Advertisement

Symbiosis

, Volume 76, Issue 3, pp 321–327 | Cite as

Can endosymbiotic microbes modulate natural selection in plant populations? An example with Lolium perenne and its fungal endophyte

  • Gregory P. Cheplick
Short Communications
  • 70 Downloads

Abstract

Many plant species are symbiotic with systemic microbes. For example, many grasses are inhabited by fungal endophytes that affect aspects of their host’s physiology, morphology, and reproduction. However, there have not been any analyses of the potential effect of endophytes on the strength of phenotypic selection on quantitative traits. Here, a previously published data set on several life history traits measured for two years in a field population of 12–13 Lolium perenne genotypes, each replicated as symbiotic and non-symbiotic plants, was analyzed using the standard Lande-Arnold method of selection analysis. In one year, endophytic symbionts reduced the strength of selection on the number of reproductive tillers when relative fitness was expressed as seed yield. Also, symbionts selected for reduced tiller production when fitness was expressed as mean seed mass. These changes in the strength of selection only occurred when fitness of genotypes when symbiotic was unrelated to fitness of the same genotypes when non-symbiotic. In a second year, when fitness of symbiotic and non-symbiotic groups were significantly correlated, there was no detectable selection on reproductive tiller production. Because the effects of microbial endosymbionts were only shown for one year in a single host population, additional research is needed to better assess how endosymbionts might mediate selective pressures in other natural plant populations.

Keywords

Fungal endophytes Natural selection Perennial ryegrass Selection differential 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author thanks P. Diggle and an anonymous reviewer for insightful comments and suggestions on earlier versions of the manuscript.

References

  1. Afkhami ME, Rudgers JA (2008) Symbiosis lost: imperfect vertical transmission of fungal endophytes in grasses. Am Nat 172:405–416CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bacon CW, White JF Jr (2016) Functions, meachnisms and regulation of endophytic and epiphytic microbial communities of plants. Symbiosis 68:87–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cheplick GP (2004) Recovery from drought stress in Lolium perenne (Poaceae): are fungal endophytes detrimental? Amer J Bot 91:1960–1968CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cheplick GP (2015a) Approaches to plant evolutionary ecology. Oxford Univ Press, New York, USAGoogle Scholar
  5. Cheplick GP (2015b) Fungal endophytes. In Oxford Bibliographies Online, Ecology Module (D Gibson ed.). Oxford Univ Press, New York http://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/obo/page/ecology
  6. Cheplick GP, Faeth SH (2009) Ecology and evolution of the grass-endophyte symbiosis. Oxford Univ Press, New York, USACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Conner JK, Hartl DL (2004) A primer of ecological genetics. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USAGoogle Scholar
  8. Faeth SH (2009) Asexual fungal symbionts alter reproductive allocation and herbivory over time in their native perennial grass hosts. Am Nat 173:554–565CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Fenner M, Thompson K (2005) The ecology of seeds Cambridge Univ Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  10. Gibert A, Hazard L (2011) Endophyte infection of Festuca eskia enhances seedling survival to drought and cutting at the expense of clonal expansion. J Plant Ecol 4:201–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gibert A, Magda D, Hazard L (2015) Interplay between endophyte-prevalence, effects and transmission: insights from a natural grass population. PLoS One 10:e0139919CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Gotelli NJ, Ellison AM (2004) A primer of ecological statistics. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USAGoogle Scholar
  13. Gorischek AM, Afkhami ME, Seifert EK, Rudgers JA (2013) Fungal symbionts as manipulators of plant reproductive biology. Am Nat 181:562–570CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Guerrero R, Margulis L, Berlanga M (2013) Symbiogenesis: the holobiont as a unit of evolution. Int Microbiol 16:133–143PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Gundel PE, Garibaldi LA, Tognetti PM, Aragón R, Ghersa CM, Omacini M (2009) Imperfect vertical transmission of the endophyte Neotyphodium in exotic grasses in grasslands of the flooding pampa. Microb Ecol 57:740–748CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Hesse U, Hahn H, Andreeva K, Förster K, Warnstorff K, Schöberlein W, Diepenbrock W (2004) Investigations on the influence of Neotyphodium endophytes on plant growth and seed yield of Lolium perenne genotypes. Crop Sci 44:1689–1695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jaenike J (2015) Heritable symbionts contribute to host plant adaptation. Funct Ecol 29:1371–1372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kingsolver JG, Hoekstra HE, Hoekstra JM, Berrigan D, Vignieri SN, Hill CE, Hoang A, Gibert P, Beerli P (2001) The strength of phenotypic selection in natural populations. Am Nat 157:245–261CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Kingsolver JG, Diamond SE, Siepielski AM, Carlson SM (2012) Synthetic analyses of phenotypic selection in natural populations: limitations and future directions. Evol Ecol 26:1101–1118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lande R, Arnold SJ (1983) The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 37:1210–1226CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Leuchtmann A, Bacon CW, Schardl CL, White JF Jr, Tadych M (2014) Nomenclatural realignment of Neotyphodium species with genus Epichloë. Mycologia 106:202–215CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Li X, Zhou Y, Mace W, Qin J, Liu H, Chen W, Ren A, Gao Y (2016) Endophyte species influence the biomass production of the native grass Achnatherum sibiricum (L.) Keng under high nitrogen availability. Ecol Evol 6:8595–8606CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Malinowski DP, Belesky DP (2000) Adaptations of endophyte-infected cool-season grasses to environmental stresses: mechanisms of drought and mineral stress tolerance. Crop Sci 40:923–940CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Moles AT, Leishman MR (2008) The seedling as part of a plant’s life history strategy. In: Leck MA, Parker VT, Simpson RL (eds) Seedling ecology and evolution. Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, pp 217–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Novas MV, Gentile A, Cabral D (2003) Comparative study of growth parameters on diaspores and seedlings between populations of Bromus setifolius from Patagonia, differing in Neotyphodium endophyte infection. Flora 198:421–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Omacini M, Chaneton EJ, Bush L, Ghersa CM (2009) A fungal endosymbiont affects host plant recruitment through seed- and litter-mediated mechanisms. Funct Ecol 23:1148–1156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Popay AJ (2009) Insect herbivory and defensive mutualisms between plants and fungi. In Defensive mutualism in microbial symbiosis (JF White Jr, MS Torres, eds), CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, pp 347–366Google Scholar
  28. Rice JS, Pinkerton BW, Stringer WC, Undersander DJ (1990) Seed production in tall fescue as affected by fungal endophyte. Crop Sci 30:1303–1305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rudgers JA, Afkhami ME, Rua MA, Davitt AJ, Hammer S, Huguet VM (2009) A fungus among us: broad patterns of endophyte distribution in the grasses. Ecology 90:1531–1539CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Saari S, Helander M, Faeth SH, Saikkonen K (2010) The effects of endophytes on seed production and seed predation of tall fescue and meadow fescue. Microb Ecol 60:928–934CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Saikkonen K, Saari S, Helander M (2010) Defensive mutualism between plants and endophytic fungi? Fungal Div 41:101–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Semmartin M, Omacini M, Gundel PE, Hernández-Agramonte IM (2015) Broad-scale variation of fungal- endophyte incidence in temperate grasses. J Ecol 103:184–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Siepielski AM, DiBattista JD, Carlson SM (2009) It’s about time: the temporal dynamics of phenotypic selection in the wild. Ecol Lett 12:1261–1276CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry, 2nd ed. WH Freeman, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  35. Vandenkoornhuyse P, Quaiser A, Duhamel M, Le Van A, Dufresne A (2015) The importance of the microbiome of the plant holobiont. New Phytol 206:1196–1206CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. van Zijll de Jong E, Dobrowski MP, Bannan NR, Stewart AV, Smith KF, Spangenberg GC, Forster JW (2008) Global genetic diversity of the perennial ryegrass fungal endophyte. Neotyphodium lolii Crop Sci 48:1487–1501Google Scholar
  37. Wäli PR, Helander M, Saloniemi I, Ahlholm J, Saikkonen K (2009) Variable effects of endophytic fungus on seedling establishment of fine fescues. Oecologia 159:49–57CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biology, College of Staten IslandCity University of New YorkNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations