:366–378.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.02.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Devanand Venkatasubbu G, Baskar R, Anusuya T, Seshan CA, Chelliah R (2016) Toxicity mechanism of titanium dioxide and zinc oxide nanoparticles against food pathogens. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 148:600–606.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2016.09.042 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Devanand Venkatasubbu G, Nagamuthu S, Anusuya T, Kumar J, Chelliah R, Ramakrishnan SR, Antony U, Khan I, Deog-Hwan Oh (2018) TiO2 nanocomposite for the controlled release of drugs against Pathogens causing Wound Infections. Mater Res Express 5(2):024003.  https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/aaa936 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fani S, Kamalidehghan B, Lo KM, Hashim NM, Chow KM, Ahmadipour F (2015) Synthesis, structural characterization, and anticancer activity of a monobenzyltin compound against MCF-7 breast cancer cells. Drug Des Dev Ther 9:6191–6201.  https://doi.org/10.2147/dddt.s87064 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Faria AFD, Moraes ACMD, Marcato PD, Martinez DST, Duran N, Filho AGS, Brandelli A, Alves OL (2014) Eco-friendly decoration of graphene oxide with biogenic silver nanoparticles: antibacterial and antibiofilm activity. J Nanopart Res 16(2):2110.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-013-2110-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fu PP, Xia Q, Hwang HM, Ray PC, Yu H (2014) Mechanisms of nanotoxicity: generation of reactive oxygen species. J Food Drug Anal 22(1):64–75.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfda.2014.01.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hosseini SA, Babaei S (2017) Graphene oxide/zinc oxide (GO/ZnO) nanocomposite as a superior photocatalyst for degradation of methylene blue (MB)-process modeling by response surface methodology (RSM). J Braz Chem Soc 28:299–307.  https://doi.org/10.5935/0103-5053.20160176 Google Scholar
  14. Huang K, Li YH, Lin S, Liang C, Wang H, Ye CX, Wang YJ, Zhang R, Fan DY, Yang HJ, Wang YG, Lei M (2014a) A facile route to reduced graphene oxide–zinc oxide nanorod composites with enhanced photocatalytic activity. Powder Technol 257:113–119.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2014.02.047 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Huang Y, Wang T, Zhao X, Wang X, Zhou L, Yang Y, Liao F, Ju Y (2014b) Poly(lactic acid)/graphene oxide–ZnO nanocomposite films with good mechanical, dynamic mechanical, anti-UV and antibacterial properties. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 90(9):1677–1684.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.4476 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jayabal P, Gayathri S, Sasirekha V, Mayandi J, Ramakrishnan V (2014) Preparation and characterization of ZnO/Graphene nanocomposite for improved photovoltaic performance. J Nanoparticle Res 16(11):12640.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-014-2640-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jayanti DN, Nugraheni AY, Kurniasari Baqiya MA, Darminto B (2017) Photoluminescence of reduced graphene oxide prepared from old coconut shell with carbonization process at varying temperatures. IOP Conf Series Mater Sci Eng 196:012005.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/196/1/012005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kaushik M, Niranjan R, Thangam R, Madhan B, Pandiyarasan V, Ramachandran C, Deog-Hwan Oh, Devanand Venkatasubbu G (2019) Investigation on the antimicrobial activity and wound healing potential of ZnO nanoparticles. Appl Surf Sci 479:1169–1177.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.02.189 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kavitha T, Gopalan AI, Lee KP, Park SY (2012) Glucose sensing, photocatalytic and antibacterial properties of graphene–ZnO nanoparticle hybrids. Carbon 50(8):2994–3000.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2012.02.082 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Khand MS, Abdelhamida HN, Hui-Fen Wu (2015) Near infrared (NIR) laser mediated surface activation of graphene oxide nanoflakes for efficient antibacterial, antifungal and wound healing treatment. Colloid Surf B Biointerfaces 127:281–291.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2014.12.049 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Liu Y, He L, Mustapha A, Li H, Hu ZQ, Lin M (2009) Antibacterial activities of zinc oxide nanoparticles against Escherichia coli O157:H7. J Appl Microbio 107:1193–1201.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04303.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Liu S, Cao S, Guo J, Luo L, Zhou Y, Lin C, Shi J, Fan C, Lv M, Wang L (2018) Graphene oxide-silver nanocomposites modulate the biofilm formation and extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) production. Nanoscale 10:19603–19611.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c8nr04064h CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Manikandan E, Kavitha G, Kennedy J (2014) Epitaxial zinc oxide, graphene oxide composite thin-films by laser technique for micro-Raman and enhanced field emission study. Ceram Int 40(10):16065–16070.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2014.07.129 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Moraes ACMD, Lima BA, Faria AFD, Brocchi M, Alves OL (2015) Graphene oxide-silver nanocomposite as a promising biocidal agent against methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Int J Nanomed 10:6847–6861.  https://doi.org/10.2147/ijn.s90660 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mu H, Tang JJ, Liu Q, Sun C, Wang T, Duan J (2016) Potent antibacterial nanoparticles against biofilm and intracellular bacteria. Sci Rep 6(1):18877.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep18877 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Padmanabhan A, Kaushik M, Niranjan R, Richards JS, Ebright B, Devanand Venkatasubbu G (2019) Zinc oxide nanoparticles induce oxidative and proteotoxic stress in ovarian cancer cells and trigger apoptosis independent of p53-mutation status. Appl Sur Sci 487:807–818.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.05.099 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Paula R, Gayenb RN, Biswasc S, Bhatd SV, Bhunia R (2016) Enhanced UV detection by transparent graphene oxide/ZnO composite thin films. RSC Adv 6(66):61661–61672.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c6ra05039e CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pereira MF, Silva-Neta AR, Farias AFF, Souza AG, Fonseca MG, Pontes LFBL, Santos IMG (2017) Pure and Al-doped ZnO obtained by the modified Pechini method applied in ethanolic transesterification of cotton seed oil. Ceramica 63:82–89.  https://doi.org/10.1590/0366-69132017633652066 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Prakash J, Venkatesan M, Bharath G, Anwer S, Pandiyarasan V, Prema D, Venkataprasanna KS, Devanand Venkatasubbu G (2019) Investigations on the in vivo toxicity analysis of reduced graphene oxide/TiO2 nanocomposite in zebrafish embryo and larvae (Danio rerio). Appl Surf Sci 481:1360–1369.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.03.287 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pulingam T, Thong KL, Ali MdE, Appaturi JN, Dinshaw IJ, Ong ZY, Leo BF (2019) Graphene oxide exhibits differential mechanistic action towards gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. Colloid Surf B Biointerfaces 181:6–15.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2019.05.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Raghupathi KR, Koodali RT, Manna AC (2011) Size-dependent bacterial growth inhibition and mechanism of antibacterial activity of zinc oxide nanoparticles. Langmuir 27(7):4020–4028.  https://doi.org/10.1021/la104825u CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rajaura RS, Sharma V, Ronin RS, Gupta DK, Srivastava S, Agrawal K, Vijay YK (2017) Synthesis, characterization and enhanced antimicrobial activity of reduced graphene oxide–zinc oxide nanocomposite. Mater Res Express 4(2):025401.  https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/aa5bff CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sawai J, Shiga H, Kojima H (2001) Kinetic analysis of death of bacteria in CaO powder slurry. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 47(1):23–26.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0964-8305(00)00115-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Seil JT, Webster TJ (2012) Antimicrobial applications of nanotechnology: methods and literature. Int J Nanomed 7:2767–2781.  https://doi.org/10.2147/ijn.s24805 Google Scholar
  35. Shareena TD, McShan D, Dasmahapatra AK, Tchounwou PB (2018) A review on graphene-based nanomaterials in biomedical applications and risks in environment and health. Nano-Micro Lett 10(3):53.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-018-0206-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Szunerits S, Boukherroub R (2016) Antibacterial activity of graphene-based materials. J Mater Chem B 4(43):6892–6912.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c6tb01647b CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tahira K, Ahmada A, Li B, Nazirb S, Khana AU, Nasirc T, Khand ZUH, Nazb R, Raza M (2016) Visible light photo catalytic inactivation of bacteria and photo degradation of methylene blue with Ag/TiO2 nanocomposite prepared by a novel method. J Photochem Photobiol B Biol 162:189–198.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2016.06.039 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tien HN, Luan VH, Hoa LT, Khoa NT, Hahn SH, Chung JS, Shin EW, Hur SH (2013) One-pot synthesis of a reduced graphene oxide–zinc oxide sphere composite and its use as a visible light photocatalyst. Chem Eng J 229:126–133.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2013.05.110 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wu X, Tan S, Xing Y, Pu Q, Wu M, Zhao JX (2017) Graphene Oxide as an Efficient Antimicrobial Nanomaterial for Eradicating Multi-Drug Resistant Bacteria in Vitro and in Vivo. Colloid Surf B Biointerfaces 157:1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2017.05.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Xie Y, He Y, Irwin PL, Jin T, Shi X (2011) Antibacterial Activity and Mechanism of Action of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles against Campylobacter jejuni. Appl Environ Microbiol 77(7):2325–2331.  https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.02149-10 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zhong L, Yun K (2015) Graphene oxide-modified ZnO particles: synthesis, characterization, and antibacterial properties. Int J Nanomed 10:79–92.  https://doi.org/10.2147/ijn.s88319 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. Prema
    • 1
  • J. Prakash
    • 1
  • S. Vignesh
    • 2
  • Pandiyarasan Veluchamy
    • 3
  • C. Ramachandran
    • 4
  • Debashree Banita Samal
    • 5
  • Deog-Hwan Oh
    • 4
  • S. Sahabudeen
    • 2
  • G. Devanand Venkatasubbu
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of NanotechnologySRM Institute of Science and TechnologyKattankulathurIndia
  2. 2.Department of BiotechnologySRM Institute of Science and TechnologyKattankulathurIndia
  3. 3.Department of Electronics and Communication EngineeringIndian Institute of Information Technology Design and ManufacturingKancheepuramIndia
  4. 4.Department of Food Science and Biotechnology, College of Biotechnology and BioscienceKangwon National University HyojaChuncheonSouth Korea
  5. 5.Department of MicrobiologyApollo Speciality HospitalChennaiIndia

Personalised recommendations