Advertisement

Interaction between islands in kinetic models of epitaxial growth of quantum dots

  • Ihor I. IzhninEmail author
  • Olena I. Fitsych
  • Alexander V. Voitsekhovskii
  • Andrey P. Kokhanenko
  • Kirill A. Lozovoy
  • Vladimir V. Dirko
Original Article
  • 4 Downloads

Abstract

In the present paper, for the first time, the influence of interactions between 3D islands during epitaxial growth of quantum dots by Stranski–Krastanov mechanism is considered in the frames of kinetic models. The contribution of interaction energy between nanoclusters into the free energy of the system in the process of islands formation is estimated. In this approximation, critical thickness of transition from 2D to 3D growth, surface density and size distribution function of quantum dots are calculated with the help of the original model. The results of the work show that considering the interactions between islands is essential for precise evaluation of characteristics of the ensemble of quantum dots. Moreover, it is shown that neglecting this contribution leads to the prediction of higher surface densities and smaller sizes of quantum dots, which is the traditional problem of theoretical models. Accounting for the new factor gives unexpected result for the dependence of surface density of islands on deposition rate. These results are of paramount importance from the point of view of device applications of quantum dot heterostructures.

Keywords

Molecular beam epitaxy Self-assembly Heterostructure Nanocluster Free energy Elastic interaction 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The reported study was funded by RFBR according to the research project No. 18-31-00001.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests 

References

  1. Aqua J-N, Berbezier I, Favre L (2013) Growth and self-organization of SiGe nanostructures. Phys Rep 522:59–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Dolbak AE, Olshanetsky BZ (2008) Effect of adsorbed Sn on Ge diffusivity on Si(111) surface. Central Eur J Phys 6:637Google Scholar
  3. Dubrovskii VG (2014) Nucleation theory and growth of nanostructures. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dubrovskii VG, Cirlin GE, Ustinov VM (2003) Kinetics of the initial stage of coherent island formation in heteroepitaxial systems. Phys Rev B 68:075409 (1–9)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dubrovskii VG, Sibirev NV, Zhang X, Suris RA (2010) Stress-driven nucleation of three-dimensional crystal islands: from quantum dots to nanoneedles. Cryst Growth Des 10:3949–3955CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Izhnin II, Fitsych OI, Voitsekhovskii AV, Kokhanenko AP, Lozovoy KA, Dirko VV (2018) Nanostructures with Ge–Si quantum dots for infrared photodetectors. Opto Electron Rev 26:195–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Li XL, Ouyang G, Yang GW (2008) A thermodynamic theory of the self-assembly of quantum dots. New J Phys. 10:043007 (1–14)Google Scholar
  8. Li XL, Wang CX, Yang GW (2014) Thermodynamic theory of growth of nanostructures. Prog Mater Sci 64:121–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Liu K, Berbezier I, David T, Favre L, Ronda A, Abbarchi M, Voorhees P, Aqua J-N (2017) Nucleation versus instability race in strained films. Phys Rev Mater 1:053402 (1–6)Google Scholar
  10. Lozovoy KA, Kokhanenko AP, Voitsekhovskii AV (2015) Generalized Muller–Kern formula for equilibrium thickness of a wetting layer with respect to the dependence of the surface energy of island facets on the thickness of the 2D layer. Phys Chem Chem Phys 17(44):30052–30056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lozovoy KA, Kokhanenko AP, Voitsekhovskii AV (2018a) Comparative analysis of germanium–silicon quantum dots formation on Si(100), Si(111) and Sn/Si(100) surfaces. Nanotechnology 29:054002 (1–7)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lozovoy KA, Kokhanenko AP, Voitsekhovskii AV (2018b) Critical thickness of transition from 2D to 3D growth and peculiarities of quantum dots formation in GexSi1−x/Sn/Si and Ge1−ySny/Si systems. Surf Sci 669:45–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Muller P, Kern R (1996) The physical origin of the two-dimensional towards three-dimensional coherent epitaxial Stranski–Krastanov transition. Appl Surf Sci 102:6–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Osipov AV, Kukushkin SA, Schmitt F, Hess P (2001) Kinetic model of coherent island formation in the case of self-limiting growth. Phys Rev B 64:205421 (1–6)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Osipov AV, Schmitt F, Kukushkin SA, Hess P (2002) Stress-driven nucleation of coherent islands: theory and experiment. Appl Surf Sci. 188:156–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ratsch C, Zangwill A (1993) Equilibrium theory of the Stranski–Krastanov epitaxial morphology. Surf Sci 293:123–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Retford CM, Asta M, Miksis MJ, Voorhees PW, Webb EB (2007) Energetics of {105}-faceted Ge nanowires on Si(001): an atomistic calculation of edge contributions. Phys Rev B 75:075311 (1–8)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Shchukin VA, Bimberg D (1999) Spontaneous ordering of nanostructures on crystal surfaces. Rev Mod Phys 71:1125–1171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Shchukin VA, Bimberg D, Munt TP, Jesson DE (2004) Elastic interaction and self-relaxation energies of coherently strained conical islands. Phys Rev B 70:085416 (1–10)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Wirths S, Buca D, Mantl S (2016) Si–Ge–Sn alloys: from growth to applications. Prog Cryst Growth Charact Mater 62:1–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Wu J, Chen S, Seeds A, Liu H (2015) Quantum dot optoelectronic devices: lasers, photodetectors and solar cells. J Phys D Appl Phys 48:363001 (1–28)Google Scholar
  22. Zaima S, Nakatsuka O, Taoka N, Kurosawa M, Takeuchi W, Sakashita M (2015) Growth and applications of GeSn-related group-IV semiconductor materials. Sci Technol Adv Mater 16:043502 (1–22)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Zhang X, Dubrovskii VG, Sibirev NV, Ren X (2011) Analytical study of elastic relaxation and plastic deformation in nanostructures on lattice mismatched substrates. Cryst Growth Des 11:5441–5448CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Scientific Research Company “Carat”LvivUkraine
  2. 2.National Research Tomsk State UniversityTomskRussia

Personalised recommendations