Advertisement

Optimization of the controllable crystal size of iron/zeolite nanocomposites using a Box–Behnken design and their catalytic activity

  • Nurazni Amat Bahari
  • Wan Nor Roslam Wan Isahak
  • Mohd Shahbudin Masdar
  • Muneer M. Ba-Abbad
Original Article
  • 6 Downloads

Abstract

Experimental conditions for the synthesis of an iron nanoparticle (NPs)–zeolite composite (hereinafter denoted as Fe/zeolite NPs) via sol–gel method were optimized using a Box–Behnken design to produce a high formic acid yield. The effects of various parameters, including weight ratio of starting materials (Fe and zeolite), volume of polyethylene glycol (PEG) as a surfactant, and calcination temperature, on controllable crystallite size, and the relationship between crystallite size and formic acid yield were studied. The crystal size, as the main parameter indicating formic acid yield, of Fe NPs was evaluated through polynomial regression. Results revealed that the optimum conditions for producing small Fe NPs based on the model were obtained at a weight ratio of Fe to zeolite of 62.5%, a PEG volume of 2 mL, and a calcination temperature of 500 °C. The experimental results (52.02 nm) versus the predicted results (58.30 nm) of the crystal size of Fe NPs under the optimum synthesis conditions were similar. Furthermore, 62.5% Fe/zeolite NPs with a crystal size of 52.02 nm produced the highest formic acid concentration from CO2 hydrogenation. Conversely, 100% Fe/zeolite NPs had a smaller crystal size but exhibited a remarkably lower reaction performance. This high ratio of Fe and zeolite contributed to the increased agglomeration of Fe particles. The zeolite surface became fully covered and subsequently reduced the reactant interaction on catalyst surfaces.

Highlights:

  • Fe–zeolite nanocomposite was optimized using a Box–Behnken design.

  • The polynomial regression model showed the optimum nanoparticle (NP) crystal size of 52.02 nm.

  • Synthesis parameters significantly affected catalyst morphology and crystal.

  • The effect of calcination plays an important role on crystal and particle size.

  • The influence of NP crystallite size was evaluated in terms of formic acid production.

Keywords

Box–Behnken design Fe/zeolite nanoparticles Optimization Carbon dioxide Formic acid 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM) and Ministry of Higher Education for funding this project under Research Grant, DIP-2016-010, and GUP-2016-057, respectively, and the Centre of Research and Innovation Management (CRIM) UKM for the use of the instruments.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Abdul Rahman NA, Mustaffa NA, Abdul Aziz ND, Badar N, Kamarulzaman N (2012) Synthesis and characterization of Fe2O3 prepared via sol–gel method. Adv Mater Res 545:410–413.  https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.545.410 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abu Amr SS, Abdul Aziz H, Bashir MJK (2014) Application of response surface methodology (RSM) for optimization of semi-aerobic landfill leachate treatment using ozone. Appl Water Sci 4:231–239.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-014-0156-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alagiri M, Abd Hamid SB (2014) Synthesis, characterization and photocatalytic application of α-Fe2O3 microflower. Mater Lett 136:329–332.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poly.2011.11.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alagiri M, Abdul Hamid SB (2015) Sol-gel synthesis of α-Fe2O3 nanoparticles and its photocatalytic application. J Sol Gel Sci Technol 74:783–789.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10971-015-3663-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Alkhatib MF, Mamun AA, Akbar I (2015) Application of response surface methodology (RSM) for optimization of color removal from POME by granular activated carbon. Int J Environ Sci Technol 12:1295–1302.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-014-0504-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ba-Abbad MM, Kadhum AAH, Mohamad AB, Takriff MS, Sopian K (2013) Optimization of process parameters using D-optimal design for synthesis of ZnO nanoparticles via sol–gel technique. J Ind Eng Chem 19:99–105.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2012.07.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ba-Abbad MM, Chai PV, Takriff MS, Benamor A, Mohammad AW (2015) Optimization of nickel oxide nanoparticle synthesis through the sol–gel method using Box–Behnken design. Mater Des 86:948–956.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2015.07.176 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ba-Abbad MM, Takriff MS, Benamor A, Mohammad AW (2016) Size and shape controlled of alpha-Fe2O3 nanoparticles prepared via sol–gel technique and their photocatalytic activity. J Sol Gel Sci Technol 1–14.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10971-016-4228-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ba-Abbad MM, Takriff MS, Benamor A, Mahmoudi E, Mohammad AW (2017) Arabic gum as green agent for ZnO nanoparticles synthesis: properties, mechanism and antibacterial activity. J Mater Sci Mater Electron 28:12100–12107.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-017-7023-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bueno-Ferrer C, Parres-Esclapez S, Lozano-Castelló D, Bueno-López A (2010) Relationship between surface area and crystal size of pure and doped cerium oxides. J Rare Earths 28:647–653.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0721(09)60172-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carter JL, Cusumano JA, Sinfelt JH (1966) Catalysis over supported metals. V. The effect of crystallite size on the catalytic activity of nickel. J Phys Chem 70:2257–2263.  https://doi.org/10.1021/j100879a029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chen SJ, Fu Y, Huang YX, Tao ZC, Zhu M (2016) Experimental investigation of CO2 separation by adsorption methods in natural gas purification. Appl Energy 179:329–337.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.06.146 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chiang CL, Lin KS, Chuang HW, Wu CM (2017) Conversion of hydrogen/carbon dioxide into formic acid and methanol over Cu/CuCr2O4 catalyst. Int J Hydrogen Energy.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.04.226 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chowdhury ZZ, Zain SM, Khan RA, Ahmad AA, Khalid K (2012) Application of response surface methodology (RSM) for optimizing production condition for removal of Pb (II) and Cu (II) onto Kenaf fiber based activated carbon. Appl Sci Eng Technol 4:458–465Google Scholar
  15. Danbaba N, Nkama I, Badau MH (2015) Application of response surface methodology (rsm) and central composite design (CCD) to optimize minerals composition of rice-cowpea composite blends during extrusion cooking. Int J Food Sci Nutr Eng 5:40–52.  https://doi.org/10.5923/j.food.20150501.06 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Darezereshki E, Bakhtiari F, Alizadeh M, Behrad vakylabad A, Ranjbar M (2012) Direct thermal decomposition synthesis and characterization of hematite (α-Fe2O3) nanoparticles. Mater Sci Semicond Process 15:91–97.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mssp.2011.09.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Díez-Ramírez J, Dorado F, de la Osa AR, Valverde JL, Sánchez P (2017) Hydrogenation of CO2 to methanol at atmospheric pressure over Cu/ZnO catalysts: influence of the calcination, reduction, and metal loading. Ind Eng Chem Res.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.6b04662 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dong Y, Chang Y, Wang Q, Tong J, Zhou J (2016) Effects of surfactants on size and structure of amylose nanoparticles prepared by precipitation. Bull Mater Sci 39:35–39.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12034-015-1115-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ferreira SLC, Bruns RE, Ferreira HS, Matos GD, David JM, Brandão GC, da Silva EGP, Portugal LA, dos Reis PS, Souza AS, dos Santos WNL (2007) Box–Behnken design: an alternative for the optimization of analytical methods. Anal Chim Acta 597:179–186.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2007.07.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gupta AK, Gupta M (2005) Synthesis and surface engineering of iron oxide nanoparticles for biomedical applications. Biomaterials 26:3995–4021.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.10.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hakim A, Marliza TS, Abu Tahari NM, Wan Isahak RWN, Yusop RM, Mohamed Hisham WM, Yarmo AM (2016) Studies on CO2 adsorption and desorption properties from various types of iron oxides (FeO, Fe2O3, and Fe3O4). Ind Eng Chem Res 55:7888–7897.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.5b04091 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Han L, Liu H, Wei Y (2011) In situ synthesis of hematite nanoparticles using a low-temperature microemulsion method. Powder Technol 207:42–46.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2010.10.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hu L, Percheron A, Chaumont D, Brachais CH (2011) Microwave-assisted one-step hydrothermal synthesis of pure iron oxide nanoparticles: magnetite, maghemite and hematite. J Sol Gel Sci Technol 60:198–205.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10971-011-2579-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jacob J, Khadar MA (2010) VSM and Mossbauer study of nanostructured hematite. J Magn Magn Mater 322:614–621.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2009.10.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jadhav VV, Patil SA, Shinde DV, Waghmare SD, Zate MK, Mane RS, Han SH (2013) Hematite nanostructures: morphology-mediated liquefied petroleum gas sensors. Sens Actuators B Chem 188:669–674.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2013.07.072 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jafarzadeh NK, Sharifnia S, Hosseini SN, Rahimpour F (2011) Statistical optimization of process conditions for photocatalytic degradation of phenol with immobilization of nano TiO2 on perlite granules. Korean J Chem Eng 28:531–538.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-010-0355-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kayan B, Gözmen B (2012) Degradation of Acid Red 274 using H2O2 in subcritical water: application of response surface methodology. J Hazard Mater 201–202:100–106.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.11.045 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kayani ZN, Afzal A, Butt MZ, Batool I, Arshad S, Ali Y, Riaz S, Naseem S (2015) Structural, optical and magnetic properties of iron oxide nano-particles. Mater Today Proc 2:5660–5663.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2015.11.105 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Körbahti BK, Rauf MA (2008) Application of response surface analysis to the photolytic degradation of Basic Red 2 dye. Chem Eng J 138:166–171.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2007.06.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lassoued A, Dkhil B, Gadri A, Ammar S (2017) Control of the shape and size of iron oxide (α-Fe2O3) nanoparticles synthesized through the chemical precipitation method. Results Phys 7:3007–3015.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2017.07.066 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Latempa TJ, Feng X, Paulose M, Grimes CA (2009) Temperature-dependent growth of self-assembled hematite (α-Fe2O3) nanotube arrays: rapid electrochemical synthesis and photoelectrochemical properties. J Phys Chem 113:16293–16298Google Scholar
  32. Li X, Liu Y, Zhang C, Wen T, Zhuang L, Wang X, Song G, Chen D, Ai Y, Hayat T, Wang X (2017) Porous Fe2O3 microcubes derived from metal organic frameworks for efficient elimination of organic pollutants and heavy metal ions. Chem Eng J.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.11.188 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Liang H, Liu K, Ni Y (2015) Synthesis of mesoporous α-Fe2O3 via sol–gel methods using cellulose nano-crystals (CNC) as template and its photo-catalytic properties. Mater Lett 159:218–220.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2015.06.103 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Liu CY, Chen CF, Leu JP, Lin YC (2007) Iron oxide nanoparticles within the pore system of mesoporous SBA-15 in different acidity: the synthesis and characterization. J Sol Gel Sci Technol 43:47–51.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10971-007-1534-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mohamad Aziz NA, Yunus R, Rashid U, Muhammad Syam A (2014) Application of response surface methodology (RSM) for optimizing the palm-based pentaerythritol ester synthesis. Ind Crops Prod 62:305–312.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.08.040 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Myers RH, Montgomery DC (2002) Response surface methodology: process and product optimization using designed experiments, 3rd edn. Wiley, Hoboken.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3758(97)81631-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Navale ST, Bandgar DK, Nalge SR, Mulik RN, Pawar SA, Chougule MA, Patil VB (2013) Novel process for synthesis of α-Fe2O3: microstructural and optoelectronic investigations. J Mater Sci Mater Electron 24:1422–1430.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-012-0944-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Palimi MJ, Rostami M, Mahdavian M, Ramezanzadeh B (2015) A study on the corrosion inhibition properties of silane-modified Fe2O3 nanoparticle on mild steel and its effect on the anticorrosion properties of the polyurethane coating. J Coat Technol Res 12:277–292.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11998-014-9631-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Park SY, Cho SA, Lim SD (2014) Application of response surface methodology (RSM) for optimization of anti-obesity effect in fermented milk by lactobacillus plantarum Q180. Korean J Food Sci An 34:836–843.  https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2014.34.6.836 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pasma SA, Daik R, Maskat MY, Hassan O (2013) Application of Box–Behnken design in optimization of glucose production from oil palm empty fruit bunch cellulose. Int J Poly Sci.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/104502 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Razavian M, Fatemi S, Komasi M (2014) Investigation the role of polyethylene glycol (PEG) as a co-template in synthesis of SAPO-34 catalyst. In: Proceedings of the the 8th international chemical engineering congress & exhibition, Kish, Iran, 24–27 February 2017Google Scholar
  42. Schneidewind J, Adam R, Baumann W, Jackstell R, Beller M (2017) Low-temperature hydrogenation of carbon dioxide to methanol with a homogeneous cobalt catalyst. Angew Chem 56:1–5.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ANGE.201609077 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Segurola J, Allen NS, Edge M, Mc Mahon A (1999) Design of eutectic photoinitiator blends for UV/visible curable acrylated printing inks and coatings. Prog Org Coat 37:23–37.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9440(99)00052-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sen R, Swaminathan T (2004) Response surface modeling and optimization to elucidate and analyze the effects of inoculum age and size on surfactin production. Biochem Eng J 21:141–148.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2004.06.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sharma S, Malik A, Satya S (2009) Application of response surface methodology (RSM) for optimization of nutrient supplementation for Cr (VI) removal by Aspergillus lentulus AML05. J Hazard Mater 164:1198–1204.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.09.030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sifontes AB, Rosales M, Méndez FJ, Oviedo O, Zoltan T (2013) Effect of calcination temperature on structural properties and photocatalytic activity of ceria nanoparticles synthesized employing chitosan as template. J Nanomater.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/265797 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Singh J, Sharma A (2012) Application of response surface methodology to the modeling of cellulase purification by solvent extraction. Adv Biosci Biotechnol 3:408–416.  https://doi.org/10.4236/abb.2012.34058 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Singh KP, Gupta S, Singh AK, Sinha S (2011) Optimizing adsorption of crystal violet dye from water by magnetic nanocomposite using response surface modeling approach. J Hazard Mater 186:1462–1473.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.12.032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Srikanth DV, Sridhar DC, Chennupati D, Rao MS (2016) Application of RSM for optimal response of process parameters on machining of CFRP composites by using AJM. Int Conf Electr Electron Optim Tech ICEEOT 1677–1681.  https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEEOT.2016.7754970
  50. Teja AS, Koh PY (2009) Synthesis, properties, and applications of magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles. Prog Cryst Growth Charact Mater 55:22–45.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcrysgrow.2008.08.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Thai TMN, Kim SR, Kim HJ (2014) Synthesis of Fe2O3 polymorph thin films via a pulsed laser deposition technique. New Phys Sae Mulli 64:252–255.  https://doi.org/10.3938/NPSM.64.252 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Umar A, Akhtar MS, Dar GN, Baskoutas S (2013) Low-temperature synthesis of α-Fe2O3 hexagonal nanoparticles for environmental remediation and smart sensor applications. Talanta 116:1060–1066.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2013.08.026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wan Isahak WNR, Che Ramli ZA, Mohamed Hisham MW, Yarmo MA (2015) The formation of a series of carbonates from carbon dioxide: capturing and utilisation. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 47:93–106.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.03.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wang GH, Li WC, Jia KM, Spliethoff B, Schüth F, Lu AH (2009) Shape and size controlled α-Fe2O3 nanoparticles as supports for gold-catalysts: synthesis and influence of support shape and size on catalytic performance. Appl Catal A Gen 364:42–47.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2009.05.030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Xie K, Guo M, Huang H, Liu Y (2014) Fabrication of iron oxide nanotube arrays by electrochemical anodization. Corros Sci.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2014.07.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Xu Y, Yang S, Zhang G, Sun Y, Gao D, Sun Y (2011) Uniform hematite α-Fe2O3 nanoparticles: morphology, size-controlled hydrothermal synthesis and formation mechanism. Mater Lett 65:1911–1914.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2011.03.085 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Xu H, Sun M, Liu S, Li Y, Wang J, Chen Y (2017) Effect of the calcination temperature of cerium-zirconium mixed oxides on the structure and catalytic performance of WO3/CeZrO2 monolithic catalyst for selective catalytic reduction of NOx with NH3. RSC Adv 7:24177–24187.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c7ra03054a CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zhang Z, Zheng H (2009) Optimization for decolorization of azo dye acid green 20 by ultrasound and H2O2 using response surface methodology. J Hazard Mater 172:1388–1393.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.07.146 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Zhang P, Guo ZP, Liu HK (2010) Submicron-sized cube-like α-Fe2O3 agglomerates as an anode material for Li-ion batteries. Electrochim Acta 55:8521–8526.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2010.07.078 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Zhang GY, Feng Y, Xu YY, Gao DZ, Sun YQ (2012) Controlled synthesis of mesoporous α-Fe2O3 nanorods and visible light photocatalytic property. Mater Res Bull 47:625–630.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.materresbull.2011.12.032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Zhang Y, Qu Y, Wang J (2018) Effect of crystal size on the catalytic performance of HZSM-5 zeolite in the methanol to aromatics reaction. Pet Sci Technol 36:898–903.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10916466.2018.1451889 httpsCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research Centre for Sustainable Process Technology (CESPRO), Faculty of Engineering and Built EnvironmentUniversiti Kebangsaan MalaysiaBangiMalaysia
  2. 2.Chemical Engineering Programme, Faculty of Engineering and Built EnvironmentUniversiti Kebangsaan MalaysiaBangiMalaysia
  3. 3.Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and PetroleumHadhramout UniversityMukallaYemen

Personalised recommendations